Search (237 results, page 1 of 12)

  • × year_i:[2020 TO 2030}
  1. Zhang, L.; Lu, W.; Yang, J.: LAGOS-AND : a large gold standard dataset for scholarly author name disambiguation (2023) 0.10 
    0.10170995 = sum of:
  0.021106426 = product of:
    0.0844257 = sum of:
      0.0844257 = weight(_text_:authors in 883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0844257 = score(doc=883,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.23704608 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05199731 = queryNorm
          0.35615736 = fieldWeight in 883, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=883)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.080603525 = sum of:
    0.04537893 = weight(_text_:l in 883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04537893 = score(doc=883,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20667124 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05199731 = queryNorm
        0.2195706 = fieldWeight in 883, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=883)
    0.03522459 = weight(_text_:22 in 883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03522459 = score(doc=883,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18208572 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05199731 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 883, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=883)
    Abstract
    In this article, we present a method to automatically build large labeled datasets for the author ambiguity problem in the academic world by leveraging the authoritative academic resources, ORCID and DOI. Using the method, we built LAGOS-AND, two large, gold-standard sub-datasets for author name disambiguation (AND), of which LAGOS-AND-BLOCK is created for clustering-based AND research and LAGOS-AND-PAIRWISE is created for classification-based AND research. Our LAGOS-AND datasets are substantially different from the existing ones. The initial versions of the datasets (v1.0, released in February 2021) include 7.5 M citations authored by 798 K unique authors (LAGOS-AND-BLOCK) and close to 1 M instances (LAGOS-AND-PAIRWISE). And both datasets show close similarities to the whole Microsoft Academic Graph (MAG) across validations of six facets. In building the datasets, we reveal the variation degrees of last names in three literature databases, PubMed, MAG, and Semantic Scholar, by comparing author names hosted to the authors' official last names shown on the ORCID pages. Furthermore, we evaluate several baseline disambiguation methods as well as the MAG's author IDs system on our datasets, and the evaluation helps identify several interesting findings. We hope the datasets and findings will bring new insights for future studies. The code and datasets are publicly available.
    Date
    22. 1.2023 18:40:36
  2. Jaeger, L.: Wissenschaftler versus Wissenschaft (2020) 0.10 
    0.09672422 = product of:
  0.19344844 = sum of:
    0.19344844 = sum of:
      0.10890943 = weight(_text_:l in 4156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.10890943 = score(doc=4156,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20667124 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05199731 = queryNorm
          0.52696943 = fieldWeight in 4156, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4156)
      0.08453901 = weight(_text_:22 in 4156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08453901 = score(doc=4156,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18208572 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05199731 = queryNorm
          0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4156, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4156)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    2. 3.2020 14:08:22
  3. Zhu, Y.; Quan, L.; Chen, P.-Y.; Kim, M.C.; Che, C.: Predicting coauthorship using bibliographic network embedding (2023) 0.05 
    0.05253846 = sum of:
  0.029848993 = product of:
    0.11939597 = sum of:
      0.11939597 = weight(_text_:authors in 917) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.11939597 = score(doc=917,freq=8.0), product of:
          0.23704608 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05199731 = queryNorm
          0.50368255 = fieldWeight in 917, product of:
            2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
              8.0 = termFreq=8.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=917)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.022689465 = product of:
    0.04537893 = sum of:
      0.04537893 = weight(_text_:l in 917) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04537893 = score(doc=917,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20667124 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05199731 = queryNorm
          0.2195706 = fieldWeight in 917, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=917)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Coauthorship prediction applies predictive analytics to bibliographic data to predict authors who are highly likely to be coauthors. In this study, we propose an approach for coauthorship prediction based on bibliographic network embedding through a graph-based bibliographic data model that can be used to model common bibliographic data, including papers, terms, sources, authors, departments, research interests, universities, and countries. A real-world dataset released by AMiner that includes more than 2 million papers, 8 million citations, and 1.7 million authors were integrated into a large bibliographic network using the proposed bibliographic data model. Translation-based methods were applied to the entities and relationships to generate their low-dimensional embeddings while preserving their connectivity information in the original bibliographic network. We applied machine learning algorithms to embeddings that represent the coauthorship relationships of the two authors and achieved high prediction results. The reference model, which is the combination of a network embedding size of 100, the most basic translation-based method, and a gradient boosting method achieved an F1 score of 0.9 and even higher scores are obtainable with different embedding sizes and more advanced embedding methods. Thus, the strengths of the proposed approach lie in its customizable components under a unified framework.
  4. Zheng, X.; Chen, J.; Yan, E.; Ni, C.: Gender and country biases in Wikipedia citations to scholarly publications (2023) 0.05 
    0.052154735 = sum of:
  0.031019984 = product of:
    0.124079935 = sum of:
      0.124079935 = weight(_text_:authors in 886) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.124079935 = score(doc=886,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.23704608 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05199731 = queryNorm
          0.52344227 = fieldWeight in 886, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=886)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.021134753 = product of:
    0.042269506 = sum of:
      0.042269506 = weight(_text_:22 in 886) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.042269506 = score(doc=886,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18208572 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05199731 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 886, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=886)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Ensuring Wikipedia cites scholarly publications based on quality and relevancy without biases is critical to credible and fair knowledge dissemination. We investigate gender- and country-based biases in Wikipedia citation practices using linked data from the Web of Science and a Wikipedia citation dataset. Using coarsened exact matching, we show that publications by women are cited less by Wikipedia than expected, and publications by women are less likely to be cited than those by men. Scholarly publications by authors affiliated with non-Anglosphere countries are also disadvantaged in getting cited by Wikipedia, compared with those by authors affiliated with Anglosphere countries. The level of gender- or country-based inequalities varies by research field, and the gender-country intersectional bias is prominent in math-intensive STEM fields. To ensure the credibility and equality of knowledge presentation, Wikipedia should consider strategies and guidelines to cite scholarly publications independent of the gender and country of authors.
    Date
    22. 1.2023 18:53:32
  5. Ma, L.: Information, platformized (2023) 0.05 
    0.04836211 = product of:
  0.09672422 = sum of:
    0.09672422 = sum of:
      0.054454714 = weight(_text_:l in 888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.054454714 = score(doc=888,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20667124 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05199731 = queryNorm
          0.26348472 = fieldWeight in 888, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=888)
      0.042269506 = weight(_text_:22 in 888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.042269506 = score(doc=888,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18208572 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05199731 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 888, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=888)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 1.2023 19:01:47
  6. Li, G.; Siddharth, L.; Luo, J.: Embedding knowledge graph of patent metadata to measure knowledge proximity (2023) 0.05 
    0.04836211 = product of:
  0.09672422 = sum of:
    0.09672422 = sum of:
      0.054454714 = weight(_text_:l in 920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.054454714 = score(doc=920,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20667124 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05199731 = queryNorm
          0.26348472 = fieldWeight in 920, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=920)
      0.042269506 = weight(_text_:22 in 920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.042269506 = score(doc=920,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18208572 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05199731 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 920, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=920)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 3.2023 12:06:55
  7. Cheti, A.; Viti, E.: Functionality and merits of a faceted thesaurus : the case of the Nuovo soggettario (2023) 0.05 
    0.04836211 = product of:
  0.09672422 = sum of:
    0.09672422 = sum of:
      0.054454714 = weight(_text_:l in 1181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.054454714 = score(doc=1181,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20667124 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05199731 = queryNorm
          0.26348472 = fieldWeight in 1181, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1181)
      0.042269506 = weight(_text_:22 in 1181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.042269506 = score(doc=1181,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18208572 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05199731 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1181, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1181)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The Nuovo soggettario, the official Italian subject indexing system edited by the National Central Library of Florence, is made up of interactive components, the core of which is a general thesaurus and some rules of a conventional syntax for subject string construction. The Nuovo soggettario Thesaurus is in compliance with ISO 25964: 2011-2013, IFLA LRM, and FAIR principle (findability, accessibility, interoperability, and reusability). Its open data are available in the Zthes, MARC21, and in SKOS formats and allow for interoperability with l library, archive, and museum databases. The Thesaurus's macrostructure is organized into four fundamental macro-categories, thirteen categories, and facets. The facets allow for the orderly development of hierarchies, thereby limiting polyhierarchies and promoting the grouping of homogenous concepts. This paper addresses the main features and peculiarities which have characterized the consistent development of this categorical structure and its effects on the syntactic sphere in a predominantly pre-coordinated usage context.
    Date
    26.11.2023 18:59:22
  8. Milard, B.; Pitarch, Y.: Egocentric cocitation networks and scientific papers destinies (2023) 0.05 
    0.04646246 = sum of:
  0.02532771 = product of:
    0.10131084 = sum of:
      0.10131084 = weight(_text_:authors in 918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.10131084 = score(doc=918,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.23704608 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05199731 = queryNorm
          0.42738882 = fieldWeight in 918, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=918)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.021134753 = product of:
    0.042269506 = sum of:
      0.042269506 = weight(_text_:22 in 918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.042269506 = score(doc=918,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18208572 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05199731 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 918, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=918)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    To what extent is the destiny of a scientific paper shaped by the cocitation network in which it is involved? What are the social contexts that can explain these structuring? Using bibliometric data, interviews with researchers, and social network analysis, this article proposes a typology based on egocentric cocitation networks that displays a quadruple structuring (before and after publication): polarization, clusterization, atomization, and attrition. It shows that the academic capital of the authors and the intellectual resources of their research are key factors of these destinies, as are the social relations between the authors concerned. The circumstances of the publishing are also correlated with the structuring of the egocentric cocitation networks, showing how socially embedded they are. Finally, the article discusses the contribution of these original networks to the analyze of scientific production and its dynamics.
    Date
    21. 3.2023 19:22:14
  9. Manley, S.: Letters to the editor and the race for publication metrics (2022) 0.05 
    0.04555151 = sum of:
  0.020894295 = product of:
    0.08357718 = sum of:
      0.08357718 = weight(_text_:authors in 547) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08357718 = score(doc=547,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.23704608 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05199731 = queryNorm
          0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 547, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=547)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.024657212 = product of:
    0.049314424 = sum of:
      0.049314424 = weight(_text_:22 in 547) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.049314424 = score(doc=547,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18208572 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05199731 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 547, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=547)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This article discusses how letters to the editor boost publishing metrics for journals and authors, and then examines letters published since 2015 in six elite journals, including the Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. The initial findings identify some potentially anomalous use of letters and unusual self-citation patterns. The article proposes that Clarivate Analytics consider slightly reconfiguring the Journal Impact Factor to more fairly account for letters and that journals transparently explain their letter submission policies.
    Date
    6. 4.2022 19:22:26
  10. Labib, A.; Chakhar, S.; Hope, L.; Shimell, J.; Malinowski, M.: Analysis of noise and bias errors in intelligence information systems (2022) 0.05 
    0.045136753 = sum of:
  0.017909396 = product of:
    0.071637586 = sum of:
      0.071637586 = weight(_text_:authors in 770) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.071637586 = score(doc=770,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.23704608 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05199731 = queryNorm
          0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 770, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=770)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.027227357 = product of:
    0.054454714 = sum of:
      0.054454714 = weight(_text_:l in 770) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.054454714 = score(doc=770,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20667124 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05199731 = queryNorm
          0.26348472 = fieldWeight in 770, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=770)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    An intelligence information system (IIS) is a particular kind of information systems (IS) devoted to the analysis of intelligence relevant to national security. Professional and military intelligence analysts play a key role in this, but their judgments can be inconsistent, mainly due to noise and bias. The team-oriented aspects of the intelligence analysis process complicates the situation further. To enable analysts to achieve better judgments, the authors designed, implemented, and validated an innovative IIS for analyzing UK Military Signals Intelligence (SIGINT) data. The developed tool, the Team Information Decision Engine (TIDE), relies on an innovative preference learning method along with an aggregation procedure that permits combining scores by individual analysts into aggregated scores. This paper reports on a series of validation trials in which the performance of individual and team-oriented analysts was accessed with respect to their effectiveness and efficiency. Results show that the use of the developed tool enhanced the effectiveness and efficiency of intelligence analysis process at both individual and team levels.
  11. Machado, L.; Martínez-Ávila, D.; Barcellos Almeida, M.; Borges, M.M.: Towards a moderate realistic foundation for ontological knowledge organization systems : the question of the naturalness of classifications (2023) 0.05 
    0.045136753 = sum of:
  0.017909396 = product of:
    0.071637586 = sum of:
      0.071637586 = weight(_text_:authors in 894) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.071637586 = score(doc=894,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.23704608 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05199731 = queryNorm
          0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 894, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=894)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.027227357 = product of:
    0.054454714 = sum of:
      0.054454714 = weight(_text_:l in 894) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.054454714 = score(doc=894,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20667124 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05199731 = queryNorm
          0.26348472 = fieldWeight in 894, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=894)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Several authors emphasize the need for a change in classification theory due to the influence of a dogmatic and monistic ontology supported by an outdated essentialism. These claims tend to focus on the fallibility of knowledge, the need for a pluralistic view, and the theoretical burden of observations. Regardless of the legitimacy of these concerns, there is the risk, when not moderate, to fall into the opposite relativistic extreme. Based on a narrative review of the literature, we aim to reflectively discuss the theoretical foundations that can serve as a basis for a realist position supporting pluralistic ontological classifications. The goal is to show that, against rather conventional solutions, objective scientific-based approaches to natural classifications are presented to be viable, allowing a proper distinction between ontological and taxonomic questions. Supported by critical scientific realism, we consider that such an approach is suitable for the development of ontological Knowledge Organization Systems (KOS). We believe that ontological perspectivism can provide the necessary adaptation to the different granularities of reality.
  12. Hottenrott, H.; Rose, M.E.; Lawson, C.: ¬The rise of multiple institutional affiliations in academia (2021) 0.04 
    0.043462284 = sum of:
  0.025849989 = product of:
    0.103399955 = sum of:
      0.103399955 = weight(_text_:authors in 313) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.103399955 = score(doc=313,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.23704608 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05199731 = queryNorm
          0.43620193 = fieldWeight in 313, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=313)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.017612295 = product of:
    0.03522459 = sum of:
      0.03522459 = weight(_text_:22 in 313) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03522459 = score(doc=313,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18208572 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05199731 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 313, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=313)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This study provides the first systematic, international, large-scale evidence on the extent and nature of multiple institutional affiliations on journal publications. Studying more than 15 million authors and 22 million articles from 40 countries we document that: In 2019, almost one in three articles was (co-)authored by authors with multiple affiliations and the share of authors with multiple affiliations increased from around 10% to 16% since 1996. The growth of multiple affiliations is prevalent in all fields and it is stronger in high impact journals. About 60% of multiple affiliations are between institutions from within the academic sector. International co-affiliations, which account for about a quarter of multiple affiliations, most often involve institutions from the United States, China, Germany and the United Kingdom, suggesting a core-periphery network. Network analysis also reveals a number communities of countries that are more likely to share affiliations. We discuss potential causes and show that the timing of the rise in multiple affiliations can be linked to the introduction of more competitive funding structures such as "excellence initiatives" in a number of countries. We discuss implications for science and science policy.
  13. Haimson, O.L.; Carter, A.J.; Corvite, S.; Wheeler, B.; Wang, L.; Liu, T.; Lige, A.: ¬The major life events taxonomy : social readjustment, social media information sharing, and online network separation during times of life transition (2021) 0.04 
    0.040301763 = product of:
  0.080603525 = sum of:
    0.080603525 = sum of:
      0.04537893 = weight(_text_:l in 263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04537893 = score(doc=263,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20667124 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05199731 = queryNorm
          0.2195706 = fieldWeight in 263, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=263)
      0.03522459 = weight(_text_:22 in 263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03522459 = score(doc=263,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18208572 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05199731 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 263, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=263)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    10. 6.2021 19:22:47
  14. Yu, C.; Xue, H.; An, L.; Li, G.: ¬A lightweight semantic-enhanced interactive network for efficient short-text matching (2023) 0.04 
    0.040301763 = product of:
  0.080603525 = sum of:
    0.080603525 = sum of:
      0.04537893 = weight(_text_:l in 890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04537893 = score(doc=890,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20667124 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05199731 = queryNorm
          0.2195706 = fieldWeight in 890, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=890)
      0.03522459 = weight(_text_:22 in 890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03522459 = score(doc=890,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18208572 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05199731 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 890, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=890)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 1.2023 19:05:27
  15. Li, Z.; He, L.; Gao, D.: Ontology construction and evaluation for Chinese traditional culture : towards digital humanity (2022) 0.04 
    0.040301763 = product of:
  0.080603525 = sum of:
    0.080603525 = sum of:
      0.04537893 = weight(_text_:l in 1097) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04537893 = score(doc=1097,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20667124 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05199731 = queryNorm
          0.2195706 = fieldWeight in 1097, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1097)
      0.03522459 = weight(_text_:22 in 1097) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03522459 = score(doc=1097,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18208572 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05199731 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1097, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1097)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 49(2022) no.1, S.22 - 39
  16. Luo, L.; Ju, J.; Li, Y.-F.; Haffari, G.; Xiong, B.; Pan, S.: ChatRule: mining logical rules with large language models for knowledge graph reasoning (2023) 0.04 
    0.040301763 = product of:
  0.080603525 = sum of:
    0.080603525 = sum of:
      0.04537893 = weight(_text_:l in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04537893 = score(doc=1171,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20667124 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05199731 = queryNorm
          0.2195706 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
      0.03522459 = weight(_text_:22 in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03522459 = score(doc=1171,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18208572 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05199731 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    23.11.2023 19:07:22
  17. Bullard, J.; Dierking, A.; Grundner, A.: Centring LGBT2QIA+ subjects in knowledge organization systems (2020) 0.04 
    0.03904415 = sum of:
  0.017909396 = product of:
    0.071637586 = sum of:
      0.071637586 = weight(_text_:authors in 5996) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.071637586 = score(doc=5996,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.23704608 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05199731 = queryNorm
          0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 5996, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5996)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.021134753 = product of:
    0.042269506 = sum of:
      0.042269506 = weight(_text_:22 in 5996) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.042269506 = score(doc=5996,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18208572 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05199731 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5996, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5996)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This paper contains a report of two interdependent knowledge organization (KO) projects for an LGBT2QIA+ library. The authors, in the context of volunteer library work for an independent library, redesigned the classification system and subject cataloguing guidelines to centre LGBT2QIA+ subjects. We discuss the priorities of creating and maintaining knowledge organization systems for a historically marginalized community and address the challenge that queer subjectivity poses to the goals of KO. The classification system features a focus on identity and physically reorganizes the library space in a way that accounts for the multiple and overlapping labels that constitute the currently articulated boundaries of this community. The subject heading system focuses on making visible topics and elements of identity made invisible by universal systems and by the newly implemented classification system. We discuss how this project may inform KO for other marginalized subjects, particularly through process and documentation that prioritizes transparency and the acceptance of an unfinished endpoint for queer KO.
    Date
    6.10.2020 21:22:33
  18. Cooke, N.A.; Kitzie, V.L.: Outsiders-within-Library and Information Science : reprioritizing the marginalized in critical sociocultural work (2021) 0.04 
    0.03904415 = sum of:
  0.017909396 = product of:
    0.071637586 = sum of:
      0.071637586 = weight(_text_:authors in 351) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.071637586 = score(doc=351,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.23704608 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05199731 = queryNorm
          0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 351, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=351)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.021134753 = product of:
    0.042269506 = sum of:
      0.042269506 = weight(_text_:22 in 351) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.042269506 = score(doc=351,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18208572 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05199731 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 351, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=351)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    While there are calls for new paradigms within the profession, there are also existing subgenres that fit this bill if they would be fully acknowledged. This essay argues that underrepresented and otherwise marginalized scholars have already produced significant work within social, cultural, and community-oriented paradigms; social justice and advocacy; and, diversity, equity, and inclusion. This work has not been sufficiently valued or promoted. Furthermore, the surrounding structural conditions have resulted in the dismissal, violently reviewed and rejected, and erased work of underrepresented scholars, and the stigmatization and delegitimization of their work. These scholars are "outsiders-within-LIS." By identifying the outsiders-within-LIS through the frame of standpoint theories, the authors are suggesting that a new paradigm does not need to be created; rather, an existing paradigm needs to be recognized and reprioritized. This reprioritized paradigm of critical sociocultural work has and will continue to creatively enrich and expand the field and decolonize LIS curricula.
    Date
    18. 9.2021 13:22:27
  19. Belabbes, M.A.; Ruthven, I.; Moshfeghi, Y.; Rasmussen Pennington, D.: Information overload : a concept analysis (2023) 0.04 
    0.038718723 = sum of:
  0.021106426 = product of:
    0.0844257 = sum of:
      0.0844257 = weight(_text_:authors in 950) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0844257 = score(doc=950,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.23704608 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05199731 = queryNorm
          0.35615736 = fieldWeight in 950, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=950)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.017612295 = product of:
    0.03522459 = sum of:
      0.03522459 = weight(_text_:22 in 950) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03522459 = score(doc=950,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18208572 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05199731 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 950, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=950)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Purpose With the shift to an information-based society and to the de-centralisation of information, information overload has attracted a growing interest in the computer and information science research communities. However, there is no clear understanding of the meaning of the term, and while there have been many proposed definitions, there is no consensus. The goal of this work was to define the concept of "information overload". In order to do so, a concept analysis using Rodgers' approach was performed. Design/methodology/approach A concept analysis using Rodgers' approach based on a corpus of documents published between 2010 and September 2020 was conducted. One surrogate for "information overload", which is "cognitive overload" was identified. The corpus of documents consisted of 151 documents for information overload and ten for cognitive overload. All documents were from the fields of computer science and information science, and were retrieved from three databases: Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) Digital Library, SCOPUS and Library and Information Science Abstracts (LISA). Findings The themes identified from the authors' concept analysis allowed us to extract the triggers, manifestations and consequences of information overload. They found triggers related to information characteristics, information need, the working environment, the cognitive abilities of individuals and the information environment. In terms of manifestations, they found that information overload manifests itself both emotionally and cognitively. The consequences of information overload were both internal and external. These findings allowed them to provide a definition of information overload. Originality/value Through the authors' concept analysis, they were able to clarify the components of information overload and provide a definition of the concept.
    Date
    22. 4.2023 19:27:56
  20. Nori, R.: Web searching and navigation : age, intelligence, and familiarity (2020) 0.04 
    0.03761396 = sum of:
  0.014924496 = product of:
    0.059697986 = sum of:
      0.059697986 = weight(_text_:authors in 5945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.059697986 = score(doc=5945,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.23704608 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05199731 = queryNorm
          0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 5945, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5945)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.022689465 = product of:
    0.04537893 = sum of:
      0.04537893 = weight(_text_:l in 5945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04537893 = score(doc=5945,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20667124 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05199731 = queryNorm
          0.2195706 = fieldWeight in 5945, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5945)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    In using the Internet to solve everyday problems, older adults tend to find fewer correct answers compared to younger adults. Some authors have argued that these differences could be explained by age-related decline. The present study aimed to analyze the relationship between web-searching navigation and users' age, considering the Intelligence Quotient (IQ) and frequency of Internet and personal computer use. The intent was to identify differences due to age and not to other variables (that is, cognitive decline, expertise with the tool). Eighteen students (18-30?years) and 18 older adults (60-75?years) took part in the experiment. Inclusion criteria were the frequent use of computers and a web-searching activity; the older adults performed the Mini-Mental State Examination to exclude cognitive impairment. Participants were requested to perform the Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test 2nd ed. to measure their IQ level, and nine everyday web-searching tasks of differing complexity. The results showed that older participants spent more time on solving tasks than younger participants, but with the same accuracy as young people. Furthermore, nonverbal IQ improved performance in terms of time among the older participants. Age did not influence web-searching behavior in users with normal expertise and intelligence.
    Editor
    Piccardi, L.

Authors

Languages

  • e 191
  • d 43
  • pt 2
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 223
  • el 36
  • m 6
  • p 2
  • s 2
  • x 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications