-
Zhang, X.; Wang, D.; Tang, Y.; Xiao, Q.: How question type influences knowledge withholding in social Q&A community (2023)
0.16
0.16312116 = product of:
0.32624233 = sum of:
0.32624233 = sum of:
0.285441 = weight(_text_:q in 1067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.285441 = score(doc=1067,freq=8.0), product of:
0.32872224 = queryWeight, product of:
6.5493927 = idf(docFreq=171, maxDocs=44218)
0.050191253 = queryNorm
0.86833495 = fieldWeight in 1067, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
6.5493927 = idf(docFreq=171, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1067)
0.04080133 = weight(_text_:22 in 1067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04080133 = score(doc=1067,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17576122 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050191253 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1067, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1067)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Social question-and-answer (Q&A) communities are becoming increasingly important for knowledge acquisition. However, some users withhold knowledge, which can hinder the effectiveness of these platforms. Based on social exchange theory, the study investigates how different types of questions influence knowledge withholding, with question difficulty and user anonymity as boundary conditions. Two experiments were conducted to test hypotheses. Results indicate that informational questions are more likely to lead to knowledge withholding than conversational ones, as they elicit more fear of negative evaluation and fear of exploitation. The study also examines the interplay of question difficulty and user anonymity with question type. Overall, this study significantly extends the existing literature on counterproductive knowledge behavior by exploring the antecedents of knowledge withholding in social Q&A communities.
- Date
- 22. 9.2023 13:51:47
-
Gabler, S.: Vergabe von DDC-Sachgruppen mittels eines Schlagwort-Thesaurus (2021)
0.11
0.10929001 = sum of:
0.049823135 = product of:
0.19929254 = sum of:
0.19929254 = weight(_text_:3a in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19929254 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
0.425522 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.050191253 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.059466876 = product of:
0.11893375 = sum of:
0.11893375 = weight(_text_:q in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11893375 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
0.32872224 = queryWeight, product of:
6.5493927 = idf(docFreq=171, maxDocs=44218)
0.050191253 = queryNorm
0.3618062 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.5493927 = idf(docFreq=171, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Master thesis Master of Science (Library and Information Studies) (MSc), Universität Wien. Advisor: Christoph Steiner. Vgl.: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371680244_Vergabe_von_DDC-Sachgruppen_mittels_eines_Schlagwort-Thesaurus. DOI: 10.25365/thesis.70030. Vgl. dazu die Präsentation unter: https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=0CAIQw7AJahcKEwjwoZzzytz_AhUAAAAAHQAAAAAQAg&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwiki.dnb.de%2Fdownload%2Fattachments%2F252121510%2FDA3%2520Workshop-Gabler.pdf%3Fversion%3D1%26modificationDate%3D1671093170000%26api%3Dv2&psig=AOvVaw0szwENK1or3HevgvIDOfjx&ust=1687719410889597&opi=89978449.
-
Kang, M.: Dual paths to continuous online knowledge sharing : a repetitive behavior perspective (2020)
0.10
0.101099424 = product of:
0.20219885 = sum of:
0.20219885 = sum of:
0.16819774 = weight(_text_:q in 5985) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16819774 = score(doc=5985,freq=4.0), product of:
0.32872224 = queryWeight, product of:
6.5493927 = idf(docFreq=171, maxDocs=44218)
0.050191253 = queryNorm
0.5116713 = fieldWeight in 5985, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
6.5493927 = idf(docFreq=171, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5985)
0.034001112 = weight(_text_:22 in 5985) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034001112 = score(doc=5985,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17576122 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050191253 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5985, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5985)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Purpose Continuous knowledge sharing by active users, who are highly active in answering questions, is crucial to the sustenance of social question-and-answer (Q&A) sites. The purpose of this paper is to examine such knowledge sharing considering reason-based elaborate decision and habit-based automated cognitive processes. Design/methodology/approach To verify the research hypotheses, survey data on subjective intentions and web-crawled data on objective behavior are utilized. The sample size is 337 with the response rate of 27.2 percent. Negative binomial and hierarchical linear regressions are used given the skewed distribution of the dependent variable (i.e. the number of answers). Findings Both elaborate decision (linking satisfaction, intentions and continuance behavior) and automated cognitive processes (linking past and continuance behavior) are significant and substitutable. Research limitations/implications By measuring both subjective intentions and objective behavior, it verifies a detailed mechanism linking continuance intentions, past behavior and continuous knowledge sharing. The significant influence of automated cognitive processes implies that online knowledge sharing is habitual for active users. Practical implications Understanding that online knowledge sharing is habitual is imperative to maintaining continuous knowledge sharing by active users. Knowledge sharing trends should be monitored to check if the frequency of sharing decreases. Social Q&A sites should intervene to restore knowledge sharing behavior through personalized incentives. Originality/value This is the first study utilizing both subjective intentions and objective behavior data in the context of online knowledge sharing. It also introduces habit-based automated cognitive processes to this context. This approach extends the current understanding of continuous online knowledge sharing behavior.
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
-
Kang, M.: Motivational affordances and survival of new askers on social Q&A sites : the case of Stack Exchange network (2022)
0.09
0.09440075 = product of:
0.1888015 = sum of:
0.1888015 = product of:
0.377603 = sum of:
0.377603 = weight(_text_:q in 447) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.377603 = score(doc=447,freq=14.0), product of:
0.32872224 = queryWeight, product of:
6.5493927 = idf(docFreq=171, maxDocs=44218)
0.050191253 = queryNorm
1.1486993 = fieldWeight in 447, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
6.5493927 = idf(docFreq=171, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=447)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Social question-and-answer (Q&A) sites are platforms where users can freely ask, share, and rate knowledge. For the sustainable growth of social Q&A sites, maintaining askers is as critical as maintaining answerers. Based on motivational affordances theory and self-determination theory, this study explores the influence of the design elements of social Q&A sites (i.e., upvotes, downvotes, edits, user profile, and comments) on the survival of new askers. In addition, the moderating effect of having an alternative experience is examined. Online data on 25,000 new askers from the top five Q&A sites in the Technology category of the Stack Exchange network are analyzed using logistic regression. The results show that the competency- and autonomy-related design features of social Q&A sites motivate new askers to continue participating. Surprisingly, having an alternative experience shows a negative moderating effect, implying that alternative experiences increase switching costs in the Stack Exchange network. This study provides valuable insights for administrators of social Q&A sites as well as academics.
-
Zhou, Q.; Lee, C.S.; Sin, S.-C.J.; Lin, S.; Hu, H.; Ismail, M.F.F. Bin: Understanding the use of YouTube as a learning resource : a social cognitive perspective (2020)
0.08
0.07646743 = product of:
0.15293486 = sum of:
0.15293486 = sum of:
0.11893375 = weight(_text_:q in 174) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11893375 = score(doc=174,freq=2.0), product of:
0.32872224 = queryWeight, product of:
6.5493927 = idf(docFreq=171, maxDocs=44218)
0.050191253 = queryNorm
0.3618062 = fieldWeight in 174, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.5493927 = idf(docFreq=171, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=174)
0.034001112 = weight(_text_:22 in 174) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034001112 = score(doc=174,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17576122 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050191253 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 174, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=174)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
-
Zhao, Y.C.; Peng, X.; Liu, Z.; Song, S.; Hansen, P.: Factors that affect asker's pay intention in trilateral payment-based social Q&A platforms : from a benefit and cost perspective (2020)
0.07
0.07283175 = product of:
0.1456635 = sum of:
0.1456635 = product of:
0.291327 = sum of:
0.291327 = weight(_text_:q in 5812) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.291327 = score(doc=5812,freq=12.0), product of:
0.32872224 = queryWeight, product of:
6.5493927 = idf(docFreq=171, maxDocs=44218)
0.050191253 = queryNorm
0.88624066 = fieldWeight in 5812, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
6.5493927 = idf(docFreq=171, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5812)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- More and more social Q&A platforms are launching a new business model to monetize online knowledge. This monetizing process introduces a more complicated cost and benefit tradeoff to users, especially for askers' concerns. Much of the previous research was conducted in the context of free-based Q&A platform, which hardly explains the triggers that motivate askers' pay intention. Based on the theories of social exchange and social capital, this study aims to identify and examine the antecedents of askers' pay intention from the perspective of benefit and cost. We empirically test our predictions based on survey data collected from 322 actual askers in a well-known trilateral payment-based social Q&A platform in China. The results by partial least squares (PLS) analysis indicate that besides noneconomic benefits including self-enhancement, social support, and entertainment, financial factors such as cost and benefit have significant influences on the perceived value of using trilateral payment-based Q&A platforms. More important, we further identify that the effect of financial benefit is moderated by perceived reciprocity belief, and the effect of perceived value is moderated by perceived trust in answerers. Our findings contribute to the previous literature by proposing a theoretical model that explains askers' behavioral intention, and the practical implications for payment-based Q&A service providers and participants.
-
Wu, Q.; Lee, C.S.; Goh, D.H.-L.: Understanding user-generated questions in social Q&A : a goal-framing approach (2023)
0.06
0.059466876 = product of:
0.11893375 = sum of:
0.11893375 = product of:
0.2378675 = sum of:
0.2378675 = weight(_text_:q in 1021) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2378675 = score(doc=1021,freq=8.0), product of:
0.32872224 = queryWeight, product of:
6.5493927 = idf(docFreq=171, maxDocs=44218)
0.050191253 = queryNorm
0.7236124 = fieldWeight in 1021, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
6.5493927 = idf(docFreq=171, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1021)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- In social Q&A, user-generated questions can be viewed as goal expressions shaping the responses. Several studies have identified askers' goals from questions. However, it remains unclear how questions set goals for responders. To fill this gap, this research applies goal-framing theory. Goal-frames influence responses by attracting responders' attention to different goals. Eight question cues are used to identify gain, hedonic and normative goal-frames. A total of 14,599 posts are collected. To investigate the influence of goal-frames, response networks are constructed. Results reveal that gain goal-frames attract interactions with questions, while hedonic, and normative goal-frames promote interactions among responses. Further, topic types influence the effects of goal-frames. Gain goal-frames increase interactions with questions in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) topics while hedonic and normative goal-frames attract interactions in non-STEM topics. This research leverages responders' perspectives to explain responses to questions, which are influenced by the goals set up by question cues. Beyond that, our findings enrich the empirical knowledge of social Q&A topics, revealing that the influence of questions varies across STEM and non-STEM topics because the question cues for specifying goals are different in the two topics. Our research opens new directions to investigate questions from responders' perspectives.
-
Zheng, X.; Chen, J.; Yan, E.; Ni, C.: Gender and country biases in Wikipedia citations to scholarly publications (2023)
0.05
0.05034321 = sum of:
0.029942546 = product of:
0.119770184 = sum of:
0.119770184 = weight(_text_:authors in 886) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.119770184 = score(doc=886,freq=6.0), product of:
0.22881259 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.050191253 = queryNorm
0.52344227 = fieldWeight in 886, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=886)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.020400666 = product of:
0.04080133 = sum of:
0.04080133 = weight(_text_:22 in 886) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04080133 = score(doc=886,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17576122 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050191253 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 886, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=886)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Ensuring Wikipedia cites scholarly publications based on quality and relevancy without biases is critical to credible and fair knowledge dissemination. We investigate gender- and country-based biases in Wikipedia citation practices using linked data from the Web of Science and a Wikipedia citation dataset. Using coarsened exact matching, we show that publications by women are cited less by Wikipedia than expected, and publications by women are less likely to be cited than those by men. Scholarly publications by authors affiliated with non-Anglosphere countries are also disadvantaged in getting cited by Wikipedia, compared with those by authors affiliated with Anglosphere countries. The level of gender- or country-based inequalities varies by research field, and the gender-country intersectional bias is prominent in math-intensive STEM fields. To ensure the credibility and equality of knowledge presentation, Wikipedia should consider strategies and guidelines to cite scholarly publications independent of the gender and country of authors.
- Date
- 22. 1.2023 18:53:32
-
Milard, B.; Pitarch, Y.: Egocentric cocitation networks and scientific papers destinies (2023)
0.04
0.04484865 = sum of:
0.024447985 = product of:
0.09779194 = sum of:
0.09779194 = weight(_text_:authors in 918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09779194 = score(doc=918,freq=4.0), product of:
0.22881259 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.050191253 = queryNorm
0.42738882 = fieldWeight in 918, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=918)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.020400666 = product of:
0.04080133 = sum of:
0.04080133 = weight(_text_:22 in 918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04080133 = score(doc=918,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17576122 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050191253 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 918, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=918)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- To what extent is the destiny of a scientific paper shaped by the cocitation network in which it is involved? What are the social contexts that can explain these structuring? Using bibliometric data, interviews with researchers, and social network analysis, this article proposes a typology based on egocentric cocitation networks that displays a quadruple structuring (before and after publication): polarization, clusterization, atomization, and attrition. It shows that the academic capital of the authors and the intellectual resources of their research are key factors of these destinies, as are the social relations between the authors concerned. The circumstances of the publishing are also correlated with the structuring of the egocentric cocitation networks, showing how socially embedded they are. Finally, the article discusses the contribution of these original networks to the analyze of scientific production and its dynamics.
- Date
- 21. 3.2023 19:22:14
-
Manley, S.: Letters to the editor and the race for publication metrics (2022)
0.04
0.043969333 = sum of:
0.020168558 = product of:
0.08067423 = sum of:
0.08067423 = weight(_text_:authors in 547) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08067423 = score(doc=547,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22881259 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.050191253 = queryNorm
0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 547, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=547)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.023800777 = product of:
0.047601555 = sum of:
0.047601555 = weight(_text_:22 in 547) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047601555 = score(doc=547,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17576122 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050191253 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 547, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=547)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This article discusses how letters to the editor boost publishing metrics for journals and authors, and then examines letters published since 2015 in six elite journals, including the Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. The initial findings identify some potentially anomalous use of letters and unusual self-citation patterns. The article proposes that Clarivate Analytics consider slightly reconfiguring the Journal Impact Factor to more fairly account for letters and that journals transparently explain their letter submission policies.
- Date
- 6. 4.2022 19:22:26
-
Liu, Q.; Yang, Z.; Cai, X.; Du, Q.; Fan, W.: ¬The more, the better? : The effect of feedback and user's past successes on idea implementation in open innovation communities (2022)
0.04
0.042049434 = product of:
0.08409887 = sum of:
0.08409887 = product of:
0.16819774 = sum of:
0.16819774 = weight(_text_:q in 497) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16819774 = score(doc=497,freq=4.0), product of:
0.32872224 = queryWeight, product of:
6.5493927 = idf(docFreq=171, maxDocs=44218)
0.050191253 = queryNorm
0.5116713 = fieldWeight in 497, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
6.5493927 = idf(docFreq=171, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=497)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Hottenrott, H.; Rose, M.E.; Lawson, C.: ¬The rise of multiple institutional affiliations in academia (2021)
0.04
0.041952677 = sum of:
0.024952123 = product of:
0.09980849 = sum of:
0.09980849 = weight(_text_:authors in 313) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09980849 = score(doc=313,freq=6.0), product of:
0.22881259 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.050191253 = queryNorm
0.43620193 = fieldWeight in 313, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=313)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.017000556 = product of:
0.034001112 = sum of:
0.034001112 = weight(_text_:22 in 313) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034001112 = score(doc=313,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17576122 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050191253 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 313, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=313)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This study provides the first systematic, international, large-scale evidence on the extent and nature of multiple institutional affiliations on journal publications. Studying more than 15 million authors and 22 million articles from 40 countries we document that: In 2019, almost one in three articles was (co-)authored by authors with multiple affiliations and the share of authors with multiple affiliations increased from around 10% to 16% since 1996. The growth of multiple affiliations is prevalent in all fields and it is stronger in high impact journals. About 60% of multiple affiliations are between institutions from within the academic sector. International co-affiliations, which account for about a quarter of multiple affiliations, most often involve institutions from the United States, China, Germany and the United Kingdom, suggesting a core-periphery network. Network analysis also reveals a number communities of countries that are more likely to share affiliations. We discuss potential causes and show that the timing of the rise in multiple affiliations can be linked to the introduction of more competitive funding structures such as "excellence initiatives" in a number of countries. We discuss implications for science and science policy.
-
Bullard, J.; Dierking, A.; Grundner, A.: Centring LGBT2QIA+ subjects in knowledge organization systems (2020)
0.04
0.037688002 = sum of:
0.017287336 = product of:
0.069149345 = sum of:
0.069149345 = weight(_text_:authors in 5996) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.069149345 = score(doc=5996,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22881259 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.050191253 = queryNorm
0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 5996, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5996)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.020400666 = product of:
0.04080133 = sum of:
0.04080133 = weight(_text_:22 in 5996) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04080133 = score(doc=5996,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17576122 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050191253 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5996, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5996)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper contains a report of two interdependent knowledge organization (KO) projects for an LGBT2QIA+ library. The authors, in the context of volunteer library work for an independent library, redesigned the classification system and subject cataloguing guidelines to centre LGBT2QIA+ subjects. We discuss the priorities of creating and maintaining knowledge organization systems for a historically marginalized community and address the challenge that queer subjectivity poses to the goals of KO. The classification system features a focus on identity and physically reorganizes the library space in a way that accounts for the multiple and overlapping labels that constitute the currently articulated boundaries of this community. The subject heading system focuses on making visible topics and elements of identity made invisible by universal systems and by the newly implemented classification system. We discuss how this project may inform KO for other marginalized subjects, particularly through process and documentation that prioritizes transparency and the acceptance of an unfinished endpoint for queer KO.
- Date
- 6.10.2020 21:22:33
-
Cooke, N.A.; Kitzie, V.L.: Outsiders-within-Library and Information Science : reprioritizing the marginalized in critical sociocultural work (2021)
0.04
0.037688002 = sum of:
0.017287336 = product of:
0.069149345 = sum of:
0.069149345 = weight(_text_:authors in 351) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.069149345 = score(doc=351,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22881259 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.050191253 = queryNorm
0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 351, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=351)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.020400666 = product of:
0.04080133 = sum of:
0.04080133 = weight(_text_:22 in 351) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04080133 = score(doc=351,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17576122 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050191253 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 351, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=351)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- While there are calls for new paradigms within the profession, there are also existing subgenres that fit this bill if they would be fully acknowledged. This essay argues that underrepresented and otherwise marginalized scholars have already produced significant work within social, cultural, and community-oriented paradigms; social justice and advocacy; and, diversity, equity, and inclusion. This work has not been sufficiently valued or promoted. Furthermore, the surrounding structural conditions have resulted in the dismissal, violently reviewed and rejected, and erased work of underrepresented scholars, and the stigmatization and delegitimization of their work. These scholars are "outsiders-within-LIS." By identifying the outsiders-within-LIS through the frame of standpoint theories, the authors are suggesting that a new paradigm does not need to be created; rather, an existing paradigm needs to be recognized and reprioritized. This reprioritized paradigm of critical sociocultural work has and will continue to creatively enrich and expand the field and decolonize LIS curricula.
- Date
- 18. 9.2021 13:22:27
-
Zhang, L.; Lu, W.; Yang, J.: LAGOS-AND : a large gold standard dataset for scholarly author name disambiguation (2023)
0.04
0.037373878 = sum of:
0.020373322 = product of:
0.08149329 = sum of:
0.08149329 = weight(_text_:authors in 883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08149329 = score(doc=883,freq=4.0), product of:
0.22881259 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.050191253 = queryNorm
0.35615736 = fieldWeight in 883, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=883)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.017000556 = product of:
0.034001112 = sum of:
0.034001112 = weight(_text_:22 in 883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034001112 = score(doc=883,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17576122 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050191253 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 883, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=883)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- In this article, we present a method to automatically build large labeled datasets for the author ambiguity problem in the academic world by leveraging the authoritative academic resources, ORCID and DOI. Using the method, we built LAGOS-AND, two large, gold-standard sub-datasets for author name disambiguation (AND), of which LAGOS-AND-BLOCK is created for clustering-based AND research and LAGOS-AND-PAIRWISE is created for classification-based AND research. Our LAGOS-AND datasets are substantially different from the existing ones. The initial versions of the datasets (v1.0, released in February 2021) include 7.5 M citations authored by 798 K unique authors (LAGOS-AND-BLOCK) and close to 1 M instances (LAGOS-AND-PAIRWISE). And both datasets show close similarities to the whole Microsoft Academic Graph (MAG) across validations of six facets. In building the datasets, we reveal the variation degrees of last names in three literature databases, PubMed, MAG, and Semantic Scholar, by comparing author names hosted to the authors' official last names shown on the ORCID pages. Furthermore, we evaluate several baseline disambiguation methods as well as the MAG's author IDs system on our datasets, and the evaluation helps identify several interesting findings. We hope the datasets and findings will bring new insights for future studies. The code and datasets are publicly available.
- Date
- 22. 1.2023 18:40:36
-
Belabbes, M.A.; Ruthven, I.; Moshfeghi, Y.; Rasmussen Pennington, D.: Information overload : a concept analysis (2023)
0.04
0.037373878 = sum of:
0.020373322 = product of:
0.08149329 = sum of:
0.08149329 = weight(_text_:authors in 950) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08149329 = score(doc=950,freq=4.0), product of:
0.22881259 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.050191253 = queryNorm
0.35615736 = fieldWeight in 950, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=950)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.017000556 = product of:
0.034001112 = sum of:
0.034001112 = weight(_text_:22 in 950) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034001112 = score(doc=950,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17576122 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050191253 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 950, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=950)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Purpose With the shift to an information-based society and to the de-centralisation of information, information overload has attracted a growing interest in the computer and information science research communities. However, there is no clear understanding of the meaning of the term, and while there have been many proposed definitions, there is no consensus. The goal of this work was to define the concept of "information overload". In order to do so, a concept analysis using Rodgers' approach was performed. Design/methodology/approach A concept analysis using Rodgers' approach based on a corpus of documents published between 2010 and September 2020 was conducted. One surrogate for "information overload", which is "cognitive overload" was identified. The corpus of documents consisted of 151 documents for information overload and ten for cognitive overload. All documents were from the fields of computer science and information science, and were retrieved from three databases: Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) Digital Library, SCOPUS and Library and Information Science Abstracts (LISA). Findings The themes identified from the authors' concept analysis allowed us to extract the triggers, manifestations and consequences of information overload. They found triggers related to information characteristics, information need, the working environment, the cognitive abilities of individuals and the information environment. In terms of manifestations, they found that information overload manifests itself both emotionally and cognitively. The consequences of information overload were both internal and external. These findings allowed them to provide a definition of information overload. Originality/value Through the authors' concept analysis, they were able to clarify the components of information overload and provide a definition of the concept.
- Date
- 22. 4.2023 19:27:56
-
Du, Q.; Li, J.; Du, Y.; Wang, G.A.; Fan, W.: Predicting crowdfunding project success based on backers' language preferences (2021)
0.04
0.035680126 = product of:
0.07136025 = sum of:
0.07136025 = product of:
0.1427205 = sum of:
0.1427205 = weight(_text_:q in 415) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1427205 = score(doc=415,freq=2.0), product of:
0.32872224 = queryWeight, product of:
6.5493927 = idf(docFreq=171, maxDocs=44218)
0.050191253 = queryNorm
0.43416747 = fieldWeight in 415, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.5493927 = idf(docFreq=171, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=415)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Sun, X.; Zhou, X.; Wang, Q.; Sharples, S.: Investigating the impact of emotions on perceiving serendipitous information encountering (2022)
0.04
0.035680126 = product of:
0.07136025 = sum of:
0.07136025 = product of:
0.1427205 = sum of:
0.1427205 = weight(_text_:q in 442) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1427205 = score(doc=442,freq=2.0), product of:
0.32872224 = queryWeight, product of:
6.5493927 = idf(docFreq=171, maxDocs=44218)
0.050191253 = queryNorm
0.43416747 = fieldWeight in 442, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.5493927 = idf(docFreq=171, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=442)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Geras, A.; Siudem, G.; Gagolewski, M.: Time to vote : temporal clustering of user activity on Stack Overflow (2022)
0.04
0.035680126 = product of:
0.07136025 = sum of:
0.07136025 = product of:
0.1427205 = sum of:
0.1427205 = weight(_text_:q in 765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1427205 = score(doc=765,freq=2.0), product of:
0.32872224 = queryWeight, product of:
6.5493927 = idf(docFreq=171, maxDocs=44218)
0.050191253 = queryNorm
0.43416747 = fieldWeight in 765, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.5493927 = idf(docFreq=171, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=765)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Question-and-answer (Q&A) sites improve access to information and ease transfer of knowledge. In recent years, they have grown in popularity and importance, enabling research on behavioral patterns of their users. We study the dynamics related to the casting of 7 M votes across a sample of 700 k posts on Stack Overflow, a large community of professional software developers. We employ log-Gaussian mixture modeling and Markov chains to formulate a simple yet elegant description of the considered phenomena. We indicate that the interevent times can naturally be clustered into 3 typical time scales: those which occur within hours, weeks, and months and show how the events become rarer and rarer as time passes. It turns out that the posts' popularity in a short period after publication is a weak predictor of its overall success, contrary to what was observed, for example, in case of YouTube clips. Nonetheless, the sleeping beauties sometimes awake and can receive bursts of votes following each other relatively quickly.
-
Qi, Q.; Hessen, D.J.; Heijden, P.G.M. van der: Improving information retrieval through correspondenceanalysis instead of latent semantic analysis (2023)
0.04
0.035680126 = product of:
0.07136025 = sum of:
0.07136025 = product of:
0.1427205 = sum of:
0.1427205 = weight(_text_:q in 1045) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1427205 = score(doc=1045,freq=2.0), product of:
0.32872224 = queryWeight, product of:
6.5493927 = idf(docFreq=171, maxDocs=44218)
0.050191253 = queryNorm
0.43416747 = fieldWeight in 1045, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.5493927 = idf(docFreq=171, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1045)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
