Search (199 results, page 1 of 10)

0.07882488 = sum of:
  0.067247674 = product of:
    0.201743 = sum of:
      0.201743 = weight(_text_:3a in 5669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.201743 = score(doc=5669,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.43075415 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050808396 = queryNorm
          0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5669, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5669)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.011577206 = product of:
    0.034731615 = sum of:
      0.034731615 = weight(_text_:29 in 5669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.034731615 = score(doc=5669,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17872804 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050808396 = queryNorm
          0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 5669, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5669)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Content

"Die Englischsprachige Wikipedia verfügt jetzt über mehr als 6 Millionen Artikel. An zweiter Stelle kommt die deutschsprachige Wikipedia mit 2.3 Millionen Artikeln, an dritter Stelle steht die französischsprachige Wikipedia mit 2.1 Millionen Artikeln (via Researchbuzz: Firehose <https://rbfirehose.com/2020/01/24/techcrunch-wikipedia-now-has-more-than-6-million-articles-in-english/> und Techcrunch <https://techcrunch.com/2020/01/23/wikipedia-english-six-million-articles/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Techcrunch+%28TechCrunch%29&guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly9yYmZpcmVob3NlLmNvbS8yMDIwLzAxLzI0L3RlY2hjcnVuY2gtd2lraXBlZGlhLW5vdy1oYXMtbW9yZS10aGFuLTYtbWlsbGlvbi1hcnRpY2xlcy1pbi1lbmdsaXNoLw&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAK0zHfjdDZ_spFZBF_z-zDjtL5iWvuKDumFTzm4HvQzkUfE2pLXQzGS6FGB_y-VISdMEsUSvkNsg2U_NWQ4lwWSvOo3jvXo1I3GtgHpP8exukVxYAnn5mJspqX50VHIWFADHhs5AerkRn3hMRtf_R3F1qmEbo8EROZXp328HMC-o>). 250120 via digithek ch = #fineBlog s.a.: Angesichts der Veröffentlichung des 6-millionsten Artikels vergangene Woche in der englischsprachigen Wikipedia hat die Community-Zeitungsseite "Wikipedia Signpost" ein Moratorium bei der Veröffentlichung von Unternehmensartikeln gefordert. Das sei kein Vorwurf gegen die Wikimedia Foundation, aber die derzeitigen Maßnahmen, um die Enzyklopädie gegen missbräuchliches undeklariertes Paid Editing zu schützen, funktionierten ganz klar nicht. *"Da die ehrenamtlichen Autoren derzeit von Werbung in Gestalt von Wikipedia-Artikeln überwältigt werden, und da die WMF nicht in der Lage zu sein scheint, dem irgendetwas entgegenzusetzen, wäre der einzige gangbare Weg für die Autoren, fürs erste die Neuanlage von Artikeln über Unternehmen zu untersagen"*, schreibt der Benutzer Smallbones in seinem Editorial <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2020-01-27/From_the_editor> zur heutigen Ausgabe."

0.040348604 = product of:
  0.08069721 = sum of:
    0.08069721 = product of:
      0.24209161 = sum of:
        0.24209161 = weight(_text_:3a in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.24209161 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.43075415 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050808396 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F2212.06721&usg=AOvVaw3i_9pZm9y_dQWoHi6uv0EN

0.033848032 = product of:
  0.067696065 = sum of:
    0.067696065 = product of:
      0.1015441 = sum of:
        0.074008755 = weight(_text_:21st in 566) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.074008755 = score(doc=566,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.29169354 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.74105 = idf(docFreq=385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050808396 = queryNorm
            0.25372094 = fieldWeight in 566, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.74105 = idf(docFreq=385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=566)
        0.027535345 = weight(_text_:22 in 566) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027535345 = score(doc=566,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17792235 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050808396 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 566, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=566)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Knowledge Architectures reviews traditional approaches to managing information and explains why they need to adapt to support 21st-century information management and discovery. Exploring the rapidly changing environment in which information is being managed and accessed, the book considers how to use knowledge architectures, the basic structures and designs that underlie all of the parts of an effective information system, to best advantage. Drawing on 40 years of work with a variety of organizations, Bedford explains that failure to understand the structure behind any given system can be the difference between an effective solution and a significant and costly failure. Demonstrating that the information user environment has shifted significantly in the past 20 years, the book explains that end users now expect designs and behaviors that are much closer to the way they think, work, and act. Acknowledging how important it is that those responsible for developing an information or knowledge management system understand knowledge structures, the book goes beyond a traditional library science perspective and uses case studies to help translate the abstract and theoretical to the practical and concrete. Explaining the structures in a simple and intuitive way and providing examples that clearly illustrate the challenges faced by a range of different organizations, Knowledge Architectures is essential reading for those studying and working in library and information science, data science, systems development, database design, and search system architecture and engineering.

Content

Section 1 Context and purpose of knowledge architecture -- 1 Making the case for knowledge architecture -- 2 The landscape of knowledge assets -- 3 Knowledge architecture and design -- 4 Knowledge architecture reference model -- 5 Knowledge architecture segments -- Section 2 Designing for availability -- 6 Knowledge object modeling -- 7 Knowledge structures for encoding, formatting, and packaging -- 8 Functional architecture for identification and distinction -- 9 Functional architectures for knowledge asset disposition and destruction -- 10 Functional architecture designs for knowledge preservation and conservation -- Section 3 Designing for accessibility -- 11 Functional architectures for knowledge seeking and discovery -- 12 Functional architecture for knowledge search -- 13 Functional architecture for knowledge categorization -- 14 Functional architectures for indexing and keywording -- 15 Functional architecture for knowledge semantics -- 16 Functional architecture for knowledge abstraction and surrogation -- Section 4 Functional architectures to support knowledge consumption -- 17 Functional architecture for knowledge augmentation, derivation, and synthesis -- 18 Functional architecture to manage risk and harm -- 19 Functional architectures for knowledge authentication and provenance -- 20 Functional architectures for securing knowledge assets -- 21 Functional architectures for authorization and asset management -- Section 5 Pulling it all together - the big picture knowledge architecture -- 22 Functional architecture for knowledge metadata and metainformation -- 23 The whole knowledge architecture - pulling it all together

0.033623837 = product of:
  0.067247674 = sum of:
    0.067247674 = product of:
      0.201743 = sum of:
        0.201743 = weight(_text_:3a in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.201743 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.43075415 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050808396 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Master thesis Master of Science (Library and Information Studies) (MSc), Universität Wien. Advisor: Christoph Steiner. Vgl.: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371680244_Vergabe_von_DDC-Sachgruppen_mittels_eines_Schlagwort-Thesaurus. DOI: 10.25365/thesis.70030. Vgl. dazu die Präsentation unter: https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=0CAIQw7AJahcKEwjwoZzzytz_AhUAAAAAHQAAAAAQAg&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwiki.dnb.de%2Fdownload%2Fattachments%2F252121510%2FDA3%2520Workshop-Gabler.pdf%3Fversion%3D1%26modificationDate%3D1671093170000%26api%3Dv2&psig=AOvVaw0szwENK1or3HevgvIDOfjx&ust=1687719410889597&opi=89978449.

0.027660318 = product of:
  0.055320635 = sum of:
    0.055320635 = product of:
      0.08298095 = sum of:
        0.041677937 = weight(_text_:29 in 299) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041677937 = score(doc=299,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17872804 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050808396 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 299, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=299)
        0.041303016 = weight(_text_:22 in 299) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041303016 = score(doc=299,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17792235 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050808396 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 299, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=299)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

30. 6.2021 16:29:52

Source

o-bib: Das offene Bibliotheksjournal. 8(2021) Nr.2, S.1-22

0.027660318 = product of:
  0.055320635 = sum of:
    0.055320635 = product of:
      0.08298095 = sum of:
        0.041677937 = weight(_text_:29 in 915) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041677937 = score(doc=915,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17872804 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050808396 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 915, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=915)
        0.041303016 = weight(_text_:22 in 915) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041303016 = score(doc=915,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17792235 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050808396 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 915, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=915)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

21. 3.2023 19:22:29

0.023050267 = product of:
  0.046100534 = sum of:
    0.046100534 = product of:
      0.0691508 = sum of:
        0.034731615 = weight(_text_:29 in 178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034731615 = score(doc=178,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17872804 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050808396 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 178, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=178)
        0.034419183 = weight(_text_:22 in 178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034419183 = score(doc=178,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17792235 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050808396 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 178, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=178)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Purpose Public attitudes towards COVID-19 and social distancing are critical in reducing its spread. It is therefore important to understand public reactions and information dissemination in all major forms, including on social media. This article investigates important issues reflected on Twitter in the early stages of the public reaction to COVID-19. Design/methodology/approach A thematic analysis of the most retweeted English-language tweets mentioning COVID-19 during March 10-29, 2020. Findings The main themes identified for the 87 qualifying tweets accounting for 14 million retweets were: lockdown life; attitude towards social restrictions; politics; safety messages; people with COVID-19; support for key workers; work; and COVID-19 facts/news. Research limitations/implications Twitter played many positive roles, mainly through unofficial tweets. Users shared social distancing information, helped build support for social distancing, criticised government responses, expressed support for key workers and helped each other cope with social isolation. A few popular tweets not supporting social distancing show that government messages sometimes failed. Practical implications Public health campaigns in future may consider encouraging grass roots social web activity to support campaign goals. At a methodological level, analysing retweet counts emphasised politics and ignored practical implementation issues. Originality/value This is the first qualitative analysis of general COVID-19-related retweeting.

Date

20. 1.2015 18:30:22

0.023050267 = product of:
  0.046100534 = sum of:
    0.046100534 = product of:
      0.0691508 = sum of:
        0.034731615 = weight(_text_:29 in 1125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034731615 = score(doc=1125,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17872804 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050808396 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 1125, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1125)
        0.034419183 = weight(_text_:22 in 1125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034419183 = score(doc=1125,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17792235 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050808396 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1125, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1125)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Interdisciplinarity implies the previous existence of disciplinary fields and not their dissolution. As a general objective, we propose to establish an initial approach to the emphasis given to interdisciplinarity in the teaching of KO, through the teaching staff responsible for postgraduate courses focused on -or related to the KO, in Ibero-American universities. For conducting the research, the framework and distribution of a survey addressed to teachers is proposed, based on four lines of action: 1. The way teachers manage the concept of interdisciplinarity. 2. The place that teachers give to interdisciplinarity in KO. 3. Assessment of interdisciplinary content that teachers incorporate into their postgraduate courses. 4. Set of teaching strategies and resources used by teachers to include interdisciplinarity in the teaching of KO. The study analyzed 22 responses. Preliminary results show that KO teachers recognize the influence of other disciplines in concepts, theories, methods, and applications, but no consensus has been reached regarding which disciplines and authors are the ones who build interdisciplinary bridges. Among other conclusions, the study strongly suggests that environmental and social tensions are reflected in subject representation, especially in the construction of friendly knowl­edge organization systems with interdisciplinary visions, and in the expressions through which information is sought.

Date

20.11.2023 17:29:13

0.020052306 = product of:
  0.040104613 = sum of:
    0.040104613 = product of:
      0.12031384 = sum of:
        0.12031384 = weight(_text_:29 in 925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12031384 = score(doc=925,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.17872804 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050808396 = queryNorm
            0.6731671 = fieldWeight in 925, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=925)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

29. 3.2023 13:23:26
29. 3.2023 13:29:19

0.01850219 = product of:
  0.03700438 = sum of:
    0.03700438 = product of:
      0.11101314 = sum of:
        0.11101314 = weight(_text_:21st in 68) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11101314 = score(doc=68,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.29169354 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.74105 = idf(docFreq=385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050808396 = queryNorm
            0.3805814 = fieldWeight in 68, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.74105 = idf(docFreq=385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=68)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

What is the digital divide? -- Research and theory of the digital divide -- Motivation and attitude -- Physical access -- Digital and 21st-century skills usage inequality -- Outcomes -- Social and digital inequality -- Solutions to soften the digital divide.

0.01850219 = product of:
  0.03700438 = sum of:
    0.03700438 = product of:
      0.11101314 = sum of:
        0.11101314 = weight(_text_:21st in 590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11101314 = score(doc=590,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.29169354 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.74105 = idf(docFreq=385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050808396 = queryNorm
            0.3805814 = fieldWeight in 590, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.74105 = idf(docFreq=385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=590)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

After two decades in the 21st Century, and despite all the advances in the area, some very important names from past centuries still do not have the recognition they deserve in the global history of library and information science and, specifically, of knowledge organization. Although acknowledged in British librarianship, the name of James Duff Brown (1862-1914) still does not have a proper recognition on a global scale. His contributions to a free and more democratic library had a prominent place in the works and projects he developed during his time at the libraries of Clerkenwell and Islington in London. Free access to the library shelves, an architecture centered on books and people, and classifications that are more dynamic were dreams fulfilled by Brown. With this biographical article, we hope to live up to his legacy and pay homage to a true librarian and an advocate of the public library and subject classification.

0.016062286 = product of:
  0.03212457 = sum of:
    0.03212457 = product of:
      0.09637371 = sum of:
        0.09637371 = weight(_text_:22 in 1079) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09637371 = score(doc=1079,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17792235 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050808396 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1079, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1079)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

27. 1.2023 16:22:55

0.015418492 = product of:
  0.030836985 = sum of:
    0.030836985 = product of:
      0.09251095 = sum of:
        0.09251095 = weight(_text_:21st in 8) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09251095 = score(doc=8,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.29169354 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.74105 = idf(docFreq=385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050808396 = queryNorm
            0.3171512 = fieldWeight in 8, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.74105 = idf(docFreq=385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=8)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The beginning of the 21st century attested to the first movements toward information architecture (IA), originating from the field of library and information science (LIS). IA is acknowledged as an important meta-discipline concerned with the design, implementation, and maintenance of digital information spaces. Despite the relevance of IA, there is little research about the subject within LIS, and still less if one considers initiatives for creating a theory for IA. In this article, we provide a theory for IA and describe the resources needed to create it through ontological models. We also choose the "document" as the key entity for such theory, contemplating kinds of documents that not only serve to register information, but also create claims and obligations in society. To achieve our goals, we provide a background for subtheories from LIS and from Applied Ontology. As a result, we present some basic theory for IA in the form of a formal framework to represent corporations in which IA activities take place, acknowledging that our approach is de facto a subset of IA we call the enterprise information architecture (EAI) approach. By doing this, we highlight the effects that documents cause within corporations in the scope of EIA.

0.015418492 = product of:
  0.030836985 = sum of:
    0.030836985 = product of:
      0.09251095 = sum of:
        0.09251095 = weight(_text_:21st in 1101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09251095 = score(doc=1101,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.29169354 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.74105 = idf(docFreq=385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050808396 = queryNorm
            0.3171512 = fieldWeight in 1101, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.74105 = idf(docFreq=385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1101)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Similar to information and knowledge, data and especially big data are now known as one of the most vital elements in the 21st century since they provide multiple capabilities to individuals and organizations. However, in comparison to some theories about information and knowledge, there are no significant attempts in most scientific disciplines for building theories about data. This paper first reviews the different definitions provided about the concept of data in the works of scholars. It then identifies and explores the philosophical aspects as well as the multiple capabilities/features that can be derived from data. Finally, a starter list of some basic/general theories is developed based on the capabilities and features of data. Such new theories can be used as meta-theories to extend data theories for various scientific disciplines. The important notion supporting the development of theories about data is that, if data is so important and if data science is to continue flourishing in a variety of specialized fields and trends, then we need to build relevant theories about data for research and practical purposes in a multi-disciplinary context.

0.013892646 = product of:
  0.027785292 = sum of:
    0.027785292 = product of:
      0.083355874 = sum of:
        0.083355874 = weight(_text_:29 in 5371) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.083355874 = score(doc=5371,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17872804 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050808396 = queryNorm
            0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 5371, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5371)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Beitrag zur Tagung: "Nationalsozialismus Digital. Die Verantwortung von Bibliotheken, Archiven und Museen sowie Forschungseinrichtungen und Medien im Umgang mit der NSZeit im Netz." Österreichische Nationalbibliothek, Universität Wien, 27. - 29. November 2019

0.013892646 = product of:
  0.027785292 = sum of:
    0.027785292 = product of:
      0.083355874 = sum of:
        0.083355874 = weight(_text_:29 in 5742) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.083355874 = score(doc=5742,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17872804 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050808396 = queryNorm
            0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 5742, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5742)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Spektrum der Wissenschaft. 2020, H.3, S.29

0.013892646 = product of:
  0.027785292 = sum of:
    0.027785292 = product of:
      0.083355874 = sum of:
        0.083355874 = weight(_text_:29 in 5903) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.083355874 = score(doc=5903,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17872804 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050808396 = queryNorm
            0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 5903, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5903)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Spektrum der Wissenschaft. 2020, H.7, S.29

0.013892646 = product of:
  0.027785292 = sum of:
    0.027785292 = product of:
      0.083355874 = sum of:
        0.083355874 = weight(_text_:29 in 481) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.083355874 = score(doc=481,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17872804 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050808396 = queryNorm
            0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 481, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=481)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Pirmasenser Zeitung. Nr. 29 vom 03.02.2023, S.2

0.013767673 = product of:
  0.027535345 = sum of:
    0.027535345 = product of:
      0.08260603 = sum of:
        0.08260603 = weight(_text_:22 in 4156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08260603 = score(doc=4156,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17792235 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050808396 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4156, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4156)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

2. 3.2020 14:08:22

0.013767673 = product of:
  0.027535345 = sum of:
    0.027535345 = product of:
      0.08260603 = sum of:
        0.08260603 = weight(_text_:22 in 1203) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08260603 = score(doc=1203,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17792235 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050808396 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1203, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1203)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Spektrum der Wissenschaft. 2023, H.10, S.22-24