Search (271 results, page 1 of 14)

  • × year_i:[2020 TO 2030}
  1. Fugmann, R.: What is information? : an information veteran looks back (2022) 0.06
    0.05997485 = product of:
      0.1199497 = sum of:
        0.1199497 = sum of:
          0.049157884 = weight(_text_:5 in 1085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049157884 = score(doc=1085,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15247129 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052250203 = queryNorm
              0.32240748 = fieldWeight in 1085, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1085)
          0.07079182 = weight(_text_:22 in 1085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07079182 = score(doc=1085,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18297131 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052250203 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1085, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1085)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    18. 8.2022 19:22:57
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 49(2022) no.1, S.3-5
  2. Bullard, J.; Dierking, A.; Grundner, A.: Centring LGBT2QIA+ subjects in knowledge organization systems (2020) 0.04
    0.042093467 = product of:
      0.084186934 = sum of:
        0.084186934 = sum of:
          0.04171185 = weight(_text_:5 in 5996) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04171185 = score(doc=5996,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.15247129 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052250203 = queryNorm
              0.27357182 = fieldWeight in 5996, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5996)
          0.042475086 = weight(_text_:22 in 5996) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042475086 = score(doc=5996,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18297131 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052250203 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5996, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5996)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    DOI:10.5771/0943-7444-2020-5-393.
    Date
    6.10.2020 21:22:33
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 47(2020) no.5, S.393-403
  3. Bargmann, S.; Blumesberger, S.; Gruber, A.; Luef, E.; Steltzer, R.: Sacherschließung geschlechtergerecht?! : Rückblick auf den Online-Workshop am 11. Mai 2022 und Aufruf zu gemeinsamen Aktivitäten (2022) 0.04
    0.041982394 = product of:
      0.08396479 = sum of:
        0.08396479 = sum of:
          0.034410518 = weight(_text_:5 in 172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.034410518 = score(doc=172,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15247129 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052250203 = queryNorm
              0.22568524 = fieldWeight in 172, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=172)
          0.04955427 = weight(_text_:22 in 172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04955427 = score(doc=172,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18297131 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052250203 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 172, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=172)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    5. 6.2016 17:23:26
    15. 2.2023 14:30:22
  4. Manley, S.: Letters to the editor and the race for publication metrics (2022) 0.04
    0.041982394 = product of:
      0.08396479 = sum of:
        0.08396479 = sum of:
          0.034410518 = weight(_text_:5 in 547) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.034410518 = score(doc=547,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15247129 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052250203 = queryNorm
              0.22568524 = fieldWeight in 547, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=547)
          0.04955427 = weight(_text_:22 in 547) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04955427 = score(doc=547,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18297131 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052250203 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 547, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=547)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    6. 4.2022 19:22:26
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 73(2022) no.5, S.702-707
  5. Noever, D.; Ciolino, M.: ¬The Turing deception (2022) 0.04
    0.041493587 = product of:
      0.082987174 = sum of:
        0.082987174 = product of:
          0.24896151 = sum of:
            0.24896151 = weight(_text_:3a in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.24896151 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.4429778 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052250203 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F2212.06721&usg=AOvVaw3i_9pZm9y_dQWoHi6uv0EN
  6. Cheti, A.; Viti, E.: Functionality and merits of a faceted thesaurus : the case of the Nuovo soggettario (2023) 0.04
    0.035984907 = product of:
      0.071969815 = sum of:
        0.071969815 = sum of:
          0.02949473 = weight(_text_:5 in 1181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.02949473 = score(doc=1181,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15247129 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052250203 = queryNorm
              0.19344449 = fieldWeight in 1181, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1181)
          0.042475086 = weight(_text_:22 in 1181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042475086 = score(doc=1181,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18297131 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052250203 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1181, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1181)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    26.11.2023 18:59:22
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 61(2023) no.5-6, S.708-733
  7. Dietz, K.: en.wikipedia.org > 6 Mio. Artikel (2020) 0.03
    0.034577988 = product of:
      0.069155976 = sum of:
        0.069155976 = product of:
          0.20746793 = sum of:
            0.20746793 = weight(_text_:3a in 5669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.20746793 = score(doc=5669,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.4429778 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052250203 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5669, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5669)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    "Die Englischsprachige Wikipedia verfügt jetzt über mehr als 6 Millionen Artikel. An zweiter Stelle kommt die deutschsprachige Wikipedia mit 2.3 Millionen Artikeln, an dritter Stelle steht die französischsprachige Wikipedia mit 2.1 Millionen Artikeln (via Researchbuzz: Firehose <https://rbfirehose.com/2020/01/24/techcrunch-wikipedia-now-has-more-than-6-million-articles-in-english/> und Techcrunch <https://techcrunch.com/2020/01/23/wikipedia-english-six-million-articles/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Techcrunch+%28TechCrunch%29&guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly9yYmZpcmVob3NlLmNvbS8yMDIwLzAxLzI0L3RlY2hjcnVuY2gtd2lraXBlZGlhLW5vdy1oYXMtbW9yZS10aGFuLTYtbWlsbGlvbi1hcnRpY2xlcy1pbi1lbmdsaXNoLw&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAK0zHfjdDZ_spFZBF_z-zDjtL5iWvuKDumFTzm4HvQzkUfE2pLXQzGS6FGB_y-VISdMEsUSvkNsg2U_NWQ4lwWSvOo3jvXo1I3GtgHpP8exukVxYAnn5mJspqX50VHIWFADHhs5AerkRn3hMRtf_R3F1qmEbo8EROZXp328HMC-o>). 250120 via digithek ch = #fineBlog s.a.: Angesichts der Veröffentlichung des 6-millionsten Artikels vergangene Woche in der englischsprachigen Wikipedia hat die Community-Zeitungsseite "Wikipedia Signpost" ein Moratorium bei der Veröffentlichung von Unternehmensartikeln gefordert. Das sei kein Vorwurf gegen die Wikimedia Foundation, aber die derzeitigen Maßnahmen, um die Enzyklopädie gegen missbräuchliches undeklariertes Paid Editing zu schützen, funktionierten ganz klar nicht. *"Da die ehrenamtlichen Autoren derzeit von Werbung in Gestalt von Wikipedia-Artikeln überwältigt werden, und da die WMF nicht in der Lage zu sein scheint, dem irgendetwas entgegenzusetzen, wäre der einzige gangbare Weg für die Autoren, fürs erste die Neuanlage von Artikeln über Unternehmen zu untersagen"*, schreibt der Benutzer Smallbones in seinem Editorial <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2020-01-27/From_the_editor> zur heutigen Ausgabe."
  8. Gabler, S.: Vergabe von DDC-Sachgruppen mittels eines Schlagwort-Thesaurus (2021) 0.03
    0.034577988 = product of:
      0.069155976 = sum of:
        0.069155976 = product of:
          0.20746793 = sum of:
            0.20746793 = weight(_text_:3a in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.20746793 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.4429778 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052250203 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Master thesis Master of Science (Library and Information Studies) (MSc), Universität Wien. Advisor: Christoph Steiner. Vgl.: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371680244_Vergabe_von_DDC-Sachgruppen_mittels_eines_Schlagwort-Thesaurus. DOI: 10.25365/thesis.70030. Vgl. dazu die Präsentation unter: https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=0CAIQw7AJahcKEwjwoZzzytz_AhUAAAAAHQAAAAAQAg&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwiki.dnb.de%2Fdownload%2Fattachments%2F252121510%2FDA3%2520Workshop-Gabler.pdf%3Fversion%3D1%26modificationDate%3D1671093170000%26api%3Dv2&psig=AOvVaw0szwENK1or3HevgvIDOfjx&ust=1687719410889597&opi=89978449.
  9. Bedford, D.: Knowledge architectures : structures and semantics (2021) 0.03
    0.031187154 = product of:
      0.06237431 = sum of:
        0.06237431 = sum of:
          0.034057584 = weight(_text_:5 in 566) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.034057584 = score(doc=566,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.15247129 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052250203 = queryNorm
              0.22337046 = fieldWeight in 566, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=566)
          0.028316725 = weight(_text_:22 in 566) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.028316725 = score(doc=566,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18297131 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052250203 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 566, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=566)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Section 1 Context and purpose of knowledge architecture -- 1 Making the case for knowledge architecture -- 2 The landscape of knowledge assets -- 3 Knowledge architecture and design -- 4 Knowledge architecture reference model -- 5 Knowledge architecture segments -- Section 2 Designing for availability -- 6 Knowledge object modeling -- 7 Knowledge structures for encoding, formatting, and packaging -- 8 Functional architecture for identification and distinction -- 9 Functional architectures for knowledge asset disposition and destruction -- 10 Functional architecture designs for knowledge preservation and conservation -- Section 3 Designing for accessibility -- 11 Functional architectures for knowledge seeking and discovery -- 12 Functional architecture for knowledge search -- 13 Functional architecture for knowledge categorization -- 14 Functional architectures for indexing and keywording -- 15 Functional architecture for knowledge semantics -- 16 Functional architecture for knowledge abstraction and surrogation -- Section 4 Functional architectures to support knowledge consumption -- 17 Functional architecture for knowledge augmentation, derivation, and synthesis -- 18 Functional architecture to manage risk and harm -- 19 Functional architectures for knowledge authentication and provenance -- 20 Functional architectures for securing knowledge assets -- 21 Functional architectures for authorization and asset management -- Section 5 Pulling it all together - the big picture knowledge architecture -- 22 Functional architecture for knowledge metadata and metainformation -- 23 The whole knowledge architecture - pulling it all together
    Isbn
    978-0-429-26891-5
  10. Ekstrand, M.D.; Wright, K.L.; Pera, M.S.: Enhancing classroom instruction with online news (2020) 0.03
    0.029987425 = product of:
      0.05997485 = sum of:
        0.05997485 = sum of:
          0.024578942 = weight(_text_:5 in 5844) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.024578942 = score(doc=5844,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15247129 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052250203 = queryNorm
              0.16120374 = fieldWeight in 5844, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5844)
          0.03539591 = weight(_text_:22 in 5844) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03539591 = score(doc=5844,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18297131 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052250203 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5844, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5844)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    Source
    Aslib journal of information management. 72(2020) no.5, S.725-744
  11. Cox, A.; Fulton, C.: Geographies of information behaviour : a conceptual exploration (2022) 0.03
    0.029987425 = product of:
      0.05997485 = sum of:
        0.05997485 = sum of:
          0.024578942 = weight(_text_:5 in 678) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.024578942 = score(doc=678,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15247129 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052250203 = queryNorm
              0.16120374 = fieldWeight in 678, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=678)
          0.03539591 = weight(_text_:22 in 678) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03539591 = score(doc=678,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18297131 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052250203 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 678, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=678)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    5. 6.2022 17:20:22
  12. Cerda-Cosme, R.; Méndez, E.: Analysis of shared research data in Spanish scientific papers about COVID-19 : a first approach (2023) 0.03
    0.029987425 = product of:
      0.05997485 = sum of:
        0.05997485 = sum of:
          0.024578942 = weight(_text_:5 in 916) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.024578942 = score(doc=916,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15247129 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052250203 = queryNorm
              0.16120374 = fieldWeight in 916, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=916)
          0.03539591 = weight(_text_:22 in 916) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03539591 = score(doc=916,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18297131 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052250203 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 916, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=916)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    During the coronavirus pandemic, changes in the way science is done and shared occurred, which motivates meta-research to help understand science communication in crises and improve its effectiveness. The objective is to study how many Spanish scientific papers on COVID-19 published during 2020 share their research data. Qualitative and descriptive study applying nine attributes: (a) availability, (b) accessibility, (c) format, (d) licensing, (e) linkage, (f) funding, (g) editorial policy, (h) content, and (i) statistics. We analyzed 1,340 papers, 1,173 (87.5%) did not have research data. A total of 12.5% share their research data of which 2.1% share their data in repositories, 5% share their data through a simple request, 0.2% do not have permission to share their data, and 5.2% share their data as supplementary material. There is a small percentage that shares their research data; however, it demonstrates the researchers' poor knowledge on how to properly share their research data and their lack of knowledge on what is research data.
    Date
    21. 3.2023 19:22:02
  13. ¬Der Student aus dem Computer (2023) 0.02
    0.024777135 = product of:
      0.04955427 = sum of:
        0.04955427 = product of:
          0.09910854 = sum of:
            0.09910854 = weight(_text_:22 in 1079) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09910854 = score(doc=1079,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18297131 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052250203 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1079, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1079)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    27. 1.2023 16:22:55
  14. Yu, L.; Fan, Z.; Li, A.: ¬A hierarchical typology of scholarly information units : based on a deduction-verification study (2020) 0.02
    0.023989938 = product of:
      0.047979876 = sum of:
        0.047979876 = sum of:
          0.019663153 = weight(_text_:5 in 5655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.019663153 = score(doc=5655,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15247129 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052250203 = queryNorm
              0.128963 = fieldWeight in 5655, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5655)
          0.028316725 = weight(_text_:22 in 5655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.028316725 = score(doc=5655,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18297131 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052250203 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5655, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5655)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose The purpose of this paper is to lay a theoretical foundation for identifying operational information units for library and information professional activities in the context of scholarly communication. Design/methodology/approach The study adopts a deduction-verification approach to formulate a typology of units for scholarly information. It first deduces possible units from an existing conceptualization of information, which defines information as the combined product of data and meaning, and then tests the usefulness of these units via two empirical investigations, one with a group of scholarly papers and the other with a sample of scholarly information users. Findings The results show that, on defining an information unit as a piece of information that is complete in both data and meaning, to such an extent that it remains meaningful to its target audience when retrieved and displayed independently in a database, it is then possible to formulate a hierarchical typology of units for scholarly information. The typology proposed in this study consists of three levels, which in turn, consists of 1, 5 and 44 units, respectively. Research limitations/implications The result of this study has theoretical implications on both the philosophical and conceptual levels: on the philosophical level, it hinges on, and reinforces the objective view of information; on the conceptual level, it challenges the conceptualization of work by IFLA's Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records and Library Reference Model but endorses that by Library of Congress's BIBFRAME 2.0 model. Practical implications It calls for reconsideration of existing operational units in a variety of library and information activities. Originality/value The study strengthens the conceptual foundation of operational information units and brings to light the primacy of "one work" as an information unit and the possibility for it to be supplemented by smaller units.
    Date
    14. 1.2020 11:15:22
  15. Boczkowski, P.; Mitchelstein, E.: ¬The digital environment : How we live, learn, work, and play now (2021) 0.02
    0.023989938 = product of:
      0.047979876 = sum of:
        0.047979876 = sum of:
          0.019663153 = weight(_text_:5 in 1003) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.019663153 = score(doc=1003,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15247129 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052250203 = queryNorm
              0.128963 = fieldWeight in 1003, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1003)
          0.028316725 = weight(_text_:22 in 1003) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.028316725 = score(doc=1003,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18297131 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052250203 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1003, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1003)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    1. Three Environments, One Life -- Part I: Foundations -- 2. Mediatization -- 3. Algorithms -- 4. Race and Ethnicity -- 5. Gender -- Part II: Institutions -- 6. Parenting -- 7. Schooling -- 8. Working -- 9. Dating -- Part III: Leisure -- 10. Sports -- 11. Televised Entertainment -- 12. News -- Part IV: Politics -- 13. Misinformation and Disinformation -- 14. Electoral Campaigns -- 15. Activism -- Part V: Innovations -- 16. Data Science -- 17. Virtual Reality -- 18. Space Exploration -- 19. Bricks and Cracks in the Digital Environment
    Date
    22. 6.2023 18:25:18
  16. Jaeger, L.: Wissenschaftler versus Wissenschaft (2020) 0.02
    0.021237543 = product of:
      0.042475086 = sum of:
        0.042475086 = product of:
          0.08495017 = sum of:
            0.08495017 = weight(_text_:22 in 4156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08495017 = score(doc=4156,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18297131 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052250203 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4156, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4156)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    2. 3.2020 14:08:22
  17. Ibrahim, G.M.; Taylor, M.: Krebszellen manipulieren Neurone : Gliome (2023) 0.02
    0.021237543 = product of:
      0.042475086 = sum of:
        0.042475086 = product of:
          0.08495017 = sum of:
            0.08495017 = weight(_text_:22 in 1203) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08495017 = score(doc=1203,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18297131 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052250203 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1203, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1203)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Spektrum der Wissenschaft. 2023, H.10, S.22-24
  18. Koch, C.: Was ist Bewusstsein? (2020) 0.02
    0.017697955 = product of:
      0.03539591 = sum of:
        0.03539591 = product of:
          0.07079182 = sum of:
            0.07079182 = weight(_text_:22 in 5723) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07079182 = score(doc=5723,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18297131 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052250203 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5723, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5723)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    17. 1.2020 22:15:11
  19. Wagner, E.: Über Impfstoffe zur digitalen Identität? (2020) 0.02
    0.017697955 = product of:
      0.03539591 = sum of:
        0.03539591 = product of:
          0.07079182 = sum of:
            0.07079182 = weight(_text_:22 in 5846) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07079182 = score(doc=5846,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18297131 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052250203 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5846, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5846)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    4. 5.2020 17:22:40
  20. Engel, B.: Corona-Gesundheitszertifikat als Exitstrategie (2020) 0.02
    0.017697955 = product of:
      0.03539591 = sum of:
        0.03539591 = product of:
          0.07079182 = sum of:
            0.07079182 = weight(_text_:22 in 5906) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07079182 = score(doc=5906,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18297131 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052250203 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5906, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5906)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    4. 5.2020 17:22:28

Languages

  • e 194
  • d 75
  • m 1
  • pt 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 236
  • el 40
  • m 23
  • p 3
  • s 3
  • A 1
  • EL 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…

Subjects

Classifications