Search (5038 results, page 2 of 252)

  1. Norris, M.; Oppenheim, C.: ¬The h-index : a broad review of a new bibliometric indicator (2010) 0.10 
    0.09895333 = product of:
  0.19790666 = sum of:
    0.19790666 = sum of:
      0.1630111 = weight(_text_:index in 4147) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.1630111 = score(doc=4147,freq=18.0), product of:
          0.2250935 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051511593 = queryNorm
          0.72419286 = fieldWeight in 4147, product of:
            4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
              18.0 = termFreq=18.0
            4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4147)
      0.03489555 = weight(_text_:22 in 4147) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03489555 = score(doc=4147,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18038483 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051511593 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4147, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4147)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Purpose - This review aims to show, broadly, how the h-index has become a subject of widespread debate, how it has spawned many variants and diverse applications since first introduced in 2005 and some of the issues in its use. Design/methodology/approach - The review drew on a range of material published in 1990 or so sources published since 2005. From these sources, a number of themes were identified and discussed ranging from the h-index's advantages to which citation database might be selected for its calculation. Findings - The analysis shows how the h-index has quickly established itself as a major subject of interest in the field of bibliometrics. Study of the index ranges from its mathematical underpinning to a range of variants perceived to address the indexes' shortcomings. The review illustrates how widely the index has been applied but also how care must be taken in its application. Originality/value - The use of bibliometric indicators to measure research performance continues, with the h-index as its latest addition. The use of the h-index, its variants and many applications to which it has been put are still at the exploratory stage. The review shows the breadth and diversity of this research and the need to verify the veracity of the h-index by more studies.
    Date
    8. 1.2011 19:22:13
    Object
    h-index
  2. Mitchell, J.S.: DDC 22 : an introduction (2003) 0.09 
    0.092656106 = product of:
  0.18531221 = sum of:
    0.18531221 = sum of:
      0.07607185 = weight(_text_:index in 1936) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07607185 = score(doc=1936,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2250935 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051511593 = queryNorm
          0.33795667 = fieldWeight in 1936, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1936)
      0.10924035 = weight(_text_:22 in 1936) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.10924035 = score(doc=1936,freq=10.0), product of:
          0.18038483 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051511593 = queryNorm
          0.6055961 = fieldWeight in 1936, product of:
            3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
              10.0 = termFreq=10.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1936)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Dewey Decimal Classification and Relative Index, Edition 22 (DDC 22) will be issued simultaneously in print and web versions in July 2003. The new edition is the first full print update to the Dewey Decimal Classification system in seven years-it includes several significant updates and many new numbers and topics. DDC 22 also features some fundamental structural changes that have been introduced with the goals of promoting classifier efficiency and improving the DDC for use in a variety of applications in the web environment. Most importantly, the content of the new edition has been shaped by the needs and recommendations of Dewey users around the world. The worldwide user community has an important role in shaping the future of the DDC.
    Object
    DDC-22
  3. Hancock, B.: Subject-specific search engines : using the Harvest system to gather and maintain information on the Internet (1998) 0.09 
    0.09030705 = product of:
  0.1806141 = sum of:
    0.1806141 = sum of:
      0.13176033 = weight(_text_:index in 3238) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.13176033 = score(doc=3238,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.2250935 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051511593 = queryNorm
          0.5853582 = fieldWeight in 3238, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3238)
      0.04885377 = weight(_text_:22 in 3238) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04885377 = score(doc=3238,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18038483 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051511593 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3238, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3238)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The increasing expansion of the Internet has made resources available to users in sometimes unmanageable abundance. To help users manage this proliferation of information, librarians have begun to add URLs to their home pages. As well, specialized search engines are being used to retrieve information from selected sources in aneffort to return pertinent results. Describes the Harvest system which has been used to develop Index Antiquus, a specialized engine, for the classics and mediaeval studies. Presents a working example of how to search Index Antiquus
    Date
    6. 3.1997 16:22:15
    Object
    Index Antiquus
  4. Townsel-Winston, M.: What's new in public services? (1992) 0.09 
    0.08939178 = product of:
  0.17878357 = sum of:
    0.17878357 = sum of:
      0.12295068 = weight(_text_:index in 5550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.12295068 = score(doc=5550,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.2250935 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051511593 = queryNorm
          0.5462205 = fieldWeight in 5550, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5550)
      0.05583288 = weight(_text_:22 in 5550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05583288 = score(doc=5550,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18038483 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051511593 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5550, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5550)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    OCLC has added 5 new databases to the FirstSearch catalogue and EPIC service: ContentsFirst, ArticleFirst, Social Sciences Index, General Science Index and Event-Line. DiscLit is available in a British literature version. DiscLit: British Authors is a CD-ROM tool for high school and college literature students. Announces winners of the OCLC on the Front Line Award and Database Magazine's Product of the year as Jane Bambrick and the Online Journal of Current Clinical Trials
    Source
    OCLC micro. 8(1992) no.6, S.21-22
  5. Woodhouse, S.: 'Dewey adapts to the world, the worlds adapt Dewey' : Strategic development of the classification into the millennium (1997) 0.09 
    0.08939178 = product of:
  0.17878357 = sum of:
    0.17878357 = sum of:
      0.12295068 = weight(_text_:index in 1810) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.12295068 = score(doc=1810,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.2250935 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051511593 = queryNorm
          0.5462205 = fieldWeight in 1810, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1810)
      0.05583288 = weight(_text_:22 in 1810) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05583288 = score(doc=1810,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18038483 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051511593 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1810, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1810)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Reports on the Dewey Classification Editorial Policy Committee, Spring meeting 1997 which aimed to agree policies for the development of the classification over the next decade and put together a strategic plan to implement it. Details: themes for the future, the concept of edition, editorial policy on the relative index, manual, schedule development, and ways to determine areas for revision
    Date
    7. 8.1998 19:22:16
    Source
    Catalogue and index. 1997, no.124, S.11-12
  6. Regimbeau, G.: Acces thématiques aux oeuvres d'art contemporaines dans les banques de données (1998) 0.09 
    0.08939178 = product of:
  0.17878357 = sum of:
    0.17878357 = sum of:
      0.12295068 = weight(_text_:index in 2237) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.12295068 = score(doc=2237,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.2250935 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051511593 = queryNorm
          0.5462205 = fieldWeight in 2237, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2237)
      0.05583288 = weight(_text_:22 in 2237) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05583288 = score(doc=2237,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18038483 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051511593 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2237, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2237)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Discusses the possibilities and difficulties encountered when using a thematic index to search contemporary art databanks. Jaconde and Videomuseum, 2 French databanks, are used as examples. the core problems found in the study are the methods and limits of indexing in both systems. A thematic index should be developed that is better adapted to 20th century art, based on the complementary and reciprocal relationship between text and image, and which fully exploits hypertext
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
  7. Miksa, F.: ¬The DDC Relative Index (2006) 0.09 
    0.08932892 = product of:
  0.17865784 = sum of:
    0.17865784 = sum of:
      0.14376229 = weight(_text_:index in 5775) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.14376229 = score(doc=5775,freq=14.0), product of:
          0.2250935 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051511593 = queryNorm
          0.63867813 = fieldWeight in 5775, product of:
            3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
              14.0 = termFreq=14.0
            4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5775)
      0.03489555 = weight(_text_:22 in 5775) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03489555 = score(doc=5775,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18038483 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051511593 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5775, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5775)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The "Relative Index" of the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) is investigated over the span of its lifetime in 22 editions of the DDC as to its character as a concept indexing system, its provision of conceptual contexts for the terms it lists, and the way in which the index intersects with special tables of categories used in the system. Striking features of the index that are discussed include how the locater function of an index is expressed in it, its practice of including concepts that have not been given specific notational locations in the system, its two methods of providing conceptual contexts for indexed terms (by means of the notation of the system and by the insertion of enhancement terms that portray conceptual context), and how the index has intersected with three types of special tables of categories in the system. Critical issues raised include the indexing of constructed or synthesized complex concepts, inconsistencies in how enhancement terms are portrayed and the absence of them in some instances, the problem of equating conceptual context with disciplinary context, and problems associated with not indexing one type of special table. Summary and conclusions are extended to problems that arise in studying the index.
  8. Neely, T.Y.: Using subject terminology & classification to provide effective reference service to diverse populations (1995) 0.09 
    0.08923259 = product of:
  0.17846517 = sum of:
    0.17846517 = sum of:
      0.10867407 = weight(_text_:index in 5560) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.10867407 = score(doc=5560,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2250935 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051511593 = queryNorm
          0.48279524 = fieldWeight in 5560, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5560)
      0.0697911 = weight(_text_:22 in 5560) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0697911 = score(doc=5560,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18038483 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051511593 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5560, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5560)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Discusses the current classification system and historical treatment of subject matter relating to African American subjects. Gives examples of carrying out searches on CARL catalogues, INFOTRAC, the Reader's Guide to Periodical Literature, and Education Index
    Source
    Colorado libraries. 21(1995) no.2, S.22-26
  9. Hüskes, R.; Kleber, D.: ¬Den Server im Griff (1999) 0.09 
    0.08923259 = product of:
  0.17846517 = sum of:
    0.17846517 = sum of:
      0.10867407 = weight(_text_:index in 4008) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.10867407 = score(doc=4008,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2250935 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051511593 = queryNorm
          0.48279524 = fieldWeight in 4008, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4008)
      0.0697911 = weight(_text_:22 in 4008) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0697911 = score(doc=4008,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18038483 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051511593 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4008, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4008)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 8.1999 21:21:10
    Object
    Microsoft Index Server
  10. Fachsystematik Bremen nebst Schlüssel 1970 ff. (1970 ff) 0.09 
    0.08562617 = sum of:
  0.06817839 = product of:
    0.20453517 = sum of:
      0.20453517 = weight(_text_:3a in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.20453517 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.43671587 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051511593 = queryNorm
          0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.017447775 = product of:
    0.03489555 = sum of:
      0.03489555 = weight(_text_:22 in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03489555 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18038483 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051511593 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    1. Agrarwissenschaften 1981. - 3. Allgemeine Geographie 2.1972. - 3a. Allgemeine Naturwissenschaften 1.1973. - 4. Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, Allgemeine Literaturwissenschaft 2.1971. - 6. Allgemeines. 5.1983. - 7. Anglistik 3.1976. - 8. Astronomie, Geodäsie 4.1977. - 12. bio Biologie, bcp Biochemie-Biophysik, bot Botanik, zoo Zoologie 1981. - 13. Bremensien 3.1983. - 13a. Buch- und Bibliothekswesen 3.1975. - 14. Chemie 4.1977. - 14a. Elektrotechnik 1974. - 15 Ethnologie 2.1976. - 16,1. Geowissenschaften. Sachteil 3.1977. - 16,2. Geowissenschaften. Regionaler Teil 3.1977. - 17. Germanistik 6.1984. - 17a,1. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hil. - 17a,2. Geschichte. Teilsystematik his Neuere Geschichte. - 17a,3. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hit Neueste Geschichte. - 18. Humanbiologie 2.1983. - 19. Ingenieurwissenschaften 1974. - 20. siehe 14a. - 21. klassische Philologie 3.1977. - 22. Klinische Medizin 1975. - 23. Kunstgeschichte 2.1971. - 24. Kybernetik. 2.1975. - 25. Mathematik 3.1974. - 26. Medizin 1976. - 26a. Militärwissenschaft 1985. - 27. Musikwissenschaft 1978. - 27a. Noten 2.1974. - 28. Ozeanographie 3.1977. -29. Pädagogik 8.1985. - 30. Philosphie 3.1974. - 31. Physik 3.1974. - 33. Politik, Politische Wissenschaft, Sozialwissenschaft. Soziologie. Länderschlüssel. Register 1981. - 34. Psychologie 2.1972. - 35. Publizistik und Kommunikationswissenschaft 1985. - 36. Rechtswissenschaften 1986. - 37. Regionale Geograpgie 3.1975. - 37a. Religionswissenschaft 1970. - 38. Romanistik 3.1976. - 39. Skandinavistik 4.1985. - 40. Slavistik 1977. - 40a. Sonstige Sprachen und Literaturen 1973. - 43. Sport 4.1983. - 44. Theaterwissenschaft 1985. - 45. Theologie 2.1976. - 45a. Ur- und Frühgeschichte, Archäologie 1970. - 47. Volkskunde 1976. - 47a. Wirtschaftswissenschaften 1971 // Schlüssel: 1. Länderschlüssel 1971. - 2. Formenschlüssel (Kurzform) 1974. - 3. Personenschlüssel Literatur 5. Fassung 1968
  11. Dousa, T.M.: Categories and the architectonics of system in Julius Otto Kaiser's method of systematic indexing (2014) 0.08 
    0.08399679 = product of:
  0.16799358 = sum of:
    0.16799358 = sum of:
      0.13309802 = weight(_text_:index in 1418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.13309802 = score(doc=1418,freq=12.0), product of:
          0.2250935 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051511593 = queryNorm
          0.591301 = fieldWeight in 1418, product of:
            3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
              12.0 = termFreq=12.0
            4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1418)
      0.03489555 = weight(_text_:22 in 1418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03489555 = score(doc=1418,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18038483 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051511593 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1418, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1418)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Categories, or concepts of high generality representing the most basic kinds of entities in the world, have long been understood to be a fundamental element in the construction of knowledge organization systems (KOSs), particularly faceted ones. Commentators on facet analysis have tended to foreground the role of categories in the structuring of controlled vocabularies and the construction of compound index terms, and the implications of this for subject representation and information retrieval. Less attention has been paid to the variety of ways in which categories can shape the overall architectonic framework of a KOS. This case study explores the range of functions that categories took in structuring various aspects of an early analytico-synthetic KOS, Julius Otto Kaiser's method of Systematic Indexing (SI). Within SI, categories not only functioned as mechanisms to partition an index vocabulary into smaller groupings of terms and as elements in the construction of compound index terms but also served as means of defining the units of indexing, or index items, incorporated into an index; determining the organization of card index files and the articulation of the guide card system serving as a navigational aids thereto; and setting structural constraints to the establishment of cross-references between terms. In all these ways, Kaiser's system of categories contributed to the general systematicity of SI.
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  12. Verwer, K.: Freiheit und Verantwortung bei Hans Jonas (2011) 0.08 
    0.081814066 = product of:
  0.16362813 = sum of:
    0.16362813 = product of:
      0.4908844 = sum of:
        0.4908844 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.4908844 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.43671587 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051511593 = queryNorm
            1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.
  13. Fachsystematik Universitätsbibliothek der Fernuniversität Hagen (1978 ff) 0.08 
    0.07841306 = product of:
  0.15682612 = sum of:
    0.15682612 = product of:
      0.31365225 = sum of:
        0.31365225 = weight(_text_:index in 3593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.31365225 = score(doc=3593,freq=34.0), product of:
            0.2250935 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051511593 = queryNorm
            1.393431 = fieldWeight in 3593, product of:
              5.8309517 = tf(freq=34.0), with freq of:
                34.0 = termFreq=34.0
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3593)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    BEA-BSD: Allgemeine und vergleichene Sprach- und Literaturwissenschaft 1985 nebst Index. - BTA-DOW: Germanistik 1985 nebst Index. - HIA-HPZ: Philosphie 1985 nebst Index. - HQA-HXZ: Psychologie 1985 nebst Index. - HYA-IKZ: Erziehungswissenschaft 1985 nebst Index. - IWA-JWZ: Autoren Geisteswissenschaften 1987. - KXA-MQZ: Geschichte 1986 nebst Index. - NOA-NWZ: Sozialwissenschaften allgemein 1978. - NXA-OSZ: Soziologie 1978 nebst Index. - OTA-PGZ: Politikwissenschaft 1978 nebst Index. - PHA-QLZ: Wirtschaftwissenschaften 1978 nebst Index. - QMA-QWZ: Rechtswissenschaft 1983 nebst Index. - STA-SZW: Naturwissenschaften allgemein 1987 nebst Index. - TTA-TSZ: Mathematik 1986 nebst Index. - TTA-TZW: Informatik und Datenverarbeitung 1986 nebst Index. - UAA-UMW: Physik 1985 nebst Index. - WAA-WHW: Technik allgemein 1984 nebst Index. - XVA-YGY: Elektrotechnik 1985 nebst Index. - ZEA-ZWM: Sonstige Gebiete der Technik 1987 nebst Index
  14. Comaroni, J.P.: Use of the Dewey Decimal Classification in the United States and Canada (1978) 0.08 
    0.078217804 = product of:
  0.15643561 = sum of:
    0.15643561 = sum of:
      0.10758185 = weight(_text_:index in 1151) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.10758185 = score(doc=1151,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.2250935 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051511593 = queryNorm
          0.4779429 = fieldWeight in 1151, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1151)
      0.04885377 = weight(_text_:22 in 1151) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04885377 = score(doc=1151,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18038483 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051511593 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1151, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1151)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    A summary of a survey of the use of the DDC in libraries of the United States and Canada is presented. (5% of alle libraries in the United States and Canada use DDC; of these are at least 75% use the most recent full or abridges edition. Librarians wish to have DDC revised continuously, but they do not want the meanings of numbers changed. Any assistance that can be provided in the application of DDC is welcome. Most of the larger libraries do not believe zhat the current index provides sufficient assistance. Divisions needing revision are listed with an index number reflecting priority. DDC is seen to be warmly regarded by librarians in general and by public service librarians in particular
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 22(1978), S.402-408
  15. Perez, E.: Industrial strength database publishing : Inmagic DB/Textworks WebPublisher (1997) 0.08 
    0.078217804 = product of:
  0.15643561 = sum of:
    0.15643561 = sum of:
      0.10758185 = weight(_text_:index in 679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.10758185 = score(doc=679,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.2250935 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051511593 = queryNorm
          0.4779429 = fieldWeight in 679, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=679)
      0.04885377 = weight(_text_:22 in 679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04885377 = score(doc=679,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18038483 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051511593 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 679, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=679)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The availability of powerful indexing and database products with easy Web connections means that libraries able to gather and edit their own data are emancipated from the large vendors. The Oregon State Library staff used the Data Magician translation utility as part of a complex, but speedy, database converison project. The Oregon Index database of approximately 300.000 records was converted from a BRS database host over to the Inmagic WebPublisher system. Describes the planning and action stepts used in producing the Web accessible index database of considerable size. Participants have high ratings to effectiveness of both the translation utility and the database engine
    Date
    6. 3.1997 16:22:15
  16. Hartman, J.H.; Proebsting, T.A.; Sundaram, R.: Index-based hyperlinks (1997) 0.08 
    0.078217804 = product of:
  0.15643561 = sum of:
    0.15643561 = sum of:
      0.10758185 = weight(_text_:index in 2723) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.10758185 = score(doc=2723,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.2250935 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051511593 = queryNorm
          0.4779429 = fieldWeight in 2723, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2723)
      0.04885377 = weight(_text_:22 in 2723) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04885377 = score(doc=2723,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18038483 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051511593 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2723, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2723)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Proposes a new mechanism for implicitly specifying hyperlinks in HTML documents using indices. Indices maintain these key /a ttribute bindings over all or part of a document, and are used by browsers to create hyperlinks dynamically. Indices may also include bindings of other indices, in a hierarchical fashion. Indices are both simpler and more general than the current HTML hyperlink mechnisms. Develops a prototype browser that user index-based hyperlinks
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:08:06
  17. Arocena, G.O.; Mendelzon, A.O.; Mihaila, G.A.: Applications of a Web query language (1997) 0.08 
    0.078217804 = product of:
  0.15643561 = sum of:
    0.15643561 = sum of:
      0.10758185 = weight(_text_:index in 2738) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.10758185 = score(doc=2738,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.2250935 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051511593 = queryNorm
          0.4779429 = fieldWeight in 2738, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2738)
      0.04885377 = weight(_text_:22 in 2738) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04885377 = score(doc=2738,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18038483 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051511593 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2738, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2738)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Reports on experiences using WebSQL, a high level declarative query language for extracting information from the WWW. WebSQL takes advantage of multiplex index servers without requiring users to know about them, and integrates full-text with topology-based queries. Illustrates the use of WebSQL for application development by describing 2 applications: Web site maintenance and specialized index construction. Sketches several other possible applications. Using the library implements a client-server architecture that allows performance of interactive intelligent searches on the Web from an applet running on a browser
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:08:06
  18. Stumpf, G.: "Kerngeschäft" Sacherschließung in neuer Sicht : was gezielte intellektuelle Arbeit und maschinelle Verfahren gemeinsam bewirken können (2015) 0.08 
    0.078217804 = product of:
  0.15643561 = sum of:
    0.15643561 = sum of:
      0.10758185 = weight(_text_:index in 1703) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.10758185 = score(doc=1703,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.2250935 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051511593 = queryNorm
          0.4779429 = fieldWeight in 1703, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1703)
      0.04885377 = weight(_text_:22 in 1703) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04885377 = score(doc=1703,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18038483 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051511593 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1703, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1703)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Es handelt sich um den leicht überarbeiteten Text eines Vortrags bei der VDB-Fortbildungsveranstaltung "Wandel als Konstante: neue Aufgaben und Herausforderungen für sozialwissenschaftliche Bibliotheken" am 22./23. Januar 2015 in Berlin.
    Source
    https://opus.bibliothek.uni-augsburg.de/opus4/frontdoor/index/index/docId/3002
  19. Meho, L.I.; Rogers, Y.: Citation counting, citation ranking, and h-index of human-computer interaction researchers : a comparison of Scopus and Web of Science (2008) 0.08 
    0.07819843 = product of:
  0.15639687 = sum of:
    0.15639687 = sum of:
      0.12150131 = weight(_text_:index in 2352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.12150131 = score(doc=2352,freq=10.0), product of:
          0.2250935 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051511593 = queryNorm
          0.5397815 = fieldWeight in 2352, product of:
            3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
              10.0 = termFreq=10.0
            4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2352)
      0.03489555 = weight(_text_:22 in 2352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03489555 = score(doc=2352,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18038483 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051511593 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2352, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2352)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This study examines the differences between Scopus and Web of Science in the citation counting, citation ranking, and h-index of 22 top human-computer interaction (HCI) researchers from EQUATOR - a large British Interdisciplinary Research Collaboration project. Results indicate that Scopus provides significantly more coverage of HCI literature than Web of Science, primarily due to coverage of relevant ACM and IEEE peer-reviewed conference proceedings. No significant differences exist between the two databases if citations in journals only are compared. Although broader coverage of the literature does not significantly alter the relative citation ranking of individual researchers, Scopus helps distinguish between the researchers in a more nuanced fashion than Web of Science in both citation counting and h-index. Scopus also generates significantly different maps of citation networks of individual scholars than those generated by Web of Science. The study also presents a comparison of h-index scores based on Google Scholar with those based on the union of Scopus and Web of Science. The study concludes that Scopus can be used as a sole data source for citation-based research and evaluation in HCI, especially when citations in conference proceedings are sought, and that researchers should manually calculate h scores instead of relying on system calculations.
    Object
    h-index
  20. Leydesdorff, L.: Can networks of journal-journal citations be used as indicators of change in the social sciences? (2003) 0.08 
    0.077406034 = product of:
  0.15481207 = sum of:
    0.15481207 = sum of:
      0.11293741 = weight(_text_:index in 4460) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.11293741 = score(doc=4460,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.2250935 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051511593 = queryNorm
          0.50173557 = fieldWeight in 4460, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4460)
      0.04187466 = weight(_text_:22 in 4460) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04187466 = score(doc=4460,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18038483 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051511593 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4460, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4460)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Aggregated journal-journal citations can be used for mapping the intellectual organization of the sciences in terms of specialties because the latter can be considered as interreading communities. Can the journal-journal citations also be used as early indicators of change by comparing the files for two subsequent years? Probabilistic entropy measures enable us to analyze changes in large datasets at different levels of aggregation and in considerable detail. Compares Journal Citation Reports of the Social Science Citation Index for 1999 with similar data for 1998 and analyzes the differences using these measures. Compares the various indicators with similar developments in the Science Citation Index. Specialty formation seems a more important mechanism in the development of the social sciences than in the natural and life sciences, but the developments in the social sciences are volatile. The use of aggregate statistics based on the Science Citation Index is ill-advised in the case of the social sciences because of structural differences in the underlying dynamics.
    Date
    6.11.2005 19:02:22

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 4171
  • m 507
  • el 235
  • s 190
  • x 52
  • b 49
  • i 37
  • r 28
  • ? 14
  • p 8
  • n 4
  • d 3
  • u 2
  • z 2
  • au 1
  • fi 1
  • h 1
  • l 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications