Search (4140 results, page 2 of 207)

  1. Malsburg, C. von der: ¬The correlation theory of brain function (1981) 0.23
    0.2302891 = product of:
      0.4605782 = sum of:
        0.04605782 = product of:
          0.13817346 = sum of:
            0.13817346 = weight(_text_:3a in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13817346 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.29502282 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03479859 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.13817346 = weight(_text_:2f in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13817346 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.29502282 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03479859 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
        0.13817346 = weight(_text_:2f in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13817346 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.29502282 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03479859 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
        0.13817346 = weight(_text_:2f in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13817346 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.29502282 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03479859 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
      0.5 = coord(4/8)
    
    Source
    http%3A%2F%2Fcogprints.org%2F1380%2F1%2FvdM_correlation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0g7DvZbQPb2U7dYb49b9v_
  2. Piros, A.: Az ETO-jelzetek automatikus interpretálásának és elemzésének kérdései (2018) 0.23
    0.2302891 = product of:
      0.4605782 = sum of:
        0.04605782 = product of:
          0.13817346 = sum of:
            0.13817346 = weight(_text_:3a in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13817346 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.29502282 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03479859 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.13817346 = weight(_text_:2f in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13817346 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.29502282 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03479859 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
        0.13817346 = weight(_text_:2f in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13817346 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.29502282 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03479859 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
        0.13817346 = weight(_text_:2f in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13817346 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.29502282 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03479859 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
      0.5 = coord(4/8)
    
    Content
    Vgl. auch: New automatic interpreter for complex UDC numbers. Unter: <https%3A%2F%2Fudcc.org%2Ffiles%2FAttilaPiros_EC_36-37_2014-2015.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3kc9CwDDCWP7aArpfjrs5b>
  3. Gabler, S.: Vergabe von DDC-Sachgruppen mittels eines Schlagwort-Thesaurus (2021) 0.23
    0.2302891 = product of:
      0.4605782 = sum of:
        0.04605782 = product of:
          0.13817346 = sum of:
            0.13817346 = weight(_text_:3a in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13817346 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.29502282 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03479859 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.13817346 = weight(_text_:2f in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13817346 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.29502282 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03479859 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
        0.13817346 = weight(_text_:2f in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13817346 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.29502282 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03479859 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
        0.13817346 = weight(_text_:2f in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13817346 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.29502282 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03479859 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
      0.5 = coord(4/8)
    
    Content
    Master thesis Master of Science (Library and Information Studies) (MSc), Universität Wien. Advisor: Christoph Steiner. Vgl.: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371680244_Vergabe_von_DDC-Sachgruppen_mittels_eines_Schlagwort-Thesaurus. DOI: 10.25365/thesis.70030. Vgl. dazu die Präsentation unter: https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=0CAIQw7AJahcKEwjwoZzzytz_AhUAAAAAHQAAAAAQAg&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwiki.dnb.de%2Fdownload%2Fattachments%2F252121510%2FDA3%2520Workshop-Gabler.pdf%3Fversion%3D1%26modificationDate%3D1671093170000%26api%3Dv2&psig=AOvVaw0szwENK1or3HevgvIDOfjx&ust=1687719410889597&opi=89978449.
  4. Stojanovic, N.: Ontology-based Information Retrieval : methods and tools for cooperative query answering (2005) 0.18
    0.18423128 = product of:
      0.36846256 = sum of:
        0.036846258 = product of:
          0.110538766 = sum of:
            0.110538766 = weight(_text_:3a in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.110538766 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.29502282 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03479859 = queryNorm
                0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.110538766 = weight(_text_:2f in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.110538766 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.29502282 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03479859 = queryNorm
            0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
        0.110538766 = weight(_text_:2f in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.110538766 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.29502282 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03479859 = queryNorm
            0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
        0.110538766 = weight(_text_:2f in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.110538766 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.29502282 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03479859 = queryNorm
            0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
      0.5 = coord(4/8)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F1627&ei=tAtYUYrBNoHKtQb3l4GYBw&usg=AFQjCNHeaxKkKU3-u54LWxMNYGXaaDLCGw&sig2=8WykXWQoDKjDSdGtAakH2Q&bvm=bv.44442042,d.Yms.
  5. Skorsky, M.: Graphische Darstellung eines Thesaurus (1997) 0.11
    0.11417671 = product of:
      0.45670685 = sum of:
        0.31500176 = weight(_text_:graphische in 1051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.31500176 = score(doc=1051,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.28753728 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.2629 = idf(docFreq=30, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03479859 = queryNorm
            1.0955162 = fieldWeight in 1051, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.2629 = idf(docFreq=30, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1051)
        0.1417051 = weight(_text_:darstellung in 1051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1417051 = score(doc=1051,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19285478 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.542029 = idf(docFreq=470, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03479859 = queryNorm
            0.73477614 = fieldWeight in 1051, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.542029 = idf(docFreq=470, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1051)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
  6. Tufte, E.R.: ¬The visual display of quantitative information (1983) 0.09
    0.09419098 = product of:
      0.3767639 = sum of:
        0.25986317 = weight(_text_:graphische in 3734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.25986317 = score(doc=3734,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.28753728 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.2629 = idf(docFreq=30, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03479859 = queryNorm
            0.9037547 = fieldWeight in 3734, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.2629 = idf(docFreq=30, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3734)
        0.116900735 = weight(_text_:darstellung in 3734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.116900735 = score(doc=3734,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19285478 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.542029 = idf(docFreq=470, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03479859 = queryNorm
            0.6061594 = fieldWeight in 3734, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.542029 = idf(docFreq=470, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3734)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    RSWK
    Statistik / Graphische Darstellung / Diagramm / Visualisierung
    Subject
    Statistik / Graphische Darstellung / Diagramm / Visualisierung
  7. Bauer, G.: Graphische Darstellung interdisziplinärer Wissensstrukturen (2004) 0.09
    0.0909366 = product of:
      0.24249761 = sum of:
        0.15750088 = weight(_text_:graphische in 3158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15750088 = score(doc=3158,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.28753728 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.2629 = idf(docFreq=30, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03479859 = queryNorm
            0.5477581 = fieldWeight in 3158, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.2629 = idf(docFreq=30, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3158)
        0.07085255 = weight(_text_:darstellung in 3158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07085255 = score(doc=3158,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19285478 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.542029 = idf(docFreq=470, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03479859 = queryNorm
            0.36738807 = fieldWeight in 3158, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.542029 = idf(docFreq=470, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3158)
        0.014144185 = product of:
          0.02828837 = sum of:
            0.02828837 = weight(_text_:22 in 3158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02828837 = score(doc=3158,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12185873 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03479859 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3158, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3158)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.375 = coord(3/8)
    
    Pages
    S.15-22
  8. Tufte, E.R.: Envisioning information (1990) 0.08
    0.080735125 = product of:
      0.3229405 = sum of:
        0.22273986 = weight(_text_:graphische in 3733) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22273986 = score(doc=3733,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.28753728 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.2629 = idf(docFreq=30, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03479859 = queryNorm
            0.7746469 = fieldWeight in 3733, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.2629 = idf(docFreq=30, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3733)
        0.10020064 = weight(_text_:darstellung in 3733) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10020064 = score(doc=3733,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19285478 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.542029 = idf(docFreq=470, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03479859 = queryNorm
            0.5195652 = fieldWeight in 3733, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.542029 = idf(docFreq=470, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3733)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Classification
    Geo A 287 / Graphische Darstellung
    SBB
    Geo A 287 / Graphische Darstellung
  9. Vogt, F.; Wille, R.: TOSCANA - a graphical tool for analyzing and exploring data (1995) 0.08
    0.08039279 = product of:
      0.32157117 = sum of:
        0.30271226 = weight(_text_:diagrams in 1901) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.30271226 = score(doc=1901,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.2623119 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.538004 = idf(docFreq=63, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03479859 = queryNorm
            1.1540165 = fieldWeight in 1901, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              7.538004 = idf(docFreq=63, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1901)
        0.018858913 = product of:
          0.037717827 = sum of:
            0.037717827 = weight(_text_:22 in 1901) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037717827 = score(doc=1901,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12185873 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03479859 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1901, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1901)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    TOSCANA is a computer program which allows an online interaction with larger data bases to analyse and explore data conceptually. It uses labelled line diagrams of concept lattices to communicate knowledge coded in given data. The basic problem to create online presentations of concept lattices is solved by composing prepared diagrams to nested line diagrams. A larger number of applications in different areas have already shown that TOSCANA is a useful tool for many purposes
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 22(1995) no.2, S.78-81
  10. Kuhlen, R.; Hammwöhner, R.; Sonnenberger, G.; Thiel, U.: TWRM-TOPOGRAPHIC : ein wissensbasiertes System zur situationsgerechten Aufbereitung und Präsentation von Textinformation in graphischen Retrievaldialogen (1988) 0.08
    0.075780496 = product of:
      0.20208132 = sum of:
        0.13125072 = weight(_text_:graphische in 3113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13125072 = score(doc=3113,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.28753728 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.2629 = idf(docFreq=30, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03479859 = queryNorm
            0.45646507 = fieldWeight in 3113, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.2629 = idf(docFreq=30, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3113)
        0.059043787 = weight(_text_:darstellung in 3113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059043787 = score(doc=3113,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19285478 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.542029 = idf(docFreq=470, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03479859 = queryNorm
            0.30615672 = fieldWeight in 3113, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.542029 = idf(docFreq=470, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3113)
        0.011786821 = product of:
          0.023573643 = sum of:
            0.023573643 = weight(_text_:22 in 3113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023573643 = score(doc=3113,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12185873 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03479859 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3113, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3113)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.375 = coord(3/8)
    
    Abstract
    Ausgehend von einer Diskussion der Gestaltungskonzeptionen und der Leistungsfähigkeit heutiger Volltext-Retrieval-Systeme wird ein Überblick über den Leistungsumfang des für die Aufbereitung und Präsentation von Textinformation zuständigen Systems TWRM-TOPOGRAPHIC gegeben. TWRM-TOPOGRAPHIC ist Teil eines neuartigen Informationssystems, das sich auf inhaltsorientierte Repräsentation von Volltexten stützt. Die beiden wesentlichsten Leistungsmerkmale von TWRM-TOPOGRAPHIC sind die graphische Retrievaldialogführung und die flexible, situationsgerechte Aufbereitung und Präsentation von Textwissen: Die Dialogführung erlaubt dem Benutzer die direkte Navigation in den auf dem Bildschirm graphisch dargestellten Wissensstrukturen, die Selektion dargestellter Objekte zur Formulierung einer Query sowie das Wechseln des Abstraktionsniveaus der dargestellten Textinformation. Die Aufbereitung und die Präsentation von Textwissen sind kognitiv-ergonomisch begründet und berücksichtigen sowohl die begrenzte Aufnahmekapazität der Benutzer als auch die Bedeutung der zeitlichen Anordnung von Informationseinheiten für die Wahmehmungs- und Gedächtnisleistung der Rezipienten. Textwissen wird in unterschiedlichen Abstraktionsstufen präsentiert: von einer sehr generischen Ebene über Wissensgraphen, automatisch generierten Abstracts bis zur diskursiven Form der Textpassage. Die Generierungskomponente des Systems leistet einen Beitrag zum situationsgerechten Systemverhalten dadurch, daß sie aus semantischen Text-Repräsentationsstrukturen unter Berücksichtigung textueller Wohlgeformtheitsbedingungen benutzerangepaßte Abstracts mit unterschiedlichem Themenschwerpunkt und variabler Ausführlichkeit produziert. Die Erprobung verschiedener LayoutVerfahren im Projekt TWRM-TOPOGRAPHIC wird durch ein flexibles, objektorientiert spezifiziertes User-Interface-Mangagement-System (UIMS) unterstützt, dessen Objektklassen und deren Interaktionsmöglichkeiten vorgestellt werden. Die Darstellung des Systems wird mit einem ausführlichen Dialogbeispiel abgeschlossen, das die Funktion des Interface und die Wirkung der drei zentralen Operatoren (Select, Zoom und Browse) im Retrievaldialog illustriert.
    Date
    15. 1.2005 14:10:22
  11. Ohly, H.P.: Erstellung und Interpretation von semantischen Karten am Beispiel des Themas 'Soziologische Beratung' (2004) 0.08
    0.07516293 = product of:
      0.30065173 = sum of:
        0.183751 = weight(_text_:graphische in 3176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.183751 = score(doc=3176,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.28753728 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.2629 = idf(docFreq=30, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03479859 = queryNorm
            0.6390511 = fieldWeight in 3176, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.2629 = idf(docFreq=30, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3176)
        0.116900735 = weight(_text_:darstellung in 3176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.116900735 = score(doc=3176,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19285478 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.542029 = idf(docFreq=470, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03479859 = queryNorm
            0.6061594 = fieldWeight in 3176, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.542029 = idf(docFreq=470, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3176)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    Bei der Analyse von Informationsströmen und -systemen mit statistischen Methoden werden die Ergebnisse gerne in Grafiken dargestellt, da diese intuitiv schneller zu erfassen sind und auch Laien ohne tiefere statistische Vorbildung eine Anschauung bekommen können. Klassisches Beispiel ist etwa die graphische Darstellung der Verluste des napoleonischen Heeres in Russland (Abb. 1). Unbeachtet bleibt dabei oft, dass trotz Einfachheit der Darstellung meist große Mengen von Daten herangezogen werden und diese dann lediglich nach wenigen Gesichtspunkten in eine Grafik projiziert werdens, was leicht auch zu Fehleinschätzungen führen kann. Es sind darum geeignete Verfahren auszuwählen, die eine adäquate und möglichst 'objektive' Interpretation ermöglichen.
  12. Wainer, H.: Picturing the uncertain world : how to understand, communicate, and control uncertainty through graphical display (2009) 0.05
    0.05382342 = product of:
      0.21529368 = sum of:
        0.14849325 = weight(_text_:graphische in 1451) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14849325 = score(doc=1451,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.28753728 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.2629 = idf(docFreq=30, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03479859 = queryNorm
            0.5164313 = fieldWeight in 1451, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.2629 = idf(docFreq=30, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1451)
        0.06680042 = weight(_text_:darstellung in 1451) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06680042 = score(doc=1451,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19285478 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.542029 = idf(docFreq=470, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03479859 = queryNorm
            0.3463768 = fieldWeight in 1451, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.542029 = idf(docFreq=470, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1451)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    RSWK
    Statistik / Unsicherheit / Graphische Darstellung (BVB)
    Subject
    Statistik / Unsicherheit / Graphische Darstellung (BVB)
  13. Thelwall, M.; Sud, P.; Wilkinson, D.: Link and co-inlink network diagrams with URL citations or title mentions (2012) 0.05
    0.050245497 = product of:
      0.20098199 = sum of:
        0.18919517 = weight(_text_:diagrams in 57) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18919517 = score(doc=57,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.2623119 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.538004 = idf(docFreq=63, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03479859 = queryNorm
            0.7212603 = fieldWeight in 57, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              7.538004 = idf(docFreq=63, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=57)
        0.011786821 = product of:
          0.023573643 = sum of:
            0.023573643 = weight(_text_:22 in 57) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023573643 = score(doc=57,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12185873 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03479859 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 57, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=57)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    Webometric network analyses have been used to map the connectivity of groups of websites to identify clusters, important sites or overall structure. Such analyses have mainly been based upon hyperlink counts, the number of hyperlinks between a pair of websites, although some have used title mentions or URL citations instead. The ability to automatically gather hyperlink counts from Yahoo! ceased in April 2011 and the ability to manually gather such counts was due to cease by early 2012, creating a need for alternatives. This article assesses URL citations and title mentions as possible replacements for hyperlinks in both binary and weighted direct link and co-inlink network diagrams. It also assesses three different types of data for the network connections: hit count estimates, counts of matching URLs, and filtered counts of matching URLs. Results from analyses of U.S. library and information science departments and U.K. universities give evidence that metrics based upon URLs or titles can be appropriate replacements for metrics based upon hyperlinks for both binary and weighted networks, although filtered counts of matching URLs are necessary to give the best results for co-title mention and co-URL citation network diagrams.
    Date
    6. 4.2012 18:16:22
  14. Soergel, D.: Unleashing the power of data through organization : structure and connections for meaning, learning and discovery (2015) 0.05
    0.050245497 = product of:
      0.20098199 = sum of:
        0.18919517 = weight(_text_:diagrams in 2376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18919517 = score(doc=2376,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.2623119 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.538004 = idf(docFreq=63, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03479859 = queryNorm
            0.7212603 = fieldWeight in 2376, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              7.538004 = idf(docFreq=63, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2376)
        0.011786821 = product of:
          0.023573643 = sum of:
            0.023573643 = weight(_text_:22 in 2376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023573643 = score(doc=2376,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12185873 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03479859 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2376, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2376)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    Knowledge organization is needed everywhere. Its importance is marked by its pervasiveness. This paper will show many areas, tasks, and functions where proper use of knowledge organization, construed as broadly as the term implies, provides support for learning and understanding, for sense making and meaning making, for inference, and for discovery by people and computer programs and thereby will make the world a better place. The paper focuses not on metadata but rather on structuring and representing the actual data or knowledge itself and argues for more communication between the largely separated KO, ontology, data modeling, and semantic web communities to address the many problems that need better solutions. In particular, the paper discusses the application of knowledge organization in knowledge bases for question answering and cognitive systems, knowledge bases for information extraction from text or multimedia, linked data, big data and data analytics, electronic health records as one example, influence diagrams (causal maps), dynamic system models, process diagrams, concept maps, and other node-link diagrams, information systems in organizations, knowledge organization for understanding and learning, and knowledge transfer between domains. The paper argues for moving beyond triples to a more powerful representation using entities and multi-way relationships but not attributes.
    Date
    27.11.2015 20:52:22
  15. Runge, S.: Wege und Möglichkeiten gemeinschaftlicher Sachkatalogisierung (1936) 0.05
    0.049581423 = product of:
      0.1983257 = sum of:
        0.1653226 = weight(_text_:darstellung in 2007) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1653226 = score(doc=2007,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19285478 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.542029 = idf(docFreq=470, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03479859 = queryNorm
            0.8572388 = fieldWeight in 2007, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.542029 = idf(docFreq=470, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2007)
        0.0330031 = product of:
          0.0660062 = sum of:
            0.0660062 = weight(_text_:22 in 2007) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0660062 = score(doc=2007,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12185873 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03479859 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2007, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2007)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Footnote
    Auszug der Darstellung unter gleichem Titel in 'Beiträge zur Sachkatalogisierung'. 1937. S.1-22.
  16. Gardner, M.: Faszinierende Mosaike (1979) 0.05
    0.049581423 = product of:
      0.1983257 = sum of:
        0.1653226 = weight(_text_:darstellung in 4230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1653226 = score(doc=4230,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19285478 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.542029 = idf(docFreq=470, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03479859 = queryNorm
            0.8572388 = fieldWeight in 4230, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.542029 = idf(docFreq=470, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4230)
        0.0330031 = product of:
          0.0660062 = sum of:
            0.0660062 = weight(_text_:22 in 4230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0660062 = score(doc=4230,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12185873 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03479859 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4230, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4230)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Content
    Darin auch eine Darstellung der Penrose-Kacheln mit mehreren Abbildungen
    Source
    Spektrum der Wissenschaft. 1979, H.11, S.22-33
  17. Seruga, J.: Object-oriented modeling of a library information system (1997) 0.05
    0.048407476 = product of:
      0.1936299 = sum of:
        0.174771 = weight(_text_:diagrams in 8477) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.174771 = score(doc=8477,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2623119 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.538004 = idf(docFreq=63, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03479859 = queryNorm
            0.6662717 = fieldWeight in 8477, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.538004 = idf(docFreq=63, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8477)
        0.018858913 = product of:
          0.037717827 = sum of:
            0.037717827 = weight(_text_:22 in 8477) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037717827 = score(doc=8477,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12185873 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03479859 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 8477, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8477)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    Analyses the OPAC at the Australian Catholic University in New South Wales, Castle Hill Campus using an object oriented model following Rumbaugh's methodology, as described in 'Object oriented modelling and design, 1991'. The process of analysis, although difficult, is one of the most effective ways of determining each function of a system of this kind. The methodology is especially useful as the data structure, behavioural and functional aspects of the system are displayed in separate diagrams. This is an advantage for those analysing systems, who can display many factors without confusing different aspects involved in the analysis process
    Source
    LASIE. 28(1997) no.4, S.22-34
  18. Kuhlen, R.; Hammwöhner, R.; Sonnenberger, G.; Thiel, U.: TWRM-TOPOGRAPHIC : ein wissensbasiertes System zur situationsgerechten Aufbereitung und Präsentation von Textinformation in graphischen Retrievaldialogen (1989) 0.05
    0.047573626 = product of:
      0.1902945 = sum of:
        0.13125072 = weight(_text_:graphische in 3112) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13125072 = score(doc=3112,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.28753728 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.2629 = idf(docFreq=30, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03479859 = queryNorm
            0.45646507 = fieldWeight in 3112, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.2629 = idf(docFreq=30, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3112)
        0.059043787 = weight(_text_:darstellung in 3112) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059043787 = score(doc=3112,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19285478 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.542029 = idf(docFreq=470, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03479859 = queryNorm
            0.30615672 = fieldWeight in 3112, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.542029 = idf(docFreq=470, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3112)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    Ausgehend von einer Diskussion der Gestaltungskonzeptionen und der Leistungsfähigkeit heutiger Volltext-Retrieval-Systeme wird ein Überblick über den Leistungsumfang des für die Aufbereitung und Präsentation von Textinformation zuständigen Systems TWRM-TOPOGRAPHIC gegeben. TWRM-TOPOGRAPHIC ist Teil eines neuartigen Informationssystems, das sich auf inhaltsorientierte Repräsentation von Volltexten stützt. Die beiden wesentlichsten Leistungsmerkmale von TWRM-TOPOGRAPHIC sind die graphische Retrievaldialogführung und die flexible, situationsgerechte Aufbereitung und Präsentation von Textwissen: Die Dialogführung erlaubt dem Benutzer die direkte Navigation in den auf dem Bildschirm graphisch dargestellten Wissensstrukturen, die Selektion dargestellter Objekte zur Formulierung einer Query sowie das Wechseln des Abstraktionsniveaus der dargestellten Textinformation. Die Aufbereitung und die Präsentation von Textwissen sind kognitiv-ergonomisch begründet und berücksichtigen sowohl die begrenzte Aufnahmekapazität der Benutzer als auch die Bedeutung der zeitlichen Anordnung von Informationseinheiten für die Wahmehmungs- und Gedächtnisleistung der Rezipienten. Textwissen wird in unterschiedlichen Abstraktionsstufen präsentiert: von einer sehr generischen Ebene über Wissensgraphen, automatisch generierten Abstracts bis zur diskursiven Form der Textpassage. Die Generierungskomponente des Systems leistet einen Beitrag zum situationsgerechten Systemverhalten dadurch, daß sie aus semantischen Text-Repräsentationsstrukturen unter Berücksichtigung textueller Wohlgeformtheitsbedingungen benutzerangepaßte Abstracts mit unterschiedlichem Themenschwerpunkt und variabler Ausführlichkeit produziert. Die Erprobung verschiedener LayoutVerfahren im Projekt TWRM-TOPOGRAPHIC wird durch ein flexibles, objektorientiert spezifiziertes User-Interface-Mangagement-System (UIMS) unterstützt, dessen Objektklassen und deren Interaktionsmöglichkeiten vorgestellt werden. Die Darstellung des Systems wird mit einem ausführlichen Dialogbeispiel abgeschlossen, das die Funktion des Interface und die Wirkung der drei zentralen Operatoren (Select, Zoom und Browse) im Retrievaldialog illustriert.
  19. Vages Information Retrieval und graphische Benutzungsoberflächen : Beispiel Werkstoffinformation (1997) 0.05
    0.04593775 = product of:
      0.367502 = sum of:
        0.367502 = weight(_text_:graphische in 2060) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.367502 = score(doc=2060,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.28753728 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.2629 = idf(docFreq=30, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03479859 = queryNorm
            1.2781022 = fieldWeight in 2060, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.2629 = idf(docFreq=30, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2060)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
  20. Hemmje, M.; Kunkel, C.; Willett, A.: ¬Eine graphische Benutzerschnittstelle für ein Volltext-Retrieval-System auf der Basis interaktiver dreidimensionaler Visualisierung (1994) 0.05
    0.04593775 = product of:
      0.367502 = sum of:
        0.367502 = weight(_text_:graphische in 457) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.367502 = score(doc=457,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.28753728 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.2629 = idf(docFreq=30, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03479859 = queryNorm
            1.2781022 = fieldWeight in 457, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.2629 = idf(docFreq=30, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=457)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    

Languages

Types

  • a 3304
  • m 503
  • el 193
  • s 163
  • x 75
  • b 40
  • i 29
  • r 21
  • ? 9
  • d 7
  • n 4
  • p 4
  • u 2
  • z 2
  • au 1
  • h 1
  • l 1
  • vi 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications