Search (10 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Cronin, B."
  1. Cronin, B.: Vernacular and vehicular language (2009) 0.02
    0.024859268 = product of:
      0.049718536 = sum of:
        0.049718536 = product of:
          0.09943707 = sum of:
            0.09943707 = weight(_text_:22 in 7192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09943707 = score(doc=7192,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18357785 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05242341 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7192, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7192)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2009 11:44:11
  2. Cronin, B.: Thinking about data (2013) 0.02
    0.024859268 = product of:
      0.049718536 = sum of:
        0.049718536 = product of:
          0.09943707 = sum of:
            0.09943707 = weight(_text_:22 in 4347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09943707 = score(doc=4347,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18357785 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05242341 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4347, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4347)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2013 16:18:36
  3. Cronin, B.: ¬The writing on the wall (2015) 0.02
    0.021307945 = product of:
      0.04261589 = sum of:
        0.04261589 = product of:
          0.08523178 = sum of:
            0.08523178 = weight(_text_:22 in 7297) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08523178 = score(doc=7297,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18357785 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05242341 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 7297, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7297)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    26. 4.2015 19:27:22
  4. Davenport, E.; Cronin, B.: Knowledge management : Semantic drift or conceptual shift? (2000) 0.02
    0.01775662 = product of:
      0.03551324 = sum of:
        0.03551324 = product of:
          0.07102648 = sum of:
            0.07102648 = weight(_text_:22 in 2277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07102648 = score(doc=2277,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18357785 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05242341 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2277, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2277)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    31. 7.2001 20:22:57
  5. Cronin, B.: Language matters (2012) 0.01
    0.012363703 = product of:
      0.024727406 = sum of:
        0.024727406 = product of:
          0.049454812 = sum of:
            0.049454812 = weight(_text_:2 in 4505) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049454812 = score(doc=4505,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05242341 = queryNorm
                0.38199544 = fieldWeight in 4505, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4505)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.2, S.217
  6. Snyder, H.; Cronin, B.; Davenport, E.: What's the use of citation? : Citation analysis as a literature topic in selected disciplines of the social sciences (1995) 0.01
    0.0074935355 = product of:
      0.014987071 = sum of:
        0.014987071 = product of:
          0.029974142 = sum of:
            0.029974142 = weight(_text_:2 in 1825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029974142 = score(doc=1825,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05242341 = queryNorm
                0.2315242 = fieldWeight in 1825, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1825)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Reports results of a study to investigate the place and role of citation analysis in selected disciplines in the social sciences, including library and information science. 5 core library and information science periodicals: Journal of documentation; Library quarterly; Journal of the American Society for Information Science; College and research libraries; and the Journal of information science, were studed to determine the percentage of articles devoted to citation analysis and develop an indictive typology to categorize the major foci of research being conducted under the rubric of citation analysis. Similar analysis was conducted for periodicals in other social sciences disciplines. Demonstrates how the rubric can be used to dertermine how citatiion analysis is applied within library and information science and other disciplines. By isolating citation from bibliometrics in general, this work is differentiated from other, previous studies. Analysis of data from a 10 year sample of transdisciplinary social sciences literature suggests that 2 application areas predominate: the validity of citation as an evaluation tool; and impact or performance studies of authors, periodicals, and institutions
    Source
    Journal of information science. 21(1995) no.2, S.75-85
  7. Cronin, B.: Metatheorizing citation (1998) 0.01
    0.007064973 = product of:
      0.014129946 = sum of:
        0.014129946 = product of:
          0.028259892 = sum of:
            0.028259892 = weight(_text_:2 in 5127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028259892 = score(doc=5127,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05242341 = queryNorm
                0.2182831 = fieldWeight in 5127, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5127)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Reviews a variety of perspectives on citation. Argues that citations have multiple articulations in that they inform our understanding of the sociocultural, cognitive, and textual aspects of scientific communication. Proposes 2 metatheoretical frameworks as a means of negotiating the interpretative differences which characterize the various discourse communities concerned with citation theory and practice
  8. Cronin, B.; Shaw, D.; LaBarre, K.: Visible, Less Visible, and Invisible Work : Patterns of Collaboration in 20th Century Chemistry (2004) 0.01
    0.0061818515 = product of:
      0.012363703 = sum of:
        0.012363703 = product of:
          0.024727406 = sum of:
            0.024727406 = weight(_text_:2 in 2094) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024727406 = score(doc=2094,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05242341 = queryNorm
                0.19099772 = fieldWeight in 2094, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2094)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 55(2004) no.2, S.160-168
  9. Cronin, B.; Snyder, H.; Atkins, H.: Comparative citation rankings of authors in mongraphic and journal literature : a study of sociology (1997) 0.01
    0.0061818515 = product of:
      0.012363703 = sum of:
        0.012363703 = product of:
          0.024727406 = sum of:
            0.024727406 = weight(_text_:2 in 4709) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024727406 = score(doc=4709,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05242341 = queryNorm
                0.19099772 = fieldWeight in 4709, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4709)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Describes a study which examined the scholarly literature of sociology. Tens of thousands of references from monographs and leading academic journals were analyzed. The relative rankings of authors who were highly cited in the monographic literature did not change in the journal literature of the same period. However, there was only a small overlap between the most highly cited authors based on the journal sample and those based on the monograph sample. The lack of correlation suggests that there may be 2 distinct populations of highly cited authors
  10. Lee, C.J.; Sugimoto, C.R.; Zhang, G.; Cronin, B.: Bias in peer review (2013) 0.01
    0.0052987295 = product of:
      0.010597459 = sum of:
        0.010597459 = product of:
          0.021194918 = sum of:
            0.021194918 = weight(_text_:2 in 525) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021194918 = score(doc=525,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05242341 = queryNorm
                0.16371232 = fieldWeight in 525, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=525)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.1, S.2-17