-
Klein, R.D.: ¬The problem of cataloguing world literature using the Nippon Decimal Classification (1994)
0.01
0.0142052965 = product of:
0.028410593 = sum of:
0.028410593 = product of:
0.056821186 = sum of:
0.056821186 = weight(_text_:22 in 867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056821186 = score(doc=867,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18357785 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05242341 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 867, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=867)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The Nippon Decimal Classification (NDC) system, extensively used in Japanese libraries, was devised in 1929. It is difficult to use NDC to classify world literature, such as fiction in English by non American, non British writers. This is not necessarily straightforward in other classification schemes but a survey of 40 Japanese university libraries, of which 24 responded, showed remarkable inconsistencies in the treatment of 22 world literature authors. NDC clearly needs updating to deal with this problem
-
Mirorikawa, N.: Structures of classification systems : hierarchical and multidimensional (1996)
0.01
0.010707281 = product of:
0.021414561 = sum of:
0.021414561 = product of:
0.042829122 = sum of:
0.042829122 = weight(_text_:2 in 6583) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042829122 = score(doc=6583,freq=6.0), product of:
0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.05242341 = queryNorm
0.33081776 = fieldWeight in 6583, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6583)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Considers classification systems from a structural point of view. Distinguishes between 2 kinds of methods of categorization of classification systems: the first categorized by structure, either hierarchical or multidimensional; and the second by style of expression, either enumerative or sythetic. Identifies 4 leading classification systems according to their structures: DDC, LCC, UDC and Colon Classification. Focuses on DDC referring to 2 interpretatives of its structure, one of which is hierarchical and the other is partially multidimensional. Also relates this to the matter of interpretation of the notation '0', interpreted in one instance as 'generalities', and in another as 'coordination sign'
- Source
- Annals of Japan Society of Library Science. 42(1996) no.2, S.99-110
-
ueda, K.: Simplified plan for a new maintenance system for three tools : Basic subject Headings, Nippon Decimal classification, and Nippon Cataloguing Rules (2000)
0.01
0.010597459 = product of:
0.021194918 = sum of:
0.021194918 = product of:
0.042389836 = sum of:
0.042389836 = weight(_text_:2 in 748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042389836 = score(doc=748,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.05242341 = queryNorm
0.32742465 = fieldWeight in 748, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=748)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Toshokan-Kai. 52(2000) no.1, S.2-11
-
Takeda, N.: Problems in hierarchical structures in thesauri : their influences on the results of information retrieval (1994)
0.01
0.007064973 = product of:
0.014129946 = sum of:
0.014129946 = product of:
0.028259892 = sum of:
0.028259892 = weight(_text_:2 in 2642) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028259892 = score(doc=2642,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.05242341 = queryNorm
0.2182831 = fieldWeight in 2642, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2642)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- In online retrieval search results do not always match the intent in spite of using correct keywords (descriptors). One of the causes of this problem is found in the hierarchical structures of the thesaurus, which often contains relations between broader and narrower concepts, the opposite of which is not necessarily true. Some examples are described from 2 thesauri, MeSH and JICST. In these cases searchers need to make an effort to increase precision
-
Ueda, S.: Online public access catalogues (OPACs) of university libraries in Japan (1995)
0.01
0.007064973 = product of:
0.014129946 = sum of:
0.014129946 = product of:
0.028259892 = sum of:
0.028259892 = weight(_text_:2 in 3342) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028259892 = score(doc=3342,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.05242341 = queryNorm
0.2182831 = fieldWeight in 3342, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3342)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Annals of Japan Society of Library Science. 41(1995) no.2, S.81-88
-
Hosono, K.: Information retrieval functions in digital libraries (1996)
0.01
0.007064973 = product of:
0.014129946 = sum of:
0.014129946 = product of:
0.028259892 = sum of:
0.028259892 = weight(_text_:2 in 5722) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028259892 = score(doc=5722,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.05242341 = queryNorm
0.2182831 = fieldWeight in 5722, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5722)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Pharmaceutical library bulletin [=Yakugaku Toshokan]. 41(1996) no.2, S.91-99
-
Hirawa, M.: Role of keywords in the network searching era (1998)
0.01
0.007064973 = product of:
0.014129946 = sum of:
0.014129946 = product of:
0.028259892 = sum of:
0.028259892 = weight(_text_:2 in 3446) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028259892 = score(doc=3446,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.05242341 = queryNorm
0.2182831 = fieldWeight in 3446, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3446)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Igaku Toshokan (Journal of the Japan Medical Library Association). 45(1998) no.2, S.222-227
-
Anzai, H.; Yamamoto, T.; Ishizuka, H.: Experimental service of cataloguing database through WWW (1996)
0.01
0.0061818515 = product of:
0.012363703 = sum of:
0.012363703 = product of:
0.024727406 = sum of:
0.024727406 = weight(_text_:2 in 509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024727406 = score(doc=509,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.05242341 = queryNorm
0.19099772 = fieldWeight in 509, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=509)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- ULIS. 15(1996) no.2, S.1-16
-
Voshida, K.: ¬A study on improving subject access to the OPAC : a survey of catalogue use comparing an OPAC and a card catalogue in a private university library (1994)
0.01
0.0052987295 = product of:
0.010597459 = sum of:
0.010597459 = product of:
0.021194918 = sum of:
0.021194918 = weight(_text_:2 in 753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021194918 = score(doc=753,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.05242341 = queryNorm
0.16371232 = fieldWeight in 753, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=753)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Annals of Japan Society of Library Science. 40(1994) no.2, S.71-82
-
Midorikawa, N.: ¬A discussion of the concepts of facets from the viewpoint of the structures of classification systems (1997)
0.01
0.0052987295 = product of:
0.010597459 = sum of:
0.010597459 = product of:
0.021194918 = sum of:
0.021194918 = weight(_text_:2 in 1806) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021194918 = score(doc=1806,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.05242341 = queryNorm
0.16371232 = fieldWeight in 1806, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1806)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- 2 concepts of facets have been used in studies of classification systems: one for systems which take hierarchical structure and the other for systems which take multidimensional structure. Both correspond to 'principles of division'. The concepts of facets in multidimensional structure systems is used for addressing a subject from many aspects so should equate to the broadest principle of division in order to grasp a multiplicity of aspects. The concept of facets used in hierarchical systems addresses only the significance of a coherent set of items. This concept is not distinguished from the principle of division and there is no purpose in introducing a concept of facets into hierarchical systems in addition to the principle of division
