Search (21 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Folksonomies"
  1. Broughton, V.: Automatic metadata generation : Digital resource description without human intervention (2007) 0.02
    0.021307945 = product of:
      0.04261589 = sum of:
        0.04261589 = product of:
          0.08523178 = sum of:
            0.08523178 = weight(_text_:22 in 6048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08523178 = score(doc=6048,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18357785 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05242341 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6048, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6048)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 9.2007 15:41:14
  2. Catarino, M.E.; Baptista, A.A.: Relating folksonomies with Dublin Core (2008) 0.01
    0.012555826 = product of:
      0.025111653 = sum of:
        0.025111653 = product of:
          0.050223306 = sum of:
            0.050223306 = weight(_text_:22 in 2652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050223306 = score(doc=2652,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18357785 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05242341 = queryNorm
                0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2652, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2652)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.14-22
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  3. Wesch, M.: Information R/evolution (2006) 0.01
    0.012429634 = product of:
      0.024859268 = sum of:
        0.024859268 = product of:
          0.049718536 = sum of:
            0.049718536 = weight(_text_:22 in 1267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049718536 = score(doc=1267,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18357785 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05242341 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1267, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1267)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    5. 1.2008 19:22:48
  4. Morrison, P.J.: Tagging and searching : search retrieval effectiveness of folksonomies on the World Wide Web (2008) 0.01
    0.010653973 = product of:
      0.021307945 = sum of:
        0.021307945 = product of:
          0.04261589 = sum of:
            0.04261589 = weight(_text_:22 in 2109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04261589 = score(doc=2109,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18357785 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05242341 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2109, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2109)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    1. 8.2008 12:39:22
  5. Kim, H.L.; Scerri, S.; Breslin, J.G.; Decker, S.; Kim, H.G.: ¬The state of the art in tag ontologies : a semantic model for tagging and folksonomies (2008) 0.01
    0.00887831 = product of:
      0.01775662 = sum of:
        0.01775662 = product of:
          0.03551324 = sum of:
            0.03551324 = weight(_text_:22 in 2650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03551324 = score(doc=2650,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18357785 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05242341 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2650, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2650)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  6. Braun, M.: Lesezeichen zum Stöbern : "Social bookmark"-Seiten setzen auf die Empfehlungen ihrer Nutzer (2007) 0.01
    0.0071026483 = product of:
      0.0142052965 = sum of:
        0.0142052965 = product of:
          0.028410593 = sum of:
            0.028410593 = weight(_text_:22 in 3373) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028410593 = score(doc=3373,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18357785 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05242341 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3373, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3373)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    3. 5.1997 8:44:22
  7. Peters, I.: Folksonomies und kollaborative Informationsdienste : eine Alternative zur Websuche? (2011) 0.01
    0.007064973 = product of:
      0.014129946 = sum of:
        0.014129946 = product of:
          0.028259892 = sum of:
            0.028259892 = weight(_text_:2 in 343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028259892 = score(doc=343,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05242341 = queryNorm
                0.2182831 = fieldWeight in 343, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=343)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Handbuch Internet-Suchmaschinen, 2: Neue Entwicklungen in der Web-Suche. Hrsg.: D. Lewandowski
  8. Sauperl, A.: UDC and Folksonomies (2010) 0.01
    0.006244613 = product of:
      0.012489226 = sum of:
        0.012489226 = product of:
          0.024978451 = sum of:
            0.024978451 = weight(_text_:2 in 4069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024978451 = score(doc=4069,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05242341 = queryNorm
                0.19293682 = fieldWeight in 4069, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4069)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Social tagging systems, known as "folksonomies," represent an important part of web resource discovery as they enable free and unrestricted browsing through information space. Folksonomies consisting of subject designators (tags) assigned by users, however, have one important drawback: they do not express semantic relationships, either hierarchical or associative, between tags. As a consequence, the use of tags to browse information resources requires moving from one resource to another, based on coincidence and not on the pre-established meaningful or logical connections that may exist between related resources. We suggest that the semantic structure of the Universal Decimal Classification (UDC) may be used in complementing and supporting tag-based browsing. In this work, two specific questions were investigated: 1) Are terms used as tags in folksonomies included in the UDC?; and, 2) Which facets of UDC match the characteristics of documents or information objects that are tagged in folksonomies? A collection of the most popular tags from Amazon, LibraryThing, Delicious, and 43Things was investigated. The universal nature of UDC was examined through the universality of topics and facets covering diverse human interests which are at the same time interconnected and form a rich and intricate semantic structure. The results suggest that UDC-supported folksonomies could be implemented in resource discovery, in particular in library portals and catalogues.
    Content
    Teil von: Papers from Classification at a Crossroads: Multiple Directions to Usability: International UDC Seminar 2009-Part 2
  9. Peters, I.; Stock, W.G.: Power tags in information retrieval (2010) 0.01
    0.006244613 = product of:
      0.012489226 = sum of:
        0.012489226 = product of:
          0.024978451 = sum of:
            0.024978451 = weight(_text_:2 in 865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024978451 = score(doc=865,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05242341 = queryNorm
                0.19293682 = fieldWeight in 865, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=865)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    2. 6.2013 21:00:52
    2. 6.2013 21:06:48
  10. Lüth, J.: Inhaltserschließung durch Nutzerinnen und Nutzer : Ergebnisse eines Tests mit Internetquellen der virtuellen Fachbibliothek EconBiz (2007) 0.01
    0.0061818515 = product of:
      0.012363703 = sum of:
        0.012363703 = product of:
          0.024727406 = sum of:
            0.024727406 = weight(_text_:2 in 411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024727406 = score(doc=411,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05242341 = queryNorm
                0.19099772 = fieldWeight in 411, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=411)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vortrag anlässlich des 96. Deutscher Bibliothekartag, Leipzig, 2007. - Vgl. auch den Bericht: Fiala, S.: Deutscher Bibliothekartag Leipzig 2007: Sacherschließung - Informationsdienstleistung. In: Mitt. VOEB 60(2007) H.2, S.44-48.
  11. Mai, J.-E.: Folksonomies and the new order : authority in the digital disorder (2011) 0.01
    0.0061818515 = product of:
      0.012363703 = sum of:
        0.012363703 = product of:
          0.024727406 = sum of:
            0.024727406 = weight(_text_:2 in 4553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024727406 = score(doc=4553,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05242341 = queryNorm
                0.19099772 = fieldWeight in 4553, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4553)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 38(2011) no.2, S.114-122
  12. Peters, I.: Folksonomies : nutzergenerierte Schlagwörter als Indexierungswerkzeug für die Massen (2011) 0.01
    0.0061818515 = product of:
      0.012363703 = sum of:
        0.012363703 = product of:
          0.024727406 = sum of:
            0.024727406 = weight(_text_:2 in 4909) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024727406 = score(doc=4909,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05242341 = queryNorm
                0.19099772 = fieldWeight in 4909, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4909)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Inhalt 1. Zur Notwendigkeit der Inhaltserschließung im Web 2.0 2. Funktion und Nutzen von Folksonomies 3. Folksonomies in Bibliotheken 4. Danksagung
  13. Watters, C.; Nizam, N.: Knowledge organization on the Web : the emergent role of social classification (2012) 0.01
    0.0061818515 = product of:
      0.012363703 = sum of:
        0.012363703 = product of:
          0.024727406 = sum of:
            0.024727406 = weight(_text_:2 in 828) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024727406 = score(doc=828,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05242341 = queryNorm
                0.19099772 = fieldWeight in 828, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=828)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    2. 6.2013 16:55:54
  14. Rafferty, P.: Tagging (2018) 0.01
    0.0061818515 = product of:
      0.012363703 = sum of:
        0.012363703 = product of:
          0.024727406 = sum of:
            0.024727406 = weight(_text_:2 in 4647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024727406 = score(doc=4647,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05242341 = queryNorm
                0.19099772 = fieldWeight in 4647, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4647)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    2. 9.2014 19:19:40
  15. Bullard, J.: Curated Folksonomies : three implementations of structure through human judgment (2018) 0.01
    0.0061818515 = product of:
      0.012363703 = sum of:
        0.012363703 = product of:
          0.024727406 = sum of:
            0.024727406 = weight(_text_:2 in 5002) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024727406 = score(doc=5002,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05242341 = queryNorm
                0.19099772 = fieldWeight in 5002, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5002)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    2. 9.2014 19:19:40
  16. Peters, I.; Stock, W.G.: Folksonomies in Wissensrepräsentation und Information Retrieval (2008) 0.01
    0.0052987295 = product of:
      0.010597459 = sum of:
        0.010597459 = product of:
          0.021194918 = sum of:
            0.021194918 = weight(_text_:2 in 1597) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021194918 = score(doc=1597,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05242341 = queryNorm
                0.16371232 = fieldWeight in 1597, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1597)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 59(2008) H.2, S.77-90
  17. Munk, T.B.; Moerk, K.: Folksonomies, tagging communities, and tagging strategies : an empirical study (2007) 0.00
    0.004415608 = product of:
      0.008831216 = sum of:
        0.008831216 = product of:
          0.017662432 = sum of:
            0.017662432 = weight(_text_:2 in 1091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017662432 = score(doc=1091,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05242341 = queryNorm
                0.13642694 = fieldWeight in 1091, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1091)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The subject of this article is folksonomies on the Internet. One of the largest folksonomies on the Internet in terms of number of users and tagged websites is the computer program del.icio.us, where more than 100,000 people have tagged the websites that they and others find using their own keywords. How this is done in practice and the patterns to be found are the focus of this article. The empirical basis is the collection of 76,601 different keywords with a total frequency of 178,215 from 500 randomly chosen taggers on del.icio.us at the end of 2005. The keywords collected were then analyzed quantitatively statistically by uncovering their frequency and percentage distribution and through a statistical correspondence analysis in order to uncover possible patterns in the users' tags. Subsequently, a qualitative textual analysis of the tags was made in order to find out by analysis which tagging strategies are represented in the data material. This led to four conclusions. 1) the distribution of keywords follows classic power law; 2) distinct tagging communities are identifiable; 3) the most frequently used tags are situated on a general-specific axis; and 4) nine distinct tagging strategies are observed. These four conclusions are put into perspective collectively in respect of a number of more general and theoretical considerations concerning folksonomies and the classification systems of the future.
  18. Park, H.: ¬A conceptual framework to study folksonomic interaction (2011) 0.00
    0.004415608 = product of:
      0.008831216 = sum of:
        0.008831216 = product of:
          0.017662432 = sum of:
            0.017662432 = weight(_text_:2 in 4852) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017662432 = score(doc=4852,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05242341 = queryNorm
                0.13642694 = fieldWeight in 4852, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4852)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper proposes a conceptual framework to recast a folksonomy as a Web classification and to use this to explore the ways in which people work with it in assessing, sharing, and navigating Web resources. The author uses information scent and foraging theory as a context to discuss how folksonomy is constructed through interactions among users, a folksonomic system, and a given domain that consists of a group of users who share the same interest or goals. The discussion centers on two dimensions of folksonomies: (1) folksonomy as a Web classification which puts like information together in a Web context; and (2) folksonomy as information scent which helps users to find related resources and users, and obtain desired information. This paper aims to integrate these two dimensions with a conceptual framework that addresses the structure of a folksonomy shaped by users' interactions. A proposed framework consists of three components of users' interactions with a folksonomy: (a) tagging - cognitive categorization of Web accessible resources by an individual user; (b) navigation - exploration and discovery of Web accessible resources in the folksonomic system; and (c) knowledge sharing - representation and communication of knowledge within a domain. This understanding will help us motivate possible future directions of research in folksonomy. This initial framework will frame a number of research questions and help lay the groundwork for future empirical research which focuses on qualitative analysis of a folksonomy and users' tagging behaviors.
  19. Moreiro-González, J.-A.; Bolaños-Mejías, C.: Folksonomy indexing from the assignment of free tags to setup subject : a search analysis into the domain of legal history (2018) 0.00
    0.004415608 = product of:
      0.008831216 = sum of:
        0.008831216 = product of:
          0.017662432 = sum of:
            0.017662432 = weight(_text_:2 in 4640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017662432 = score(doc=4640,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05242341 = queryNorm
                0.13642694 = fieldWeight in 4640, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4640)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    2. 9.2014 19:19:40
  20. Johansson, S.; Golub, K.: LibraryThing for libraries : how tag moderation and size limitations affect tag clouds (2019) 0.00
    0.004415608 = product of:
      0.008831216 = sum of:
        0.008831216 = product of:
          0.017662432 = sum of:
            0.017662432 = weight(_text_:2 in 5398) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017662432 = score(doc=5398,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05242341 = queryNorm
                0.13642694 = fieldWeight in 5398, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5398)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    2. 9.2014 19:19:40