Search (241 results, page 1 of 13)

  • × theme_ss:"Metadaten"
  1. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications part 2 (2004) 0.08
    0.084688365 = product of:
      0.16937673 = sum of:
        0.16937673 = sum of:
          0.069939665 = weight(_text_:2 in 2841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.069939665 = score(doc=2841,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05242341 = queryNorm
              0.5402231 = fieldWeight in 2841, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2841)
          0.09943707 = weight(_text_:22 in 2841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09943707 = score(doc=2841,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18357785 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05242341 = queryNorm
              0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2841, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2841)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2
  2. Jimenez, V.O.R.: Nuevas perspectivas para la catalogacion : metadatos ver MARC (1999) 0.08
    0.08146289 = product of:
      0.16292578 = sum of:
        0.16292578 = sum of:
          0.042389836 = weight(_text_:2 in 5743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042389836 = score(doc=5743,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05242341 = queryNorm
              0.32742465 = fieldWeight in 5743, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5743)
          0.12053595 = weight(_text_:22 in 5743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.12053595 = score(doc=5743,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.18357785 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05242341 = queryNorm
              0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 5743, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5743)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    30. 3.2002 19:45:22
    Source
    Revista Española de Documentaçion Cientifica. 22(1999) no.2, S.198-219
  3. Tennant, R.: ¬A bibliographic metadata infrastructure for the twenty-first century (2004) 0.05
    0.054308593 = product of:
      0.10861719 = sum of:
        0.10861719 = sum of:
          0.028259892 = weight(_text_:2 in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.028259892 = score(doc=2845,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05242341 = queryNorm
              0.2182831 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
          0.08035729 = weight(_text_:22 in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08035729 = score(doc=2845,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.18357785 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05242341 = queryNorm
              0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    9.12.2005 19:22:38
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.175-181
  4. Gorman, M.: Metadata or cataloguing? : a false choice (1999) 0.05
    0.048393354 = product of:
      0.09678671 = sum of:
        0.09678671 = sum of:
          0.03996552 = weight(_text_:2 in 6095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03996552 = score(doc=6095,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05242341 = queryNorm
              0.30869892 = fieldWeight in 6095, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6095)
          0.056821186 = weight(_text_:22 in 6095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.056821186 = score(doc=6095,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18357785 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05242341 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6095, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6095)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    2. 8.2001 19:32:21
    Source
    Journal of Internet cataloging. 2(1999) no.1, S.5-22
  5. Rogers, D.: Cataloguing Internet resources : the evolution of the Dublin Core metadata set (1997) 0.04
    0.04254054 = product of:
      0.08508108 = sum of:
        0.08508108 = sum of:
          0.028259892 = weight(_text_:2 in 903) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.028259892 = score(doc=903,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05242341 = queryNorm
              0.2182831 = fieldWeight in 903, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=903)
          0.056821186 = weight(_text_:22 in 903) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.056821186 = score(doc=903,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18357785 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05242341 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 903, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=903)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Cataloguing Australia. 23(1997) nos.1/2, S.17-22
  6. Hakala, J.: Dublin core in 1997 : a report from Dublin Core metadata workshops 4 & 5 (1998) 0.04
    0.03722297 = product of:
      0.07444594 = sum of:
        0.07444594 = sum of:
          0.024727406 = weight(_text_:2 in 2220) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.024727406 = score(doc=2220,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05242341 = queryNorm
              0.19099772 = fieldWeight in 2220, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2220)
          0.049718536 = weight(_text_:22 in 2220) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049718536 = score(doc=2220,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18357785 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05242341 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2220, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2220)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    2. 3.1999 9:39:01
    Source
    Nordinfo Nytt. 1997, nos.3/4, S.10-22
  7. Marchiori, M.: ¬The limits of Web metadata, and beyond (1998) 0.04
    0.03722297 = product of:
      0.07444594 = sum of:
        0.07444594 = sum of:
          0.024727406 = weight(_text_:2 in 3383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.024727406 = score(doc=3383,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05242341 = queryNorm
              0.19099772 = fieldWeight in 3383, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3383)
          0.049718536 = weight(_text_:22 in 3383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049718536 = score(doc=3383,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18357785 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05242341 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3383, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3383)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Highlights 2 major problems of the WWW metadata: it will take some time before a reasonable number of people start using metadata to provide a better Web classification, and that no one can guarantee that a majority of the Web objects will be ever properly classified via metadata. Addresses the problem of how to cope with intrinsic limits of Web metadata, proposes a method to solve these problems and show evidence of its effectiveness. Examines the important problem of what is the required critical mass in the WWW for metadata in order for it to be really useful
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:08:06
  8. Lubas, R.L.; Wolfe, R.H.W.; Fleischman, M.: Creating metadata practices for MIT's OpenCourseWare Project (2004) 0.04
    0.03722297 = product of:
      0.07444594 = sum of:
        0.07444594 = sum of:
          0.024727406 = weight(_text_:2 in 2843) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.024727406 = score(doc=2843,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05242341 = queryNorm
              0.19099772 = fieldWeight in 2843, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2843)
          0.049718536 = weight(_text_:22 in 2843) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049718536 = score(doc=2843,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18357785 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05242341 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2843, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2843)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.138-143
  9. Carvalho, J.R. de; Cordeiro, M.I.; Lopes, A.; Vieira, M.: Meta-information about MARC : an XML framework for validation, explanation and help systems (2004) 0.04
    0.03722297 = product of:
      0.07444594 = sum of:
        0.07444594 = sum of:
          0.024727406 = weight(_text_:2 in 2848) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.024727406 = score(doc=2848,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05242341 = queryNorm
              0.19099772 = fieldWeight in 2848, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2848)
          0.049718536 = weight(_text_:22 in 2848) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049718536 = score(doc=2848,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18357785 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05242341 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2848, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2848)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.131-137
  10. Warner, S.: E-prints and the Open Archives Initiative (2003) 0.04
    0.03722297 = product of:
      0.07444594 = sum of:
        0.07444594 = sum of:
          0.024727406 = weight(_text_:2 in 4772) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.024727406 = score(doc=4772,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05242341 = queryNorm
              0.19099772 = fieldWeight in 4772, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4772)
          0.049718536 = weight(_text_:22 in 4772) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049718536 = score(doc=4772,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18357785 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05242341 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4772, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4772)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    18.12.2005 13:18:22
    Source
    Library hi tech. 21(2003) no.2, S.151-158
  11. Vellucci, S.L.: Metadata and authority control (2000) 0.04
    0.03722297 = product of:
      0.07444594 = sum of:
        0.07444594 = sum of:
          0.024727406 = weight(_text_:2 in 180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.024727406 = score(doc=180,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05242341 = queryNorm
              0.19099772 = fieldWeight in 180, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=180)
          0.049718536 = weight(_text_:22 in 180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049718536 = score(doc=180,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18357785 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05242341 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 180, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=180)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    2. 1.2007 18:06:01
  12. Keith, C.: Using XSLT to manipulate MARC metadata (2004) 0.03
    0.031905405 = product of:
      0.06381081 = sum of:
        0.06381081 = sum of:
          0.021194918 = weight(_text_:2 in 4747) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.021194918 = score(doc=4747,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05242341 = queryNorm
              0.16371232 = fieldWeight in 4747, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4747)
          0.04261589 = weight(_text_:22 in 4747) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04261589 = score(doc=4747,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18357785 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05242341 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4747, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4747)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.122-130
  13. Kurth, M.; Ruddy, D.; Rupp, N.: Repurposing MARC metadata : using digital project experience to develop a metadata management design (2004) 0.03
    0.031905405 = product of:
      0.06381081 = sum of:
        0.06381081 = sum of:
          0.021194918 = weight(_text_:2 in 4748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.021194918 = score(doc=4748,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05242341 = queryNorm
              0.16371232 = fieldWeight in 4748, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4748)
          0.04261589 = weight(_text_:22 in 4748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04261589 = score(doc=4748,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18357785 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05242341 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4748, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4748)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.144-152
  14. Franklin, R.A.: Re-inventing subject access for the semantic web (2003) 0.03
    0.031905405 = product of:
      0.06381081 = sum of:
        0.06381081 = sum of:
          0.021194918 = weight(_text_:2 in 2556) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.021194918 = score(doc=2556,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05242341 = queryNorm
              0.16371232 = fieldWeight in 2556, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2556)
          0.04261589 = weight(_text_:22 in 2556) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04261589 = score(doc=2556,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18357785 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05242341 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2556, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2556)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    30.12.2008 18:22:46
    Source
    Online information review. 27(2003) no.2, S.94-101
  15. Sewing, S.: Bestandserhaltung und Archivierung : Koordinierung auf der Basis eines gemeinsamen Metadatenformates in den deutschen und österreichischen Bibliotheksverbünden (2021) 0.03
    0.031905405 = product of:
      0.06381081 = sum of:
        0.06381081 = sum of:
          0.021194918 = weight(_text_:2 in 266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.021194918 = score(doc=266,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05242341 = queryNorm
              0.16371232 = fieldWeight in 266, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=266)
          0.04261589 = weight(_text_:22 in 266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04261589 = score(doc=266,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18357785 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05242341 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 266, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=266)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In den Handlungsempfehlungen der Koordinierungsstelle für die Erhaltung des schriftlichen Kulturguts (KEK) von 2015 (KEK-Handlungsempfehlungen) wird ein nationaler Standard bei der Dokumentation von Bestandserhaltung gefordert: "In den Bibliothekskatalogen sollten künftig für den verbundübergreifenden Abgleich Bestandserhaltungsmaßnahmen für die Bestände ab 1851 [.] in standardisierter Form dokumentiert und recherchierbar gemacht werden. Dies bedarf einer gemeinsamen Festlegung mit den Bibliotheksverbünden [.]." In den KEK-Handlungsempfehlungen werden auf der Basis einer im Jahr 2015 erfolgten Erhebung für Monografien fast neun Millionen Bände aus dem Zeitabschnitt 1851-1990 als Pflichtexemplare an Bundes- und Ländereinrichtungen angegeben, die akut vom Papierzerfall bedroht und als erste Stufe einer Gesamtstrategie zu entsäuern sind. Ein Ziel der KEK ist es, standardisierte und zertifizierte Verfahren zur Massenentsäuerung zu fördern. Im Metadatenformat sind zunächst fünf Verfahren der Massenentsäuerung in Form von kontrolliertem Vokabular dokumentiert: DEZ, Mg3/MBG, METE, MgO, MMMC[2]. Mit diesen Angaben, die gezielt selektiert werden können, ist mittel- und langfristig die Anwendung einzelner Verfahren der Massenentsäuerung abrufbar und statistisch auswertbar.
    Date
    22. 5.2021 12:43:05
  16. Andresen, L.: Metadata in Denmark (2000) 0.03
    0.028410593 = product of:
      0.056821186 = sum of:
        0.056821186 = product of:
          0.11364237 = sum of:
            0.11364237 = weight(_text_:22 in 4899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11364237 = score(doc=4899,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18357785 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05242341 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4899, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4899)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    16. 7.2000 20:58:22
  17. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004) 0.03
    0.028410593 = product of:
      0.056821186 = sum of:
        0.056821186 = product of:
          0.11364237 = sum of:
            0.11364237 = weight(_text_:22 in 2840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11364237 = score(doc=2840,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18357785 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05242341 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2840, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2840)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
  18. Wisser, K.M.; O'Brien Roper, J.: Maximizing metadata : exploring the EAD-MARC relationship (2003) 0.03
    0.026587836 = product of:
      0.053175673 = sum of:
        0.053175673 = sum of:
          0.017662432 = weight(_text_:2 in 154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.017662432 = score(doc=154,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05242341 = queryNorm
              0.13642694 = fieldWeight in 154, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=154)
          0.03551324 = weight(_text_:22 in 154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03551324 = score(doc=154,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18357785 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05242341 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 154, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=154)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 47(2003) no.2, S.71-76
  19. Wessel, C.: "Publishing and sharing your metadata application profile" : 2. SCHEMAS-Workshop in Bonn (2001) 0.03
    0.026442189 = product of:
      0.052884378 = sum of:
        0.052884378 = sum of:
          0.024473786 = weight(_text_:2 in 5650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.024473786 = score(doc=5650,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05242341 = queryNorm
              0.18903872 = fieldWeight in 5650, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5650)
          0.028410593 = weight(_text_:22 in 5650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.028410593 = score(doc=5650,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18357785 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05242341 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5650, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5650)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Immer mehr Institutionen erkennen die Bedeutung von Metadaten für die Auffindung elektronischer Dokumente und entwickeln ihr eigenes, domain-spezifisches Application Profile. Sie wählen aus einem bereits existierenden Set von Metadaten ein für ihre Bedürfnisse passendes Subset aus, fügen lokale Ergänzungen hinzu und passen die Definitionen an. Um andere über die eigenen Anwendungen zu informieren, ist es sinnvoll, die jeweiligen Application Profiles zu veröffentlichen. Dadurch wird eine Nachnutzung ermöglicht und neuen Anwendern die Entwicklung eigener Profile erleichtert. Weitere Vorteile wären eine Standardisierung der Metadatenelemente und -formate und Erhöhung der Interoperabilität. In diesem Kontext entstehende Fragen wurden auf dem 2. SCHEMAS-Workshop diskutiert, der vom 23. bis 24. November 2000 in Bonn stattfand. Die einzelnen Vorträge finden sich unter <http://lwww. schemas-forum.org/workshops/ws2/Programme.htm/>. SCHEMAS1 ist die Bezeichnung für ein "Forum for Metadata Schema Implementors". Dieses EU-Projekt wird getragen von Makx Dekkers (PricewaterhouseCoopers), Tom Baker (GMD) und Rachel Heery (UKOLN). In seiner Einführung erläuterte Makx Dekkers die Ziele von SCHEMAS: Da es viele verschiedene Schemes zur Beschreibung von Internet-Ressourcen gibt, wächst die Notwendigkeit der Entwicklung von Standards zur Vermeidung von Doppelarbeit und Konfusion. SCHEMAS stellt Informationen bereit (Metadata Watch Reports, Standards Framework Reports, Guidelines), veranstaltet Workshops und entwickelt ein Registry, in dem Metadatenprofile gesammelt werden sollen. Dadurch sollen Anwender von Metadatenformaten über den Status und neue Entwicklungen im Bereich Metadaten informiert werden. Über die Definition des Begriffs Application Profile war bereits beim 8. Workshop der Dublin Core Metadata Initiative in Ottawa im Oktober2 diskutiert worden. Rachel Heery legte nun folgende Definition vor: In einem "Namespace Schema" werden neue Elemente genannt und definiert, so dass ein standardisiertes Set entsteht. Ein "Application Profile" nutzt bereits vorhandene Elemente aus einem oder mehreren Namespace Schemas nach und optimiert diese für eine bestimmte Anwendung. Da die Zahl der Namespaces und Application Profiles ständig zunimmt, ist es sinnvoll, sie an einer zentralen Stelle zu registrieren. Diese Zentralstelle will das SCHEMAS Registry werden. Tom Baker beschrieb dessen Funktion mit einem Vergleich aus der Linguistik: Metadaten sind eine Sprache, Registries das Wörterbuch. Wie ein Wörterbuch, so hat auch ein Registry zwei Aufgaben: Es beschreibt Sprache anhand von Gebrauchsbeispielen und schreibt diesen Gebrauch vor, indem es Empfehlungen gibt (describe and prescribe). Dadurch entsteht ein Standard für diese Sprache
    Date
    11. 3.2001 17:10:22
    Source
    Bibliotheksdienst. 35(2001) H.2, S.189-192
  20. Moen, W.E.: ¬The metadata approach to accessing government information (2001) 0.02
    0.024859268 = product of:
      0.049718536 = sum of:
        0.049718536 = product of:
          0.09943707 = sum of:
            0.09943707 = weight(_text_:22 in 4407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09943707 = score(doc=4407,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18357785 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05242341 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4407, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4407)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    28. 3.2002 9:22:34

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 219
  • el 23
  • s 13
  • m 11
  • b 2
  • n 1
  • More… Less…