-
Smiraglia, R.P.: On sameness and difference : an editorial (2008)
0.01
0.013293918 = product of:
0.026587836 = sum of:
0.026587836 = sum of:
0.008831216 = weight(_text_:2 in 1919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008831216 = score(doc=1919,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.05242341 = queryNorm
0.06821347 = fieldWeight in 1919, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1919)
0.01775662 = weight(_text_:22 in 1919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01775662 = score(doc=1919,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18357785 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05242341 = queryNorm
0.09672529 = fieldWeight in 1919, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1919)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- 2. Collocation versus disambiguation Of course, the practical reality is that systems must accommodate dual purposes when they declare entities to be the same or different. We wish at once to collocate or draw together everything that is alike, and at the same time to disambiguate the collocated set. So, the tension between the two purposes holds every system in balance. A set of collocated entities is thought to contain entities that are the same to some degree, but different enough to require an approach to sorting the elements of the set. It reminds me again of Wilson, who said of relevance that sometimes people just want something that serves as a means to some end. What does that suggest about sameness and difference? Perhaps that "more or less the same" or "a little bit different" reveals a sort of fuzzy-set, which opens the brackets around the set of equivalent entities that have been collocated. If so, then it means all the more that the differences, no matter how slight, need to be accounted for in the disambiguation. Of course there is quite a lot of overlap among domains, especially among closely related domains. We can see that in the articles in the present issue of this journal. We have papers that have come from at least three domains, and yet they all treat of knowledge and its conceptual ordering. Yet there is little conformity among the works cited by these four papers. What does that tell us? Perhaps that different domains are a little bit the same?
- Date
- 12. 6.2008 20:18:22
-
Beak, J.; Smiraglia, R.P.: Contours of knowledge : core and granularity in the evolution of the DCMI domain (2014)
0.01
0.010653973 = product of:
0.021307945 = sum of:
0.021307945 = product of:
0.04261589 = sum of:
0.04261589 = weight(_text_:22 in 1415) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04261589 = score(doc=1415,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18357785 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05242341 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1415, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1415)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
-
Smiraglia, R.P.: Classification interaction demonstrated empirically (2014)
0.01
0.010653973 = product of:
0.021307945 = sum of:
0.021307945 = product of:
0.04261589 = sum of:
0.04261589 = weight(_text_:22 in 1420) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04261589 = score(doc=1420,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18357785 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05242341 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1420, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1420)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
-
Smiraglia, R.P.: ¬The nature of "a work" : implications for the organization of knowledge (2001)
0.01
0.010597459 = product of:
0.021194918 = sum of:
0.021194918 = product of:
0.042389836 = sum of:
0.042389836 = weight(_text_:2 in 5983) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042389836 = score(doc=5983,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.05242341 = queryNorm
0.32742465 = fieldWeight in 5983, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5983)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: KO 29(2002) no.2, S.107-109 (G. Campbell)
-
Leazer, G.H.; Smiraglia, R.P.: Bibliographic families in the library catalog : a qualitative analysis and grounded theory (1999)
0.01
0.00887831 = product of:
0.01775662 = sum of:
0.01775662 = product of:
0.03551324 = sum of:
0.03551324 = weight(_text_:22 in 107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03551324 = score(doc=107,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18357785 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05242341 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 107, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=107)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Smiraglia, R.P.: Shifting intension in knowledge organization : an editorial (2012)
0.01
0.00887831 = product of:
0.01775662 = sum of:
0.01775662 = product of:
0.03551324 = sum of:
0.03551324 = weight(_text_:22 in 630) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03551324 = score(doc=630,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18357785 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05242341 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 630, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=630)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 2.2013 11:09:49
-
Smiraglia, R.P.: ISKO 12's bookshelf - evolving intension : an editorial (2013)
0.01
0.00887831 = product of:
0.01775662 = sum of:
0.01775662 = product of:
0.03551324 = sum of:
0.03551324 = weight(_text_:22 in 636) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03551324 = score(doc=636,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18357785 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05242341 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 636, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=636)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 2.2013 11:43:34
-
Graf, A.M.; Smiraglia, R.P.: Race & ethnicity in the Encyclopedia of Milwaukee : a case study in the use of domain analysis (2014)
0.01
0.00887831 = product of:
0.01775662 = sum of:
0.01775662 = product of:
0.03551324 = sum of:
0.03551324 = weight(_text_:22 in 1412) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03551324 = score(doc=1412,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18357785 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05242341 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1412, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1412)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
-
Smiraglia, R.P.: Empirical methods for knowledge evolution across knowledge organization systems (2016)
0.01
0.0074935355 = product of:
0.014987071 = sum of:
0.014987071 = product of:
0.029974142 = sum of:
0.029974142 = weight(_text_:2 in 3172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029974142 = score(doc=3172,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.05242341 = queryNorm
0.2315242 = fieldWeight in 3172, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3172)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Knowledge organization systems, including classifications, can be evaluated and explained by reference to what is called concept theory, attributing to concepts atomic status as basic elements. There are two ways to test knowledge organization systems; both are means of measuring the efficacy of concept theory in specific situations. These are: 1) analyze how well a system represents its warranted concepts; and, 2) analyze how well individual knowledge organization systems are populated with classified target objects. This paper is an attempt to bring together examples from ongoing research to demonstrate the use of empirical approaches to understanding the evolution of knowledge across time as it is represented in knowledge organization systems. The potential for using knowledge organization as a roadmap for the world of knowledge is revealed in the capability of knowledge organization systems to serve as roadmaps and data-mining tools for the knowledge landscape.
- Date
- 2. 9.2014 19:19:40
-
Friedman, A.; Smiraglia, R.P.: Nodes and arcs : concept map, semiotics, and knowledge organization (2013)
0.01
0.0071026483 = product of:
0.0142052965 = sum of:
0.0142052965 = product of:
0.028410593 = sum of:
0.028410593 = weight(_text_:22 in 770) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028410593 = score(doc=770,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18357785 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05242341 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 770, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=770)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Vgl. auch den Beitrag: Treude, L.: Das Problem der Konzeptdefinition in der Wissensorganisation: über einen missglückten Versuch der Klärung. In: LIBREAS: Library ideas. no.22, 2013, S.xx-xx.
-
Smiraglia, R.P.: Keywords, indexing, text analysis : an editorial (2013)
0.01
0.006244613 = product of:
0.012489226 = sum of:
0.012489226 = product of:
0.024978451 = sum of:
0.024978451 = weight(_text_:2 in 1390) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024978451 = score(doc=1390,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.05242341 = queryNorm
0.19293682 = fieldWeight in 1390, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1390)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Recently I was asked in earnest why KO doesn't have keywords. To which my reply was to LOL. Really-I laughed, out loud, and then I said "but it does, in every line!" I decided to undertake a little editorial experiment by using the contents of the last two issues of Knowledge Organization - Volume 40 (2013) number 1 contained an editorial, 4 peer-reviewed articles, a book review, a classification issues report, and two substantive letters to the editor. Volume 40 (2013) number 2 contained 5 peer-reviewed articles, some ISKO news, and a bibliographic essay book review; unfortunately at the time this was written number 2 had not been indexed by either service. I decided to compare keywords drawn from Thompson Reuters' Web of ScienceT and EBSCOHost's Library and Information Science and Technology Abstracts with Full Text (LISTA) to the actual keywords pulled from the texts. Full texts were uploaded to Voyeur from Hermeneutica.ca -The Rhetoric of Text Analysis (http://hermeneuti.ca/voyeur/) to derive most frequently used terms (applying an English language stoplist). Table 1 contains those comparative results.
-
Smiraglia, R.P.: "Bridget's Revelationes, Ockham's Tractatus, and Doctrines and Covenanants" : qualitative analysis and epistemological perspectives on theological works (2002)
0.01
0.0061818515 = product of:
0.012363703 = sum of:
0.012363703 = product of:
0.024727406 = sum of:
0.024727406 = weight(_text_:2 in 5627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024727406 = score(doc=5627,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.05242341 = queryNorm
0.19099772 = fieldWeight in 5627, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5627)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Random samples of works were drawn from the catalogs of the Bobst Library, New York University, and the Burke Library, Union Theological Seminary, New York. Results indicated: 1) derivative bibliographic relationships existed for somewhere between one-half and two-thirds of theological works; 2) there was a positive correlation between the age of the progenitor work and the extent of derivation; and, 3) forms and genres were useful in a limited way for predicting the incidence of derivative relationships in theological literature. Qualitative analysis reveals the important aspects of the genres "revelation" and "scripture" among theological works.
-
Smiraglia, R.P.: Referencing as evidentiary : an editorial (2020)
0.01
0.0061818515 = product of:
0.012363703 = sum of:
0.012363703 = product of:
0.024727406 = sum of:
0.024727406 = weight(_text_:2 in 5729) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024727406 = score(doc=5729,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.05242341 = queryNorm
0.19099772 = fieldWeight in 5729, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5729)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 2. 9.2014 19:19:40
-
Smiraglia, R.P.; Lee, H.-L.: Rethinking the authorship principle (2012)
0.01
0.0052987295 = product of:
0.010597459 = sum of:
0.010597459 = product of:
0.021194918 = sum of:
0.021194918 = weight(_text_:2 in 5575) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021194918 = score(doc=5575,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.05242341 = queryNorm
0.16371232 = fieldWeight in 5575, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5575)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The fundamental principle of order in the library catalogue is the authorship principle, which serves as the organizing node of an alphabetico-classed system, in which "texts" of "works" are organized first alphabetically by uniform title of the progenitor work and then are subarranged using titles for variant instantiations, under the heading for an "author." We analyze case studies of entries from (1) the first documented imperial library catalogue, the Seven Epitomes (Qilue [??]), in China; (2) Abelard's Works, which featured prominently in the 1848 testimony of Antonio Panizzi; and (3) The French Chef and the large family of instantiated works associated with it. Our analysis shows that the catalogue typically contains many large superwork sets. A more pragmatic approach to the design of catalogues is to array descriptions of resources in relation to the superwork sets to which they might belong. In all cases, a multidimensional faceted arrangement incorporating ideational nodes from the universe of recorded knowledge holds promise for greatly enhanced retrieval capability.
-
Smiraglia, R.P.: Derivative bibliographic relationships among theological works (1999)
0.00
0.004415608 = product of:
0.008831216 = sum of:
0.008831216 = product of:
0.017662432 = sum of:
0.017662432 = weight(_text_:2 in 6676) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017662432 = score(doc=6676,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.05242341 = queryNorm
0.13642694 = fieldWeight in 6676, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6676)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Derivative bibliographic relationships are the primary relationships that exist among the members of a bibliographic family--the set of interrelated works where the relationships among entities express shared semantic or linguistic activity. Derivative bibliographic relationships exist between any new conception of a work and its original source (the progenitor), or its successor, or both. Discipline was a poor predictor of derivative relationships in prior studies of derivative bibliographic relationships. For the present study random samples of works were drawn from the catalogs of the Bobst Library, New York University, and the Burke Library, Union Theological Seminary, New York. Two sites were chosen to allow a test of the differences in collection development patterns between a university research library and a theological library. Bibliographic families were compiled for each work. Results indicate: 1) derivative bibliographic relationships exist for somewhere between one-half and two-thirds of theological works in this study; 2) there is little difference in proportions of derivative bibliographic relationships or in the size of bibliographic families between the two collections; 3) there is a positive correlation between the age of the progenitor work and the size of the bibliographic family); 4) there are significant gaps in coverage of theological bibliographic families online; 5) there is some evidence of differing patterns of derivation between Judaic and Islamic literature and Christian literature; 5) forms and genres are useful in a limited way for predicting the incidence of derivative relationships in theological literature
-
Smiraglia, R.P.: ¬The history of "The Work" in the modern catalog (2003)
0.00
0.004415608 = product of:
0.008831216 = sum of:
0.008831216 = product of:
0.017662432 = sum of:
0.017662432 = weight(_text_:2 in 5652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017662432 = score(doc=5652,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.05242341 = queryNorm
0.13642694 = fieldWeight in 5652, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5652)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Also published as Cataloging and Classification Quarterly, 35(2002/03)1/2 and 35(2002/03)3/4
-
Smiraglia, R.P.: Keywords redux : an editorial (2015)
0.00
0.004415608 = product of:
0.008831216 = sum of:
0.008831216 = product of:
0.017662432 = sum of:
0.017662432 = weight(_text_:2 in 2099) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017662432 = score(doc=2099,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.05242341 = queryNorm
0.13642694 = fieldWeight in 2099, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2099)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 2. 9.2014 19:19:40
-
Smiraglia, R.P.: Bibliocentrism revisited : RDA and FRBRoo (2015)
0.00
0.004415608 = product of:
0.008831216 = sum of:
0.008831216 = product of:
0.017662432 = sum of:
0.017662432 = weight(_text_:2 in 2364) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017662432 = score(doc=2364,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.05242341 = queryNorm
0.13642694 = fieldWeight in 2364, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2364)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 2. 9.2014 19:19:40
-
Smiraglia, R.P.; Cai, X.: Tracking the evolution of clustering, machine learning, automatic indexing and automatic classification in knowledge organization (2017)
0.00
0.004415608 = product of:
0.008831216 = sum of:
0.008831216 = product of:
0.017662432 = sum of:
0.017662432 = weight(_text_:2 in 3627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017662432 = score(doc=3627,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.05242341 = queryNorm
0.13642694 = fieldWeight in 3627, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3627)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 2. 9.2014 19:19:40
-
Smiraglia, R.P.: ISKO 15's Bookshelf : dispersion in a digital age. An editorial (2018)
0.00
0.004415608 = product of:
0.008831216 = sum of:
0.008831216 = product of:
0.017662432 = sum of:
0.017662432 = weight(_text_:2 in 4528) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017662432 = score(doc=4528,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.05242341 = queryNorm
0.13642694 = fieldWeight in 4528, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4528)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 2. 9.2014 19:19:40
