Search (13 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × language_ss:"chi"
  1. Lin, W.-Y.C.: ¬The concept and applications of faceted classifications (2006) 0.05
    0.048393354 = product of:
      0.09678671 = sum of:
        0.09678671 = sum of:
          0.03996552 = weight(_text_:2 in 5083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03996552 = score(doc=5083,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05242341 = queryNorm
              0.30869892 = fieldWeight in 5083, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5083)
          0.056821186 = weight(_text_:22 in 5083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.056821186 = score(doc=5083,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18357785 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05242341 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5083, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5083)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http://research.dils.tku.edu.tw/joemls/44/44-2/153-172.pdf.
    Date
    27. 5.2007 22:19:35
    Source
    Journal of educational media and library sciences. 47(2006) no.2, S.153-171
  2. Lee, Y.-R.: ¬A study on the conditions of using OPAC access points and subject searching by users (1997) 0.01
    0.0142052965 = product of:
      0.028410593 = sum of:
        0.028410593 = product of:
          0.056821186 = sum of:
            0.056821186 = weight(_text_:22 in 933) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056821186 = score(doc=933,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18357785 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05242341 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 933, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=933)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Bulletin of library and information science. 1997, no.22, S.39-55
  3. Yi, H.; Shubai, L.: Application of classification in information organization under the networking environment (1998) 0.01
    0.0142052965 = product of:
      0.028410593 = sum of:
        0.028410593 = product of:
          0.056821186 = sum of:
            0.056821186 = weight(_text_:22 in 3236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056821186 = score(doc=3236,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18357785 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05242341 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3236, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3236)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information. 17(1998) no.1, S.19-22
  4. Pu, H.-T.: Exploration of personalized information service for OPAC (1997) 0.01
    0.012429634 = product of:
      0.024859268 = sum of:
        0.024859268 = product of:
          0.049718536 = sum of:
            0.049718536 = weight(_text_:22 in 1772) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049718536 = score(doc=1772,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18357785 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05242341 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1772, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1772)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    4. 8.1998 19:36:22
  5. Hsueh, L.-k.: ¬The development and implementation of the MARC AMC : an overview (1997) 0.01
    0.00999138 = product of:
      0.01998276 = sum of:
        0.01998276 = product of:
          0.03996552 = sum of:
            0.03996552 = weight(_text_:2 in 2284) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03996552 = score(doc=2284,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05242341 = queryNorm
                0.30869892 = fieldWeight in 2284, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2284)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    2. 2.1999 13:05:59
    Source
    Journal of educational media and library sciences. 35(1997) no.2, S.126-147
  6. Hsieh, Y.-s.: ¬A study on the users' perception to the body language of reference librarians (1997) 0.01
    0.008831216 = product of:
      0.017662432 = sum of:
        0.017662432 = product of:
          0.035324864 = sum of:
            0.035324864 = weight(_text_:2 in 2819) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035324864 = score(doc=2819,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05242341 = queryNorm
                0.27285388 = fieldWeight in 2819, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2819)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Part 2 of an article reporting results of a questionnaire survey of library users' perceptions of reference librarians' body language aims and its influence on the users' satisfaction of the reference interviews
  7. Tsai, B.-s.: Infomapping in information retrieval (1997) 0.01
    0.0074935355 = product of:
      0.014987071 = sum of:
        0.014987071 = product of:
          0.029974142 = sum of:
            0.029974142 = weight(_text_:2 in 2877) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029974142 = score(doc=2877,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05242341 = queryNorm
                0.2315242 = fieldWeight in 2877, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2877)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Capability and capacity in handling the topology of a special subject information field has made infomapping techniques and systems instrumental in information searching, monitoring and navigation. Applying the technique to communication networks can reveal the intellectual relationships among junior and senior researchers in the field, and can also show the continuing popularity of a particular researcher's citation record over time. Reports the use of Java in making a cartoon series of chronological maps based on citation analysis on a special subject field (nutrition and dietetics). The map making methods, Java programming, and statistical analysis of the map data are presented, and the advantage and significance of constructing Java maps in enhancing information retrieval discussed. Further technical developments in applying VRML to link together a 3-D spatial indexing system and a 2-D HTML Web site are suggested
    Source
    Journal of information; communication; and library science. 4(1997) no.2, S.3-13
  8. Liu, H.-M.C.: Selection and comparison of WWW search tools (1996) 0.01
    0.007064973 = product of:
      0.014129946 = sum of:
        0.014129946 = product of:
          0.028259892 = sum of:
            0.028259892 = weight(_text_:2 in 617) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028259892 = score(doc=617,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05242341 = queryNorm
                0.2182831 = fieldWeight in 617, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=617)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of information; communication; and library science. 2(1996) no.4, S.41-63
  9. Tsay, M.-Y.: From Science Citation Index to Journal Citation Reports, amd criteria for journals evaluation (1997) 0.01
    0.0061818515 = product of:
      0.012363703 = sum of:
        0.012363703 = product of:
          0.024727406 = sum of:
            0.024727406 = weight(_text_:2 in 657) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024727406 = score(doc=657,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05242341 = queryNorm
                0.19099772 = fieldWeight in 657, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=657)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of information; communication; and library science. 4(1997) no.2, S.27-41
  10. Fu, R.-X.: ¬The comparison between Chinese and Western bibliography (1996) 0.01
    0.0061818515 = product of:
      0.012363703 = sum of:
        0.012363703 = product of:
          0.024727406 = sum of:
            0.024727406 = weight(_text_:2 in 89) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024727406 = score(doc=89,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05242341 = queryNorm
                0.19099772 = fieldWeight in 89, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=89)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    A comparison of Chinese and Western bibliography reveals many differences. The purpose of traditional Chinese bibliography is to organize documents in a reasonable and valuable way, which essentially reflects the value and importance of human beings and their culture. Modern Western bibliography, on the other hand, attempts to order documents from the angle of form and philosophy, essentially reflecting the understanding of human culture, metaphysics and logic. Asserts that an understanding of the similarities and differences between the 2 approaches can contribute toward a reconsideration of the general theories, methods and techniques of bibliography
  11. Wu, C.-J.: Metadata and future developments in cataloguing (1997) 0.01
    0.0061818515 = product of:
      0.012363703 = sum of:
        0.012363703 = product of:
          0.024727406 = sum of:
            0.024727406 = weight(_text_:2 in 2826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024727406 = score(doc=2826,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05242341 = queryNorm
                0.19099772 = fieldWeight in 2826, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2826)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of information; communication; and library science. 4(1997) no.2, S.42-52
  12. Hsieh, Y.-s.: ¬A study on the users' perception to the body language of reference librarians (1997) 0.01
    0.0052987295 = product of:
      0.010597459 = sum of:
        0.010597459 = product of:
          0.021194918 = sum of:
            0.021194918 = weight(_text_:2 in 2818) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021194918 = score(doc=2818,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05242341 = queryNorm
                0.16371232 = fieldWeight in 2818, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2818)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of educational media and library sciences. 35(1997) no.2, S.172-193
  13. Tseng, Y.-H.: Solving vocabulary problems with interactive query expansion (1998) 0.00
    0.004415608 = product of:
      0.008831216 = sum of:
        0.008831216 = product of:
          0.017662432 = sum of:
            0.017662432 = weight(_text_:2 in 5159) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017662432 = score(doc=5159,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05242341 = queryNorm
                0.13642694 = fieldWeight in 5159, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5159)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    One of the major causes of search failures in information retrieval systems is vocabulary mismatch. Presents a solution to the vocabulary problem through 2 strategies known as term suggestion (TS) and term relevance feedback (TRF). In TS, collection specific terms are extracted from the text collection. These terms and their frequencies constitute the keyword database for suggesting terms in response to users' queries. One effect of this term suggestion is that it functions as a dynamic directory if the query is a general term that contains broad meaning. In term relevance feedback, terms extracted from the top ranked documents retrieved from the previous query are shown to users for relevance feedback. In the experiment, interactive TS provides very high precision rates while achieving similar recall rates as n-gram matching. Local TRF achieves improvement in both precision and recall rate in a full text news database and degrades slightly in recall rate in bibliographic databases due to the very limited source of information for feedback. In terms of Rijsbergen's combined measure of recall and precision, both TS and TRF achieve better performance than n-gram matching, which implies that the greater improvement in precision rate compensates the slight degradation in recall rate for TS and TRF