Search (179 results, page 1 of 9)

  • × theme_ss:"Benutzerstudien"
  1. Tomney, H.; Burton, P.F.: Electronic journals : a case study of usage and attitudes among academics (1998) 0.04
    0.04254054 = product of:
      0.08508108 = sum of:
        0.08508108 = sum of:
          0.028259892 = weight(_text_:2 in 3687) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.028259892 = score(doc=3687,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05242341 = queryNorm
              0.2182831 = fieldWeight in 3687, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3687)
          0.056821186 = weight(_text_:22 in 3687) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.056821186 = score(doc=3687,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18357785 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05242341 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3687, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3687)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Reports results of a questionnaire survey to assess the attitudes of scholarly users towards electronic journals and examines the current level of use of these publications by university academics in 2 departments in each of 5 faculties of a UK university
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:07:29
  2. Large, A.; Beheshti, J.; Rahman, T.: Design criteria for children's Web portals : the users speak out (2002) 0.04
    0.036295015 = product of:
      0.07259003 = sum of:
        0.07259003 = sum of:
          0.029974142 = weight(_text_:2 in 197) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.029974142 = score(doc=197,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05242341 = queryNorm
              0.2315242 = fieldWeight in 197, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=197)
          0.04261589 = weight(_text_:22 in 197) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04261589 = score(doc=197,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18357785 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05242341 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 197, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=197)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    2. 6.2005 10:34:22
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 53(2002) no.2, S.79-94
  3. Westman, S.; Laine-Hernandez, M.; Oittinen, P.: Development and evaluation of a multifaceted magazine image categorization model (2011) 0.03
    0.030245846 = product of:
      0.060491692 = sum of:
        0.060491692 = sum of:
          0.024978451 = weight(_text_:2 in 4193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.024978451 = score(doc=4193,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05242341 = queryNorm
              0.19293682 = fieldWeight in 4193, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4193)
          0.03551324 = weight(_text_:22 in 4193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03551324 = score(doc=4193,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18357785 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05242341 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4193, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4193)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The development of visual retrieval methods requires information about user interaction with images, including their description and categorization. This article presents the development of a categorization model for magazine images based on two user studies. In Study 1, we elicited 10 main classes of magazine image categorization criteria through sorting tasks with nonexpert and expert users (N=30). Multivariate methods, namely, multidimensional scaling and hierarchical clustering, were used to analyze similarity data. Content analysis of category names gave rise to classes that were synthesized into a categorization framework. The framework was evaluated in Study 2 by experts (N=24) who categorized another set of images consistent with the framework and found it to be useful in the task. Based on the evaluation study the framework was solidified into a model for categorizing magazine imagery. Connections between classes were analyzed both from the original sorting data and from the evaluation study and included into the final model. The model is a practical categorization tool that may be used in workplaces, such as magazine editorial offices. It may also serve to guide the development of computational methods for image understanding, selection of concepts for automatic detection, and approaches to support browsing and exploratory image search.
    Date
    22. 1.2011 14:09:26
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.2, S.295-313
  4. Belkin, N.J.: ¬An overview of results from Rutgers' investigations of interactive information retrieval (1998) 0.03
    0.026587836 = product of:
      0.053175673 = sum of:
        0.053175673 = sum of:
          0.017662432 = weight(_text_:2 in 2339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.017662432 = score(doc=2339,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05242341 = queryNorm
              0.13642694 = fieldWeight in 2339, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2339)
          0.03551324 = weight(_text_:22 in 2339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03551324 = score(doc=2339,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18357785 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05242341 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2339, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2339)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
    Source
    Visualizing subject access for 21st century information resources: Papers presented at the 1997 Clinic on Library Applications of Data Processing, 2-4 Mar 1997, Graduate School of Library and Information Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Ed.: P.A. Cochrane et al
  5. Beaudoin, J.E.: Content-based image retrieval methods and professional image users (2016) 0.03
    0.026587836 = product of:
      0.053175673 = sum of:
        0.053175673 = sum of:
          0.017662432 = weight(_text_:2 in 2637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.017662432 = score(doc=2637,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05242341 = queryNorm
              0.13642694 = fieldWeight in 2637, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2637)
          0.03551324 = weight(_text_:22 in 2637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03551324 = score(doc=2637,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18357785 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05242341 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2637, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2637)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2016 12:32:25
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 67(2016) no.2, S.350-365
  6. Scholle, U.: Kann ich Ihnen behilflich sein? : Erhebung am zentralen Auskunftsplatz der ULB Münster (2000) 0.02
    0.024859268 = product of:
      0.049718536 = sum of:
        0.049718536 = product of:
          0.09943707 = sum of:
            0.09943707 = weight(_text_:22 in 7585) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09943707 = score(doc=7585,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18357785 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05242341 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7585, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7585)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2000 17:52:11
  7. Branch, J.L.: Investigating the information-seeking process of adolescents : the value of using think alouds and think afters (2000) 0.02
    0.024859268 = product of:
      0.049718536 = sum of:
        0.049718536 = product of:
          0.09943707 = sum of:
            0.09943707 = weight(_text_:22 in 3924) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09943707 = score(doc=3924,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18357785 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05242341 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3924, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3924)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library and information science research. 22(2000) no.4, S.371-382
  8. Yoo, E.-Y.; Robbins, L.S.: Understanding middle-aged women's health information seeking on the web : a theoretical approach (2008) 0.02
    0.021307945 = product of:
      0.04261589 = sum of:
        0.04261589 = product of:
          0.08523178 = sum of:
            0.08523178 = weight(_text_:22 in 2973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08523178 = score(doc=2973,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18357785 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05242341 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2973, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2973)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    9. 2.2008 17:52:22
  9. Griesbaum, J.; Mahrholz, N.; Kiedrowski, K. von Löwe; Rittberger, M.: Knowledge generation in online forums : a case study in the German educational domain (2015) 0.02
    0.02127027 = product of:
      0.04254054 = sum of:
        0.04254054 = sum of:
          0.014129946 = weight(_text_:2 in 4440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.014129946 = score(doc=4440,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05242341 = queryNorm
              0.10914155 = fieldWeight in 4440, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4440)
          0.028410593 = weight(_text_:22 in 4440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.028410593 = score(doc=4440,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18357785 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05242341 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 4440, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4440)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    Source
    Aslib journal of information management. 67(2015) no.1, S.2-26
  10. Hildreth, C.R.: Accounting for users' inflated assessments of on-line catalogue search performance and usefulness : an experimental study (2001) 0.01
    0.014987071 = product of:
      0.029974142 = sum of:
        0.029974142 = product of:
          0.059948284 = sum of:
            0.059948284 = weight(_text_:2 in 4130) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.059948284 = score(doc=4130,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05242341 = queryNorm
                0.4630484 = fieldWeight in 4130, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4130)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Auch unter: http:\\www.shef.ac.uk/~is/publications/infres/6-2/paper_101.html.
    Source
    Information Research. 6(2001), no.2
  11. Wallace, P.M.: Periodical title searching in online catalogues (1997) 0.01
    0.0142052965 = product of:
      0.028410593 = sum of:
        0.028410593 = product of:
          0.056821186 = sum of:
            0.056821186 = weight(_text_:22 in 1628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056821186 = score(doc=1628,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18357785 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05242341 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1628, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1628)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    29. 7.1998 10:57:22
  12. Gremett, P.: Utilizing a user's context to improve search results (2006) 0.01
    0.0142052965 = product of:
      0.028410593 = sum of:
        0.028410593 = product of:
          0.056821186 = sum of:
            0.056821186 = weight(_text_:22 in 5299) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056821186 = score(doc=5299,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18357785 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05242341 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5299, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5299)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:17:44
  13. Schneider, R.: OPACs, Benutzer und das Web (2009) 0.01
    0.0142052965 = product of:
      0.028410593 = sum of:
        0.028410593 = product of:
          0.056821186 = sum of:
            0.056821186 = weight(_text_:22 in 2905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056821186 = score(doc=2905,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18357785 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05242341 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2905, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2905)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2009 18:50:43
  14. Markey, K.: Thus spoke the OPAC user (1983) 0.01
    0.014129946 = product of:
      0.028259892 = sum of:
        0.028259892 = product of:
          0.056519784 = sum of:
            0.056519784 = weight(_text_:2 in 785) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056519784 = score(doc=785,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05242341 = queryNorm
                0.4365662 = fieldWeight in 785, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=785)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Information technology and libraries. 2(1983), S.381-387
  15. Bishop, D.F.: ¬The CLR OPAC study : analysis of ARL user responses (1983) 0.01
    0.014129946 = product of:
      0.028259892 = sum of:
        0.028259892 = product of:
          0.056519784 = sum of:
            0.056519784 = weight(_text_:2 in 1479) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056519784 = score(doc=1479,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05242341 = queryNorm
                0.4365662 = fieldWeight in 1479, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1479)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Information technology and libraries. 2(1983), S.315-321
  16. Barnes, R.C.M.: Information user studies : pt.2: comparison of some recent surveys (1965) 0.01
    0.014129946 = product of:
      0.028259892 = sum of:
        0.028259892 = product of:
          0.056519784 = sum of:
            0.056519784 = weight(_text_:2 in 4974) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056519784 = score(doc=4974,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05242341 = queryNorm
                0.4365662 = fieldWeight in 4974, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4974)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  17. Connell, T.H.: User acceptance of library catalog results : an exploratory study (1991) 0.01
    0.014129946 = product of:
      0.028259892 = sum of:
        0.028259892 = product of:
          0.056519784 = sum of:
            0.056519784 = weight(_text_:2 in 7250) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056519784 = score(doc=7250,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05242341 = queryNorm
                0.4365662 = fieldWeight in 7250, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7250)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 35(1991) no.2, S.191-201
  18. Kerr, W.: ¬The professor looks at the card catalog (1942) 0.01
    0.014129946 = product of:
      0.028259892 = sum of:
        0.028259892 = product of:
          0.056519784 = sum of:
            0.056519784 = weight(_text_:2 in 6189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056519784 = score(doc=6189,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05242341 = queryNorm
                0.4365662 = fieldWeight in 6189, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6189)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    College and research libraries. 4(1942/43) no.2, S.134-141
  19. Kaske, N.K.: ¬A comparative study of subject searching in an OPAC among branch libraries of a university library system (1988) 0.01
    0.012429634 = product of:
      0.024859268 = sum of:
        0.024859268 = product of:
          0.049718536 = sum of:
            0.049718536 = weight(_text_:22 in 760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049718536 = score(doc=760,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18357785 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05242341 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 760, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=760)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The degree of variability in the percentage of subject searching in an online public access catalog (OPAC) among branch libraries of one university was studied. A full semester's worth of transactions was analyzed, not sampled. The time units used were hour of the day, day of the week, and week of the semester. The findings show that subject searching varies from a low of 22% to a high of 74% over the hours of a day. Variability for the days of the week ranged from 17% to 64%, and for the weeks of the semester variability ranged from 12% to 70%. Valuable management information on the utilization of the OPAC within each brach library and among all the branch libraries is provided through numerous charts and graphs.
  20. Witt, M.: Survey on the use of the catalogue at the Mediatheque of the Cité des Sciences et de l'Industrie (CSI) (1993) 0.01
    0.012429634 = product of:
      0.024859268 = sum of:
        0.024859268 = product of:
          0.049718536 = sum of:
            0.049718536 = weight(_text_:22 in 7914) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049718536 = score(doc=7914,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18357785 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05242341 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7914, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7914)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    International cataloguing and bibliographic control. 22(1993) no.4, S.68-71

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 175
  • r 2
  • b 1
  • el 1
  • s 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…