-
Døsen, K.: One more reference on self-reference (1992)
0.03
0.028410593 = product of:
0.056821186 = sum of:
0.056821186 = product of:
0.11364237 = sum of:
0.11364237 = weight(_text_:22 in 4604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11364237 = score(doc=4604,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18357785 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05242341 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4604, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4604)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 7. 2.2005 14:10:22
-
Braam, R.R.; Moed, H.F.; Raan, F.J. van: Mapping of science by combined co-citation and word analysis : T.1: Structural aspects - T.2: Dynamical Aspects (1991)
0.01
0.014987071 = product of:
0.029974142 = sum of:
0.029974142 = product of:
0.059948284 = sum of:
0.059948284 = weight(_text_:2 in 1119) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059948284 = score(doc=1119,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.05242341 = queryNorm
0.4630484 = fieldWeight in 1119, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1119)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 42(1991), S.233-251(T.1); S.252-266(T.2)
-
Huber, C.: Web of science (1999)
0.01
0.014129946 = product of:
0.028259892 = sum of:
0.028259892 = product of:
0.056519784 = sum of:
0.056519784 = weight(_text_:2 in 3595) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056519784 = score(doc=3595,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.05242341 = queryNorm
0.4365662 = fieldWeight in 3595, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3595)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Library journal. 124(1999) no.2, S.132
-
Campanario, J.M.: Have referees rejected some of the most-cited articles of all times? (1996)
0.01
0.010653973 = product of:
0.021307945 = sum of:
0.021307945 = product of:
0.04261589 = sum of:
0.04261589 = weight(_text_:22 in 4215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04261589 = score(doc=4215,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18357785 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05242341 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4215, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4215)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- In this article a quantitative study is reported on the resistance that scientists may encounter when they do innovative work or when they attempt to publish articles that later become highly cited. A set of 205 commentaries by authors of some of the most-cited papers of all times have been examined in order to identify those articles whose authors encountered difficulty in getting his or her work published. There are 22 commentaries (10,7%) in which authors mention some difficulty or resistance in doing or publishing the research reported in the article. Three of the articles which had problems in being published are the most cited from their respective journals. According the authors' commentaries, although sometimes referees' negative evaluations can help improve the articles, in other instances referees and editors wrongly rejected the highly cited articles
-
Snyder, H.; Bonzi, S.: Patterns of self-citation across disciplines : 1980-1989 (1998)
0.01
0.010653973 = product of:
0.021307945 = sum of:
0.021307945 = product of:
0.04261589 = sum of:
0.04261589 = weight(_text_:22 in 3692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04261589 = score(doc=3692,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18357785 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05242341 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3692, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3692)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 5.1999 19:33:24
-
Osareh, F.: Bibliometrics, citation analysis and co-citation analysis : a review of literature II (1996)
0.01
0.00999138 = product of:
0.01998276 = sum of:
0.01998276 = product of:
0.03996552 = sum of:
0.03996552 = weight(_text_:2 in 7105) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03996552 = score(doc=7105,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.05242341 = queryNorm
0.30869892 = fieldWeight in 7105, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7105)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Part 2 of a 2 part article reviewing the technique of bibliometrics and one of its most widely used methods, citation analysis. Reports on studies of author co-citation, periodical by periodical citation analysis and country by country citation analysis in addition to the mapping of science as an application of citation analysis. Considers the limitations, problems and reliability of citation analysis
-
Wouters, P.: ¬The signs of science (1998)
0.01
0.00999138 = product of:
0.01998276 = sum of:
0.01998276 = product of:
0.03996552 = sum of:
0.03996552 = weight(_text_:2 in 1023) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03996552 = score(doc=1023,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.05242341 = queryNorm
0.30869892 = fieldWeight in 1023, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1023)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 2. 3.1997 12:16:21
- Source
- Scientometrics. 41(1998) nos.1/2, S.225-241
-
Szava-Kovats, E.: Non-indexed literature citedness (1997)
0.01
0.00999138 = product of:
0.01998276 = sum of:
0.01998276 = product of:
0.03996552 = sum of:
0.03996552 = weight(_text_:2 in 3002) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03996552 = score(doc=3002,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.05242341 = queryNorm
0.30869892 = fieldWeight in 3002, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3002)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Discusses citation counting measurements, and provides a qualitative analysis of citation analysis (also known as scientometrics or informetrics). Critically evaluates citation indexes, drawing on 2 major investigations carried out by the author. Explains the importance of the phenomenon of non-indexed citedness, and highlights some serious limitations of citation indexes as a basis for measuring the scientific literature and hence making judgements about the respective merits of individual scientists
- Source
- International information communication and education. 16(1997) no.2, S.203-209
-
Piternick, A.B.: Name of an author! (1992)
0.01
0.008831216 = product of:
0.017662432 = sum of:
0.017662432 = product of:
0.035324864 = sum of:
0.035324864 = weight(_text_:2 in 3293) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035324864 = score(doc=3293,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.05242341 = queryNorm
0.27285388 = fieldWeight in 3293, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3293)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Indexer. 18(1992) no.2, S.95-100
-
Shaw, W.M.: Subject and citation indexing : pt.1: the clustering structure of composite representations in the cystic fibrosis document collection (1991)
0.01
0.0074935355 = product of:
0.014987071 = sum of:
0.014987071 = product of:
0.029974142 = sum of:
0.029974142 = weight(_text_:2 in 4841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029974142 = score(doc=4841,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.05242341 = queryNorm
0.2315242 = fieldWeight in 4841, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4841)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The presence of clustering structure in the CF document collection (cystic fibrosis) is evaluated as a function of the exhaustivity of 5 composite representations. The composite representations are constructed from 2 subject descriptions, based on MeSH and subheadings, and 2 citation indexes, based on the complete set of references an and a comprehensive set of citations to each document. Experiment results reveal observable evidence of clustering structure diminishes as the exhaustivity of each representation is decreased. The representation composed of references and citations shows less evidence of clustering structure at the exhaustive level but more uniform evidence of clustering structure over a wide range of exhaustivity levels than composite representations that include subject descriptions. The structures imposed on the CF document collection by all composite representations satisfy the necessary condition for a meaningful clustering outcome
-
Snyder, H.; Cronin, B.; Davenport, E.: What's the use of citation? : Citation analysis as a literature topic in selected disciplines of the social sciences (1995)
0.01
0.0074935355 = product of:
0.014987071 = sum of:
0.014987071 = product of:
0.029974142 = sum of:
0.029974142 = weight(_text_:2 in 1825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029974142 = score(doc=1825,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.05242341 = queryNorm
0.2315242 = fieldWeight in 1825, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1825)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Reports results of a study to investigate the place and role of citation analysis in selected disciplines in the social sciences, including library and information science. 5 core library and information science periodicals: Journal of documentation; Library quarterly; Journal of the American Society for Information Science; College and research libraries; and the Journal of information science, were studed to determine the percentage of articles devoted to citation analysis and develop an indictive typology to categorize the major foci of research being conducted under the rubric of citation analysis. Similar analysis was conducted for periodicals in other social sciences disciplines. Demonstrates how the rubric can be used to dertermine how citatiion analysis is applied within library and information science and other disciplines. By isolating citation from bibliometrics in general, this work is differentiated from other, previous studies. Analysis of data from a 10 year sample of transdisciplinary social sciences literature suggests that 2 application areas predominate: the validity of citation as an evaluation tool; and impact or performance studies of authors, periodicals, and institutions
- Source
- Journal of information science. 21(1995) no.2, S.75-85
-
Weinberg, B.H.: ¬The earliest Hebrew citation indexes (1997)
0.01
0.0074935355 = product of:
0.014987071 = sum of:
0.014987071 = product of:
0.029974142 = sum of:
0.029974142 = weight(_text_:2 in 86) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029974142 = score(doc=86,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.05242341 = queryNorm
0.2315242 = fieldWeight in 86, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=86)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The invention of the citation index was credited to Shepard (1873) and Shapiro described a legal citation index published in 1743. A similar index was embedded in the Talmud 2 centuries earlier (1546). The 1st Hebrew citation index to a printed book is dated 1511. The earliest Hebrew manuscript citation index, ascribed to Maimonides, dates from the 12th century. Considerable knowledge was assumed for users of these tools. The substantial knowledge of their compilers contrats with the semi-automatic production of modern citation indexes. The terms citation, quotation, reference, cross-reference, locator, and concordance are employed inconsistently in publications about Hebrew indexes. There is a lack of citation links between the secondary literature on Hebrew indexes and that of citation analysis
- Footnote
- Contribution to part 1 of a 2 part series on the history of documentation and information science
-
Howard, D.L.: What the eye sees while predicitng a document's pertinence from its citation (1991)
0.01
0.007064973 = product of:
0.014129946 = sum of:
0.014129946 = product of:
0.028259892 = sum of:
0.028259892 = weight(_text_:2 in 3675) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028259892 = score(doc=3675,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.05242341 = queryNorm
0.2182831 = fieldWeight in 3675, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3675)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Predicting relevance of documents from citations is a common problem for information users. The study addresses the relevance prediction process and most specifically, what is viewed by the subject while using the citations. 2 kinds of protocols were collected while 11 subjects viewed 7 citations each. Eye fixations and eye movements between parts of citations were examined. Verbal reports from subjects during this process were used to explore the process of assessment
-
Shaw, W.M.: Subject and citation indexing : pt.2: the optimal, cluster-based retrieval performance of composite representations (1991)
0.01
0.007064973 = product of:
0.014129946 = sum of:
0.014129946 = product of:
0.028259892 = sum of:
0.028259892 = weight(_text_:2 in 4842) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028259892 = score(doc=4842,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.05242341 = queryNorm
0.2182831 = fieldWeight in 4842, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4842)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Moed, H.F.: Differences in the construction of SCI based bibliometric indicators among various producers : a first overview (1996)
0.01
0.007064973 = product of:
0.014129946 = sum of:
0.014129946 = product of:
0.028259892 = sum of:
0.028259892 = weight(_text_:2 in 5073) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028259892 = score(doc=5073,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.05242341 = queryNorm
0.2182831 = fieldWeight in 5073, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5073)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Scientometrics. 35(1996) no.2, S.177-191
-
Oppenheim, C.: Do citations count? : Citation indexing and the Research Assessment Exercise (RAE) (1996)
0.01
0.007064973 = product of:
0.014129946 = sum of:
0.014129946 = product of:
0.028259892 = sum of:
0.028259892 = weight(_text_:2 in 6673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028259892 = score(doc=6673,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.05242341 = queryNorm
0.2182831 = fieldWeight in 6673, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6673)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Serials. 9(1996) no.2, S.155-161
-
Osareh, F.: Bibliometrics, citation analysis and co-citation analysis : a review of literature I (1996)
0.01
0.007064973 = product of:
0.014129946 = sum of:
0.014129946 = product of:
0.028259892 = sum of:
0.028259892 = weight(_text_:2 in 7170) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028259892 = score(doc=7170,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.05242341 = queryNorm
0.2182831 = fieldWeight in 7170, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7170)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Part 1 of a 2 part article reviewing the technique of bibliometrics and one of its most widely used methods, citation analysis. Traces the history and development of bibliometrics, including its definition, scope, role in scholarly communication and applications. Treats citation analysis similarly with particular reference to bibliographic coupling and cocitation coupling
-
So, C.Y.K.: Citation ranking versus expert judgement in evaluating communication scholars : effects of research specialty size and individual prominence (1998)
0.01
0.007064973 = product of:
0.014129946 = sum of:
0.014129946 = product of:
0.028259892 = sum of:
0.028259892 = weight(_text_:2 in 327) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028259892 = score(doc=327,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.05242341 = queryNorm
0.2182831 = fieldWeight in 327, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=327)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 2. 3.1997 12:16:21
-
Kostoff, R.N.: Citation analysis cross field normalization : a new paradigm (1997)
0.01
0.007064973 = product of:
0.014129946 = sum of:
0.014129946 = product of:
0.028259892 = sum of:
0.028259892 = weight(_text_:2 in 464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028259892 = score(doc=464,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.05242341 = queryNorm
0.2182831 = fieldWeight in 464, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=464)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 2. 3.1997 12:16:21
-
Göbel, S.: Aspekte der Mathematikliteratur : Untersuchungen in verschiedenen Datenbanken (1997)
0.01
0.007064973 = product of:
0.014129946 = sum of:
0.014129946 = product of:
0.028259892 = sum of:
0.028259892 = weight(_text_:2 in 2166) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028259892 = score(doc=2166,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.05242341 = queryNorm
0.2182831 = fieldWeight in 2166, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2166)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Mitteilungen der Deutschen Mathematiker-Vereinigung. 1997, H.2, S.48-53
