Search (3648 results, page 1 of 183)

  1. Sears' list of subject headings (2018) 0.25
    0.25226063 = product of:
      0.50452125 = sum of:
        0.45812398 = weight(_text_:22th in 4652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.45812398 = score(doc=4652,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.6280387 = queryWeight, product of:
              11.00374 = idf(docFreq=1, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05707502 = queryNorm
            0.72945184 = fieldWeight in 4652, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              11.00374 = idf(docFreq=1, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4652)
        0.04639726 = weight(_text_:22 in 4652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04639726 = score(doc=4652,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.199867 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05707502 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4652, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4652)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Date
    21.12.2018 18:22:12
    Issue
    22th ed.
  2. Jeng, W.; DesAutels, S.; He, D.; Li, L.: Information exchange on an academic social networking site : a multidiscipline comparison on researchgate Q&A (2017) 0.16
    0.16041826 = product of:
      0.641673 = sum of:
        0.641673 = weight(_text_:asnss in 3431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.641673 = score(doc=3431,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.57574135 = queryWeight, product of:
              10.087449 = idf(docFreq=4, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05707502 = queryNorm
            1.1145161 = fieldWeight in 3431, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              10.087449 = idf(docFreq=4, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3431)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The increasing popularity of academic social networking sites (ASNSs) requires studies on the usage of ASNSs among scholars and evaluations of the effectiveness of these ASNSs. However, it is unclear whether current ASNSs have fulfilled their design goal, as scholars' actual online interactions on these platforms remain unexplored. To fill the gap, this article presents a study based on data collected from ResearchGate. Adopting a mixed-method design by conducting qualitative content analysis and statistical analysis on 1,128 posts collected from ResearchGate Q&A, we examine how scholars exchange information and resources, and how their practices vary across three distinct disciplines: library and information services, history of art, and astrophysics. Our results show that the effect of a questioner's intention (i.e., seeking information or discussion) is greater than disciplinary factors in some circumstances. Across the three disciplines, responses to questions provide various resources, including experts' contact details, citations, links to Wikipedia, images, and so on. We further discuss several implications of the understanding of scholarly information exchange and the design of better academic social networking interfaces, which should stimulate scholarly interactions by minimizing confusion, improving the clarity of questions, and promoting scholarly content management.
  3. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.16
    0.15917403 = product of:
      0.31834805 = sum of:
        0.27195078 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.27195078 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.48388267 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05707502 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.04639726 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04639726 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.199867 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05707502 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  4. Jeng, W.; He, D.; Jiang, J.: User participation in an academic social networking service : a survey of open group users on Mendeley (2015) 0.14
    0.1389263 = product of:
      0.5557052 = sum of:
        0.5557052 = weight(_text_:asnss in 1815) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.5557052 = score(doc=1815,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.57574135 = queryWeight, product of:
              10.087449 = idf(docFreq=4, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05707502 = queryNorm
            0.9651994 = fieldWeight in 1815, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              10.087449 = idf(docFreq=4, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1815)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Although there are a number of social networking services that specifically target scholars, little has been published about the actual practices and the usage of these so-called academic social networking services (ASNSs). To fill this gap, we explore the populations of academics who engage in social activities using an ASNS; as an indicator of further engagement, we also determine their various motivations for joining a group in ASNSs. Using groups and their members in Mendeley as the platform for our case study, we obtained 146 participant responses from our online survey about users' common activities, usage habits, and motivations for joining groups. Our results show that (a) participants did not engage with social-based features as frequently and actively as they engaged with research-based features, and (b) users who joined more groups seemed to have a stronger motivation to increase their professional visibility and to contribute the research articles that they had read to the group reading list. Our results generate interesting insights into Mendeley's user populations, their activities, and their motivations relative to the social features of Mendeley. We also argue that further design of ASNSs is needed to take greater account of disciplinary differences in scholarly communication and to establish incentive mechanisms for encouraging user participation.
  5. Ostermaier-Grabow, A.; Linek, S.B.: Communication and self-presentation behavior on academic social networking sites : an exploratory case study on profiles and discussion threads on ResearchGate (2019) 0.14
    0.1389263 = product of:
      0.5557052 = sum of:
        0.5557052 = weight(_text_:asnss in 5391) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.5557052 = score(doc=5391,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.57574135 = queryWeight, product of:
              10.087449 = idf(docFreq=4, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05707502 = queryNorm
            0.9651994 = fieldWeight in 5391, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              10.087449 = idf(docFreq=4, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5391)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Several Academic Social Networking Sites (ASNSs) have been launched in the last few years and their number of members is growing. Researchers using ASNSs come from very divergent scientific backgrounds and academic levels, prompting one to ask the question, What kind of communication and self-presentation behaviors occur within these structures? The qualitative study presented in this article analyzed the communication behavior of a selected sample on ResearchGate (RG). It investigates how researchers present themselves on their personal-profile sites and how they interact with other researchers. Overall, the results show that mostly young male academics without previous connections to each other (for example, faculty colleges) use RG for their scholarly exchanges. In general, communication behavior is characterized by an objective, professional, unemotional choice of words and seldom the use of polite salutations or words of farewell. However, there seems to be a correlation between long discussion and an increased use of colloquial and emotional language. Based on our findings, we derived preliminary practical recommendations for communications on ASNSs to improve the relationships in online academic interactions, to foster inclusiveness of gender and culture, and to reduce insecurity in matters of communication, presentation, and the exchange of scientific data.
  6. Verwer, K.: Freiheit und Verantwortung bei Hans Jonas (2011) 0.14
    0.13597539 = product of:
      0.54390156 = sum of:
        0.54390156 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.54390156 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.48388267 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05707502 = queryNorm
            1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.
  7. Fachsystematik Bremen nebst Schlüssel 1970 ff. (1970 ff) 0.13
    0.13264503 = product of:
      0.26529005 = sum of:
        0.22662567 = weight(_text_:3a in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22662567 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.48388267 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05707502 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
        0.038664386 = weight(_text_:22 in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038664386 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.199867 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05707502 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Content
    1. Agrarwissenschaften 1981. - 3. Allgemeine Geographie 2.1972. - 3a. Allgemeine Naturwissenschaften 1.1973. - 4. Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, Allgemeine Literaturwissenschaft 2.1971. - 6. Allgemeines. 5.1983. - 7. Anglistik 3.1976. - 8. Astronomie, Geodäsie 4.1977. - 12. bio Biologie, bcp Biochemie-Biophysik, bot Botanik, zoo Zoologie 1981. - 13. Bremensien 3.1983. - 13a. Buch- und Bibliothekswesen 3.1975. - 14. Chemie 4.1977. - 14a. Elektrotechnik 1974. - 15 Ethnologie 2.1976. - 16,1. Geowissenschaften. Sachteil 3.1977. - 16,2. Geowissenschaften. Regionaler Teil 3.1977. - 17. Germanistik 6.1984. - 17a,1. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hil. - 17a,2. Geschichte. Teilsystematik his Neuere Geschichte. - 17a,3. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hit Neueste Geschichte. - 18. Humanbiologie 2.1983. - 19. Ingenieurwissenschaften 1974. - 20. siehe 14a. - 21. klassische Philologie 3.1977. - 22. Klinische Medizin 1975. - 23. Kunstgeschichte 2.1971. - 24. Kybernetik. 2.1975. - 25. Mathematik 3.1974. - 26. Medizin 1976. - 26a. Militärwissenschaft 1985. - 27. Musikwissenschaft 1978. - 27a. Noten 2.1974. - 28. Ozeanographie 3.1977. -29. Pädagogik 8.1985. - 30. Philosphie 3.1974. - 31. Physik 3.1974. - 33. Politik, Politische Wissenschaft, Sozialwissenschaft. Soziologie. Länderschlüssel. Register 1981. - 34. Psychologie 2.1972. - 35. Publizistik und Kommunikationswissenschaft 1985. - 36. Rechtswissenschaften 1986. - 37. Regionale Geograpgie 3.1975. - 37a. Religionswissenschaft 1970. - 38. Romanistik 3.1976. - 39. Skandinavistik 4.1985. - 40. Slavistik 1977. - 40a. Sonstige Sprachen und Literaturen 1973. - 43. Sport 4.1983. - 44. Theaterwissenschaft 1985. - 45. Theologie 2.1976. - 45a. Ur- und Frühgeschichte, Archäologie 1970. - 47. Volkskunde 1976. - 47a. Wirtschaftswissenschaften 1971 // Schlüssel: 1. Länderschlüssel 1971. - 2. Formenschlüssel (Kurzform) 1974. - 3. Personenschlüssel Literatur 5. Fassung 1968
  8. Kleineberg, M.: Context analysis and context indexing : formal pragmatics in knowledge organization (2014) 0.11
    0.11331283 = product of:
      0.45325133 = sum of:
        0.45325133 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.45325133 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.48388267 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05707502 = queryNorm
            0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja
  9. Schrodt, R.: Tiefen und Untiefen im wissenschaftlichen Sprachgebrauch (2008) 0.09
    0.09065027 = product of:
      0.36260107 = sum of:
        0.36260107 = weight(_text_:3a in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.36260107 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.48388267 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05707502 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Content
    Vgl. auch: https://studylibde.com/doc/13053640/richard-schrodt. Vgl. auch: http%3A%2F%2Fwww.univie.ac.at%2FGermanistik%2Fschrodt%2Fvorlesung%2Fwissenschaftssprache.doc&usg=AOvVaw1lDLDR6NFf1W0-oC9mEUJf.
  10. Popper, K.R.: Three worlds : the Tanner lecture on human values. Deliverd at the University of Michigan, April 7, 1978 (1978) 0.09
    0.09065027 = product of:
      0.36260107 = sum of:
        0.36260107 = weight(_text_:3a in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.36260107 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.48388267 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05707502 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Ftannerlectures.utah.edu%2F_documents%2Fa-to-z%2Fp%2Fpopper80.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3f4QRTEH-OEBmoYr2J_c7H
  11. Lee, J.; Oh, S.; Dong, H.; Wang, F.; Burnett, G.: Motivations for self-archiving on an academic social networking site : a study on researchgate (2019) 0.08
    0.08020913 = product of:
      0.3208365 = sum of:
        0.3208365 = weight(_text_:asnss in 5249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3208365 = score(doc=5249,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.57574135 = queryWeight, product of:
              10.087449 = idf(docFreq=4, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05707502 = queryNorm
            0.55725807 = fieldWeight in 5249, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              10.087449 = idf(docFreq=4, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5249)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    This study investigates motivations for self-archiving research items on academic social networking sites (ASNSs). A model of these motivations was developed based on two existing motivation models: motivation for self-archiving in academia and motivations for information sharing in social media. The proposed model is composed of 18 factors drawn from personal, social, professional, and external contexts, including enjoyment, personal/professional gain, reputation, learning, self-efficacy, altruism, reciprocity, trust, community interest, social engagement, publicity, accessibility, self-archiving culture, influence of external actors, credibility, system stability, copyright concerns, additional time, and effort. Two hundred and twenty-six ResearchGate users participated in the survey. Accessibility was the most highly rated factor, followed by altruism, reciprocity, trust, self-efficacy, reputation, publicity, and others. Personal, social, and professional factors were also highly rated, while external factors were rated relatively low. Motivations were correlated with one another, demonstrating that RG motivations for self-archiving could increase or decrease based on several factors in combination with motivations from the personal, social, professional, and external contexts. We believe the findings from this study can increase our understanding of users' motivations in sharing their research and provide useful implications for the development and improvement of ASNS services, thereby attracting more active users.
  12. Vetere, G.; Lenzerini, M.: Models for semantic interoperability in service-oriented architectures (2005) 0.08
    0.079318985 = product of:
      0.31727594 = sum of:
        0.31727594 = weight(_text_:3a in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.31727594 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.48388267 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05707502 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5386707&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fxpls%2Fabs_all.jsp%3Farnumber%3D5386707.
  13. Gödert, W.; Lepsky, K.: Informationelle Kompetenz : ein humanistischer Entwurf (2019) 0.08
    0.079318985 = product of:
      0.31727594 = sum of:
        0.31727594 = weight(_text_:3a in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.31727594 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.48388267 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05707502 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Philosophisch-ethische Rezensionen vom 09.11.2019 (Jürgen Czogalla), Unter: https://philosophisch-ethische-rezensionen.de/rezension/Goedert1.html. In: B.I.T. online 23(2020) H.3, S.345-347 (W. Sühl-Strohmenger) [Unter: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.b-i-t-online.de%2Fheft%2F2020-03-rezensionen.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0iY3f_zNcvEjeZ6inHVnOK]. In: Open Password Nr. 805 vom 14.08.2020 (H.-C. Hobohm) [Unter: https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzE0MywiOGI3NjZkZmNkZjQ1IiwwLDAsMTMxLDFd].
  14. #220 0.08
    0.07655158 = product of:
      0.30620632 = sum of:
        0.30620632 = weight(_text_:22 in 219) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.30620632 = score(doc=219,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.199867 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05707502 = queryNorm
            1.5320505 = fieldWeight in 219, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.21875 = fieldNorm(doc=219)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 5.1998 20:02:22
  15. #1387 0.08
    0.07655158 = product of:
      0.30620632 = sum of:
        0.30620632 = weight(_text_:22 in 1386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.30620632 = score(doc=1386,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.199867 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05707502 = queryNorm
            1.5320505 = fieldWeight in 1386, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.21875 = fieldNorm(doc=1386)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 5.1998 20:02:22
  16. #2103 0.08
    0.07655158 = product of:
      0.30620632 = sum of:
        0.30620632 = weight(_text_:22 in 2102) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.30620632 = score(doc=2102,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.199867 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05707502 = queryNorm
            1.5320505 = fieldWeight in 2102, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.21875 = fieldNorm(doc=2102)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 5.1998 20:02:22
  17. Mas, S.; Marleau, Y.: Proposition of a faceted classification model to support corporate information organization and digital records management (2009) 0.07
    0.067987695 = product of:
      0.27195078 = sum of:
        0.27195078 = weight(_text_:3a in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.27195078 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.48388267 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05707502 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?reload=true&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fiel5%2F4755313%2F4755314%2F04755480.pdf%3Farnumber%3D4755480&authDecision=-203.
  18. Li, L.; Shang, Y.; Zhang, W.: Improvement of HITS-based algorithms on Web documents 0.07
    0.067987695 = product of:
      0.27195078 = sum of:
        0.27195078 = weight(_text_:3a in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.27195078 = score(doc=2514,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.48388267 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05707502 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdelab.csd.auth.gr%2F~dimitris%2Fcourses%2Fir_spring06%2Fpage_rank_computing%2Fp527-li.pdf. Vgl. auch: http://www2002.org/CDROM/refereed/643/.
  19. Zeng, Q.; Yu, M.; Yu, W.; Xiong, J.; Shi, Y.; Jiang, M.: Faceted hierarchy : a new graph type to organize scientific concepts and a construction method (2019) 0.07
    0.067987695 = product of:
      0.27195078 = sum of:
        0.27195078 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.27195078 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.48388267 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05707502 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.
  20. Suchenwirth, L.: Sacherschliessung in Zeiten von Corona : neue Herausforderungen und Chancen (2019) 0.07
    0.067987695 = product of:
      0.27195078 = sum of:
        0.27195078 = weight(_text_:3a in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.27195078 = score(doc=484,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.48388267 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05707502 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Footnote
    https%3A%2F%2Fjournals.univie.ac.at%2Findex.php%2Fvoebm%2Farticle%2Fdownload%2F5332%2F5271%2F&usg=AOvVaw2yQdFGHlmOwVls7ANCpTii.

Languages

Types

  • a 3048
  • m 344
  • el 161
  • s 139
  • b 39
  • x 35
  • i 23
  • r 17
  • ? 8
  • p 4
  • d 3
  • n 3
  • u 2
  • z 2
  • au 1
  • h 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications