Search (9531 results, page 1 of 477)

  1. Ackermann, E.: Piaget's constructivism, Papert's constructionism : what's the difference? (2001) 0.29
    0.2878983 = sum of:
      0.27380103 = product of:
        0.54760206 = sum of:
          0.21367967 = weight(_text_:3a in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.21367967 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.45624086 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05381461 = queryNorm
              0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
          0.3339224 = weight(_text_:2c in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.3339224 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.570342 = queryWeight, product of:
                10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05381461 = queryNorm
              0.5854775 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
        0.5 = coord(2/4)
      0.0140972715 = product of:
        0.042291813 = sum of:
          0.042291813 = weight(_text_:i in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042291813 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20297416 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05381461 = queryNorm
              0.20836058 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    What is the difference between Piaget's constructivism and Papert's "constructionism"? Beyond the mere play on the words, I think the distinction holds, and that integrating both views can enrich our understanding of how people learn and grow. Piaget's constructivism offers a window into what children are interested in, and able to achieve, at different stages of their development. The theory describes how children's ways of doing and thinking evolve over time, and under which circumstance children are more likely to let go of-or hold onto- their currently held views. Piaget suggests that children have very good reasons not to abandon their worldviews just because someone else, be it an expert, tells them they're wrong. Papert's constructionism, in contrast, focuses more on the art of learning, or 'learning to learn', and on the significance of making things in learning. Papert is interested in how learners engage in a conversation with [their own or other people's] artifacts, and how these conversations boost self-directed learning, and ultimately facilitate the construction of new knowledge. He stresses the importance of tools, media, and context in human development. Integrating both perspectives illuminates the processes by which individuals come to make sense of their experience, gradually optimizing their interactions with the world.
    Content
    Vgl.: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Piaget-%E2%80%99-s-Constructivism-%2C-Papert-%E2%80%99-s-%3A-What-%E2%80%99-s-Ackermann/89cbcc1e740a4591443ff4765a6ae8df0fdf5554. Darunter weitere Hinweise auf verwandte Beiträge. Auch unter: Learning Group Publication 5(2001) no.3, S.438.
  2. Verwer, K.: Freiheit und Verantwortung bei Hans Jonas (2011) 0.16
    0.16204126 = sum of:
      0.1282078 = product of:
        0.5128312 = sum of:
          0.5128312 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.5128312 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.45624086 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05381461 = queryNorm
              1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.033833455 = product of:
        0.10150036 = sum of:
          0.10150036 = weight(_text_:i in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.10150036 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20297416 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05381461 = queryNorm
              0.50006545 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.
    Footnote
    Inauguraldissertation zur Erlangung der Doktorwürde Vorgelegt der Philosophischen Fakultät I der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin.
  3. Gödert, W.; Lepsky, K.: Informationelle Kompetenz : ein humanistischer Entwurf (2019) 0.15
    0.14727442 = sum of:
      0.074787885 = product of:
        0.29915154 = sum of:
          0.29915154 = weight(_text_:3a in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.29915154 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.45624086 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05381461 = queryNorm
              0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.072486535 = product of:
        0.108729795 = sum of:
          0.059208542 = weight(_text_:i in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.059208542 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20297416 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05381461 = queryNorm
              0.29170483 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
          0.049521253 = weight(_text_:c in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049521253 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18562838 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05381461 = queryNorm
              0.2667763 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
        0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Philosophisch-ethische Rezensionen vom 09.11.2019 (Jürgen Czogalla), Unter: https://philosophisch-ethische-rezensionen.de/rezension/Goedert1.html. In: B.I.T. online 23(2020) H.3, S.345-347 (W. Sühl-Strohmenger) [Unter: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.b-i-t-online.de%2Fheft%2F2020-03-rezensionen.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0iY3f_zNcvEjeZ6inHVnOK]. In: Open Password Nr. 805 vom 14.08.2020 (H.-C. Hobohm) [Unter: https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzE0MywiOGI3NjZkZmNkZjQ1IiwwLDAsMTMxLDFd].
  4. Mejías, C. Bolaños- => Bolaños-Mejías, C.: 0.14
    0.13836753 = product of:
      0.27673507 = sum of:
        0.27673507 = product of:
          0.41510257 = sum of:
            0.2401153 = weight(_text_:c in 4643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.2401153 = score(doc=4643,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18562838 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05381461 = queryNorm
                1.2935269 = fieldWeight in 4643, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.1875 = fieldNorm(doc=4643)
            0.17498727 = weight(_text_:22 in 4643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.17498727 = score(doc=4643,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18844959 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05381461 = queryNorm
                0.92856276 = fieldWeight in 4643, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.1875 = fieldNorm(doc=4643)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    21.12.2018 17:37:22
  5. Belayche, C.: ¬A propos de la classification de Dewey (1997) 0.13
    0.13031894 = sum of:
      0.053702384 = product of:
        0.21480954 = sum of:
          0.21480954 = weight(_text_:author's in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.21480954 = score(doc=1171,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.36164242 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05381461 = queryNorm
              0.59398323 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.07661655 = product of:
        0.11492482 = sum of:
          0.05659572 = weight(_text_:c in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05659572 = score(doc=1171,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18562838 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05381461 = queryNorm
              0.3048872 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
          0.058329094 = weight(_text_:22 in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.058329094 = score(doc=1171,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18844959 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05381461 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
        0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    All classifications are based on ideologies and Dewey is marked by its author's origins in 19th century North America. Subsequent revisions indicate changed ways of understanding the world. Section 157 (psycho-pathology) is now included with 616.89 (mental troubles), reflecting the move to a genetic-based approach. Table 5 (racial, ethnic and national groups) is however unchanged, despite changing views on such categorisation
    Source
    Bulletin d'informations de l'Association des Bibliothecaires Francais. 1997, no.175, S.22-23
  6. Shuttleworth, C.: Marot, Hofstadter, index (1998) 0.13
    0.13031894 = sum of:
      0.053702384 = product of:
        0.21480954 = sum of:
          0.21480954 = weight(_text_:author's in 4642) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.21480954 = score(doc=4642,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.36164242 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05381461 = queryNorm
              0.59398323 = fieldWeight in 4642, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4642)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.07661655 = product of:
        0.11492482 = sum of:
          0.05659572 = weight(_text_:c in 4642) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05659572 = score(doc=4642,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18562838 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05381461 = queryNorm
              0.3048872 = fieldWeight in 4642, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4642)
          0.058329094 = weight(_text_:22 in 4642) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.058329094 = score(doc=4642,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18844959 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05381461 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4642, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4642)
        0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Comments on Douglas Hofstadter's index to his book 'Le ton beau de Marot: in praise of the music of language'. Hofstadter took charge of the book design, typography, typesetting and copy-editing, and also compiled the index which covers 23 pages of 3 columnes and is set in a practically illegible 4-point. Although the index breaks all the rules of indexing, it is a masterly creation showing the author's industry, exhuberance and wit. Summarizes Hofstadter's own remarks on how creating the index gave hin new insights into what his book was essentially about
    Source
    Indexer. 21(1998) no.1, S.22-23
  7. Popper, K.R.: Three worlds : the Tanner lecture on human values. Deliverd at the University of Michigan, April 7, 1978 (1978) 0.12
    0.124539375 = sum of:
      0.08547187 = product of:
        0.34188747 = sum of:
          0.34188747 = weight(_text_:3a in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.34188747 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.45624086 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05381461 = queryNorm
              0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.039067507 = product of:
        0.11720252 = sum of:
          0.11720252 = weight(_text_:i in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.11720252 = score(doc=230,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.20297416 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05381461 = queryNorm
              0.57742584 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    In this lecture I intend to challenge those who uphold a monist or even a dualist view of the universe; and I will propose, instead, a pluralist view. I will propose a view of the universe that recognizes at least three different but interacting sub-universes.
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Ftannerlectures.utah.edu%2F_documents%2Fa-to-z%2Fp%2Fpopper80.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3f4QRTEH-OEBmoYr2J_c7H
  8. Coles, C.: Information seeking behaviour of public library users : use and non-use of electronic media (1999) 0.12
    0.11814705 = sum of:
      0.026851192 = product of:
        0.10740477 = sum of:
          0.10740477 = weight(_text_:author's in 286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.10740477 = score(doc=286,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.36164242 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05381461 = queryNorm
              0.29699162 = fieldWeight in 286, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=286)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.09129586 = sum of:
        0.03383345 = weight(_text_:i in 286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03383345 = score(doc=286,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20297416 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05381461 = queryNorm
            0.16668847 = fieldWeight in 286, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=286)
        0.02829786 = weight(_text_:c in 286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02829786 = score(doc=286,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18562838 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05381461 = queryNorm
            0.1524436 = fieldWeight in 286, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=286)
        0.029164547 = weight(_text_:22 in 286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029164547 = score(doc=286,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18844959 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05381461 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 286, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=286)
    
    Abstract
    This paper highlights some of the significant findings from author's PhD: "Factors affecting the end-use of electronic databases in public libraries." Public libraries have a wide range of different types of users who, unlike academic or special library users, are not necessarily information-trained (see Coles, 1998). Whereas the academic, special library user may have specific information needs that can be met by electronic sources, public library users do not necessarily have such specific information needs that can easily be identified and met. Most user surveys have tended to concentrate on the searching and retrieval aspect of information seeking behaviour, whereas this study's user survey focused more on how people perceived and related to Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs). It was not how people searched a particular electronic source, in this case CD-ROM, that was of prime interest but rather whether or not people actually used them at all and the reasons why people did or did not use electronic media. There were several reasons the study looked at CD-ROM specifically. Firstly, CD-ROM is a well established technology, most people should be familiar with CD-ROM/multimedia. Secondly, CD-ROM was, at the start of the study, the only open access electronic media widely available in public libraries. As well as examining why public library users chose to use electronic sources, the paper looks at the types of CD-ROM databases used both in the library and in general Also examined are what sort of searches users carried out. Where appropriate some of the problems inherent in studying end-users in public libraries and the difficulty in getting reliable data, are discussed. Several methods were used to collect the data. I wished to avoid limiting research to a small sample of library sites, the aim was to be as broad in scope as possible. There were two main groups of people 1 wished to look at: non-users as well as CD-ROM users
    Date
    22. 3.2002 8:51:28
  9. Bibliographie zu den Biographischen Archiven : mit einem Essay von Hans Wollschläger (1994) 0.11
    0.11240049 = sum of:
      0.09781821 = product of:
        0.39127284 = sum of:
          0.39127284 = weight(_text_:2200 in 1711) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.39127284 = score(doc=1711,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.47391918 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.806516 = idf(docFreq=17, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05381461 = queryNorm
              0.8256109 = fieldWeight in 1711, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                8.806516 = idf(docFreq=17, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1711)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.014582273 = product of:
        0.043746818 = sum of:
          0.043746818 = weight(_text_:22 in 1711) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.043746818 = score(doc=1711,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18844959 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05381461 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1711, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1711)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Classification
    NC 2200 (BVB)
    Date
    21. 3.2008 12:22:03
    RVK
    NC 2200 (BVB)
  10. Dewey, M.: Decimal classification beginnings (1990) 0.11
    0.10971812 = sum of:
      0.08055358 = product of:
        0.3222143 = sum of:
          0.3222143 = weight(_text_:author's in 3554) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.3222143 = score(doc=3554,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.36164242 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05381461 = queryNorm
              0.8909749 = fieldWeight in 3554, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3554)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.029164545 = product of:
        0.087493636 = sum of:
          0.087493636 = weight(_text_:22 in 3554) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.087493636 = score(doc=3554,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18844959 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05381461 = queryNorm
              0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3554, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3554)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the author's development of the Dewey Decimal Classification
    Date
    25.12.1995 22:28:43
  11. Dahlberg, I.: Normung und Klassifikation (1978) 0.10
    0.10499667 = product of:
      0.20999333 = sum of:
        0.20999333 = product of:
          0.31498998 = sum of:
            0.16916725 = weight(_text_:i in 1612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.16916725 = score(doc=1612,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20297416 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05381461 = queryNorm
                0.83344233 = fieldWeight in 1612, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1612)
            0.14582273 = weight(_text_:22 in 1612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14582273 = score(doc=1612,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18844959 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05381461 = queryNorm
                0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 1612, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1612)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    DK-Mitteilungen. 22(1978) Nr.5/6, S.13-18
  12. Dahlberg, I.: Kolloquium Einheitsklassifikation (1975) 0.10
    0.10499667 = product of:
      0.20999333 = sum of:
        0.20999333 = product of:
          0.31498998 = sum of:
            0.16916725 = weight(_text_:i in 1625) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.16916725 = score(doc=1625,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20297416 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05381461 = queryNorm
                0.83344233 = fieldWeight in 1625, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1625)
            0.14582273 = weight(_text_:22 in 1625) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14582273 = score(doc=1625,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18844959 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05381461 = queryNorm
                0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 1625, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1625)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Nachrichten für Dokumentation. 26(1975), S.22-25
  13. Dahlberg, I.: Conceptual definitions for INTERCONCEPT (1981) 0.10
    0.10499667 = product of:
      0.20999333 = sum of:
        0.20999333 = product of:
          0.31498998 = sum of:
            0.16916725 = weight(_text_:i in 1630) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.16916725 = score(doc=1630,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20297416 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05381461 = queryNorm
                0.83344233 = fieldWeight in 1630, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1630)
            0.14582273 = weight(_text_:22 in 1630) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14582273 = score(doc=1630,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18844959 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05381461 = queryNorm
                0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 1630, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1630)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    International classification. 8(1981), S.16-22
  14. Gödert, W.; Hubrich, J.; Boteram, F.: Thematische Recherche und Interoperabilität : Wege zur Optimierung des Zugriffs auf heterogen erschlossene Dokumente (2009) 0.10
    0.09563249 = sum of:
      0.0834806 = product of:
        0.3339224 = sum of:
          0.3339224 = weight(_text_:2c in 193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.3339224 = score(doc=193,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.570342 = queryWeight, product of:
                10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05381461 = queryNorm
              0.5854775 = fieldWeight in 193, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=193)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.012151895 = product of:
        0.036455683 = sum of:
          0.036455683 = weight(_text_:22 in 193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.036455683 = score(doc=193,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18844959 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05381461 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 193, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=193)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    https://opus4.kobv.de/opus4-bib-info/frontdoor/index/index/searchtype/authorsearch/author/%22Hubrich%2C+Jessica%22/docId/703/start/0/rows/20
  15. Castle, C.: Getting the central RDM message across : a case study of central versus discipline-specific Research Data Services (RDS) at the University of Cambridge (2019) 0.10
    0.09535199 = sum of:
      0.047466647 = product of:
        0.18986659 = sum of:
          0.18986659 = weight(_text_:author's in 5491) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.18986659 = score(doc=5491,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.36164242 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05381461 = queryNorm
              0.52501196 = fieldWeight in 5491, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5491)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.04788534 = product of:
        0.07182801 = sum of:
          0.035372324 = weight(_text_:c in 5491) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.035372324 = score(doc=5491,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18562838 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05381461 = queryNorm
              0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 5491, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5491)
          0.036455683 = weight(_text_:22 in 5491) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.036455683 = score(doc=5491,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18844959 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05381461 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5491, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5491)
        0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    RDS are usually cross-disciplinary, centralised services, which are increasingly provided at a university by the academic library and in collaboration with other RDM stakeholders, such as the Research Office. At research-intensive universities, research data is generated in a wide range of disciplines and sub-disciplines. This paper will discuss how providing discipline-specific RDM support is approached by such universities and academic libraries, and the advantages and disadvantages of these central and discipline-specific approaches. A descriptive case study on the author's experiences of collaborating with a central RDS at the University of Cambridge, as a subject librarian embedded in an academic department, is a major component of this paper. The case study describes how centralised RDM services offered by the Office of Scholarly Communication (OSC) have been adapted to meet discipline-specific needs in the Department of Chemistry. It will introduce the department and the OSC, and describe the author's role in delivering RDM training, as well as the Data Champions programme, and their membership of the RDM Project Group. It will describe the outcomes of this collaboration for the Department of Chemistry, and for the centralised service. Centralised and discipline-specific approaches to RDS provision have their own advantages and disadvantages. Supporting the discipline-specific RDM needs of researchers is proving particularly challenging for universities to address sustainably: it requires adequate financial resources and staff skilled (or re-skilled) in RDM. A mixed approach is the most desirable, cost-effective way of providing RDS, but this still has constraints.
    Date
    7. 9.2019 21:30:22
  16. Koch, C.: Consciousness : confessions of a romantic reductionist (2012) 0.09
    0.08660856 = sum of:
      0.03260607 = product of:
        0.13042428 = sum of:
          0.13042428 = weight(_text_:2200 in 4561) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.13042428 = score(doc=4561,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.47391918 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.806516 = idf(docFreq=17, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05381461 = queryNorm
              0.27520362 = fieldWeight in 4561, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                8.806516 = idf(docFreq=17, maxDocs=44218)
                0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=4561)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.054002494 = product of:
        0.08100374 = sum of:
          0.06099413 = weight(_text_:i in 4561) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06099413 = score(doc=4561,freq=26.0), product of:
              0.20297416 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05381461 = queryNorm
              0.30050194 = fieldWeight in 4561, product of:
                5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
                  26.0 = termFreq=26.0
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=4561)
          0.020009609 = weight(_text_:c in 4561) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.020009609 = score(doc=4561,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.18562838 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05381461 = queryNorm
              0.10779391 = fieldWeight in 4561, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=4561)
        0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Classification
    WW 2200
    Content
    In which I introduce the ancient mind-body problem, explain why I am on a quest to use reason and empirical inquiry to solve it, acquaint you with Francis Crick, explain how he relates to this quest, make a confession, and end on a sad note -- In which I write about the wellsprings of my inner conflict between religion and reason, why I grew up wanting to be a scientist, why I wear a lapel pin of Professor Calculus, and how I acquired a second mentor late in life -- In which I explain why consciousness challenges the scientific view of the world, how consciousness can be investigated empirically with both feet firmly planted on the ground, why animals share consciousness with humans, and why self-consciousness is not as important as many people think it is -- In which you hear tales of scientist-magicians that make you look but not see, how they track the footprints of consciousness by peering into your skull, why you don't see with your eyes, and why attention and consciousness are not the same -- In which you learn from neurologists and neurosurgeons that some neurons care a great deal about celebrities, that cutting the cerebral cortex in two does not reduce consciousness by half, that color is leached from the world by the loss of a small cortical region, and that the destruction of a sugar cube-sized chunk of brain stem or thalamic tissue leaves you undead -- In which I defend two propositions that my younger self found nonsense--you are unaware of most of the things that go on in your head, and zombie agents control much of your life, even though you confidently believe that you are in charge -- In which I throw caution to the wind, bring up free will, Der ring des Nibelungen, and what physics says about determinism, explain the impoverished ability of your mind to choose, show that your will lags behind your brain's decision, and that freedom is just another word for feeling -- In which I argue that consciousness is a fundamental property of complex things, rhapsodize about integrated information theory, how it explains many puzzling facts about consciousness and provides a blueprint for building sentient machines -- In which I outline an electromagnetic gadget to measure consciousness, describe efforts to harness the power of genetic engineering to track consciousness in mice, and find myself building cortical observatories -- In which I muse about final matters considered off-limits to polite scientific discourse: to wit, the relationship between science and religion, the existence of God, whether this God can intervene in the universe, the death of my mentor, and my recent tribulations.
    Footnote
    Now it might seem that is a fairly well-defined scientific task: just figure out how the brain does it. In the end I think that is the right attitude to have. But our peculiar history makes it difficult to have exactly that attitude-to take consciousness as a biological phenomenon like digestion or photosynthesis, and figure out how exactly it works as a biological phenomenon. Two philosophical obstacles cast a shadow over the whole subject. The first is the tradition of God, the soul, and immortality. Consciousness is not a part of the ordinary biological world of digestion and photosynthesis: it is part of a spiritual world. It is sometimes thought to be a property of the soul and the soul is definitely not a part of the physical world. The other tradition, almost as misleading, is a certain conception of Science with a capital "S." Science is said to be "reductionist" and "materialist," and so construed there is no room for consciousness in Science. If it really exists, consciousness must really be something else. It must be reducible to something else, such as neuron firings, computer programs running in the brain, or dispositions to behavior. There are also a number of purely technical difficulties to neurobiological research. The brain is an extremely complicated mechanism with about a hundred billion neurons in ... (Rest nicht frei). " [https://www.nybooks.com/articles/2013/01/10/can-information-theory-explain-consciousness/].
    Erwiderung von C. Koch u. G. Tononi in: The New York Review of Books, 07.03.2013 [https://www.nybooks.com/articles/2013/03/07/can-photodiode-be-conscious/?pagination=false&printpage=true] mit einer weiteren Erwiderung von J. Searle.
    RVK
    WW 2200
  17. Molitor, K.: Zu den Vorschlägen betreffend einheitlichen Zetteldruck I (1905) 0.08
    0.08399733 = product of:
      0.16799466 = sum of:
        0.16799466 = product of:
          0.251992 = sum of:
            0.1353338 = weight(_text_:i in 4390) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1353338 = score(doc=4390,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20297416 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05381461 = queryNorm
                0.6667539 = fieldWeight in 4390, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4390)
            0.11665819 = weight(_text_:22 in 4390) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11665819 = score(doc=4390,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18844959 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05381461 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4390, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4390)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Zentralblatt für Bibliothekswesen. 22(1905), S.129-135
  18. Modelle und Konzepte der Beitragsdokumentation und Filmarchivierung im Lokalfernsehsender Hamburg I : Endbericht (1996) 0.08
    0.08399733 = product of:
      0.16799466 = sum of:
        0.16799466 = product of:
          0.251992 = sum of:
            0.1353338 = weight(_text_:i in 7383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1353338 = score(doc=7383,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20297416 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05381461 = queryNorm
                0.6667539 = fieldWeight in 7383, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7383)
            0.11665819 = weight(_text_:22 in 7383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11665819 = score(doc=7383,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18844959 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05381461 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 7383, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7383)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 2.1997 19:46:30
  19. Bußmann, I.: CHILIAS: die europäische virtuelle Kinderbibliothek der Zukunft (1996) 0.08
    0.08399733 = product of:
      0.16799466 = sum of:
        0.16799466 = product of:
          0.251992 = sum of:
            0.1353338 = weight(_text_:i in 2921) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1353338 = score(doc=2921,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20297416 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05381461 = queryNorm
                0.6667539 = fieldWeight in 2921, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2921)
            0.11665819 = weight(_text_:22 in 2921) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11665819 = score(doc=2921,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18844959 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05381461 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2921, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2921)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    21. 9.1996 16:03:22
  20. Kosmos Weltatlas 2000 : Der Kompass für das 21. Jahrhundert. Inklusive Welt-Routenplaner (1999) 0.08
    0.08399733 = product of:
      0.16799466 = sum of:
        0.16799466 = product of:
          0.251992 = sum of:
            0.1353338 = weight(_text_:i in 4085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1353338 = score(doc=4085,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20297416 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05381461 = queryNorm
                0.6667539 = fieldWeight in 4085, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4085)
            0.11665819 = weight(_text_:22 in 4085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11665819 = score(doc=4085,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18844959 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05381461 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4085, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4085)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    7.11.1999 18:22:39
    Type
    i

Languages

Types

Themes

Subjects

Classifications