Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

Rousseau, R.; Zuccala, A.: ¬A classification of author co-citations : definitions and search strategies (2004) 0.06
```
0.05574252 = product of:
  0.22297008 = sum of:
    0.22297008 = weight(_text_:author's in 2266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.22297008 = score(doc=2266,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.42469525 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
          0.063197255 = queryNorm
        0.52501196 = fieldWeight in 2266, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2266)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
```
Abstract

The term author co-citation is defined and classified according to four distinct forms: the pure first-author co-citation, the pure author co-citation, the general author co-citation, and the special co-authorlco-citation. Each form can be used to obtain one count in an author co-citation study, based an a binary counting rule, which either recognizes the co-citedness of two authors in a given reference list (1) or does not (0). Most studies using author co-citations have relied solely an first-author cocitation counts as evidence of an author's oeuvre or body of work contributed to a research field. In this article, we argue that an author's contribution to a selected field of study should not be limited, but should be based an his/her complete list of publications, regardless of author ranking. We discuss the implications associated with using each co-citation form and show where simple first-author co-citations fit within our classification scheme. Examples are given to substantiate each author co-citation form defined in our classification, including a set of sample Dialog(TM) searches using references extracted from the SciSearch database.

Egghe, L.; Guns, R.; Rousseau, R.; Leuven, K.U.: Erratum (2012) 0.02

0.02140589 = product of:
  0.08562356 = sum of:
    0.08562356 = weight(_text_:22 in 4992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08562356 = score(doc=4992,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22130603 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.063197255 = queryNorm
        0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4992, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4992)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date: 14. 2.2012 12:53:22

Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: Averaging and globalising quotients of informetric and scientometric data (1996) 0.01

0.012843533 = product of:
  0.051374134 = sum of:
    0.051374134 = weight(_text_:22 in 7659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.051374134 = score(doc=7659,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22130603 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.063197255 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 7659, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7659)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source: Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.3, S.165-170

Asonuma, A.; Fang, Y.; Rousseau, R.: Reflections on the age distribution of Japanese scientists (2006) 0.01

0.012843533 = product of:
  0.051374134 = sum of:
    0.051374134 = weight(_text_:22 in 5270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.051374134 = score(doc=5270,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22130603 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.063197255 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5270, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5270)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date: 22. 7.2006 15:26:24

Ahlgren, P.; Jarneving, B.; Rousseau, R.: Requirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson's correlation coefficient (2003) 0.01

0.008562356 = product of:
  0.034249425 = sum of:
    0.034249425 = weight(_text_:22 in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.034249425 = score(doc=5171,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22130603 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.063197255 = queryNorm
        0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5171)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date: 9. 7.2006 10:22:35

Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

Authors

Years

Themes