Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Rousseau, R."
  1. Rousseau, R.; Zuccala, A.: ¬A classification of author co-citations : definitions and search strategies (2004) 0.02
    0.020954091 = product of:
      0.041908182 = sum of:
        0.041908182 = product of:
          0.16763273 = sum of:
            0.16763273 = weight(_text_:author's in 2266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.16763273 = score(doc=2266,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.31929317 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04751278 = queryNorm
                0.52501196 = fieldWeight in 2266, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2266)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The term author co-citation is defined and classified according to four distinct forms: the pure first-author co-citation, the pure author co-citation, the general author co-citation, and the special co-authorlco-citation. Each form can be used to obtain one count in an author co-citation study, based an a binary counting rule, which either recognizes the co-citedness of two authors in a given reference list (1) or does not (0). Most studies using author co-citations have relied solely an first-author cocitation counts as evidence of an author's oeuvre or body of work contributed to a research field. In this article, we argue that an author's contribution to a selected field of study should not be limited, but should be based an his/her complete list of publications, regardless of author ranking. We discuss the implications associated with using each co-citation form and show where simple first-author co-citations fit within our classification scheme. Examples are given to substantiate each author co-citation form defined in our classification, including a set of sample Dialog(TM) searches using references extracted from the SciSearch database.
  2. Egghe, L.; Guns, R.; Rousseau, R.; Leuven, K.U.: Erratum (2012) 0.02
    0.016093314 = product of:
      0.032186627 = sum of:
        0.032186627 = product of:
          0.064373255 = sum of:
            0.064373255 = weight(_text_:22 in 4992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.064373255 = score(doc=4992,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16638166 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04751278 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4992, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4992)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    14. 2.2012 12:53:22
  3. Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: Averaging and globalising quotients of informetric and scientometric data (1996) 0.01
    0.009655988 = product of:
      0.019311976 = sum of:
        0.019311976 = product of:
          0.03862395 = sum of:
            0.03862395 = weight(_text_:22 in 7659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03862395 = score(doc=7659,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16638166 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04751278 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 7659, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7659)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.3, S.165-170
  4. Asonuma, A.; Fang, Y.; Rousseau, R.: Reflections on the age distribution of Japanese scientists (2006) 0.01
    0.009655988 = product of:
      0.019311976 = sum of:
        0.019311976 = product of:
          0.03862395 = sum of:
            0.03862395 = weight(_text_:22 in 5270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03862395 = score(doc=5270,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16638166 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04751278 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5270, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5270)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:26:24
  5. Ahlgren, P.; Jarneving, B.; Rousseau, R.: Requirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson's correlation coefficient (2003) 0.01
    0.006437326 = product of:
      0.012874652 = sum of:
        0.012874652 = product of:
          0.025749303 = sum of:
            0.025749303 = weight(_text_:22 in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025749303 = score(doc=5171,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16638166 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04751278 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5171)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    9. 7.2006 10:22:35