-
Smith, A.G.: Web links as analogues of citations (2004)
0.26
0.2575925 = product of:
0.7727775 = sum of:
0.7727775 = weight(_text_:analogues in 4205) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.7727775 = score(doc=4205,freq=2.0), product of:
0.50438404 = queryWeight, product of:
9.905128 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44218)
0.05092151 = queryNorm
1.5321212 = fieldWeight in 4205, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
9.905128 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4205)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
-
Feldman, T.: ¬The emergence of the electronic book (1990)
0.18
0.18399464 = product of:
0.5519839 = sum of:
0.5519839 = weight(_text_:analogues in 2874) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.5519839 = score(doc=2874,freq=2.0), product of:
0.50438404 = queryWeight, product of:
9.905128 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44218)
0.05092151 = queryNorm
1.0943723 = fieldWeight in 2874, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
9.905128 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2874)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Examines the emergence of hand held electronic analogues of the book and their potential impact on traditional publishing, bookselling and libraries.
-
Hamilton, A.: Interface metaphors and logical analogues : a question of terminology (2000)
0.15
0.14719571 = product of:
0.44158712 = sum of:
0.44158712 = weight(_text_:analogues in 4381) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.44158712 = score(doc=4381,freq=2.0), product of:
0.50438404 = queryWeight, product of:
9.905128 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44218)
0.05092151 = queryNorm
0.8754978 = fieldWeight in 4381, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
9.905128 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4381)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
-
Toward a theory of librarianship. Papers in honour of Jesse Hauk Shera (1973)
0.13
0.12879625 = product of:
0.38638875 = sum of:
0.38638875 = weight(_text_:analogues in 1446) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.38638875 = score(doc=1446,freq=2.0), product of:
0.50438404 = queryWeight, product of:
9.905128 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44218)
0.05092151 = queryNorm
0.7660606 = fieldWeight in 1446, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
9.905128 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1446)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Content
- Enthält u.a. die Beiträge: VICKERY, B.C.: The nature of information science; FOSKETT, D.J.: The contribution of classification to a theory of librarianship; KOCHEN, M.: Referential consulting networks; GOFFMAN, W.: On information retrieval systems; BOOTH, A.D.: On a fallacy in the use of computing machines for automated dictionary retrieval; MORSE, P.M.: Browsing and search theory; FAIRTHORNE, R.A.: The symmetries of ignorance; RICHMOND, P.A.: A thesaurus within a thesaurus: a study in ambiguity; METCALFE, J.: When is a subject not a subject?; DUNKIN, P.S.: From pig to man; TAUBER, M.F. u. H. FEINBERG: Book catalogs; MENZEL, H.: Informal communication in science: its advantages and its formal analogues; KUNZE, H.: On the professional image and the education of the librarian
-
Day, R.E.: Documents from head to toe : bodies of knowledge in the works of Paul Otlet and Georges Bataille (2018)
0.11
0.11039679 = product of:
0.33119035 = sum of:
0.33119035 = weight(_text_:analogues in 5524) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.33119035 = score(doc=5524,freq=2.0), product of:
0.50438404 = queryWeight, product of:
9.905128 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44218)
0.05092151 = queryNorm
0.65662336 = fieldWeight in 5524, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
9.905128 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5524)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- This article contrasts Paul Otlet's epistemology of documents with that of Georges Bataille's in the late 1920s and early 1930s in regard to the body parts that they assign as sites and analogues for documents. A double meaning to the notion of documents emerges, defensive and offensive of and to twentieth-century European scientific epistemology, morality, and aesthetics: documents as the full and truthful representation of reality, and documents as the material inscription of social, cultural, and physical affordances leading to the reality of irrational drives. The brain as the site of the mind is said to be the physical location given to the former, and "the body" is the physical site given to the latter, reinforcing a traditional Western anatomical psychology determined by ideational and materialist ontologies and corresponding traditional bodily tropes for "reason" and "the senses."
-
Castle, C.: Getting the central RDM message across : a case study of central versus discipline-specific Research Data Services (RDS) at the University of Cambridge (2019)
0.10
0.10310113 = product of:
0.15465169 = sum of:
0.059886433 = product of:
0.17965929 = sum of:
0.17965929 = weight(_text_:author's in 5491) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17965929 = score(doc=5491,freq=4.0), product of:
0.34220037 = queryWeight, product of:
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.05092151 = queryNorm
0.52501196 = fieldWeight in 5491, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5491)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.09476525 = sum of:
0.060269445 = weight(_text_:group in 5491) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.060269445 = score(doc=5491,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23570116 = queryWeight, product of:
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.05092151 = queryNorm
0.2557028 = fieldWeight in 5491, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5491)
0.03449581 = weight(_text_:22 in 5491) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03449581 = score(doc=5491,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17831846 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05092151 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5491, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5491)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- RDS are usually cross-disciplinary, centralised services, which are increasingly provided at a university by the academic library and in collaboration with other RDM stakeholders, such as the Research Office. At research-intensive universities, research data is generated in a wide range of disciplines and sub-disciplines. This paper will discuss how providing discipline-specific RDM support is approached by such universities and academic libraries, and the advantages and disadvantages of these central and discipline-specific approaches. A descriptive case study on the author's experiences of collaborating with a central RDS at the University of Cambridge, as a subject librarian embedded in an academic department, is a major component of this paper. The case study describes how centralised RDM services offered by the Office of Scholarly Communication (OSC) have been adapted to meet discipline-specific needs in the Department of Chemistry. It will introduce the department and the OSC, and describe the author's role in delivering RDM training, as well as the Data Champions programme, and their membership of the RDM Project Group. It will describe the outcomes of this collaboration for the Department of Chemistry, and for the centralised service. Centralised and discipline-specific approaches to RDS provision have their own advantages and disadvantages. Supporting the discipline-specific RDM needs of researchers is proving particularly challenging for universities to address sustainably: it requires adequate financial resources and staff skilled (or re-skilled) in RDM. A mixed approach is the most desirable, cost-effective way of providing RDS, but this still has constraints.
- Date
- 7. 9.2019 21:30:22
-
Trauth, E.M.: Qualitative research in IS : issues and trends (2001)
0.10
0.10108294 = product of:
0.30324882 = sum of:
0.30324882 = sum of:
0.19286223 = weight(_text_:group in 5848) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19286223 = score(doc=5848,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23570116 = queryWeight, product of:
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.05092151 = queryNorm
0.8182489 = fieldWeight in 5848, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5848)
0.11038659 = weight(_text_:22 in 5848) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11038659 = score(doc=5848,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17831846 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05092151 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5848, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5848)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 25. 3.2003 15:35:22
- Imprint
- Hershey, PA : Idea Group Publ.
-
Dewey, M.: Decimal classification beginnings (1990)
0.10
0.095350415 = product of:
0.14302562 = sum of:
0.10163065 = product of:
0.30489194 = sum of:
0.30489194 = weight(_text_:author's in 3554) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.30489194 = score(doc=3554,freq=2.0), product of:
0.34220037 = queryWeight, product of:
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.05092151 = queryNorm
0.8909749 = fieldWeight in 3554, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3554)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.041394968 = product of:
0.082789935 = sum of:
0.082789935 = weight(_text_:22 in 3554) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.082789935 = score(doc=3554,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17831846 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05092151 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3554, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3554)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Describes the author's development of the Dewey Decimal Classification
- Date
- 25.12.1995 22:28:43
-
Zeng, Q.; Yu, M.; Yu, W.; Xiong, J.; Shi, Y.; Jiang, M.: Faceted hierarchy : a new graph type to organize scientific concepts and a construction method (2019)
0.08
0.078025684 = product of:
0.11703852 = sum of:
0.08087686 = product of:
0.24263057 = sum of:
0.24263057 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.24263057 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
0.43171313 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.05092151 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.036161665 = product of:
0.07232333 = sum of:
0.07232333 = weight(_text_:group in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07232333 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23570116 = queryWeight, product of:
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.05092151 = queryNorm
0.30684334 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- On a scientific concept hierarchy, a parent concept may have a few attributes, each of which has multiple values being a group of child concepts. We call these attributes facets: classification has a few facets such as application (e.g., face recognition), model (e.g., svm, knn), and metric (e.g., precision). In this work, we aim at building faceted concept hierarchies from scientific literature. Hierarchy construction methods heavily rely on hypernym detection, however, the faceted relations are parent-to-child links but the hypernym relation is a multi-hop, i.e., ancestor-to-descendent link with a specific facet "type-of". We use information extraction techniques to find synonyms, sibling concepts, and ancestor-descendent relations from a data science corpus. And we propose a hierarchy growth algorithm to infer the parent-child links from the three types of relationships. It resolves conflicts by maintaining the acyclic structure of a hierarchy.
- Content
- Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.
-
Coates, E.J.: CRG proposals for a new general classification (1969)
0.08
0.075812206 = product of:
0.2274366 = sum of:
0.2274366 = sum of:
0.14464666 = weight(_text_:group in 1283) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14464666 = score(doc=1283,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23570116 = queryWeight, product of:
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.05092151 = queryNorm
0.6136867 = fieldWeight in 1283, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1283)
0.082789935 = weight(_text_:22 in 1283) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.082789935 = score(doc=1283,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17831846 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05092151 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1283, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1283)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Pages
- S.19-22
- Source
- Classification and information control. Papers representing the work of the Classification Research Group during 1960-1968
-
Lewison, G.: ¬The work of the Bibliometrics Research Group (City University) and associates (2005)
0.08
0.075812206 = product of:
0.2274366 = sum of:
0.2274366 = sum of:
0.14464666 = weight(_text_:group in 4890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14464666 = score(doc=4890,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23570116 = queryWeight, product of:
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.05092151 = queryNorm
0.6136867 = fieldWeight in 4890, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4890)
0.082789935 = weight(_text_:22 in 4890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.082789935 = score(doc=4890,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17831846 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05092151 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4890, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4890)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 20. 1.2007 17:02:22
-
Definition of the CIDOC Conceptual Reference Model (2003)
0.07
0.07285008 = product of:
0.21855024 = sum of:
0.21855024 = sum of:
0.17715527 = weight(_text_:group in 1652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17715527 = score(doc=1652,freq=12.0), product of:
0.23570116 = queryWeight, product of:
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.05092151 = queryNorm
0.7516097 = fieldWeight in 1652, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1652)
0.041394968 = weight(_text_:22 in 1652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041394968 = score(doc=1652,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17831846 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05092151 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1652, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1652)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- This document is the formal definition of the CIDOC Conceptual Reference Model ("CRM"), a formal ontology intended to facilitate the integration, mediation and interchange of heterogeneous cultural heritage information. The CRM is the culmination of more than a decade of standards development work by the International Committee for Documentation (CIDOC) of the International Council of Museums (ICOM). Work on the CRM itself began in 1996 under the auspices of the ICOM-CIDOC Documentation Standards Working Group. Since 2000, development of the CRM has been officially delegated by ICOM-CIDOC to the CIDOC CRM Special Interest Group, which collaborates with the ISO working group ISO/TC46/SC4/WG9 to bring the CRM to the form and status of an International Standard.
- Date
- 6. 8.2010 14:22:28
- Editor
- ICOM/CIDOC Documentation Standards Group
- Issue
- Version 3.4.9 - 30.11.2003. Produced by the ICOM/CIDOC Documentation Standards Group, continued by the CIDOC CRM Special Interest Group.
-
Goggins, S.P.; Mascaro, C.; Valetto, G.: Group informatics : a methodological approach and ontology for sociotechnical group research (2013)
0.07
0.07285008 = product of:
0.21855024 = sum of:
0.21855024 = sum of:
0.17715527 = weight(_text_:group in 665) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17715527 = score(doc=665,freq=12.0), product of:
0.23570116 = queryWeight, product of:
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.05092151 = queryNorm
0.7516097 = fieldWeight in 665, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=665)
0.041394968 = weight(_text_:22 in 665) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041394968 = score(doc=665,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17831846 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05092151 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 665, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=665)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- We present a methodological approach, called Group Informatics, for understanding the social connections that are created between members of technologically mediated groups. Our methodological approach supports focused thinking about how online groups differ from each other, and diverge from their face-to-face counterparts. Group Informatics is grounded in 5 years of empirical studies of technologically mediated groups in online learning, software engineering, online political discourse, crisis informatics, and other domains. We describe the Group Informatics model and the related, 2-phase methodological approach in detail. Phase one of the methodological approach centers on a set of guiding research questions aimed at directing the application of Group Informatics to new corpora of integrated electronic trace data and qualitative research data. Phase 2 of the methodological approach is a systematic set of steps for transforming electronic trace data into weighted social networks.
- Date
- 22. 3.2013 19:36:45
-
Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004)
0.07
0.067716226 = product of:
0.10157434 = sum of:
0.08087686 = product of:
0.24263057 = sum of:
0.24263057 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.24263057 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.43171313 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.05092151 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.020697484 = product of:
0.041394968 = sum of:
0.041394968 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041394968 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17831846 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05092151 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Content
- Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
- Date
- 8. 1.2013 10:22:32
-
Farazi, M.: Faceted lightweight ontologies : a formalization and some experiments (2010)
0.07
0.06502141 = product of:
0.09753211 = sum of:
0.067397386 = product of:
0.20219214 = sum of:
0.20219214 = weight(_text_:3a in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.20219214 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
0.43171313 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.05092151 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.030134723 = product of:
0.060269445 = sum of:
0.060269445 = weight(_text_:group in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.060269445 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23570116 = queryWeight, product of:
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.05092151 = queryNorm
0.2557028 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- While classifications are heavily used to categorize web content, the evolution of the web foresees a more formal structure - ontology - which can serve this purpose. Ontologies are core artifacts of the Semantic Web which enable machines to use inference rules to conduct automated reasoning on data. Lightweight ontologies bridge the gap between classifications and ontologies. A lightweight ontology (LO) is an ontology representing a backbone taxonomy where the concept of the child node is more specific than the concept of the parent node. Formal lightweight ontologies can be generated from their informal ones. The key applications of formal lightweight ontologies are document classification, semantic search, and data integration. However, these applications suffer from the following problems: the disambiguation accuracy of the state of the art NLP tools used in generating formal lightweight ontologies from their informal ones; the lack of background knowledge needed for the formal lightweight ontologies; and the limitation of ontology reuse. In this dissertation, we propose a novel solution to these problems in formal lightweight ontologies; namely, faceted lightweight ontology (FLO). FLO is a lightweight ontology in which terms, present in each node label, and their concepts, are available in the background knowledge (BK), which is organized as a set of facets. A facet can be defined as a distinctive property of the groups of concepts that can help in differentiating one group from another. Background knowledge can be defined as a subset of a knowledge base, such as WordNet, and often represents a specific domain.
- Content
- PhD Dissertation at International Doctorate School in Information and Communication Technology. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fcore.ac.uk%2Fdownload%2Fpdf%2F150083013.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2n-qisNagpyT0lli_6QbAQ.
-
Ackermann, E.: Piaget's constructivism, Papert's constructionism : what's the difference? (2001)
0.07
0.06502141 = product of:
0.09753211 = sum of:
0.067397386 = product of:
0.20219214 = sum of:
0.20219214 = weight(_text_:3a in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.20219214 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
0.43171313 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.05092151 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.030134723 = product of:
0.060269445 = sum of:
0.060269445 = weight(_text_:group in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.060269445 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23570116 = queryWeight, product of:
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.05092151 = queryNorm
0.2557028 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Content
- Vgl.: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Piaget-%E2%80%99-s-Constructivism-%2C-Papert-%E2%80%99-s-%3A-What-%E2%80%99-s-Ackermann/89cbcc1e740a4591443ff4765a6ae8df0fdf5554. Darunter weitere Hinweise auf verwandte Beiträge. Auch unter: Learning Group Publication 5(2001) no.3, S.438.
-
Sauperl, A.: Subject determination during the cataloging process : the development of a system based on theoretical principles (2002)
0.06
0.06483032 = product of:
0.09724547 = sum of:
0.025407663 = product of:
0.076222986 = sum of:
0.076222986 = weight(_text_:author's in 2293) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.076222986 = score(doc=2293,freq=2.0), product of:
0.34220037 = queryWeight, product of:
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.05092151 = queryNorm
0.22274372 = fieldWeight in 2293, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2293)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.071837805 = sum of:
0.05114032 = weight(_text_:group in 2293) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05114032 = score(doc=2293,freq=4.0), product of:
0.23570116 = queryWeight, product of:
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.05092151 = queryNorm
0.21697101 = fieldWeight in 2293, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2293)
0.020697484 = weight(_text_:22 in 2293) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020697484 = score(doc=2293,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17831846 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05092151 = queryNorm
0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 2293, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2293)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 27. 9.2005 14:22:19
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Knowledge organization 30(2003) no.2, S.114-115 (M. Hudon); "This most interesting contribution to the literature of subject cataloguing originates in the author's doctoral dissertation, prepared under the direction of jerry Saye at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. In seven highly readable chapters, Alenka Sauperl develops possible answers to her principal research question: How do cataloguers determine or identify the topic of a document and choose appropriate subject representations? Specific questions at the source of this research an a process which has not been a frequent object of study include: Where do cataloguers look for an overall sense of what a document is about? How do they get an overall sense of what a document is about, especially when they are not familiar with the discipline? Do they consider only one or several possible interpretations? How do they translate meanings in appropriate and valid class numbers and subject headings? Using a strictly qualitative methodology, Dr. Sauperl's research is a study of twelve cataloguers in reallife situation. The author insists an the holistic rather than purely theoretical understanding of the process she is targeting. Participants in the study were professional cataloguers, with at least one year experience in their current job at one of three large academic libraries in the Southeastern United States. All three libraries have a large central cataloguing department, and use OCLC sources and the same automated system; the context of cataloguing tasks is thus considered to be reasonably comparable. All participants were volunteers in this study which combined two datagathering techniques: the think-aloud method and time-line interviews. A model of the subject cataloguing process was first developed from observations of a group of six cataloguers who were asked to independently perform original cataloguing an three nonfiction, non-serial items selected from materials regularly assigned to them for processing. The model was then used for follow-up interviews. Each participant in the second group of cataloguers was invited to reflect an his/her work process for a recent challenging document they had catalogued. Results are presented in 12 stories describing as many personal approaches to subject cataloguing. From these stories a summarization is offered and a theoretical model of subject cataloguing is developed which, according to the author, represents a realistic approach to subject cataloguing. Stories alternate comments from the researcher and direct quotations from the observed or interviewed cataloguers. Not surprisingly, the participants' stories reveal similarities in the sequence and accomplishment of several tasks in the process of subject cataloguing. Sauperl's proposed model, described in Chapter 5, includes as main stages: 1) Examination of the book and subject identification; 2) Search for subject headings; 3) Classification. Chapter 6 is a hypothetical Gase study, using the proposed model to describe the various stages of cataloguing a hypothetical resource. ...
-
Timotin, A.: Multilingvism si tezaure de concepte (1994)
0.06
0.06385583 = product of:
0.19156748 = sum of:
0.19156748 = sum of:
0.13637419 = weight(_text_:group in 7887) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13637419 = score(doc=7887,freq=4.0), product of:
0.23570116 = queryWeight, product of:
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.05092151 = queryNorm
0.5785894 = fieldWeight in 7887, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7887)
0.055193294 = weight(_text_:22 in 7887) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055193294 = score(doc=7887,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17831846 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05092151 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7887, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7887)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Discusses the importance and utility of a thesaurus of concepts to provide logical support for multilingualism. Deals in particular with the IEC (International Electrotechnical Commission) Thesaurus,a nd the work of the IEC Thesaurus Working Group, consisting of specialists of the Research Institute in Electrical Engineering (ICPE) and the University Politehnica of Bucharest. Describes how this group contributed to the thesaurus and implemented the multilingual database required by the editing and updating of multilingual database required by the editing and updating of multilingual dictionaries in electrical engineering
- Source
- Probleme de Informare si Documentare. 28(1994) no.1, S.13-22
-
OWL Web Ontology Language Test Cases (2004)
0.06
0.06385583 = product of:
0.19156748 = sum of:
0.19156748 = sum of:
0.13637419 = weight(_text_:group in 4685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13637419 = score(doc=4685,freq=4.0), product of:
0.23570116 = queryWeight, product of:
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.05092151 = queryNorm
0.5785894 = fieldWeight in 4685, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4685)
0.055193294 = weight(_text_:22 in 4685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055193294 = score(doc=4685,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17831846 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05092151 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4685, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4685)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- This document contains and presents test cases for the Web Ontology Language (OWL) approved by the Web Ontology Working Group. Many of the test cases illustrate the correct usage of the Web Ontology Language (OWL), and the formal meaning of its constructs. Other test cases illustrate the resolution of issues considered by the Working Group. Conformance for OWL documents and OWL document checkers is specified.
- Date
- 14. 8.2011 13:33:22
-
Belayche, C.: ¬A propos de la classification de Dewey (1997)
0.06
0.06356694 = product of:
0.09535041 = sum of:
0.06775376 = product of:
0.20326129 = sum of:
0.20326129 = weight(_text_:author's in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.20326129 = score(doc=1171,freq=2.0), product of:
0.34220037 = queryWeight, product of:
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.05092151 = queryNorm
0.59398323 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.027596647 = product of:
0.055193294 = sum of:
0.055193294 = weight(_text_:22 in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055193294 = score(doc=1171,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17831846 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05092151 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- All classifications are based on ideologies and Dewey is marked by its author's origins in 19th century North America. Subsequent revisions indicate changed ways of understanding the world. Section 157 (psycho-pathology) is now included with 616.89 (mental troubles), reflecting the move to a genetic-based approach. Table 5 (racial, ethnic and national groups) is however unchanged, despite changing views on such categorisation
- Source
- Bulletin d'informations de l'Association des Bibliothecaires Francais. 1997, no.175, S.22-23
