Search (7 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × language_ss:"chi"
  1. Xiong, L.J.: On the compiling of cataloguing rules for Chinese document(s) (1997) 0.03
    0.03130122 = product of:
      0.06260244 = sum of:
        0.06260244 = product of:
          0.25040975 = sum of:
            0.25040975 = weight(_text_:author's in 3199) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.25040975 = score(doc=3199,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3372617 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050186608 = queryNorm
                0.742479 = fieldWeight in 3199, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3199)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Based on the author's practice and experience in compiling 'Cataloguing rules for Chinese documents', explains the background to the rules and their style, highlighting various points which need attention when using them
  2. Wu, C.-J.: Metadata and future developments in cataloguing (1997) 0.02
    0.021910854 = product of:
      0.043821707 = sum of:
        0.043821707 = product of:
          0.17528683 = sum of:
            0.17528683 = weight(_text_:author's in 2826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.17528683 = score(doc=2826,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3372617 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050186608 = queryNorm
                0.51973534 = fieldWeight in 2826, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2826)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Metadata is a resource which can assist the information retrieval of digital documents on the Internet. In designing a metadata system, it is necessary to consider the characteristics of digital documents, such as the variety of file formats, frequent format transformation and the difficulty of distinguishing between the different versions. Provides a brief analysis of some existing metadata formats, and introduces several pronciples for the future development of cataloguing on the Internet. Briefly describes the Metadata Experimental System (MES) currently under development, and located at the author's homepage
  3. Tseng, Y.-H.: Solving vocabulary problems with interactive query expansion (1998) 0.02
    0.018222425 = product of:
      0.03644485 = sum of:
        0.03644485 = product of:
          0.0728897 = sum of:
            0.0728897 = weight(_text_:n in 5159) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0728897 = score(doc=5159,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.2163874 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050186608 = queryNorm
                0.33684817 = fieldWeight in 5159, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5159)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    One of the major causes of search failures in information retrieval systems is vocabulary mismatch. Presents a solution to the vocabulary problem through 2 strategies known as term suggestion (TS) and term relevance feedback (TRF). In TS, collection specific terms are extracted from the text collection. These terms and their frequencies constitute the keyword database for suggesting terms in response to users' queries. One effect of this term suggestion is that it functions as a dynamic directory if the query is a general term that contains broad meaning. In term relevance feedback, terms extracted from the top ranked documents retrieved from the previous query are shown to users for relevance feedback. In the experiment, interactive TS provides very high precision rates while achieving similar recall rates as n-gram matching. Local TRF achieves improvement in both precision and recall rate in a full text news database and degrades slightly in recall rate in bibliographic databases due to the very limited source of information for feedback. In terms of Rijsbergen's combined measure of recall and precision, both TS and TRF achieve better performance than n-gram matching, which implies that the greater improvement in precision rate compensates the slight degradation in recall rate for TS and TRF
  4. Lee, Y.-R.: ¬A study on the conditions of using OPAC access points and subject searching by users (1997) 0.01
    0.013599185 = product of:
      0.02719837 = sum of:
        0.02719837 = product of:
          0.05439674 = sum of:
            0.05439674 = weight(_text_:22 in 933) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05439674 = score(doc=933,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17574495 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050186608 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 933, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=933)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Bulletin of library and information science. 1997, no.22, S.39-55
  5. Yi, H.; Shubai, L.: Application of classification in information organization under the networking environment (1998) 0.01
    0.013599185 = product of:
      0.02719837 = sum of:
        0.02719837 = product of:
          0.05439674 = sum of:
            0.05439674 = weight(_text_:22 in 3236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05439674 = score(doc=3236,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17574495 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050186608 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3236, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3236)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information. 17(1998) no.1, S.19-22
  6. Lin, W.-Y.C.: ¬The concept and applications of faceted classifications (2006) 0.01
    0.013599185 = product of:
      0.02719837 = sum of:
        0.02719837 = product of:
          0.05439674 = sum of:
            0.05439674 = weight(_text_:22 in 5083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05439674 = score(doc=5083,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17574495 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050186608 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5083, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5083)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    27. 5.2007 22:19:35
  7. Pu, H.-T.: Exploration of personalized information service for OPAC (1997) 0.01
    0.011899287 = product of:
      0.023798574 = sum of:
        0.023798574 = product of:
          0.047597148 = sum of:
            0.047597148 = weight(_text_:22 in 1772) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047597148 = score(doc=1772,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17574495 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050186608 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1772, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1772)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    4. 8.1998 19:36:22