Search (3772 results, page 1 of 189)

  1. Ackermann, E.: Piaget's constructivism, Papert's constructionism : what's the difference? (2001) 0.11
    0.11382227 = product of:
      0.22764453 = sum of:
        0.22764453 = product of:
          0.45528907 = sum of:
            0.17765823 = weight(_text_:3a in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.17765823 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.37932923 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044742715 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
            0.27763084 = weight(_text_:2c in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.27763084 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.4741956 = queryWeight, product of:
                  10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044742715 = queryNorm
                0.5854775 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
          0.5 = coord(2/4)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Piaget-%E2%80%99-s-Constructivism-%2C-Papert-%E2%80%99-s-%3A-What-%E2%80%99-s-Ackermann/89cbcc1e740a4591443ff4765a6ae8df0fdf5554. Darunter weitere Hinweise auf verwandte Beiträge. Auch unter: Learning Group Publication 5(2001) no.3, S.438.
  2. Maturana, M.T.I.: Beneficios de la utilizacion de lenguajes controlados en el analisis y recuperacion de informacion (1997) 0.10
    0.104748085 = product of:
      0.20949617 = sum of:
        0.20949617 = product of:
          0.41899234 = sum of:
            0.41899234 = weight(_text_:m.t.i in 2055) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.41899234 = score(doc=2055,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.49233723 = queryWeight, product of:
                  11.00374 = idf(docFreq=1, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044742715 = queryNorm
                0.85102713 = fieldWeight in 2055, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  11.00374 = idf(docFreq=1, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2055)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  3. Dewey, M.: Decimal classification beginnings (1990) 0.10
    0.10334623 = sum of:
      0.06697411 = product of:
        0.26789644 = sum of:
          0.26789644 = weight(_text_:author's in 3554) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.26789644 = score(doc=3554,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.3006779 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044742715 = queryNorm
              0.8909749 = fieldWeight in 3554, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3554)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.036372118 = product of:
        0.072744235 = sum of:
          0.072744235 = weight(_text_:22 in 3554) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.072744235 = score(doc=3554,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15668136 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044742715 = queryNorm
              0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3554, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3554)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the author's development of the Dewey Decimal Classification
    Date
    25.12.1995 22:28:43
  4. Gödert, W.; Hubrich, J.; Boteram, F.: Thematische Recherche und Interoperabilität : Wege zur Optimierung des Zugriffs auf heterogen erschlossene Dokumente (2009) 0.08
    0.084562756 = sum of:
      0.06940771 = product of:
        0.27763084 = sum of:
          0.27763084 = weight(_text_:2c in 193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.27763084 = score(doc=193,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.4741956 = queryWeight, product of:
                10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044742715 = queryNorm
              0.5854775 = fieldWeight in 193, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=193)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.01515505 = product of:
        0.0303101 = sum of:
          0.0303101 = weight(_text_:22 in 193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0303101 = score(doc=193,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15668136 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044742715 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 193, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=193)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    https://opus4.kobv.de/opus4-bib-info/frontdoor/index/index/searchtype/authorsearch/author/%22Hubrich%2C+Jessica%22/docId/703/start/0/rows/20
  5. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.07
    0.07148352 = sum of:
      0.053297468 = product of:
        0.21318987 = sum of:
          0.21318987 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.21318987 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.37932923 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044742715 = queryNorm
              0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.018186059 = product of:
        0.036372118 = sum of:
          0.036372118 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.036372118 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15668136 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044742715 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  6. Belayche, C.: ¬A propos de la classification de Dewey (1997) 0.07
    0.068897486 = sum of:
      0.044649407 = product of:
        0.17859763 = sum of:
          0.17859763 = weight(_text_:author's in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.17859763 = score(doc=1171,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.3006779 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044742715 = queryNorm
              0.59398323 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.02424808 = product of:
        0.04849616 = sum of:
          0.04849616 = weight(_text_:22 in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04849616 = score(doc=1171,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15668136 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044742715 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    All classifications are based on ideologies and Dewey is marked by its author's origins in 19th century North America. Subsequent revisions indicate changed ways of understanding the world. Section 157 (psycho-pathology) is now included with 616.89 (mental troubles), reflecting the move to a genetic-based approach. Table 5 (racial, ethnic and national groups) is however unchanged, despite changing views on such categorisation
    Source
    Bulletin d'informations de l'Association des Bibliothecaires Francais. 1997, no.175, S.22-23
  7. Shuttleworth, C.: Marot, Hofstadter, index (1998) 0.07
    0.068897486 = sum of:
      0.044649407 = product of:
        0.17859763 = sum of:
          0.17859763 = weight(_text_:author's in 4642) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.17859763 = score(doc=4642,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.3006779 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044742715 = queryNorm
              0.59398323 = fieldWeight in 4642, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4642)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.02424808 = product of:
        0.04849616 = sum of:
          0.04849616 = weight(_text_:22 in 4642) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04849616 = score(doc=4642,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15668136 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044742715 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4642, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4642)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Comments on Douglas Hofstadter's index to his book 'Le ton beau de Marot: in praise of the music of language'. Hofstadter took charge of the book design, typography, typesetting and copy-editing, and also compiled the index which covers 23 pages of 3 columnes and is set in a practically illegible 4-point. Although the index breaks all the rules of indexing, it is a masterly creation showing the author's industry, exhuberance and wit. Summarizes Hofstadter's own remarks on how creating the index gave hin new insights into what his book was essentially about
    Source
    Indexer. 21(1998) no.1, S.22-23
  8. Jacobs, J.W.; Summers, E.; Ankersen, E.: Cyril: expanding the horizons of MARC21 (2004) 0.07
    0.068897486 = sum of:
      0.044649407 = product of:
        0.17859763 = sum of:
          0.17859763 = weight(_text_:author's in 4749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.17859763 = score(doc=4749,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.3006779 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044742715 = queryNorm
              0.59398323 = fieldWeight in 4749, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4749)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.02424808 = product of:
        0.04849616 = sum of:
          0.04849616 = weight(_text_:22 in 4749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04849616 = score(doc=4749,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15668136 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044742715 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4749, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4749)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the construction of the author's Perl program, Cyril, to add vernacular Russian (Cyrillic) characters to existing MARC records. The program takes advantage of the ALA-LC standards for Romanization to create character mappings that "de-transliterate" specified MARC fields. The creation of Cyril raises both linguistic and technical issues, which are thoroughly examined. Concludes by considering the implications for cataloging and authority control standards, as we move to a multilingual, multi-script bibliographic environment.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.8-17
  9. Capps, M.; Ladd, B.; Stotts, D.: Enhanced graph models in the Web : multi-client, multi-head, multi-tail browsing (1996) 0.06
    0.060285304 = sum of:
      0.039068233 = product of:
        0.15627293 = sum of:
          0.15627293 = weight(_text_:author's in 5860) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.15627293 = score(doc=5860,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.3006779 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044742715 = queryNorm
              0.51973534 = fieldWeight in 5860, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5860)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.02121707 = product of:
        0.04243414 = sum of:
          0.04243414 = weight(_text_:22 in 5860) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04243414 = score(doc=5860,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15668136 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044742715 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5860, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5860)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Richer graph models permit authors to 'program' the browsing behaviour they want WWW readers to see by turning the hypertext into a hyperprogram with specific semantics. Multiple browsing streams can be started under the author's control and then kept in step through the synchronization mechanisms provided by the graph model. Adds a Semantic Web Graph Layer (SWGL) which allows dynamic interpretation of link and node structures according to graph models. Details the SWGL and its architecture, some sample protocol implementations, and the latest extensions to MHTML
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:08:06
  10. #220 0.06
    0.06001094 = product of:
      0.12002188 = sum of:
        0.12002188 = product of:
          0.24004376 = sum of:
            0.24004376 = weight(_text_:22 in 219) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.24004376 = score(doc=219,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15668136 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044742715 = queryNorm
                1.5320505 = fieldWeight in 219, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.21875 = fieldNorm(doc=219)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 5.1998 20:02:22
  11. #1387 0.06
    0.06001094 = product of:
      0.12002188 = sum of:
        0.12002188 = product of:
          0.24004376 = sum of:
            0.24004376 = weight(_text_:22 in 1386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.24004376 = score(doc=1386,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15668136 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044742715 = queryNorm
                1.5320505 = fieldWeight in 1386, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.21875 = fieldNorm(doc=1386)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 5.1998 20:02:22
  12. #2103 0.06
    0.06001094 = product of:
      0.12002188 = sum of:
        0.12002188 = product of:
          0.24004376 = sum of:
            0.24004376 = weight(_text_:22 in 2102) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.24004376 = score(doc=2102,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15668136 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044742715 = queryNorm
                1.5320505 = fieldWeight in 2102, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.21875 = fieldNorm(doc=2102)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 5.1998 20:02:22
  13. Fachsystematik Bremen nebst Schlüssel 1970 ff. (1970 ff) 0.06
    0.05956961 = sum of:
      0.044414558 = product of:
        0.17765823 = sum of:
          0.17765823 = weight(_text_:3a in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.17765823 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.37932923 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044742715 = queryNorm
              0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.01515505 = product of:
        0.0303101 = sum of:
          0.0303101 = weight(_text_:22 in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0303101 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15668136 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044742715 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    1. Agrarwissenschaften 1981. - 3. Allgemeine Geographie 2.1972. - 3a. Allgemeine Naturwissenschaften 1.1973. - 4. Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, Allgemeine Literaturwissenschaft 2.1971. - 6. Allgemeines. 5.1983. - 7. Anglistik 3.1976. - 8. Astronomie, Geodäsie 4.1977. - 12. bio Biologie, bcp Biochemie-Biophysik, bot Botanik, zoo Zoologie 1981. - 13. Bremensien 3.1983. - 13a. Buch- und Bibliothekswesen 3.1975. - 14. Chemie 4.1977. - 14a. Elektrotechnik 1974. - 15 Ethnologie 2.1976. - 16,1. Geowissenschaften. Sachteil 3.1977. - 16,2. Geowissenschaften. Regionaler Teil 3.1977. - 17. Germanistik 6.1984. - 17a,1. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hil. - 17a,2. Geschichte. Teilsystematik his Neuere Geschichte. - 17a,3. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hit Neueste Geschichte. - 18. Humanbiologie 2.1983. - 19. Ingenieurwissenschaften 1974. - 20. siehe 14a. - 21. klassische Philologie 3.1977. - 22. Klinische Medizin 1975. - 23. Kunstgeschichte 2.1971. - 24. Kybernetik. 2.1975. - 25. Mathematik 3.1974. - 26. Medizin 1976. - 26a. Militärwissenschaft 1985. - 27. Musikwissenschaft 1978. - 27a. Noten 2.1974. - 28. Ozeanographie 3.1977. -29. Pädagogik 8.1985. - 30. Philosphie 3.1974. - 31. Physik 3.1974. - 33. Politik, Politische Wissenschaft, Sozialwissenschaft. Soziologie. Länderschlüssel. Register 1981. - 34. Psychologie 2.1972. - 35. Publizistik und Kommunikationswissenschaft 1985. - 36. Rechtswissenschaften 1986. - 37. Regionale Geograpgie 3.1975. - 37a. Religionswissenschaft 1970. - 38. Romanistik 3.1976. - 39. Skandinavistik 4.1985. - 40. Slavistik 1977. - 40a. Sonstige Sprachen und Literaturen 1973. - 43. Sport 4.1983. - 44. Theaterwissenschaft 1985. - 45. Theologie 2.1976. - 45a. Ur- und Frühgeschichte, Archäologie 1970. - 47. Volkskunde 1976. - 47a. Wirtschaftswissenschaften 1971 // Schlüssel: 1. Länderschlüssel 1971. - 2. Formenschlüssel (Kurzform) 1974. - 3. Personenschlüssel Literatur 5. Fassung 1968
  14. Castle, C.: Getting the central RDM message across : a case study of central versus discipline-specific Research Data Services (RDS) at the University of Cambridge (2019) 0.05
    0.054619923 = sum of:
      0.039464872 = product of:
        0.15785949 = sum of:
          0.15785949 = weight(_text_:author's in 5491) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.15785949 = score(doc=5491,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.3006779 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044742715 = queryNorm
              0.52501196 = fieldWeight in 5491, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5491)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.01515505 = product of:
        0.0303101 = sum of:
          0.0303101 = weight(_text_:22 in 5491) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0303101 = score(doc=5491,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15668136 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044742715 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5491, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5491)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    RDS are usually cross-disciplinary, centralised services, which are increasingly provided at a university by the academic library and in collaboration with other RDM stakeholders, such as the Research Office. At research-intensive universities, research data is generated in a wide range of disciplines and sub-disciplines. This paper will discuss how providing discipline-specific RDM support is approached by such universities and academic libraries, and the advantages and disadvantages of these central and discipline-specific approaches. A descriptive case study on the author's experiences of collaborating with a central RDS at the University of Cambridge, as a subject librarian embedded in an academic department, is a major component of this paper. The case study describes how centralised RDM services offered by the Office of Scholarly Communication (OSC) have been adapted to meet discipline-specific needs in the Department of Chemistry. It will introduce the department and the OSC, and describe the author's role in delivering RDM training, as well as the Data Champions programme, and their membership of the RDM Project Group. It will describe the outcomes of this collaboration for the Department of Chemistry, and for the centralised service. Centralised and discipline-specific approaches to RDS provision have their own advantages and disadvantages. Supporting the discipline-specific RDM needs of researchers is proving particularly challenging for universities to address sustainably: it requires adequate financial resources and staff skilled (or re-skilled) in RDM. A mixed approach is the most desirable, cost-effective way of providing RDS, but this still has constraints.
    Date
    7. 9.2019 21:30:22
  15. Verwer, K.: Freiheit und Verantwortung bei Hans Jonas (2011) 0.05
    0.053297468 = product of:
      0.106594935 = sum of:
        0.106594935 = product of:
          0.42637974 = sum of:
            0.42637974 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.42637974 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.37932923 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044742715 = queryNorm
                1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.
  16. Brueggeman, P.: ¬19 tips for enhancing CD-ROM performance (1993) 0.05
    0.051673114 = sum of:
      0.033487055 = product of:
        0.13394822 = sum of:
          0.13394822 = weight(_text_:author's in 3749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.13394822 = score(doc=3749,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.3006779 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044742715 = queryNorm
              0.44548744 = fieldWeight in 3749, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3749)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.018186059 = product of:
        0.036372118 = sum of:
          0.036372118 = weight(_text_:22 in 3749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.036372118 = score(doc=3749,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15668136 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044742715 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3749, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3749)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Lists 19 tips, based on the author's experience with IBM compatible CD-ROM workstations, designed to yield improved performance by more efficient use of the computer hardware, particularly the hard disc. The tips also apply to Macintosh workstations. Covers: optimising files; placing CD-ROM software at the front of the hard disc; using disc caching software; use of the autopark facility; checking the interleave; browsing for orphan files; using CHKDSK/f command; low level formatting of hard disc; purchasing of microcomputers with large RAM caches; stepping up in MHZ and CPU; using more memory and memory management software; putting full path before software is loaded by AUTOEXEC.BAT and batch files; REM software specific lines in AUTOEXEC.BAT and CONFIG.SYS; feeding paper tp printer from a box on the flor; booting up in turbo mode and with Num Lock off; speeding up cursor keys; and protecting system enhancements
    Source
    CD-ROM professional. 6(1993) no.1, S.17-22
  17. Zhang, Y.: Developing a holistic model for digital library evaluation (2010) 0.05
    0.051673114 = sum of:
      0.033487055 = product of:
        0.13394822 = sum of:
          0.13394822 = weight(_text_:author's in 2360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.13394822 = score(doc=2360,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.3006779 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044742715 = queryNorm
              0.44548744 = fieldWeight in 2360, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2360)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.018186059 = product of:
        0.036372118 = sum of:
          0.036372118 = weight(_text_:22 in 2360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.036372118 = score(doc=2360,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15668136 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044742715 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2360, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2360)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This article reports the author's recent research in developing a holistic model for various levels of digital library (DL) evaluation in which perceived important criteria from heterogeneous stakeholder groups are organized and presented. To develop such a model, the author applied a three-stage research approach: exploration, confirmation, and verification. During the exploration stage, a literature review was conducted followed by an interview, along with a card sorting technique, to collect important criteria perceived by DL experts. Then the criteria identified were used for developing an online survey during the confirmation stage. Survey respondents (431 in total) from 22 countries rated the importance of the criteria. A holistic DL evaluation model was constructed using statistical techniques. Eventually, the verification stage was devised to test the reliability of the model in the context of searching and evaluating an operational DL. The proposed model fills two lacunae in the DL domain: (a) the lack of a comprehensive and flexible framework to guide and benchmark evaluations, and (b) the uncertainty about what divergence exists among heterogeneous DL stakeholders, including general users.
  18. Hjoerland, B.: ¬The importance of theories of knowledge : indexing and information retrieval as an example (2011) 0.05
    0.051673114 = sum of:
      0.033487055 = product of:
        0.13394822 = sum of:
          0.13394822 = weight(_text_:author's in 4359) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.13394822 = score(doc=4359,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.3006779 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044742715 = queryNorm
              0.44548744 = fieldWeight in 4359, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4359)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.018186059 = product of:
        0.036372118 = sum of:
          0.036372118 = weight(_text_:22 in 4359) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.036372118 = score(doc=4359,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15668136 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044742715 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4359, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4359)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    A recent study in information science (IS), raises important issues concerning the value of human indexing and basic theories of indexing and information retrieval, as well as the use of quantitative and qualitative approaches in IS and the underlying theories of knowledge informing the field. The present article uses L&E as the point of departure for demonstrating in what way more social and interpretative understandings may provide fruitful improvements for research in indexing, knowledge organization, and information retrieval. The artcle is motivated by the observation that philosophical contributions tend to be ignored in IS if they are not directly formed as criticisms or invitations to dialogs. It is part of the author's ongoing publication of articles about philosophical issues in IS and it is intended to be followed by analyzes of other examples of contributions to core issues in IS. Although it is formulated as a criticism of a specific paper, it should be seen as part of a general discussion of the philosophical foundation of IS and as a support to the emerging social paradigm in this field.
    Date
    17. 3.2011 19:22:55
  19. Kleineberg, M.: Context analysis and context indexing : formal pragmatics in knowledge organization (2014) 0.04
    0.044414558 = product of:
      0.088829115 = sum of:
        0.088829115 = product of:
          0.35531646 = sum of:
            0.35531646 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.35531646 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.37932923 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044742715 = queryNorm
                0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja
  20. Chylkowska, E.: Implementation of information exchange : online dictionaries (2005) 0.04
    0.04306093 = sum of:
      0.02790588 = product of:
        0.11162352 = sum of:
          0.11162352 = weight(_text_:author's in 3011) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.11162352 = score(doc=3011,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.3006779 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044742715 = queryNorm
              0.3712395 = fieldWeight in 3011, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3011)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.01515505 = product of:
        0.0303101 = sum of:
          0.0303101 = weight(_text_:22 in 3011) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0303101 = score(doc=3011,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15668136 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044742715 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3011, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3011)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    We are living in a society in which using Internet is a part of everyday life. People use Internet at schools, universities, at work in small and big companies. The Web gives huge number of information from every possible field of knowledge, and one of the problems that one can face by searching through the web is the fact that this information may be written in many different languages that one does not understand. That is why web site designers came up with an idea to create on-line dictionaries to make surfing on the Web easier. The most popular are bilingual dictionaries (in Poland the most known are: LING.pl, LEKSYKA.pl, and Dict.pl), but one can find also multilingual ones (Logos.com, Lexicool.com). Nowadays, when using Internet in education becomes more and more popular, on-line dictionaries are the best supplement for a good quality work. The purpose of this paper is to present, compare and recommend the best (from the author's point of view) multilingual dictionaries that can be found on the Internet and that can serve educational purposes well.
    Date
    22. 7.2009 11:05:56

Languages

Types

  • a 3143
  • m 372
  • el 163
  • s 142
  • b 40
  • x 35
  • i 23
  • r 17
  • ? 8
  • p 4
  • d 3
  • n 3
  • u 2
  • z 2
  • au 1
  • h 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications