Search (3782 results, page 1 of 190)

0.4683761 = product of:
  0.9367522 = sum of:
    0.84254974 = weight(_text_:22nd in 4594) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.84254974 = score(doc=4594,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.6123101 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.806516 = idf(docFreq=17, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06952921 = queryNorm
        1.376018 = fieldWeight in 4594, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          8.806516 = idf(docFreq=17, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4594)
    0.09420249 = weight(_text_:22 in 4594) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09420249 = score(doc=4594,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24347946 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06952921 = queryNorm
        0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4594, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4594)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

This work has been fully updated for the 22nd edition of DDC, and is used as reference for the application of Dewey coding or as a course text in the Dewey System

Object

DDC-22

0.26467416 = product of:
  0.5293483 = sum of:
    0.41630533 = weight(_text_:author's in 3554) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.41630533 = score(doc=3554,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.46724698 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06952921 = queryNorm
        0.8909749 = fieldWeight in 3554, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3554)
    0.11304298 = weight(_text_:22 in 3554) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11304298 = score(doc=3554,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24347946 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06952921 = queryNorm
        0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3554, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3554)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

Describes the author's development of the Dewey Decimal Classification

Date

25.12.1995 22:28:43

0.20852043 = product of:
  0.8340817 = sum of:
    0.8340817 = weight(_text_:22nd in 5738) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.8340817 = score(doc=5738,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.6123101 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.806516 = idf(docFreq=17, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06952921 = queryNorm
        1.3621883 = fieldWeight in 5738, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.806516 = idf(docFreq=17, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5738)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

The Bowker annual of library and book trade information. 22nd ed

0.20699254 = product of:
  0.41398507 = sum of:
    0.3574636 = weight(_text_:22nd in 4652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.3574636 = score(doc=4652,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.6123101 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.806516 = idf(docFreq=17, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06952921 = queryNorm
        0.583795 = fieldWeight in 4652, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.806516 = idf(docFreq=17, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4652)
    0.05652149 = weight(_text_:22 in 4652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05652149 = score(doc=4652,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24347946 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06952921 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4652, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4652)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Date

21.12.2018 18:22:12

Footnote

Introduction und Rez. in: Knowledge Organization 45(2018) no.8, S.712-714. u.d.T. "Satija, M. P. 2018: "The 22nd edition (2018) of the Sears List of Subject Headings: A brief introduction." (DOI:10.5771/0943-7444-2018-8-712).

0.19390696 = product of:
  0.38781393 = sum of:
    0.33129245 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.33129245 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.58946943 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06952921 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.05652149 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05652149 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24347946 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06952921 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Content

Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.

Date

8. 1.2013 10:22:32

0.1787318 = product of:
  0.7149272 = sum of:
    0.7149272 = weight(_text_:22nd in 7764) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.7149272 = score(doc=7764,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.6123101 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.806516 = idf(docFreq=17, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06952921 = queryNorm
        1.16759 = fieldWeight in 7764, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.806516 = idf(docFreq=17, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7764)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

Indexing tradition and innovation: proceedings of the 22nd Annual Conference of the American Society of Indexers

0.1787318 = product of:
  0.7149272 = sum of:
    0.7149272 = weight(_text_:22nd in 7767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.7149272 = score(doc=7767,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.6123101 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.806516 = idf(docFreq=17, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06952921 = queryNorm
        1.16759 = fieldWeight in 7767, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.806516 = idf(docFreq=17, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7767)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

Indexing tradition and innovation: proceedings of the 22nd Annual Conference of the American Society of Indexers

0.17644943 = product of:
  0.35289887 = sum of:
    0.27753687 = weight(_text_:author's in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.27753687 = score(doc=1171,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.46724698 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06952921 = queryNorm
        0.59398323 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
    0.07536199 = weight(_text_:22 in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07536199 = score(doc=1171,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24347946 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06952921 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

All classifications are based on ideologies and Dewey is marked by its author's origins in 19th century North America. Subsequent revisions indicate changed ways of understanding the world. Section 157 (psycho-pathology) is now included with 616.89 (mental troubles), reflecting the move to a genetic-based approach. Table 5 (racial, ethnic and national groups) is however unchanged, despite changing views on such categorisation

Source

Bulletin d'informations de l'Association des Bibliothecaires Francais. 1997, no.175, S.22-23

0.17644943 = product of:
  0.35289887 = sum of:
    0.27753687 = weight(_text_:author's in 4642) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.27753687 = score(doc=4642,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.46724698 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06952921 = queryNorm
        0.59398323 = fieldWeight in 4642, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4642)
    0.07536199 = weight(_text_:22 in 4642) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07536199 = score(doc=4642,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24347946 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06952921 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4642, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4642)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

Comments on Douglas Hofstadter's index to his book 'Le ton beau de Marot: in praise of the music of language'. Hofstadter took charge of the book design, typography, typesetting and copy-editing, and also compiled the index which covers 23 pages of 3 columnes and is set in a practically illegible 4-point. Although the index breaks all the rules of indexing, it is a masterly creation showing the author's industry, exhuberance and wit. Summarizes Hofstadter's own remarks on how creating the index gave hin new insights into what his book was essentially about

Source

Indexer. 21(1998) no.1, S.22-23

0.17644943 = product of:
  0.35289887 = sum of:
    0.27753687 = weight(_text_:author's in 4749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.27753687 = score(doc=4749,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.46724698 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06952921 = queryNorm
        0.59398323 = fieldWeight in 4749, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4749)
    0.07536199 = weight(_text_:22 in 4749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07536199 = score(doc=4749,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24347946 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06952921 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4749, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4749)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

Describes the construction of the author's Perl program, Cyril, to add vernacular Russian (Cyrillic) characters to existing MARC records. The program takes advantage of the ALA-LC standards for Romanization to create character mappings that "de-transliterate" specified MARC fields. The creation of Cyril raises both linguistic and technical issues, which are thoroughly examined. Concludes by considering the implications for cataloging and authority control standards, as we move to a multilingual, multi-script bibliographic environment.

Source

Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.8-17

0.1690018 = product of:
  0.3380036 = sum of:
    0.23830906 = weight(_text_:22nd in 1842) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.23830906 = score(doc=1842,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.6123101 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.806516 = idf(docFreq=17, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06952921 = queryNorm
        0.38919666 = fieldWeight in 1842, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.806516 = idf(docFreq=17, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1842)
    0.09969454 = weight(_text_:22 in 1842) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09969454 = score(doc=1842,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.24347946 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06952921 = queryNorm
        0.4094577 = fieldWeight in 1842, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1842)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

A system of library classification that flashed across the inquiring mind of young Melvil Louis Kossuth Dewey (known as Melvil Dewey) in 1873 is still the most popular classification scheme.. The modern library classification begins with Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC). Melvil Dewey devised DDC in 1876. DDC has is credit of 128 years of boudless success. The DDC is being taught as a practical subject throughout the world and it is being used in majority of libraries in about 150 countries. This is the result of continuous revision that 22nd Edition of DDC has been published in July 2003. No other classification scheme has published so many editions. Some welcome changes have been made in DDC 22. To reduce the Christian bias in 200 religion, the numbers 201 to 209 have been devoted to specific aspects of religion. In the previous editions these numbers were devoted to Christianity. to enhance the classifier's efficiency, Table 7 has been removed from DDC 22 and the provision of adding group of persons is made by direct use of notation already available in schedules and in notation -08 from Table 1 Standard Subdivision. The present book is an attempt to explain, with suitable examples, the salient provisions of DDC 22. The book is written in simple language so that the students may not face any difficulty in understanding what is being explained. The examples in the book are explained in a step-by-step procedure. It is hoped that this book will prove of great help and use to the library professionals in general and library and information science students in particular.

Content

1. Introduction to DDC 22 2. Major changes in DDC 22 3. Introduction to the schedules 4. Use of Table 1 : Standard Subdivisions 5. Use of Table 2 : Areas 6. Use of Table 3 : Subdivisions for the arts, for individual literatures, for specific literary forms 7. Use to Table 4 : Subdivisions of individual languages and language families 8. Use of Table 5 : Ethic and National groups 9. Use of Table 6 : Languages 10. Treatment of Groups of Persons

Object

DDC-22

0.16564623 = product of:
  0.6625849 = sum of:
    0.6625849 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.6625849 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.58946943 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06952921 = queryNorm
        1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Content

Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.

0.16158915 = product of:
  0.3231783 = sum of:
    0.27607706 = weight(_text_:3a in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.27607706 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.58946943 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06952921 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
    0.047101244 = weight(_text_:22 in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.047101244 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24347946 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06952921 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Content

1. Agrarwissenschaften 1981. - 3. Allgemeine Geographie 2.1972. - 3a. Allgemeine Naturwissenschaften 1.1973. - 4. Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, Allgemeine Literaturwissenschaft 2.1971. - 6. Allgemeines. 5.1983. - 7. Anglistik 3.1976. - 8. Astronomie, Geodäsie 4.1977. - 12. bio Biologie, bcp Biochemie-Biophysik, bot Botanik, zoo Zoologie 1981. - 13. Bremensien 3.1983. - 13a. Buch- und Bibliothekswesen 3.1975. - 14. Chemie 4.1977. - 14a. Elektrotechnik 1974. - 15 Ethnologie 2.1976. - 16,1. Geowissenschaften. Sachteil 3.1977. - 16,2. Geowissenschaften. Regionaler Teil 3.1977. - 17. Germanistik 6.1984. - 17a,1. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hil. - 17a,2. Geschichte. Teilsystematik his Neuere Geschichte. - 17a,3. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hit Neueste Geschichte. - 18. Humanbiologie 2.1983. - 19. Ingenieurwissenschaften 1974. - 20. siehe 14a. - 21. klassische Philologie 3.1977. - 22. Klinische Medizin 1975. - 23. Kunstgeschichte 2.1971. - 24. Kybernetik. 2.1975. - 25. Mathematik 3.1974. - 26. Medizin 1976. - 26a. Militärwissenschaft 1985. - 27. Musikwissenschaft 1978. - 27a. Noten 2.1974. - 28. Ozeanographie 3.1977. -29. Pädagogik 8.1985. - 30. Philosphie 3.1974. - 31. Physik 3.1974. - 33. Politik, Politische Wissenschaft, Sozialwissenschaft. Soziologie. Länderschlüssel. Register 1981. - 34. Psychologie 2.1972. - 35. Publizistik und Kommunikationswissenschaft 1985. - 36. Rechtswissenschaften 1986. - 37. Regionale Geograpgie 3.1975. - 37a. Religionswissenschaft 1970. - 38. Romanistik 3.1976. - 39. Skandinavistik 4.1985. - 40. Slavistik 1977. - 40a. Sonstige Sprachen und Literaturen 1973. - 43. Sport 4.1983. - 44. Theaterwissenschaft 1985. - 45. Theologie 2.1976. - 45a. Ur- und Frühgeschichte, Archäologie 1970. - 47. Volkskunde 1976. - 47a. Wirtschaftswissenschaften 1971 // Schlüssel: 1. Länderschlüssel 1971. - 2. Formenschlüssel (Kurzform) 1974. - 3. Personenschlüssel Literatur 5. Fassung 1968

0.15439326 = product of:
  0.3087865 = sum of:
    0.24284476 = weight(_text_:author's in 5860) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.24284476 = score(doc=5860,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.46724698 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06952921 = queryNorm
        0.51973534 = fieldWeight in 5860, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5860)
    0.065941736 = weight(_text_:22 in 5860) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.065941736 = score(doc=5860,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24347946 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06952921 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5860, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5860)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

Richer graph models permit authors to 'program' the browsing behaviour they want WWW readers to see by turning the hypertext into a hyperprogram with specific semantics. Multiple browsing streams can be started under the author's control and then kept in step through the synchronization mechanisms provided by the graph model. Adds a Semantic Web Graph Layer (SWGL) which allows dynamic interpretation of link and node structures according to graph models. Details the SWGL and its architecture, some sample protocol implementations, and the latest extensions to MHTML

Date

1. 8.1996 22:08:06

0.149384 = product of:
  0.298768 = sum of:
    0.25797713 = weight(_text_:22nd in 129) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.25797713 = score(doc=129,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.6123101 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.806516 = idf(docFreq=17, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06952921 = queryNorm
        0.4213178 = fieldWeight in 129, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          8.806516 = idf(docFreq=17, maxDocs=44218)
          0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=129)
    0.040790875 = weight(_text_:22 in 129) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.040790875 = score(doc=129,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.24347946 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06952921 = queryNorm
        0.16753313 = fieldWeight in 129, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=129)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Footnote

Rez. in: Knowledge organization 31(2004) no.2, S.112-114 (M.P. Satija) : "With nearly 130 years of eventful and checkered history, the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) is the oldest living yet thriving modern library classification. Having undergone 21 revisions, it is the most applied library classification structure all over the world. Apart from its use in libraries in more than 135 countries across six continents, many national and trade bibliographies use it for content organization. Furthermore, it is now making successful forays into the world of electronic documents and networked information. The print version of the 22nd edition was released in September 2003, two months later than the scheduled time of July 2003, and two months after the release of the electronic version, WebDewey. The period between print editions now seems settled to seven years as a matter of policy. As WebDewey, an the other hand, is updated an a quarterly basis, what really constitutes a new edition is problematic; edition is rolling, always in a flux without much fixity. The last half century, and more specifically the tenure of Benjamin A. Custer as editor (1956-1980; Editions 16-19), has been an era of structural changes in the DDC, backed by professional management and organizational planning. Custer was instrumental in not only resuscitating the system, but also in putting DDC back an the path of progress. His able successor, Dr. John P. Comaromi, edited the 20`h edition (1989) and ushered in a period of simplification and consolidation. Following the acquisition of Forest Press by OCLC in 1988, much more research has gone into making new editions of the DDC. The OCLC Office of Research has involved itself in classification research, especially in the harmonization of various knowledge classification systems and mapping of DDC numbers to subject headings, above all to make DDC capable of organizing electronic information of every sort. The acquisition of DDC by OCLC has also inaugurated an era of new products and services, along with organized marketing. DDC21 (1996) was a product of high IT, and the 22nd edition can safely be termed a child of network technology. It is indeed the first edition produced in the web environment. To stay abreast of current developments an knowledge practices, the editors relied an the Internet and electronic databases for new topics and terms. Editors and policy makes got constant feedback and suggestions via the Internet to add new features and to achieve accuracy and efficiency. In addition to the feedback and expert advice, this edition, as usual, is based an actual classification of three quarters of a million current books in the Decimal Classification Division of the Library of Congress since 1996.
Changes DDC22 is the second edition prepared by Joan S. Mitchell who took over as editor in 1993. It carries forward the policies and improvements started in DDC21, especially the onslaught an the Christian and western cultural blas in the schedules and tables. The plan for reducing Christian blas in 200 Religion, initiated in DDC21, has now been completed, with some additional provisions in 296 and 297. An outstanding change has been the abrogation of Table 7 Persons. The functions of Table 7 are now filled by using T1-08 and whatever notation is appropriate from 011-999. There are at least six places in the tables and 12 places in the schedules where the use of T7 was prescribed; what good the abolition of T7 has produced is not clear. In fact, it does make number building in some cases a bit circuitous, especially while using Table 3C. It has also resulted in the reuse of many DDC 21 numbers with new meanings. However, some numbers remain the same e.g., Social customs of artists 390.47 (both in DDC21 and DDC22). A few numbers have also become shorter in length. In compliance with the recommendations of D'Elia's survey, all works relating to directories of travel facilities such as hotels, lodges, Motels, inns, have been shifted to 910.46 and to 913/919 whereas 647.94 continues to be in place for general information about hotels. A common practice in previous editions, that is full class or extensive revisions (phoenix schedules), appear to have been discontinued in the preparation of DDC22. But minor changes are numerous. There are more than one thousand relocations and discontiuations of class numbers. Some 40 numbers have been reused. ... However, all these changes are not those projected as slated changes for DDC22 in the DDC21 (1996), namely in 520 Astronomy, 355-359 Military science, 636-639 Animal husbandry and 690 Buildings. Obviously the switch over to the DDC 22 will put less strain an libraries. There has been considerable improvement in the manual, now shifted to volume 1 of the print edition (pp. 1-182). Notes in the manual have been shortened by removing redundant information and by dividing them into smaller sections. Some information from the manual has been transferred to the schedules and tables, in the form of notes. The manual is now clearer and easier to read. Flow Charts, built-in numbers, and see also references should help classifiers achieve greater consistency. The relative index has been beefed up. With its 928 pages, it is 333 pages longer than the previous one, including new built-in numbers and many additional terms. The entry vocabulary is wide-based and current. DDC 22, the first edition of this millennium, has kept pace with the fast changing information environment to map and organize it squarely. To quote our friends at OCLC: knowledge is a big world, and they have organized it."

Issue

22nd ed.

Object

DDC-22

0.14620575 = product of:
  0.2924115 = sum of:
    0.24531025 = weight(_text_:author's in 5491) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.24531025 = score(doc=5491,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.46724698 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06952921 = queryNorm
        0.52501196 = fieldWeight in 5491, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5491)
    0.047101244 = weight(_text_:22 in 5491) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.047101244 = score(doc=5491,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24347946 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06952921 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5491, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5491)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

RDS are usually cross-disciplinary, centralised services, which are increasingly provided at a university by the academic library and in collaboration with other RDM stakeholders, such as the Research Office. At research-intensive universities, research data is generated in a wide range of disciplines and sub-disciplines. This paper will discuss how providing discipline-specific RDM support is approached by such universities and academic libraries, and the advantages and disadvantages of these central and discipline-specific approaches. A descriptive case study on the author's experiences of collaborating with a central RDS at the University of Cambridge, as a subject librarian embedded in an academic department, is a major component of this paper. The case study describes how centralised RDM services offered by the Office of Scholarly Communication (OSC) have been adapted to meet discipline-specific needs in the Department of Chemistry. It will introduce the department and the OSC, and describe the author's role in delivering RDM training, as well as the Data Champions programme, and their membership of the RDM Project Group. It will describe the outcomes of this collaboration for the Department of Chemistry, and for the centralised service. Centralised and discipline-specific approaches to RDS provision have their own advantages and disadvantages. Supporting the discipline-specific RDM needs of researchers is proving particularly challenging for universities to address sustainably: it requires adequate financial resources and staff skilled (or re-skilled) in RDM. A mixed approach is the most desirable, cost-effective way of providing RDS, but this still has constraints.

Date

7. 9.2019 21:30:22

0.13803853 = product of:
  0.5521541 = sum of:
    0.5521541 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.5521541 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.58946943 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06952921 = queryNorm
        0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja

0.13233708 = product of:
  0.26467416 = sum of:
    0.20815267 = weight(_text_:author's in 3749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.20815267 = score(doc=3749,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.46724698 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06952921 = queryNorm
        0.44548744 = fieldWeight in 3749, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3749)
    0.05652149 = weight(_text_:22 in 3749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05652149 = score(doc=3749,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24347946 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06952921 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3749, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3749)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

Lists 19 tips, based on the author's experience with IBM compatible CD-ROM workstations, designed to yield improved performance by more efficient use of the computer hardware, particularly the hard disc. The tips also apply to Macintosh workstations. Covers: optimising files; placing CD-ROM software at the front of the hard disc; using disc caching software; use of the autopark facility; checking the interleave; browsing for orphan files; using CHKDSK/f command; low level formatting of hard disc; purchasing of microcomputers with large RAM caches; stepping up in MHZ and CPU; using more memory and memory management software; putting full path before software is loaded by AUTOEXEC.BAT and batch files; REM software specific lines in AUTOEXEC.BAT and CONFIG.SYS; feeding paper tp printer from a box on the flor; booting up in turbo mode and with Num Lock off; speeding up cursor keys; and protecting system enhancements

Source

CD-ROM professional. 6(1993) no.1, S.17-22

0.13233708 = product of:
  0.26467416 = sum of:
    0.20815267 = weight(_text_:author's in 2360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.20815267 = score(doc=2360,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.46724698 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06952921 = queryNorm
        0.44548744 = fieldWeight in 2360, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2360)
    0.05652149 = weight(_text_:22 in 2360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05652149 = score(doc=2360,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24347946 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06952921 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2360, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2360)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

This article reports the author's recent research in developing a holistic model for various levels of digital library (DL) evaluation in which perceived important criteria from heterogeneous stakeholder groups are organized and presented. To develop such a model, the author applied a three-stage research approach: exploration, confirmation, and verification. During the exploration stage, a literature review was conducted followed by an interview, along with a card sorting technique, to collect important criteria perceived by DL experts. Then the criteria identified were used for developing an online survey during the confirmation stage. Survey respondents (431 in total) from 22 countries rated the importance of the criteria. A holistic DL evaluation model was constructed using statistical techniques. Eventually, the verification stage was devised to test the reliability of the model in the context of searching and evaluating an operational DL. The proposed model fills two lacunae in the DL domain: (a) the lack of a comprehensive and flexible framework to guide and benchmark evaluations, and (b) the uncertainty about what divergence exists among heterogeneous DL stakeholders, including general users.

0.13233708 = product of:
  0.26467416 = sum of:
    0.20815267 = weight(_text_:author's in 4359) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.20815267 = score(doc=4359,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.46724698 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06952921 = queryNorm
        0.44548744 = fieldWeight in 4359, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4359)
    0.05652149 = weight(_text_:22 in 4359) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05652149 = score(doc=4359,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24347946 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06952921 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4359, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4359)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

A recent study in information science (IS), raises important issues concerning the value of human indexing and basic theories of indexing and information retrieval, as well as the use of quantitative and qualitative approaches in IS and the underlying theories of knowledge informing the field. The present article uses L&E as the point of departure for demonstrating in what way more social and interpretative understandings may provide fruitful improvements for research in indexing, knowledge organization, and information retrieval. The artcle is motivated by the observation that philosophical contributions tend to be ignored in IS if they are not directly formed as criticisms or invitations to dialogs. It is part of the author's ongoing publication of articles about philosophical issues in IS and it is intended to be followed by analyzes of other examples of contributions to core issues in IS. Although it is formulated as a criticism of a specific paper, it should be seen as part of a general discussion of the philosophical foundation of IS and as a support to the emerging social paradigm in this field.

Date

17. 3.2011 19:22:55