Search (376 results, page 1 of 19)

  • × theme_ss:"Datenformate"
  1. Tillett, B.B.: Gemeinsame internationale Ausgangsdaten für Normsätze (1997) 0.17 
    0.17325467 = sum of:
  0.0015297168 = product of:
    0.007648584 = sum of:
      0.007648584 = weight(_text_:a in 6449) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.007648584 = score(doc=6449,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.05003199 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.043391112 = queryNorm
          0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 6449, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6449)
    0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.17172495 = product of:
    0.3434499 = sum of:
      0.3434499 = weight(_text_:b.b in 6449) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.3434499 = score(doc=6449,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.33526558 = queryWeight, product of:
            7.7265954 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44218)
            0.043391112 = queryNorm
          1.0244114 = fieldWeight in 6449, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            7.7265954 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6449)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Type
    a
  2. Leazer, G.H.: Recent research on the sequential bibliographic relationship and its implications for standards and the library catalog : an examination of serials (1996) 0.10 
    0.101718456 = sum of:
  0.0015455693 = product of:
    0.0077278465 = sum of:
      0.0077278465 = weight(_text_:a in 5579) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0077278465 = score(doc=5579,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.05003199 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.043391112 = queryNorm
          0.1544581 = fieldWeight in 5579, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5579)
    0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.100172885 = product of:
    0.20034577 = sum of:
      0.20034577 = weight(_text_:b.b in 5579) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.20034577 = score(doc=5579,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.33526558 = queryWeight, product of:
            7.7265954 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44218)
            0.043391112 = queryNorm
          0.59757334 = fieldWeight in 5579, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            7.7265954 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5579)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Evaluates current research into bibliographic relationships sparked off by B.B. Tillett's taxonomy of bibliographic relationships (LRTS 35(1991) no.4, S.393-405) and R.P. Smiraglia's taxonomy of the derivative bibliographic relationship (PhD dissertation, Chicago Univ., Graduate Library School, 1992). These researches provide the context for a discussion of recent research and standards work. Reevaluates research on the sequential relationship drawn from work conducted on periodicals and the implications of that research is applied to cataloguing system design. Evaluates the conceptual designs proposed by researchers such as G.H. Leazer and M. Gorman's and uses them in a critique of the USMARC format for bibliographic description
    Type
    a
  3. Boruah, B.B.; Ravikumar, S.; Gayang, F.L.: Consistency, extent, and validation of the utilization of the MARC 21 bibliographic standard in the college libraries of Assam in India (2023) 0.10 
    0.101434834 = sum of:
  0.0012619521 = product of:
    0.0063097603 = sum of:
      0.0063097603 = weight(_text_:a in 1183) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0063097603 = score(doc=1183,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.05003199 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.043391112 = queryNorm
          0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 1183, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1183)
    0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.100172885 = product of:
    0.20034577 = sum of:
      0.20034577 = weight(_text_:b.b in 1183) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.20034577 = score(doc=1183,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.33526558 = queryWeight, product of:
            7.7265954 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44218)
            0.043391112 = queryNorm
          0.59757334 = fieldWeight in 1183, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            7.7265954 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1183)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This paper brings light to the existing practice of cataloging in the college libraries of Assam in terms of utilizing the MARC 21 standard and its structure, i.e., the tags, subfield codes, and indicators. Catalog records from six college libraries are collected and a survey is conducted to understand the local users' information requirements for the catalog. Places, where libraries have scope to improve and which divisions of tags could be more helpful for them in information retrieval, are identified and suggested. This study fulfilled the need for local-level assessment of the catalogs.
    Type
    a
  4. Authority control in the online environment : considerations and practices (1989) 0.10 
    0.100172885 = product of:
  0.20034577 = sum of:
    0.20034577 = product of:
      0.40069154 = sum of:
        0.40069154 = weight(_text_:b.b in 236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.40069154 = score(doc=236,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.33526558 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.7265954 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043391112 = queryNorm
            1.1951467 = fieldWeight in 236, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.7265954 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=236)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Editor
    Tillett, B.B.
  5. Jimenez, V.O.R.: Nuevas perspectivas para la catalogacion : metadatos ver MARC (1999) 0.05 
    0.05141381 = sum of:
  0.0015297168 = product of:
    0.007648584 = sum of:
      0.007648584 = weight(_text_:a in 5743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.007648584 = score(doc=5743,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.05003199 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.043391112 = queryNorm
          0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 5743, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5743)
    0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.049884096 = product of:
    0.09976819 = sum of:
      0.09976819 = weight(_text_:22 in 5743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.09976819 = score(doc=5743,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.15194829 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.043391112 = queryNorm
          0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 5743, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5743)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    30. 3.2002 19:45:22
    Source
    Revista Española de Documentaçion Cientifica. 22(1999) no.2, S.198-219
    Type
    a
  6. Geißelmann, F.: Arbeitsergebnisse der Arbeitsgruppe Codes (2000) 0.04 
    0.042936947 = sum of:
  0.0017846696 = product of:
    0.008923348 = sum of:
      0.008923348 = weight(_text_:a in 4973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.008923348 = score(doc=4973,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.05003199 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.043391112 = queryNorm
          0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 4973, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4973)
    0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.041152276 = product of:
    0.08230455 = sum of:
      0.08230455 = weight(_text_:22 in 4973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08230455 = score(doc=4973,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15194829 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.043391112 = queryNorm
          0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4973, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4973)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    26. 8.2000 19:22:35
    Type
    a
  7. Weber, R.: "Functional requirements for bibliographic records" und Regelwerksentwicklung (2001) 0.04 
    0.042936947 = sum of:
  0.0017846696 = product of:
    0.008923348 = sum of:
      0.008923348 = weight(_text_:a in 6838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.008923348 = score(doc=6838,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.05003199 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.043391112 = queryNorm
          0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 6838, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6838)
    0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.041152276 = product of:
    0.08230455 = sum of:
      0.08230455 = weight(_text_:22 in 6838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08230455 = score(doc=6838,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15194829 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.043391112 = queryNorm
          0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6838, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6838)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Dialog mit Bibliotheken. 13(2001) H.3, S.20-22
    Type
    a
  8. Tennant, R.: ¬A bibliographic metadata infrastructure for the twenty-first century (2004) 0.04 
    0.03575408 = sum of:
  0.0024980172 = product of:
    0.012490085 = sum of:
      0.012490085 = weight(_text_:a in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.012490085 = score(doc=2845,freq=12.0), product of:
          0.05003199 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.043391112 = queryNorm
          0.24964198 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
            3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
              12.0 = termFreq=12.0
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
    0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.033256065 = product of:
    0.06651213 = sum of:
      0.06651213 = weight(_text_:22 in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06651213 = score(doc=2845,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.15194829 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.043391112 = queryNorm
          0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The current library bibliographic infrastructure was constructed in the early days of computers - before the Web, XML, and a variety of other technological advances that now offer new opportunities. General requirements of a modern metadata infrastructure for libraries are identified, including such qualities as versatility, extensibility, granularity, and openness. A new kind of metadata infrastructure is then proposed that exhibits at least some of those qualities. Some key challenges that must be overcome to implement a change of this magnitude are identified.
    Date
    9.12.2005 19:22:38
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.175-181
    Type
    a
  9. Caplan, P.; Guenther, R.: Metadata for Internet resources : the Dublin Core Metadata Elements Set and its mapping to USMARC (1996) 0.03 
    0.034275874 = sum of:
  0.0010198111 = product of:
    0.005099056 = sum of:
      0.005099056 = weight(_text_:a in 2408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.005099056 = score(doc=2408,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.05003199 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.043391112 = queryNorm
          0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 2408, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2408)
    0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.033256065 = product of:
    0.06651213 = sum of:
      0.06651213 = weight(_text_:22 in 2408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06651213 = score(doc=2408,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.15194829 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.043391112 = queryNorm
          0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2408, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2408)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    13. 1.2007 18:31:22
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.43-58
    Type
    a
  10. Paulus, W.; Weishaupt, K.: Bibliotheksdaten werden mehr wert : LibLink wertet bibliothekarische Dienstleistung auf (1996) 0.03 
    0.03066925 = sum of:
  0.001274764 = product of:
    0.0063738194 = sum of:
      0.0063738194 = weight(_text_:a in 5228) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0063738194 = score(doc=5228,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.05003199 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.043391112 = queryNorm
          0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 5228, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5228)
    0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.029394485 = product of:
    0.05878897 = sum of:
      0.05878897 = weight(_text_:22 in 5228) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05878897 = score(doc=5228,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15194829 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.043391112 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5228, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5228)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    29. 9.1996 18:58:22
    Type
    a
  11. Hoffmann, L.: ¬Die Globalisierung macht vor der Katalogisierung nicht Halt : Mit AACR2 zum Global Player? (2003) 0.03 
    0.03066925 = sum of:
  0.001274764 = product of:
    0.0063738194 = sum of:
      0.0063738194 = weight(_text_:a in 1544) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0063738194 = score(doc=1544,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.05003199 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.043391112 = queryNorm
          0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 1544, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1544)
    0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.029394485 = product of:
    0.05878897 = sum of:
      0.05878897 = weight(_text_:22 in 1544) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05878897 = score(doc=1544,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15194829 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.043391112 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1544, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1544)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 3.2016 12:15:46
    Type
    a
  12. Murphy, C.: Curriculum-enhanced MARC (CEMARC) : a new cataloging format for school librarians (1995) 0.03 
    0.030644625 = sum of:
  0.0015455693 = product of:
    0.0077278465 = sum of:
      0.0077278465 = weight(_text_:a in 5100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0077278465 = score(doc=5100,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.05003199 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.043391112 = queryNorm
          0.1544581 = fieldWeight in 5100, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5100)
    0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.029099056 = product of:
    0.058198113 = sum of:
      0.058198113 = weight(_text_:22 in 5100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.058198113 = score(doc=5100,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.15194829 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.043391112 = queryNorm
          0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 5100, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5100)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Briefly summarizes the problems encountered when attempting to use the USMARC cataloguing format in US school libraries and describes the development of CEMARC format by the Northwest Ohio Educational Technology Foundation (NWOET), which addresses the main problems by: offering sata entry guidelines for a minimum USMARC standard in order to clarify inconsistencies in application; and by suggesting enhancements and new fields that go beyond the USMARC standard. Concludes with brief notes on early CEMARC implementation
    Date
    11. 9.1996 19:22:20
    Source
    Literacy: traditional, cultural, technological. Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the International Association of School Librarianship (selected papers), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh University, School of Library and Information Science, 17-22 Jul 94
    Type
    a
  13. Gopinath, M.A.: Standardization for resource sharing databases (1995) 0.03 
    0.026013605 = sum of:
  0.0024980172 = product of:
    0.012490085 = sum of:
      0.012490085 = weight(_text_:a in 4414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.012490085 = score(doc=4414,freq=12.0), product of:
          0.05003199 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.043391112 = queryNorm
          0.24964198 = fieldWeight in 4414, product of:
            3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
              12.0 = termFreq=12.0
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4414)
    0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.023515588 = product of:
    0.047031175 = sum of:
      0.047031175 = weight(_text_:22 in 4414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.047031175 = score(doc=4414,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15194829 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.043391112 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4414, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4414)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    It is helpful and essential to adopt standards for bibliographic information, project description and institutional information which are shareable for access to information resources within a country. Describes a strategy for adopting international standards of bibliographic information exchange for developing a resource sharing facilitation database in India. A list of 22 ISO standards for information processing is included
    Source
    Library science with a slant to documentation and information studies. 32(1995) no.3, S.i-iv
    Type
    a
  14. Coyle, K.: Future considerations : the functional library systems record (2004) 0.03 
    0.026013605 = sum of:
  0.0024980172 = product of:
    0.012490085 = sum of:
      0.012490085 = weight(_text_:a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.012490085 = score(doc=562,freq=12.0), product of:
          0.05003199 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.043391112 = queryNorm
          0.24964198 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
            3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
              12.0 = termFreq=12.0
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.023515588 = product of:
    0.047031175 = sum of:
      0.047031175 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.047031175 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15194829 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.043391112 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The paper performs a thought experiment on the concept of a record based on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records and library system functions, and concludes that if we want to develop a functional bibliographic record we need to do it within the context of a flexible, functional library systems record structure. The article suggests a new way to look at the library systems record that would allow libraries to move forward in terms of technology but also in terms of serving library users.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.166-174
    Type
    a
  15. Proffitt, M.: Pulling it all together : use of METS in RLG cultural materials service (2004) 0.03 
    0.02555521 = sum of:
  0.0020396223 = product of:
    0.010198112 = sum of:
      0.010198112 = weight(_text_:a in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.010198112 = score(doc=767,freq=8.0), product of:
          0.05003199 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.043391112 = queryNorm
          0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
            2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
              8.0 = termFreq=8.0
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
    0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.023515588 = product of:
    0.047031175 = sum of:
      0.047031175 = weight(_text_:22 in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.047031175 = score(doc=767,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15194829 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.043391112 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    RLG has used METS for a particular application, that is as a wrapper for structural metadata. When RLG cultural materials was launched, there was no single way to deal with "complex digital objects". METS provides a standard means of encoding metadata regarding the digital objects represented in RCM, and METS has now been fully integrated into the workflow for this service.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.65-68
    Type
    a
  16. Cundiff, M.V.: ¬An introduction to the Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard (METS) (2004) 0.03 
    0.02555521 = sum of:
  0.0020396223 = product of:
    0.010198112 = sum of:
      0.010198112 = weight(_text_:a in 2834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.010198112 = score(doc=2834,freq=8.0), product of:
          0.05003199 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.043391112 = queryNorm
          0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 2834, product of:
            2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
              8.0 = termFreq=8.0
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2834)
    0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.023515588 = product of:
    0.047031175 = sum of:
      0.047031175 = weight(_text_:22 in 2834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.047031175 = score(doc=2834,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15194829 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.043391112 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2834, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2834)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This article provides an introductory overview of the Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard, better known as METS. It will be of most use to librarians and technical staff who are encountering METS for the first time. The article contains a brief history of the development of METS, a primer covering the basic structure and content of METS documents, and a discussion of several issues relevant to the implementation and continuing development of METS including object models, extension schemata, and application profiles.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.52-64
    Type
    a
  17. El-Sherbini, M.: Metadata and the future of cataloging (2001) 0.03 
    0.025281953 = sum of:
  0.0017663649 = product of:
    0.008831824 = sum of:
      0.008831824 = weight(_text_:a in 751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.008831824 = score(doc=751,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.05003199 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.043391112 = queryNorm
          0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 751, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=751)
    0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.023515588 = product of:
    0.047031175 = sum of:
      0.047031175 = weight(_text_:22 in 751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.047031175 = score(doc=751,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15194829 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.043391112 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 751, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=751)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This article is a survey of representative metadata efforts comparing them to MARC 21 metadata in order to determine if new electronic formats require the development of a new set of standards. This study surveys the ongoing metadata projects in order to identify what types of metadata exist and how they are used and also compares and analyzes selected metadata elements in an attempt to illustrate how they are related to MARC 21 metadata format elements.
    Date
    23. 1.2007 11:22:30
    Type
    a
  18. Bales, K.: ¬The USMARC formats and visual materials (1989) 0.02 
    0.024957819 = sum of:
  0.0014422309 = product of:
    0.0072111543 = sum of:
      0.0072111543 = weight(_text_:a in 2861) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0072111543 = score(doc=2861,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.05003199 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.043391112 = queryNorm
          0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 2861, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2861)
    0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.023515588 = product of:
    0.047031175 = sum of:
      0.047031175 = weight(_text_:22 in 2861) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.047031175 = score(doc=2861,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15194829 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.043391112 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2861, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2861)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Paper presented at a symposium on 'Implementing the Art and Architecture Thesaurus (AAT): Controlled Vocabulary in the Extended MARC format', held at the 1989 Annual Conference of the Art Libraries Society of North America. Describes how changes are effected in MARC and the role of the various groups in the library community that are involved in the implementing these changes. Discusses the expansion of the formats to accomodate cataloguing and retrieval for visual materials. Expanded capabilities for coding visual materials offer greater opportunity for user access.
    Date
    4.12.1995 22:40:20
    Type
    a
  19. McCallum, S.H.: ¬An introduction to the Metadata Object Description Schema (MODS) (2004) 0.02 
    0.024957819 = sum of:
  0.0014422309 = product of:
    0.0072111543 = sum of:
      0.0072111543 = weight(_text_:a in 81) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0072111543 = score(doc=81,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.05003199 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.043391112 = queryNorm
          0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 81, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=81)
    0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.023515588 = product of:
    0.047031175 = sum of:
      0.047031175 = weight(_text_:22 in 81) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.047031175 = score(doc=81,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15194829 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.043391112 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 81, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=81)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This paper provides an introduction to the Metadata Object Description Schema (MODS), a MARC21 compatible XML schema for descriptive metadata. It explains the requirements that the schema targets and the special features that differentiate it from MARC, such as user-oriented tags, regrouped data elements, linking, recursion, and accommodations for electronic resources.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.82-88
    Type
    a
  20. Radwanski, A.: Rozwoj formatu MARC (1996) 0.02 
    0.024957819 = sum of:
  0.0014422309 = product of:
    0.0072111543 = sum of:
      0.0072111543 = weight(_text_:a in 3052) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0072111543 = score(doc=3052,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.05003199 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.043391112 = queryNorm
          0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 3052, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3052)
    0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.023515588 = product of:
    0.047031175 = sum of:
      0.047031175 = weight(_text_:22 in 3052) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.047031175 = score(doc=3052,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15194829 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.043391112 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3052, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3052)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 2.1999 20:34:37
    Type
    a

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 337
  • m 17
  • el 14
  • s 11
  • b 2
  • l 2
  • n 2
  • r 2
  • ? 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications