Search (1864 results, page 1 of 94)

  • × theme_ss:"Formalerschließung"
  1. Tillett, B.B.: Problems and solutions in cataloging electronic resources (2000) 0.20
    0.20213044 = sum of:
      0.0017846696 = product of:
        0.008923348 = sum of:
          0.008923348 = weight(_text_:a in 6461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.008923348 = score(doc=6461,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.05003199 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043391112 = queryNorm
              0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 6461, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6461)
        0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.20034577 = product of:
        0.40069154 = sum of:
          0.40069154 = weight(_text_:b.b in 6461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.40069154 = score(doc=6461,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.33526558 = queryWeight, product of:
                7.7265954 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043391112 = queryNorm
              1.1951467 = fieldWeight in 6461, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                7.7265954 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6461)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a
  2. Tillett, B.B.: Authority control at the international level (2000) 0.17
    0.17377338 = sum of:
      0.001274764 = product of:
        0.0063738194 = sum of:
          0.0063738194 = weight(_text_:a in 191) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0063738194 = score(doc=191,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.05003199 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043391112 = queryNorm
              0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 191, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=191)
        0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.17249861 = sum of:
        0.14310412 = weight(_text_:b.b in 191) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14310412 = score(doc=191,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.33526558 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.7265954 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043391112 = queryNorm
            0.4268381 = fieldWeight in 191, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.7265954 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=191)
        0.029394485 = weight(_text_:22 in 191) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029394485 = score(doc=191,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15194829 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043391112 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 191, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=191)
    
    Abstract
    International efforts to provide authority control include the work of IFLA, the AUTHOR Project funded by the European Commission, and related work conducted under the auspices of the ICA/CDS. IFLA developed the guidelines Form and Structure of Corporate Headings, documented the formulation of names along the lines of national origin in its publication Names of Persons, and published Guidelines for Authority and Reference Entries. Attention has shifted from a single authority record for each entity that would be shared internationally through the exchange of records to linking parallel authority records for the same entity. The access control of the future will account for difference in cataloging rules, transliteration standards, and cultural differences within the same language as well as for the need for different languages and scripts and will enable users to display the script and form of a heading that they expect. Project AUTHOR is a shared set of resource national authority files that used selections from the authority files of France, the United Kingdom, Spain, Portugal, and Belgium. The prototype tested an adaptation of Z39.50 server software for authority records and displays for user interface. An international standard for authority control records has been developed for corporate bodies, persons, and families. Through joint meetings efforts have been synchronized to develop authority control at the international level.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Type
    a
  3. Tillett, B.B.: FRBR and RDA (Resource Description and Access) (2007) 0.17
    0.17325467 = sum of:
      0.0015297168 = product of:
        0.007648584 = sum of:
          0.007648584 = weight(_text_:a in 1680) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.007648584 = score(doc=1680,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.05003199 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043391112 = queryNorm
              0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 1680, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1680)
        0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.17172495 = product of:
        0.3434499 = sum of:
          0.3434499 = weight(_text_:b.b in 1680) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.3434499 = score(doc=1680,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.33526558 = queryWeight, product of:
                7.7265954 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043391112 = queryNorm
              1.0244114 = fieldWeight in 1680, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                7.7265954 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1680)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a
  4. Tillett, B.B.: ¬A taxonomy of bibliographic relationships (1991) 0.12
    0.11698131 = sum of:
      0.0024980172 = product of:
        0.012490085 = sum of:
          0.012490085 = weight(_text_:a in 6686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.012490085 = score(doc=6686,freq=12.0), product of:
              0.05003199 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043391112 = queryNorm
              0.24964198 = fieldWeight in 6686, product of:
                3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                  12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6686)
        0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.1144833 = product of:
        0.2289666 = sum of:
          0.2289666 = weight(_text_:b.b in 6686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.2289666 = score(doc=6686,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.33526558 = queryWeight, product of:
                7.7265954 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043391112 = queryNorm
              0.68294096 = fieldWeight in 6686, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                7.7265954 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6686)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    A bibliographic relationship is an association between two or more bibliographic items or works. In an effort to provide the theoretical base for a conceptual model of the library catalog, past and future, the bibliographic relationship is examined here in detail. In this first of a series of reports, a taxonomy of bibliographic relationships is derived from an analysis of cataloging rules and types of bibliographic items.
    Type
    a
  5. Tillett, B.B.: ¬A summary of the treatment of bibliographic relationships in cataloguing rules (1991) 0.12
    0.11624966 = sum of:
      0.0017663649 = product of:
        0.008831824 = sum of:
          0.008831824 = weight(_text_:a in 6739) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.008831824 = score(doc=6739,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.05003199 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043391112 = queryNorm
              0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 6739, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6739)
        0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.1144833 = product of:
        0.2289666 = sum of:
          0.2289666 = weight(_text_:b.b in 6739) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.2289666 = score(doc=6739,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.33526558 = queryWeight, product of:
                7.7265954 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043391112 = queryNorm
              0.68294096 = fieldWeight in 6739, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                7.7265954 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6739)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Reports on an analytical study to examine the cataloguing rules in AACR2 to reveal practices for indicating bibliographic relationships in cataloguing records and identify types of relationships. Relationships defined and investigated were: equivalence; derivative; descriptive; whole-part; accompanying; sequential; and shared characteristic relationships.Each type of bibliographic relationship has had several linking devices used to connect bibliographic entities. The technology available to create and maintain a catalogue has greatly influenced the types of linking devices included in the catalogue and prescribed in cataloguing rules
    Type
    a
  6. Tillett, B.B.: Bibliographic relationships (2001) 0.12
    0.11550311 = sum of:
      0.0010198111 = product of:
        0.005099056 = sum of:
          0.005099056 = weight(_text_:a in 1144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.005099056 = score(doc=1144,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.05003199 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043391112 = queryNorm
              0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 1144, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1144)
        0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.1144833 = product of:
        0.2289666 = sum of:
          0.2289666 = weight(_text_:b.b in 1144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.2289666 = score(doc=1144,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.33526558 = queryWeight, product of:
                7.7265954 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043391112 = queryNorm
              0.68294096 = fieldWeight in 1144, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                7.7265954 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1144)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a
  7. Tillett, B.B.: Authority control : state of the art and new perspectives (2004) 0.10
    0.10235865 = sum of:
      0.002185765 = product of:
        0.010928825 = sum of:
          0.010928825 = weight(_text_:a in 5655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.010928825 = score(doc=5655,freq=12.0), product of:
              0.05003199 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043391112 = queryNorm
              0.21843673 = fieldWeight in 5655, product of:
                3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                  12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5655)
        0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.100172885 = product of:
        0.20034577 = sum of:
          0.20034577 = weight(_text_:b.b in 5655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.20034577 = score(doc=5655,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.33526558 = queryWeight, product of:
                7.7265954 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043391112 = queryNorm
              0.59757334 = fieldWeight in 5655, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                7.7265954 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5655)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Authority control is necessary for meeting the catalog's objectives of enabling users to find the works of an author and to collocate all works of a person or corporate body. This article looks at the current state of authority control as compared to the visions of the 1979 LITA (Library Information and Technology Association) Institutes and the 1984 Authority Control Interest Group. It explores a new view of IFLA's Universal Bibliographic Control (UBC) and a future vision of a virtual international authority file as a building block for the Semantic Web and reinforces the importance of authority control to improve the precision of searches of large databases or the Internet.
    Type
    a
  8. Leazer, G.H.: Recent research on the sequential bibliographic relationship and its implications for standards and the library catalog : an examination of serials (1996) 0.10
    0.101718456 = sum of:
      0.0015455693 = product of:
        0.0077278465 = sum of:
          0.0077278465 = weight(_text_:a in 5579) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0077278465 = score(doc=5579,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.05003199 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043391112 = queryNorm
              0.1544581 = fieldWeight in 5579, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5579)
        0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.100172885 = product of:
        0.20034577 = sum of:
          0.20034577 = weight(_text_:b.b in 5579) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.20034577 = score(doc=5579,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.33526558 = queryWeight, product of:
                7.7265954 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043391112 = queryNorm
              0.59757334 = fieldWeight in 5579, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                7.7265954 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5579)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Evaluates current research into bibliographic relationships sparked off by B.B. Tillett's taxonomy of bibliographic relationships (LRTS 35(1991) no.4, S.393-405) and R.P. Smiraglia's taxonomy of the derivative bibliographic relationship (PhD dissertation, Chicago Univ., Graduate Library School, 1992). These researches provide the context for a discussion of recent research and standards work. Reevaluates research on the sequential relationship drawn from work conducted on periodicals and the implications of that research is applied to cataloguing system design. Evaluates the conceptual designs proposed by researchers such as G.H. Leazer and M. Gorman's and uses them in a critique of the USMARC format for bibliographic description
    Type
    a
  9. Tillett, B.B.: Catalog it once for all : a history of cooperative cataloging in the United States prior to 1967 (before MARC) (1993) 0.10
    0.101718456 = sum of:
      0.0015455693 = product of:
        0.0077278465 = sum of:
          0.0077278465 = weight(_text_:a in 575) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0077278465 = score(doc=575,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.05003199 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043391112 = queryNorm
              0.1544581 = fieldWeight in 575, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=575)
        0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.100172885 = product of:
        0.20034577 = sum of:
          0.20034577 = weight(_text_:b.b in 575) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.20034577 = score(doc=575,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.33526558 = queryWeight, product of:
                7.7265954 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043391112 = queryNorm
              0.59757334 = fieldWeight in 575, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                7.7265954 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=575)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Librarians in the United States always seem to be trying to reduce their costs and share resources through various centralized or cooperative endeavors. Early cooperative cataloging efforts, prior to 1967 when the MARC format made its appearance and automation took off, clearly recognized the need to create a shared national resource of bibliographic records. Yet, the dreams of cataloging it once for all turned into nightmares over and over as many schemes were tried and failed. However, some schemes succeeded and millions of items were cataloged through these early efforts. The promise of our preliminary steps in cooperative cataloging during the pre-automation era sparked our imaginations and raised our hopes for the future.
    Type
    a
  10. Tillett, B.B.: FRBR and cataloging for the future (2004) 0.10
    0.101434834 = sum of:
      0.0012619521 = product of:
        0.0063097603 = sum of:
          0.0063097603 = weight(_text_:a in 5854) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0063097603 = score(doc=5854,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.05003199 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043391112 = queryNorm
              0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 5854, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5854)
        0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.100172885 = product of:
        0.20034577 = sum of:
          0.20034577 = weight(_text_:b.b in 5854) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.20034577 = score(doc=5854,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.33526558 = queryWeight, product of:
                7.7265954 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043391112 = queryNorm
              0.59757334 = fieldWeight in 5854, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                7.7265954 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5854)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The conceptual model known as "FRBR" (Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records) reminds us of the basic elements in describing materials in the bibliographic universe, the inter-relationships, and the fundamental user tasks that we are trying to address when we create library catalogs. This model provides a new perspective on cataloging that should influence the design of future systems, cataloging codes, and cataloging practices. This paper explores current activities to utilize the FRBR model within cataloging principles, cataloging codes, and cataloging systems, and offers questions, visions, and suggests some next steps.
    Type
    a
  11. Tillett, B.B.: Numbers to identify entities (ISADN's-International Standard Authority Data Numbers) (2007) 0.10
    0.101434834 = sum of:
      0.0012619521 = product of:
        0.0063097603 = sum of:
          0.0063097603 = weight(_text_:a in 792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0063097603 = score(doc=792,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.05003199 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043391112 = queryNorm
              0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 792, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=792)
        0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.100172885 = product of:
        0.20034577 = sum of:
          0.20034577 = weight(_text_:b.b in 792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.20034577 = score(doc=792,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.33526558 = queryWeight, product of:
                7.7265954 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043391112 = queryNorm
              0.59757334 = fieldWeight in 792, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                7.7265954 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=792)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The advantages of unique identifiers for the entities described in authority records are outweighed by the costs to manage an international system for assigning and maintaining such unique identifiers. Today's and tomorrow's systems perhaps can do without unique identifiers, but the attraction of unique identifiers still persists. This paper provides a personal recommendation to use the existing machine-generated record control numbers from our authority records as an interim measure until we see what future systems need.
    Type
    a
  12. Tillett, B.B.: RDA, or, The long journey of the catalog to the digital age (2016) 0.10
    0.101434834 = sum of:
      0.0012619521 = product of:
        0.0063097603 = sum of:
          0.0063097603 = weight(_text_:a in 2945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0063097603 = score(doc=2945,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.05003199 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043391112 = queryNorm
              0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 2945, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2945)
        0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.100172885 = product of:
        0.20034577 = sum of:
          0.20034577 = weight(_text_:b.b in 2945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.20034577 = score(doc=2945,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.33526558 = queryWeight, product of:
                7.7265954 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043391112 = queryNorm
              0.59757334 = fieldWeight in 2945, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                7.7265954 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2945)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    RDA was created in response to complaints about the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules, especially the call for a more international, principle-based content standard that takes the perspective of the conceptual models of FRBR (Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records) and FRAD (Functional Requirements for Authority Data). The past and ongoing process for continuous improvement to RDA is through the Joint Steering Committee for Development of RDA (known as the JSC, but recently renamed the RDA Steering Committee - RSC) to make RDA even more international and principle-based.
    Type
    a
  13. Boruah, B.B.; Ravikumar, S.; Gayang, F.L.: Consistency, extent, and validation of the utilization of the MARC 21 bibliographic standard in the college libraries of Assam in India (2023) 0.10
    0.101434834 = sum of:
      0.0012619521 = product of:
        0.0063097603 = sum of:
          0.0063097603 = weight(_text_:a in 1183) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0063097603 = score(doc=1183,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.05003199 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043391112 = queryNorm
              0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 1183, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1183)
        0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.100172885 = product of:
        0.20034577 = sum of:
          0.20034577 = weight(_text_:b.b in 1183) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.20034577 = score(doc=1183,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.33526558 = queryWeight, product of:
                7.7265954 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043391112 = queryNorm
              0.59757334 = fieldWeight in 1183, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                7.7265954 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1183)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper brings light to the existing practice of cataloging in the college libraries of Assam in terms of utilizing the MARC 21 standard and its structure, i.e., the tags, subfield codes, and indicators. Catalog records from six college libraries are collected and a survey is conducted to understand the local users' information requirements for the catalog. Places, where libraries have scope to improve and which divisions of tags could be more helpful for them in information retrieval, are identified and suggested. This study fulfilled the need for local-level assessment of the catalogs.
    Type
    a
  14. Tillett, B.B.: AACR2 and metadata : library opportunities in the global semantic Web (2003) 0.09
    0.087187245 = sum of:
      0.0013247736 = product of:
        0.0066238684 = sum of:
          0.0066238684 = weight(_text_:a in 5510) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0066238684 = score(doc=5510,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.05003199 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043391112 = queryNorm
              0.13239266 = fieldWeight in 5510, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5510)
        0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.08586247 = product of:
        0.17172495 = sum of:
          0.17172495 = weight(_text_:b.b in 5510) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.17172495 = score(doc=5510,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.33526558 = queryWeight, product of:
                7.7265954 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043391112 = queryNorm
              0.5122057 = fieldWeight in 5510, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                7.7265954 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5510)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Explores the opportunities for libraries to contribute to the proposed global "Semantic Web." Library name and subject authority files, including work that IFLA has done related to a new view of "Universal Bibliographic Control" in the Internet environment and the work underway in the U.S. and Europe, are making a reality of the virtual international authority file on the Web. The bibliographic and authority records created according to AACR2 reflect standards for metadata that libraries have provided for years. New opportunities for using these records in the digital world are described (interoperability), including mapping with Dublin Core metadata. AACR2 recently updated Chapter 9 on Electronic Resources. That process and highlights of the changes are described, including Library of Congress' rule interpretations.
    Type
    a
  15. Tillett, B.B.: Complementarity of perspectives for resource descriptions (2015) 0.07
    0.072656035 = sum of:
      0.001103978 = product of:
        0.00551989 = sum of:
          0.00551989 = weight(_text_:a in 2288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.00551989 = score(doc=2288,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.05003199 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043391112 = queryNorm
              0.11032722 = fieldWeight in 2288, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2288)
        0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.07155206 = product of:
        0.14310412 = sum of:
          0.14310412 = weight(_text_:b.b in 2288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.14310412 = score(doc=2288,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.33526558 = queryWeight, product of:
                7.7265954 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043391112 = queryNorm
              0.4268381 = fieldWeight in 2288, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                7.7265954 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2288)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Bibliographic data is used to describe resources held in the collections of libraries, archives and museums. That data is mostly available on the Web today and mostly as linked data. Also on the Web are the controlled vocabulary systems of name authority files, like the Virtual International Authority File (VIAF), classification systems, and subject terms. These systems offer their own linked data to potentially help users find the information they want - whether at their local library or anywhere in the world that is willing to make their resources available. We have found it beneficial to merge authority data for names on a global level, as the entities are relatively clear. That is not true for subject concepts and terminology that have categorisation systems developed according to varying principles and schemes and are in multiple languages. Rather than requiring everyone in the world to use the same categorisation/classification system in the same language, we know that the Web offers us the opportunity to add descriptors assigned around the world using multiple systems from multiple perspectives to identify our resources. Those descriptors add value to refine searches, help users worldwide and share globally what each library does locally.
    Source
    Classification and authority control: expanding resource discovery: proceedings of the International UDC Seminar 2015, 29-30 October 2015, Lisbon, Portugal. Eds.: Slavic, A. u. M.I. Cordeiro
    Type
    a
  16. RAK-NBM : Interpretationshilfe zu NBM 3b,3 (2000) 0.07
    0.06855175 = sum of:
      0.0020396223 = product of:
        0.010198112 = sum of:
          0.010198112 = weight(_text_:a in 4362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.010198112 = score(doc=4362,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.05003199 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043391112 = queryNorm
              0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 4362, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4362)
        0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.06651213 = product of:
        0.13302426 = sum of:
          0.13302426 = weight(_text_:22 in 4362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.13302426 = score(doc=4362,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.15194829 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043391112 = queryNorm
              0.8754574 = fieldWeight in 4362, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4362)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2000 19:22:27
    Type
    a
  17. Carter, J.A.: PASSPORT/PRISM: authors and titles and MARC : oh my! (1993) 0.05
    0.049070798 = sum of:
      0.0020396223 = product of:
        0.010198112 = sum of:
          0.010198112 = weight(_text_:a in 527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.010198112 = score(doc=527,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.05003199 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043391112 = queryNorm
              0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 527, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=527)
        0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.047031175 = product of:
        0.09406235 = sum of:
          0.09406235 = weight(_text_:22 in 527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09406235 = score(doc=527,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15194829 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043391112 = queryNorm
              0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 527, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=527)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    OCLC systems and services. 9(1993) no.3, S.20-22
    Type
    a
  18. Madison, O.M:A.: ¬The role of the name main-entry heading in the online environment (1992) 0.05
    0.049070798 = sum of:
      0.0020396223 = product of:
        0.010198112 = sum of:
          0.010198112 = weight(_text_:a in 4397) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.010198112 = score(doc=4397,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.05003199 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043391112 = queryNorm
              0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 4397, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4397)
        0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.047031175 = product of:
        0.09406235 = sum of:
          0.09406235 = weight(_text_:22 in 4397) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09406235 = score(doc=4397,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15194829 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043391112 = queryNorm
              0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4397, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4397)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Serials librarian. 22(1992), S.371-391
    Type
    a
  19. Bärhausen, A.; Euskirchen, A.: Nachbearbeitung der Katalog-Konversion oder : Es bleibt viel zu tun, packen wir's an! (1999) 0.04
    0.043778036 = sum of:
      0.002207956 = product of:
        0.01103978 = sum of:
          0.01103978 = weight(_text_:a in 4367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.01103978 = score(doc=4367,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.05003199 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043391112 = queryNorm
              0.22065444 = fieldWeight in 4367, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4367)
        0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.04157008 = product of:
        0.08314016 = sum of:
          0.08314016 = weight(_text_:22 in 4367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08314016 = score(doc=4367,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.15194829 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043391112 = queryNorm
              0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 4367, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4367)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2000 19:36:10
    22. 1.2000 19:40:40
    Type
    a
  20. Houissa, A.: Arabic personal names : their components and rendering in catalog entries (1991) 0.04
    0.04367618 = sum of:
      0.0025239042 = product of:
        0.012619521 = sum of:
          0.012619521 = weight(_text_:a in 2857) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.012619521 = score(doc=2857,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.05003199 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043391112 = queryNorm
              0.25222903 = fieldWeight in 2857, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2857)
        0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.041152276 = product of:
        0.08230455 = sum of:
          0.08230455 = weight(_text_:22 in 2857) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08230455 = score(doc=2857,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15194829 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043391112 = queryNorm
              0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2857, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2857)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 13(1991) no.2, S.3-22
    Type
    a

Authors

Languages

Types

  • a 1731
  • el 94
  • m 80
  • b 17
  • s 17
  • n 9
  • r 8
  • ag 2
  • l 2
  • x 2
  • ? 1
  • p 1
  • More… Less…

Subjects

Classifications