Search (16321 results, page 1 of 817)

  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Tillett, B.B.: ¬The history of linking devices (1992) 0.23 
    0.23100622 = sum of:
  0.0020396223 = product of:
    0.010198112 = sum of:
      0.010198112 = weight(_text_:a in 5401) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.010198112 = score(doc=5401,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.05003199 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.043391112 = queryNorm
          0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 5401, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5401)
    0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.2289666 = product of:
    0.4579332 = sum of:
      0.4579332 = weight(_text_:b.b in 5401) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.4579332 = score(doc=5401,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.33526558 = queryWeight, product of:
            7.7265954 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44218)
            0.043391112 = queryNorm
          1.3658819 = fieldWeight in 5401, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            7.7265954 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44218)
            0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5401)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Type
    a
  2. Tillett, B.B.: Bibliographic relationships : an empirical study of the LC machine-readable records (1992) 0.23 
    0.23100622 = sum of:
  0.0020396223 = product of:
    0.010198112 = sum of:
      0.010198112 = weight(_text_:a in 623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.010198112 = score(doc=623,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.05003199 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.043391112 = queryNorm
          0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 623, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=623)
    0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.2289666 = product of:
    0.4579332 = sum of:
      0.4579332 = weight(_text_:b.b in 623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.4579332 = score(doc=623,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.33526558 = queryWeight, product of:
            7.7265954 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44218)
            0.043391112 = queryNorm
          1.3658819 = fieldWeight in 623, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            7.7265954 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44218)
            0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=623)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Type
    a
  3. Tillett, B.B.: Gemeinsame internationale Ausgangsdaten für Normsätze (1997) 0.17 
    0.17325467 = sum of:
  0.0015297168 = product of:
    0.007648584 = sum of:
      0.007648584 = weight(_text_:a in 6449) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.007648584 = score(doc=6449,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.05003199 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.043391112 = queryNorm
          0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 6449, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6449)
    0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.17172495 = product of:
    0.3434499 = sum of:
      0.3434499 = weight(_text_:b.b in 6449) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.3434499 = score(doc=6449,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.33526558 = queryWeight, product of:
            7.7265954 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44218)
            0.043391112 = queryNorm
          1.0244114 = fieldWeight in 6449, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            7.7265954 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6449)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Type
    a
  4. Higginbotham, B.B.; Bowdoin, S.: Access versus assets : a comprehensive guide to resource sharing for academic libraries (1993) 0.17 
    0.17325467 = sum of:
  0.0015297168 = product of:
    0.007648584 = sum of:
      0.007648584 = weight(_text_:a in 3568) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.007648584 = score(doc=3568,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.05003199 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.043391112 = queryNorm
          0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 3568, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3568)
    0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.17172495 = product of:
    0.3434499 = sum of:
      0.3434499 = weight(_text_:b.b in 3568) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.3434499 = score(doc=3568,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.33526558 = queryWeight, product of:
            7.7265954 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44218)
            0.043391112 = queryNorm
          1.0244114 = fieldWeight in 3568, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            7.7265954 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3568)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
  5. James, B.B.: Designing bibliographic databases for business searchers (1992) 0.14 
    0.14437889 = sum of:
  0.001274764 = product of:
    0.0063738194 = sum of:
      0.0063738194 = weight(_text_:a in 4040) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0063738194 = score(doc=4040,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.05003199 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.043391112 = queryNorm
          0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 4040, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4040)
    0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.14310412 = product of:
    0.28620824 = sum of:
      0.28620824 = weight(_text_:b.b in 4040) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.28620824 = score(doc=4040,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.33526558 = queryWeight, product of:
            7.7265954 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44218)
            0.043391112 = queryNorm
          0.8536762 = fieldWeight in 4040, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            7.7265954 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4040)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Type
    a
  6. Cooperative cataloging : past, present, and future (1993) 0.12 
    0.12275266 = sum of:
  0.0013247736 = product of:
    0.0066238684 = sum of:
      0.0066238684 = weight(_text_:a in 375) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0066238684 = score(doc=375,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.05003199 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.043391112 = queryNorm
          0.13239266 = fieldWeight in 375, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=375)
    0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.121427886 = product of:
    0.24285577 = sum of:
      0.24285577 = weight(_text_:b.b in 375) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.24285577 = score(doc=375,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.33526558 = queryWeight, product of:
            7.7265954 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44218)
            0.043391112 = queryNorm
          0.72436833 = fieldWeight in 375, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            7.7265954 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=375)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Enthält die folgenden Beiträge: TILLETT, B.B.: Catalog it once for all: a history of cooperative cataloging in the United States prior to 1967 (before MARC); ANDERSON, G.: Symmetry and extrapolation: passion and precision - cooperative cataloging at the beginning of the 21st century; BARTLEY, L.K.: The CONSER model: a personal view; HARRIMAN, R.: The news in review: the United States newspaper program; JOACHIM, M.D.: Cooperative cataloging of microform sets; RIEMER, J.J. u. K. MORGENROTH: Hang together or hang separately: the cooperative authority work component of NACO; WIGGINS, B.: The national coordinated cataloging program; ROSENBLATT, S.: The national coordinated cataloging program from the participant's perspective; HOLLEY, R.P.: Cooperative cataloging outside North America: status report 1993; THOMAS, S.E. u. J.A. YOUNGER: Cooperative cataloging: a vision for the future
    Editor
    Baker, B.B.
  7. Tillett, B.B.: ¬A taxonomy of bibliographic relationships (1991) 0.12 
    0.11698131 = sum of:
  0.0024980172 = product of:
    0.012490085 = sum of:
      0.012490085 = weight(_text_:a in 6686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.012490085 = score(doc=6686,freq=12.0), product of:
          0.05003199 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.043391112 = queryNorm
          0.24964198 = fieldWeight in 6686, product of:
            3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
              12.0 = termFreq=12.0
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6686)
    0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.1144833 = product of:
    0.2289666 = sum of:
      0.2289666 = weight(_text_:b.b in 6686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.2289666 = score(doc=6686,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.33526558 = queryWeight, product of:
            7.7265954 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44218)
            0.043391112 = queryNorm
          0.68294096 = fieldWeight in 6686, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            7.7265954 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6686)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    A bibliographic relationship is an association between two or more bibliographic items or works. In an effort to provide the theoretical base for a conceptual model of the library catalog, past and future, the bibliographic relationship is examined here in detail. In this first of a series of reports, a taxonomy of bibliographic relationships is derived from an analysis of cataloging rules and types of bibliographic items.
    Type
    a
  8. Davis, B.B.: Indiana State University's NOTIS service group (1991) 0.12 
    0.11624966 = sum of:
  0.0017663649 = product of:
    0.008831824 = sum of:
      0.008831824 = weight(_text_:a in 2307) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.008831824 = score(doc=2307,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.05003199 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.043391112 = queryNorm
          0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 2307, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2307)
    0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.1144833 = product of:
    0.2289666 = sum of:
      0.2289666 = weight(_text_:b.b in 2307) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.2289666 = score(doc=2307,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.33526558 = queryWeight, product of:
            7.7265954 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44218)
            0.043391112 = queryNorm
          0.68294096 = fieldWeight in 2307, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            7.7265954 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2307)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    A comparatively informal cooperative arrangement among five Indiana libraries sharing Indiana State University's NOTIS system is described. In contrast to groups that were planned as consortia and that have formal governance and staff, the ISU service group, which includes the libraries of Indiana State University, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, St. Mary-of-the-Woods College, University of Southern Indiana, and Vincennes University, has evolved over a period of five years as opportunities for funding have become available
    Type
    a
  9. Prasad, A.R.D.; Kar, B.B.: Parsing Boolean search expression using definite clause grammars (1994) 0.12 
    0.11624966 = sum of:
  0.0017663649 = product of:
    0.008831824 = sum of:
      0.008831824 = weight(_text_:a in 8188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.008831824 = score(doc=8188,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.05003199 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.043391112 = queryNorm
          0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 8188, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8188)
    0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.1144833 = product of:
    0.2289666 = sum of:
      0.2289666 = weight(_text_:b.b in 8188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.2289666 = score(doc=8188,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.33526558 = queryWeight, product of:
            7.7265954 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44218)
            0.043391112 = queryNorm
          0.68294096 = fieldWeight in 8188, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            7.7265954 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8188)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Briefly discusses the role of search languages in information retrieval and broadly groups the search languages into 4 categories. Explains the idea of definite clause grammars and demonstrates how parsers for Boolean logic-based search languages can easily be developed. Presents a partial Prolog code of the parser that was used in an object-oriented bibliographic database management system
    Source
    Library science with a slant to documentation. 31(1994) no.1, S.24-26
    Type
    a
  10. Tillett, B.B.: ¬A summary of the treatment of bibliographic relationships in cataloguing rules (1991) 0.12 
    0.11624966 = sum of:
  0.0017663649 = product of:
    0.008831824 = sum of:
      0.008831824 = weight(_text_:a in 6739) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.008831824 = score(doc=6739,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.05003199 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.043391112 = queryNorm
          0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 6739, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6739)
    0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.1144833 = product of:
    0.2289666 = sum of:
      0.2289666 = weight(_text_:b.b in 6739) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.2289666 = score(doc=6739,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.33526558 = queryWeight, product of:
            7.7265954 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44218)
            0.043391112 = queryNorm
          0.68294096 = fieldWeight in 6739, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            7.7265954 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6739)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Reports on an analytical study to examine the cataloguing rules in AACR2 to reveal practices for indicating bibliographic relationships in cataloguing records and identify types of relationships. Relationships defined and investigated were: equivalence; derivative; descriptive; whole-part; accompanying; sequential; and shared characteristic relationships.Each type of bibliographic relationship has had several linking devices used to connect bibliographic entities. The technology available to create and maintain a catalogue has greatly influenced the types of linking devices included in the catalogue and prescribed in cataloguing rules
    Type
    a
  11. Cavanaugh, B.B.: ¬The Ovid Java client interface : a comparison with the Ovid Web Gateway and Windows Client interface (1998) 0.12 
    0.11592553 = sum of:
  0.0014422309 = product of:
    0.0072111543 = sum of:
      0.0072111543 = weight(_text_:a in 4740) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0072111543 = score(doc=4740,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.05003199 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.043391112 = queryNorm
          0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 4740, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4740)
    0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.1144833 = product of:
    0.2289666 = sum of:
      0.2289666 = weight(_text_:b.b in 4740) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.2289666 = score(doc=4740,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.33526558 = queryWeight, product of:
            7.7265954 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44218)
            0.043391112 = queryNorm
          0.68294096 = fieldWeight in 4740, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            7.7265954 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4740)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Type
    a
  12. Alexander, B.B.; Gyeszly, S.D.: OPAC or card catalog : patrons preference in an academic library (1991) 0.10 
    0.1021682 = sum of:
  0.0019953214 = product of:
    0.009976607 = sum of:
      0.009976607 = weight(_text_:a in 2226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.009976607 = score(doc=2226,freq=10.0), product of:
          0.05003199 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.043391112 = queryNorm
          0.19940455 = fieldWeight in 2226, product of:
            3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
              10.0 = termFreq=10.0
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2226)
    0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.100172885 = product of:
    0.20034577 = sum of:
      0.20034577 = weight(_text_:b.b in 2226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.20034577 = score(doc=2226,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.33526558 = queryWeight, product of:
            7.7265954 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44218)
            0.043391112 = queryNorm
          0.59757334 = fieldWeight in 2226, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            7.7265954 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2226)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Since the closing of the Sterling C. Evans Library author/title card catalog on march 6, 1989, librarians have observed a number of patrons who continued to use that catalog, even though NOTIS, the OPAC offered more comprehensive and current access to library holdings. To determine the reasons for this use, the authors prepared a one-page questionnaire, focusing on the users' preference for an inadequate card catalog in an environment which offers a superior OPAC. Card catalog patrons were then surveyed in order to gather data and build a user profile. Survey results were tabulated and analyzed, revealing the underlying reasons for users' preference for the card or online catalog. Conclusions will provide direction for improvements in users' access to online catalogs
    Type
    a
  13. Leazer, G.H.: Recent research on the sequential bibliographic relationship and its implications for standards and the library catalog : an examination of serials (1996) 0.10 
    0.101718456 = sum of:
  0.0015455693 = product of:
    0.0077278465 = sum of:
      0.0077278465 = weight(_text_:a in 5579) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0077278465 = score(doc=5579,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.05003199 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.043391112 = queryNorm
          0.1544581 = fieldWeight in 5579, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5579)
    0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.100172885 = product of:
    0.20034577 = sum of:
      0.20034577 = weight(_text_:b.b in 5579) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.20034577 = score(doc=5579,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.33526558 = queryWeight, product of:
            7.7265954 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44218)
            0.043391112 = queryNorm
          0.59757334 = fieldWeight in 5579, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            7.7265954 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5579)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Evaluates current research into bibliographic relationships sparked off by B.B. Tillett's taxonomy of bibliographic relationships (LRTS 35(1991) no.4, S.393-405) and R.P. Smiraglia's taxonomy of the derivative bibliographic relationship (PhD dissertation, Chicago Univ., Graduate Library School, 1992). These researches provide the context for a discussion of recent research and standards work. Reevaluates research on the sequential relationship drawn from work conducted on periodicals and the implications of that research is applied to cataloguing system design. Evaluates the conceptual designs proposed by researchers such as G.H. Leazer and M. Gorman's and uses them in a critique of the USMARC format for bibliographic description
    Type
    a
  14. Tillett, B.B.: Catalog it once for all : a history of cooperative cataloging in the United States prior to 1967 (before MARC) (1993) 0.10 
    0.101718456 = sum of:
  0.0015455693 = product of:
    0.0077278465 = sum of:
      0.0077278465 = weight(_text_:a in 575) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0077278465 = score(doc=575,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.05003199 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.043391112 = queryNorm
          0.1544581 = fieldWeight in 575, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=575)
    0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.100172885 = product of:
    0.20034577 = sum of:
      0.20034577 = weight(_text_:b.b in 575) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.20034577 = score(doc=575,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.33526558 = queryWeight, product of:
            7.7265954 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44218)
            0.043391112 = queryNorm
          0.59757334 = fieldWeight in 575, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            7.7265954 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=575)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Librarians in the United States always seem to be trying to reduce their costs and share resources through various centralized or cooperative endeavors. Early cooperative cataloging efforts, prior to 1967 when the MARC format made its appearance and automation took off, clearly recognized the need to create a shared national resource of bibliographic records. Yet, the dreams of cataloging it once for all turned into nightmares over and over as many schemes were tried and failed. However, some schemes succeeded and millions of items were cataloged through these early efforts. The promise of our preliminary steps in cooperative cataloging during the pre-automation era sparked our imaginations and raised our hopes for the future.
    Type
    a
  15. Kilgour, F.G.; Moran, B.B.; Barden, J.R.: Retrieval effectiveness of surname-title-word searches for known items by academic library users (1999) 0.10 
    0.101434834 = sum of:
  0.0012619521 = product of:
    0.0063097603 = sum of:
      0.0063097603 = weight(_text_:a in 3061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0063097603 = score(doc=3061,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.05003199 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.043391112 = queryNorm
          0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 3061, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3061)
    0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.100172885 = product of:
    0.20034577 = sum of:
      0.20034577 = weight(_text_:b.b in 3061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.20034577 = score(doc=3061,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.33526558 = queryWeight, product of:
            7.7265954 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44218)
            0.043391112 = queryNorm
          0.59757334 = fieldWeight in 3061, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            7.7265954 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3061)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This article reports the findings of an experiment using a simulated title pages, author surnames, and title words, one-third of which were selected by each of the 3 authors, to determine the frequency of one-screen displays when used to search for known items in an implied Boolean retrieval system. Searches comprising surname plus one significant title word produced one-screen displays 78% of time; surname plus 2 words 97% of the time; and surname plus 3 words 98,5%. Three quarters of the significant words were nouns
    Type
    a
  16. Barrett, B.B.: Hit rates with the OCLC CD450 cataloging system : a test with recent, academic approval books (1990) 0.09 
    0.08773599 = sum of:
  0.0018735128 = product of:
    0.009367564 = sum of:
      0.009367564 = weight(_text_:a in 504) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.009367564 = score(doc=504,freq=12.0), product of:
          0.05003199 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.043391112 = queryNorm
          0.18723148 = fieldWeight in 504, product of:
            3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
              12.0 = termFreq=12.0
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=504)
    0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.08586247 = product of:
    0.17172495 = sum of:
      0.17172495 = weight(_text_:b.b in 504) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.17172495 = score(doc=504,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.33526558 = queryWeight, product of:
            7.7265954 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44218)
            0.043391112 = queryNorm
          0.5122057 = fieldWeight in 504, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            7.7265954 = idf(docFreq=52, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=504)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The work begins by reviewing publications on the use of optical-disc technology in cataloging departments. This section includes descriptive information on specific products and comparative considerations on the value of the CD genre. Most commentary to date seems to find cost advantages to the optical format for smaller libraries but fewer attractions for larger institutions who would lose online immediacy. An outline of the design and results of the OCLC test follows along with various tables showing the class makeup of the overall sample, the hit-rate for the two vendors, and other data. Most of the sample consisted of English-language titles that would support the general academic mission of a variety of disciplines. Well over 90% of the titles searched had MARC records on discs within two issues or three months. Although concluding that departments acquiring over 5000 titles per year may find online utilities more effective, the article still urges a careful analysis of laser cataloging products with a variety of acquisition samples and for a variety of libraries.
    Type
    a
  17. Jascó, P.: Searching for images by similarity online (1998) 0.07 
    0.06855175 = sum of:
  0.0020396223 = product of:
    0.010198112 = sum of:
      0.010198112 = weight(_text_:a in 393) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.010198112 = score(doc=393,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.05003199 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.043391112 = queryNorm
          0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 393, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=393)
    0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.06651213 = product of:
    0.13302426 = sum of:
      0.13302426 = weight(_text_:22 in 393) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.13302426 = score(doc=393,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.15194829 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.043391112 = queryNorm
          0.8754574 = fieldWeight in 393, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=393)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    29.11.2004 13:03:22
    Source
    Online. 22(1998) no.6, S.99-102
    Type
    a
  18. Lutz, H.: Back to business : was CompuServe Unternehmen bietet (1997) 0.07 
    0.06855175 = sum of:
  0.0020396223 = product of:
    0.010198112 = sum of:
      0.010198112 = weight(_text_:a in 6569) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.010198112 = score(doc=6569,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.05003199 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.043391112 = queryNorm
          0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 6569, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6569)
    0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.06651213 = product of:
    0.13302426 = sum of:
      0.13302426 = weight(_text_:22 in 6569) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.13302426 = score(doc=6569,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.15194829 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.043391112 = queryNorm
          0.8754574 = fieldWeight in 6569, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6569)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 2.1997 19:50:29
    Source
    Cogito. 1997, H.1, S.22-23
    Type
    a
  19. Klauß, H.: SISIS : 10. Anwenderforum Berlin-Brandenburg (1999) 0.07 
    0.06855175 = sum of:
  0.0020396223 = product of:
    0.010198112 = sum of:
      0.010198112 = weight(_text_:a in 463) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.010198112 = score(doc=463,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.05003199 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.043391112 = queryNorm
          0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 463, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=463)
    0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.06651213 = product of:
    0.13302426 = sum of:
      0.13302426 = weight(_text_:22 in 463) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.13302426 = score(doc=463,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.15194829 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.043391112 = queryNorm
          0.8754574 = fieldWeight in 463, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=463)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 2.1999 10:22:52
    Type
    a
  20. fwt: Wie das Gehirn Bilder 'liest' (1999) 0.07 
    0.06855175 = sum of:
  0.0020396223 = product of:
    0.010198112 = sum of:
      0.010198112 = weight(_text_:a in 4042) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.010198112 = score(doc=4042,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.05003199 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.043391112 = queryNorm
          0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 4042, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4042)
    0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.06651213 = product of:
    0.13302426 = sum of:
      0.13302426 = weight(_text_:22 in 4042) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.13302426 = score(doc=4042,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.15194829 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.043391112 = queryNorm
          0.8754574 = fieldWeight in 4042, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4042)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 7.2000 19:01:22
    Type
    a

Authors

Languages

Types

  • a 15019
  • m 662
  • s 413
  • el 144
  • r 107
  • i 66
  • b 47
  • x 35
  • ? 14
  • p 12
  • d 8
  • h 6
  • l 6
  • n 4
  • z 2
  • au 1
  • pat 1
  • u 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications