Search (1 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Catarci, T."
  • × theme_ss:"Computer Based Training"
  1. Mirabella, V.; Kimani, S.; Gabrielli, S.; Catarci, T.: Accessible e-learning material: a no-frills avenue for didactical experts (2004) 0.00
    0.0029362366 = product of:
      0.005872473 = sum of:
        0.005872473 = product of:
          0.011744946 = sum of:
            0.011744946 = weight(_text_:e in 5927) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.011744946 = score(doc=5927,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04602077 = queryNorm
                0.17755324 = fieldWeight in 5927, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5927)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Different organizations adopt accessibility for various and diverse reasons. Interesting and inspiring as such reasons may be, it is important to ensure that the motivation for supporting accessibility is that it is the right thing to do, i.e. a commitment to the provision of equal opportunities for accessing resources for people with special needs. Among the various efforts for supporting the development of accessible e-learning material, most of them propose guidelines that prevalently address technical accessibility issues (such as the format and navigation of learning material) with little or no consideration for the didactical experts, and thus their didactical experience, in developing learning material. Moreover, the aforementioned guidelines tend to provide generic indications on alternative forms of didactical content for equivalent access to it. None the less, the sole provision of equivalent forms does not guarantee the retention of desirable user interface aspects and may therefore have a negative impact on learning effectiveness. While this paper acknowledges the role of such guidelines, it does propose that the didactical experts be provided with a non-technical recourse, improving their development of accessible e-learning content. By tapping into the experience of the didactical experts, this work provides them with an avenue leading to enhance the accessibility of e-learning material.
    Language
    e