Vanclay, J.K.: On the robustness of the h-index (2007)
0.01
0.012499675 = product of:
0.02499935 = sum of:
0.02499935 = product of:
0.0499987 = sum of:
0.0499987 = weight(_text_:h in 576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0499987 = score(doc=576,freq=8.0), product of:
0.113842286 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045821942 = queryNorm
0.4391927 = fieldWeight in 576, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=576)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The h-index (Hirsch, 2005) is robust, remaining relatively unaffected by errors in the long tails of the citations-rank distribution, such as typographic errors that short-change frequently cited articles and create bogus additional records. This robustness, and the ease with which h-indices can be verified, support the use of a Hirsch-type index over alternatives such as the journal impact factor. These merits of the h-index apply both to individuals and to journals.
