-
Barry, C.I.; Schamber, L.: User-defined relevance criteria : a comparison of 2 studies (1995)
0.02
0.015836604 = product of:
0.031673208 = sum of:
0.031673208 = product of:
0.063346416 = sum of:
0.063346416 = weight(_text_:l in 3850) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.063346416 = score(doc=3850,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18031335 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.045365814 = queryNorm
0.35131297 = fieldWeight in 3850, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3850)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Schamber, L.; Bateman, J.: User criteria in relevance evaluation : toward development of a measurement scale (1996)
0.01
0.013857029 = product of:
0.027714059 = sum of:
0.027714059 = product of:
0.055428118 = sum of:
0.055428118 = weight(_text_:l in 7351) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055428118 = score(doc=7351,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18031335 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.045365814 = queryNorm
0.30739886 = fieldWeight in 7351, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7351)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Barry, C.L.; Schamber, L.: Users' criteria for relevance evaluation : a cross-situational comparison (1998)
0.01
0.011877453 = product of:
0.023754906 = sum of:
0.023754906 = product of:
0.04750981 = sum of:
0.04750981 = weight(_text_:l in 3271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04750981 = score(doc=3271,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18031335 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.045365814 = queryNorm
0.26348472 = fieldWeight in 3271, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3271)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)