Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Levitt, J.M."
  1. Levitt, J.M.; Thelwall, M.: Citation levels and collaboration within library and information science (2009) 0.04 
    0.04138469 = product of:
  0.12415406 = sum of:
    0.12415406 = sum of:
      0.08460651 = weight(_text_:j.m in 2734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08460651 = score(doc=2734,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.25143987 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
            0.041279983 = queryNorm
          0.33648807 = fieldWeight in 2734, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2734)
      0.039547548 = weight(_text_:22 in 2734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.039547548 = score(doc=2734,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.14455546 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.041279983 = queryNorm
          0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2734, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2734)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Collaboration is a major research policy objective, but does it deliver higher quality research? This study uses citation analysis to examine the Web of Science (WoS) Information Science & Library Science subject category (IS&LS) to ascertain whether, in general, more highly cited articles are more highly collaborative than other articles. It consists of two investigations. The first investigation is a longitudinal comparison of the degree and proportion of collaboration in five strata of citation; it found that collaboration in the highest four citation strata (all in the most highly cited 22%) increased in unison over time, whereas collaboration in the lowest citation strata (un-cited articles) remained low and stable. Given that over 40% of the articles were un-cited, it seems important to take into account the differences found between un-cited articles and relatively highly cited articles when investigating collaboration in IS&LS. The second investigation compares collaboration for 35 influential information scientists; it found that their more highly cited articles on average were not more highly collaborative than their less highly cited articles. In summary, although collaborative research is conducive to high citation in general, collaboration has apparently not tended to be essential to the success of current and former elite information scientists.
    Date
    22. 3.2009 12:43:51
  2. Levitt, J.M.; Thelwall, M.: Is multidisciplinary research more highly cited? : a macrolevel study (2008) 0.01 
    0.014101086 = product of:
  0.042303257 = sum of:
    0.042303257 = product of:
      0.08460651 = sum of:
        0.08460651 = weight(_text_:j.m in 2375) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08460651 = score(doc=2375,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25143987 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041279983 = queryNorm
            0.33648807 = fieldWeight in 2375, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2375)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  3. Levitt, J.M.; Thelwall, M.; Oppenheim, C.: Variations between subjects in the extent to which the social sciences have become more interdisciplinary (2011) 0.01 
    0.014101086 = product of:
  0.042303257 = sum of:
    0.042303257 = product of:
      0.08460651 = sum of:
        0.08460651 = weight(_text_:j.m in 4465) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08460651 = score(doc=4465,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25143987 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041279983 = queryNorm
            0.33648807 = fieldWeight in 4465, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4465)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  4. Thelwall, M.; Levitt, J.M.: National scientific performance evolution patterns : retrenchment, successful expansion, or overextension (2018) 0.01 
    0.014101086 = product of:
  0.042303257 = sum of:
    0.042303257 = product of:
      0.08460651 = sum of:
        0.08460651 = weight(_text_:j.m in 4225) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08460651 = score(doc=4225,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25143987 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041279983 = queryNorm
            0.33648807 = fieldWeight in 4225, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4225)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Authors

Years