Search (3247 results, page 2 of 163)

  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Miller, J.P.; Rholes, J.M.; Wielhorksi, K.: Planning reference service points : a decision-making model (1993) 0.05
    0.04512348 = product of:
      0.13537043 = sum of:
        0.13537043 = product of:
          0.27074087 = sum of:
            0.27074087 = weight(_text_:j.m in 5622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.27074087 = score(doc=5622,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25143987 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041279983 = queryNorm
                1.0767618 = fieldWeight in 5622, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5622)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  2. Keefe, J.M.: ¬The image as document : descriptive programs at Rensselaer (1990) 0.05
    0.04512348 = product of:
      0.13537043 = sum of:
        0.13537043 = product of:
          0.27074087 = sum of:
            0.27074087 = weight(_text_:j.m in 5637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.27074087 = score(doc=5637,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25143987 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041279983 = queryNorm
                1.0767618 = fieldWeight in 5637, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5637)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  3. Perreault, J.M.: Some perils of the 'user-friendly' attitude in cataloguing (1986) 0.05
    0.04512348 = product of:
      0.13537043 = sum of:
        0.13537043 = product of:
          0.27074087 = sum of:
            0.27074087 = weight(_text_:j.m in 6177) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.27074087 = score(doc=6177,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25143987 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041279983 = queryNorm
                1.0767618 = fieldWeight in 6177, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6177)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  4. Day, J.M.: LISA on CD-ROM : a user evaluation (1987) 0.05
    0.04512348 = product of:
      0.13537043 = sum of:
        0.13537043 = product of:
          0.27074087 = sum of:
            0.27074087 = weight(_text_:j.m in 6884) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.27074087 = score(doc=6884,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25143987 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041279983 = queryNorm
                1.0767618 = fieldWeight in 6884, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6884)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  5. Tague, J.M.: ¬The pragmatics of information retrieval experimentation (1981) 0.05
    0.04512348 = product of:
      0.13537043 = sum of:
        0.13537043 = product of:
          0.27074087 = sum of:
            0.27074087 = weight(_text_:j.m in 3149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.27074087 = score(doc=3149,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25143987 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041279983 = queryNorm
                1.0767618 = fieldWeight in 3149, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3149)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  6. Ziman, J.M.: ¬The proliferation of scientific literature : a natural process (1980) 0.05
    0.04512348 = product of:
      0.13537043 = sum of:
        0.13537043 = product of:
          0.27074087 = sum of:
            0.27074087 = weight(_text_:j.m in 1079) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.27074087 = score(doc=1079,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25143987 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041279983 = queryNorm
                1.0767618 = fieldWeight in 1079, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1079)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  7. Russell, M.; Brittain, J.M.: Health informatics (2002) 0.05
    0.04512348 = product of:
      0.13537043 = sum of:
        0.13537043 = product of:
          0.27074087 = sum of:
            0.27074087 = weight(_text_:j.m in 4297) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.27074087 = score(doc=4297,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25143987 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041279983 = queryNorm
                1.0767618 = fieldWeight in 4297, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4297)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  8. Campanario, J.M.: Have referees rejected some of the most-cited articles of all times? (1996) 0.05
    0.045028344 = product of:
      0.13508503 = sum of:
        0.13508503 = sum of:
          0.101527825 = weight(_text_:j.m in 4215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.101527825 = score(doc=4215,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.25143987 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041279983 = queryNorm
              0.4037857 = fieldWeight in 4215, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4215)
          0.033557206 = weight(_text_:22 in 4215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.033557206 = score(doc=4215,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14455546 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041279983 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4215, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4215)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    In this article a quantitative study is reported on the resistance that scientists may encounter when they do innovative work or when they attempt to publish articles that later become highly cited. A set of 205 commentaries by authors of some of the most-cited papers of all times have been examined in order to identify those articles whose authors encountered difficulty in getting his or her work published. There are 22 commentaries (10,7%) in which authors mention some difficulty or resistance in doing or publishing the research reported in the article. Three of the articles which had problems in being published are the most cited from their respective journals. According the authors' commentaries, although sometimes referees' negative evaluations can help improve the articles, in other instances referees and editors wrongly rejected the highly cited articles
  9. Dabbadie, M.; Blancherie, J.M.: Alexandria, a multilingual dictionary for knowledge management purposes (2006) 0.05
    0.045028344 = product of:
      0.13508503 = sum of:
        0.13508503 = sum of:
          0.101527825 = weight(_text_:j.m in 2465) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.101527825 = score(doc=2465,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.25143987 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041279983 = queryNorm
              0.4037857 = fieldWeight in 2465, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2465)
          0.033557206 = weight(_text_:22 in 2465) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.033557206 = score(doc=2465,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14455546 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041279983 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2465, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2465)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Alexandria is an innovation of international impact. It is the only multilingual dictionary for websites and PCs. A double click on a word opens a small window that gives interactive translations between 22 languages and includes meaning, synonyms and associated expressions. It is an ASP application grounded on a semantic network that is portable on any operating system or platform. Behind the application is the Integral Dictionary is the semantic network created by Memodata. Alexandria can be customized with specific vocabulary, descriptive articles, images, sounds, videos, etc. Its domains of application are considerable: e-tourism, online medias, language learning, international websites. Alexandria has also proved to be a basic tool for knowledge management purposes. The application can be customized according to a user or an organization needs. An application dedicated to mobile devices is currently being developed. Future developments are planned in the field of e-tourism in relation with French "pôles de compétitivité".
  10. Leysen, J.M.; Boydston, J.M.K.: Supply and demand for catalogers : present and future (2005) 0.05
    0.045028344 = product of:
      0.13508503 = sum of:
        0.13508503 = sum of:
          0.101527825 = weight(_text_:j.m in 121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.101527825 = score(doc=121,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.25143987 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041279983 = queryNorm
              0.4037857 = fieldWeight in 121, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=121)
          0.033557206 = weight(_text_:22 in 121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.033557206 = score(doc=121,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14455546 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041279983 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 121, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=121)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  11. Vanderwende, L.; Suzuki, H.; Brockett, J.M.; Nenkova, A.: Beyond SumBasic : task-focused summarization with sentence simplification and lexical expansion (2007) 0.05
    0.045028344 = product of:
      0.13508503 = sum of:
        0.13508503 = sum of:
          0.101527825 = weight(_text_:j.m in 948) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.101527825 = score(doc=948,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.25143987 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041279983 = queryNorm
              0.4037857 = fieldWeight in 948, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=948)
          0.033557206 = weight(_text_:22 in 948) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.033557206 = score(doc=948,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14455546 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041279983 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 948, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=948)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    In recent years, there has been increased interest in topic-focused multi-document summarization. In this task, automatic summaries are produced in response to a specific information request, or topic, stated by the user. The system we have designed to accomplish this task comprises four main components: a generic extractive summarization system, a topic-focusing component, sentence simplification, and lexical expansion of topic words. This paper details each of these components, together with experiments designed to quantify their individual contributions. We include an analysis of our results on two large datasets commonly used to evaluate task-focused summarization, the DUC2005 and DUC2006 datasets, using automatic metrics. Additionally, we include an analysis of our results on the DUC2006 task according to human evaluation metrics. In the human evaluation of system summaries compared to human summaries, i.e., the Pyramid method, our system ranked first out of 22 systems in terms of overall mean Pyramid score; and in the human evaluation of summary responsiveness to the topic, our system ranked third out of 35 systems.
  12. Arbelaitz, O.; Martínez-Otzeta. J.M.; Muguerza, J.: User modeling in a social network for cognitively disabled people (2016) 0.05
    0.045028344 = product of:
      0.13508503 = sum of:
        0.13508503 = sum of:
          0.101527825 = weight(_text_:j.m in 2639) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.101527825 = score(doc=2639,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.25143987 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041279983 = queryNorm
              0.4037857 = fieldWeight in 2639, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2639)
          0.033557206 = weight(_text_:22 in 2639) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.033557206 = score(doc=2639,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14455546 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041279983 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2639, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2639)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2016 12:02:26
  13. Erickson, L.B.; Wisniewski, P.; Xu, H.; Carroll, J.M.; Rosson, M.B.; Perkins, D.F.: ¬The boundaries between : parental involvement in a teen's online world (2016) 0.05
    0.045028344 = product of:
      0.13508503 = sum of:
        0.13508503 = sum of:
          0.101527825 = weight(_text_:j.m in 2932) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.101527825 = score(doc=2932,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.25143987 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041279983 = queryNorm
              0.4037857 = fieldWeight in 2932, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2932)
          0.033557206 = weight(_text_:22 in 2932) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.033557206 = score(doc=2932,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14455546 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041279983 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2932, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2932)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    7. 5.2016 20:05:22
  14. Campos, L.M. de; Fernández-Luna, J.M.; Huete, J.F.: Implementing relevance feedback in the Bayesian network retrieval model (2003) 0.05
    0.045028344 = product of:
      0.13508503 = sum of:
        0.13508503 = sum of:
          0.101527825 = weight(_text_:j.m in 825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.101527825 = score(doc=825,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.25143987 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041279983 = queryNorm
              0.4037857 = fieldWeight in 825, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=825)
          0.033557206 = weight(_text_:22 in 825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.033557206 = score(doc=825,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14455546 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041279983 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 825, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=825)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2003 19:30:19
  15. Eiriksson, J.M.; Retsloff, J.M.: Librarians in the 'information age' : promoter of change or provider of stability? (2005) 0.04
    0.042453133 = product of:
      0.12735939 = sum of:
        0.12735939 = sum of:
          0.09572135 = weight(_text_:j.m in 3012) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09572135 = score(doc=3012,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.25143987 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041279983 = queryNorm
              0.3806928 = fieldWeight in 3012, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3012)
          0.031638037 = weight(_text_:22 in 3012) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.031638037 = score(doc=3012,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.14455546 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041279983 = queryNorm
              0.21886435 = fieldWeight in 3012, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3012)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2009 11:23:22
  16. Levitt, J.M.; Thelwall, M.: Citation levels and collaboration within library and information science (2009) 0.04
    0.04138469 = product of:
      0.12415406 = sum of:
        0.12415406 = sum of:
          0.08460651 = weight(_text_:j.m in 2734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08460651 = score(doc=2734,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.25143987 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041279983 = queryNorm
              0.33648807 = fieldWeight in 2734, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2734)
          0.039547548 = weight(_text_:22 in 2734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.039547548 = score(doc=2734,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.14455546 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041279983 = queryNorm
              0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2734, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2734)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Collaboration is a major research policy objective, but does it deliver higher quality research? This study uses citation analysis to examine the Web of Science (WoS) Information Science & Library Science subject category (IS&LS) to ascertain whether, in general, more highly cited articles are more highly collaborative than other articles. It consists of two investigations. The first investigation is a longitudinal comparison of the degree and proportion of collaboration in five strata of citation; it found that collaboration in the highest four citation strata (all in the most highly cited 22%) increased in unison over time, whereas collaboration in the lowest citation strata (un-cited articles) remained low and stable. Given that over 40% of the articles were un-cited, it seems important to take into account the differences found between un-cited articles and relatively highly cited articles when investigating collaboration in IS&LS. The second investigation compares collaboration for 35 influential information scientists; it found that their more highly cited articles on average were not more highly collaborative than their less highly cited articles. In summary, although collaborative research is conducive to high citation in general, collaboration has apparently not tended to be essential to the success of current and former elite information scientists.
    Date
    22. 3.2009 12:43:51
  17. Donovan, P.W.; Hunt, D.C.; Mack, J.M.: Mathematics in a major library using the Dewey Decimal Classification (1975) 0.04
    0.039483044 = product of:
      0.11844913 = sum of:
        0.11844913 = product of:
          0.23689826 = sum of:
            0.23689826 = weight(_text_:j.m in 1643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.23689826 = score(doc=1643,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25143987 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041279983 = queryNorm
                0.9421666 = fieldWeight in 1643, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1643)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  18. Perreault, J.M.: On the articulation of surrogates : an attempt at an epistemological foundation (1967) 0.04
    0.039483044 = product of:
      0.11844913 = sum of:
        0.11844913 = product of:
          0.23689826 = sum of:
            0.23689826 = weight(_text_:j.m in 1998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.23689826 = score(doc=1998,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25143987 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041279983 = queryNorm
                0.9421666 = fieldWeight in 1998, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1998)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  19. Perreault, J.M.: On the articulation of surrogates : an attempt at an epistemological foundation (1967) 0.04
    0.039483044 = product of:
      0.11844913 = sum of:
        0.11844913 = product of:
          0.23689826 = sum of:
            0.23689826 = weight(_text_:j.m in 3487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.23689826 = score(doc=3487,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25143987 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041279983 = queryNorm
                0.9421666 = fieldWeight in 3487, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3487)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  20. Farradane, J.; Russel, J.M.; Yates-Mercer, P.A.: Problems in information retrieval : logical jumps in the expression of information (1973) 0.04
    0.039483044 = product of:
      0.11844913 = sum of:
        0.11844913 = product of:
          0.23689826 = sum of:
            0.23689826 = weight(_text_:j.m in 3888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.23689826 = score(doc=3888,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25143987 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041279983 = queryNorm
                0.9421666 = fieldWeight in 3888, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3888)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    

Authors

Languages

Types

  • el 72
  • b 34
  • p 1
  • More… Less…

Themes