Search (417 results, page 1 of 21)

  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  1. Schreiber, M.: Revisiting the g-index : the average number of citations in the g-core (2009) 0.03
    0.028224587 = product of:
      0.08467376 = sum of:
        0.08467376 = product of:
          0.12701064 = sum of:
            0.019301658 = weight(_text_:m in 3313) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019301658 = score(doc=3313,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.087754816 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03526487 = queryNorm
                0.21994986 = fieldWeight in 3313, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3313)
            0.10770898 = weight(_text_:g in 3313) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10770898 = score(doc=3313,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.132453 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03526487 = queryNorm
                0.81318647 = fieldWeight in 3313, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3313)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The g-index is discussed in terms of the average number of citations of the publications in the g-core, showing that it combines features of the h-index and the A-index in one number. For a visualization, data of 8 famous physicists are presented and analyzed. In comparison with the h-index, the g-index increases between 67% and 144%, on average by a factor of 2.
    Object
    g-index
  2. Lewison, G.: ¬The work of the Bibliometrics Research Group (City University) and associates (2005) 0.03
    0.027398411 = product of:
      0.08219523 = sum of:
        0.08219523 = product of:
          0.12329284 = sum of:
            0.06595801 = weight(_text_:g in 4890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06595801 = score(doc=4890,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.132453 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03526487 = queryNorm
                0.49797297 = fieldWeight in 4890, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4890)
            0.057334833 = weight(_text_:22 in 4890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.057334833 = score(doc=4890,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12349156 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03526487 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4890, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4890)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2007 17:02:22
  3. ¬Die deutsche Zeitschrift für Dokumentation, Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis von 1950 bis 2011 : eine vorläufige Bilanz in vier Abschnitten (2012) 0.03
    0.027372977 = product of:
      0.08211893 = sum of:
        0.08211893 = sum of:
          0.020472502 = weight(_text_:m in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.020472502 = score(doc=402,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.087754816 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03526487 = queryNorm
              0.23329206 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
          0.032979004 = weight(_text_:g in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.032979004 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.132453 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03526487 = queryNorm
              0.24898648 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
          0.028667416 = weight(_text_:22 in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.028667416 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.12349156 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03526487 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2012 19:35:26
    Footnote
    Besteht aus 4 Teilen: Teil 1: Eden, D., A. Arndt, A. Hoffer, T. Raschke u. P. Schön: Die Nachrichten für Dokumentation in den Jahren 1950 bis 1962 (S.159-163). Teil 2: Brose, M., E. durst, D. Nitzsche, D. Veckenstedt u. R. Wein: Statistische Untersuchung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) 1963-1975 (S.164-170). Teil 3: Bösel, J., G. Ebert, P. Garz,, M. Iwanow u. B. Russ: Methoden und Ergebnisse einer statistischen Auswertung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) 1976 bis 1988 (S.171-174). Teil 4: Engelage, H., S. Jansen, R. Mertins, K. Redel u. S. Ring: Statistische Untersuchung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) / "Information. Wissenschaft & Praxis" (IWP) 1989-2011 (S.164-170).
  4. Schreiber, M.: Fractionalized counting of publications for the g-Index (2009) 0.02
    0.023945548 = product of:
      0.07183664 = sum of:
        0.07183664 = product of:
          0.10775496 = sum of:
            0.014476244 = weight(_text_:m in 3125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.014476244 = score(doc=3125,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.087754816 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03526487 = queryNorm
                0.1649624 = fieldWeight in 3125, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3125)
            0.09327871 = weight(_text_:g in 3125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09327871 = score(doc=3125,freq=16.0), product of:
                0.132453 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03526487 = queryNorm
                0.70424014 = fieldWeight in 3125, product of:
                  4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                    16.0 = termFreq=16.0
                  3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3125)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    L. Egghe ([2008]) studied the h-index (Hirsch index) and the g-index, counting the authorship of cited articles in a fractional way. But his definition of the gF-index for the case that the article count is fractionalized yielded values that were close to or even larger than the original g-index. Here I propose an alternative definition by which the g-index is modified in such a way that the resulting gm-index is always smaller than the original g-index. Based on the interpretation of the g-index as the highest number of articles of a scientist that received on average g or more citations, in the specification of the new gm-index the articles are counted fractionally not only for the rank but also for the average.
    Object
    g-index
  5. Schreiber, M.: Do we need the g-index? (2013) 0.02
    0.023832373 = product of:
      0.07149712 = sum of:
        0.07149712 = product of:
          0.107245676 = sum of:
            0.019301658 = weight(_text_:m in 1113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019301658 = score(doc=1113,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.087754816 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03526487 = queryNorm
                0.21994986 = fieldWeight in 1113, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1113)
            0.087944016 = weight(_text_:g in 1113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.087944016 = score(doc=1113,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.132453 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03526487 = queryNorm
                0.663964 = fieldWeight in 1113, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1113)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Using a very small sample of 8 data sets it was recently shown by De Visscher (2011) that the g-index is very close to the square root of the total number of citations. It was argued that there is no bibliometrically meaningful difference. Using another somewhat larger empirical sample of 26 data sets I show that the difference may be larger and I argue in favor of the g-index.
    Object
    g-index
  6. Diodato, V.: Dictionary of bibliometrics (1994) 0.02
    0.022370791 = product of:
      0.06711237 = sum of:
        0.06711237 = product of:
          0.10066855 = sum of:
            0.033777904 = weight(_text_:m in 5666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033777904 = score(doc=5666,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.087754816 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03526487 = queryNorm
                0.38491225 = fieldWeight in 5666, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5666)
            0.06689064 = weight(_text_:22 in 5666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06689064 = score(doc=5666,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12349156 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03526487 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 5666, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5666)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Journal of library and information science 22(1996) no.2, S.116-117 (L.C. Smith)
    Type
    m
  7. Zhang, Y.; Wu, M.; Zhang, G.; Lu, J.: Stepping beyond your comfort zone : diffusion-based network analytics for knowledge trajectory recommendation (2023) 0.02
    0.021145185 = product of:
      0.063435555 = sum of:
        0.063435555 = sum of:
          0.012063538 = weight(_text_:m in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.012063538 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.087754816 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03526487 = queryNorm
              0.13746867 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
          0.027482506 = weight(_text_:g in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.027482506 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.132453 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03526487 = queryNorm
              0.20748875 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
          0.023889516 = weight(_text_:22 in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.023889516 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.12349156 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03526487 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2023 18:07:12
  8. Wersig, G.: Quantitative Methoden der Benutzerforschung (1981) 0.02
    0.021091223 = product of:
      0.06327367 = sum of:
        0.06327367 = product of:
          0.094910495 = sum of:
            0.028952489 = weight(_text_:m in 414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028952489 = score(doc=414,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.087754816 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03526487 = queryNorm
                0.3299248 = fieldWeight in 414, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=414)
            0.06595801 = weight(_text_:g in 414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06595801 = score(doc=414,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.132453 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03526487 = queryNorm
                0.49797297 = fieldWeight in 414, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=414)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Deutscher Dokumentartag 1980, Berlin, 29.9.-3.10.1980: IuD und Normung - Neue Kommunikationstechnologie - Berufspolitik - Datenbanken - Betriebsstatistik - Informetrie - Parlamentsdokumentation - Arbeitskreis Senioren - Gesprächskreise. Bearb.: M. von der Laake u. H. Strohl-Goebel
  9. Harries, G.; Wilkinson, D.; Price, L.; Fairclough, R.; Thelwall, M.: Hyperlinks as a data source for science mapping : making sense of it all (2005) 0.02
    0.021091223 = product of:
      0.06327367 = sum of:
        0.06327367 = product of:
          0.094910495 = sum of:
            0.028952489 = weight(_text_:m in 4654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028952489 = score(doc=4654,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.087754816 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03526487 = queryNorm
                0.3299248 = fieldWeight in 4654, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4654)
            0.06595801 = weight(_text_:g in 4654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06595801 = score(doc=4654,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.132453 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03526487 = queryNorm
                0.49797297 = fieldWeight in 4654, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4654)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  10. Schreiber, M.: ¬An empirical investigation of the g-index for 26 physicists in comparison with the h-index, the A-index, and the R-index (2008) 0.02
    0.018838981 = product of:
      0.05651694 = sum of:
        0.05651694 = product of:
          0.08477541 = sum of:
            0.012063538 = weight(_text_:m in 1968) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.012063538 = score(doc=1968,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.087754816 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03526487 = queryNorm
                0.13746867 = fieldWeight in 1968, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1968)
            0.07271187 = weight(_text_:g in 1968) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07271187 = score(doc=1968,freq=14.0), product of:
                0.132453 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03526487 = queryNorm
                0.5489636 = fieldWeight in 1968, product of:
                  3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                    14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                  3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1968)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    J.E. Hirsch (2005) introduced the h-index to quantify an individual's scientific research output by the largest number h of a scientist's papers that received at least h citations. To take into account the highly skewed frequency distribution of citations, L. Egghe (2006a) proposed the g-index as an improvement of the h-index. I have worked out 26 practical cases of physicists from the Institute of Physics at Chemnitz University of Technology, and compare the h and g values in this study. It is demonstrated that the g-index discriminates better between different citation patterns. This also can be achieved by evaluating B.H. Jin's (2006) A-index, which reflects the average number of citations in the h-core, and interpreting it in conjunction with the h-index. h and A can be combined into the R-index to measure the h-core's citation intensity. I also have determined the A and R values for the 26 datasets. For a better comparison, I utilize interpolated indices. The correlations between the various indices as well as with the total number of papers and the highest citation counts are discussed. The largest Pearson correlation coefficient is found between g and R. Although the correlation between g and h is relatively strong, the arrangement of the datasets is significantly different depending on whether they are put into order according to the values of either h or g.
  11. Kurtz, M.J.; Eichhorn, G.; Accomazzi, A.; Grant, C.; Demleitner, M.; Henneken, E.; Murray, S.S.: ¬The effect of use and access on citations (2005) 0.01
    0.014060816 = product of:
      0.042182446 = sum of:
        0.042182446 = product of:
          0.06327367 = sum of:
            0.019301658 = weight(_text_:m in 1064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019301658 = score(doc=1064,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.087754816 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03526487 = queryNorm
                0.21994986 = fieldWeight in 1064, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1064)
            0.043972008 = weight(_text_:g in 1064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043972008 = score(doc=1064,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.132453 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03526487 = queryNorm
                0.331982 = fieldWeight in 1064, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1064)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  12. D'Angelo, C.A.; Giuffrida, C.; Abramo, G.: ¬A heuristic approach to author name disambiguation in bibliometrics databases for large-scale research assessments (2011) 0.01
    0.013699206 = product of:
      0.041097615 = sum of:
        0.041097615 = product of:
          0.06164642 = sum of:
            0.032979004 = weight(_text_:g in 4190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032979004 = score(doc=4190,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.132453 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03526487 = queryNorm
                0.24898648 = fieldWeight in 4190, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4190)
            0.028667416 = weight(_text_:22 in 4190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028667416 = score(doc=4190,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12349156 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03526487 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4190, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4190)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2011 13:06:52
  13. Thelwall, M.; Ruschenburg, T.: Grundlagen und Forschungsfelder der Webometrie (2006) 0.01
    0.012783308 = product of:
      0.038349923 = sum of:
        0.038349923 = product of:
          0.057524882 = sum of:
            0.019301658 = weight(_text_:m in 77) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019301658 = score(doc=77,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.087754816 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03526487 = queryNorm
                0.21994986 = fieldWeight in 77, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=77)
            0.038223222 = weight(_text_:22 in 77) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038223222 = score(doc=77,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12349156 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03526487 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 77, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=77)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    4.12.2006 12:12:22
  14. Scholarly metrics under the microscope : from citation analysis to academic auditing (2015) 0.01
    0.012783308 = product of:
      0.038349923 = sum of:
        0.038349923 = product of:
          0.057524882 = sum of:
            0.019301658 = weight(_text_:m in 4654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019301658 = score(doc=4654,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.087754816 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03526487 = queryNorm
                0.21994986 = fieldWeight in 4654, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4654)
            0.038223222 = weight(_text_:22 in 4654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038223222 = score(doc=4654,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12349156 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03526487 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4654, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4654)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2017 17:12:50
    Type
    m
  15. Informations- und Wissensverarbeitung in den Sozialwissenschaften : Beiträge zur Umsetzung neuer Informationstechnologien (1994) 0.01
    0.011468797 = product of:
      0.03440639 = sum of:
        0.03440639 = product of:
          0.051609583 = sum of:
            0.024127075 = weight(_text_:m in 5067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024127075 = score(doc=5067,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.087754816 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03526487 = queryNorm
                0.27493733 = fieldWeight in 5067, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5067)
            0.027482506 = weight(_text_:g in 5067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027482506 = score(doc=5067,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.132453 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03526487 = queryNorm
                0.20748875 = fieldWeight in 5067, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5067)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Content
    Enthält u.a. die Beiträge: INGWERSEN, P.: Information science as a cognitive science; MEDER, N.: Objekt-orientierte Wissensdarstellung und -navigation; SPIESS, M.: Repräsentation unsicheren Wissens; HENRICHS, N.: Begriffswandel in Datenbanken: kontextuelle Inhaltsanalyse für Disambiguierung und ideengeschichtliche Analyse; VOGT, C. u. R. WILLE: Formale Begriffsanalyse: Darstellung und Analyse von bibliographischen Daten; RITTBERGER, M.: Online-Retrieval und Hypertext: auf dem Weg zu verknüpften Datenbanken und offenen Hypertextsystemen; SCHOPEN, M.: GRIPS-Menu: Unterstützung von Endnutzerrecherchen in Literaturdatenbanken des DIMDI; KLOSE, G. u. T. PIRLEIN: Wissensmodellierung in LILOG; DANIEL, H.-D.: Peer-review als Qualitätsfilter im wissenschaftlichen Publikationswesen
    Language
    m
  16. Stvilia, B.; Hinnant, C.C.; Schindler, K.; Worrall, A.; Burnett, G.; Burnett, K.; Kazmer, M.M.; Marty, P.F.: Composition of scientific teams and publication productivity at a national science lab (2011) 0.01
    0.011416006 = product of:
      0.034248017 = sum of:
        0.034248017 = product of:
          0.05137202 = sum of:
            0.027482506 = weight(_text_:g in 4191) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027482506 = score(doc=4191,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.132453 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03526487 = queryNorm
                0.20748875 = fieldWeight in 4191, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4191)
            0.023889516 = weight(_text_:22 in 4191) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023889516 = score(doc=4191,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12349156 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03526487 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4191, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4191)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2011 13:19:42
  17. Moed, H.F.; Halevi, G.: On full text download and citation distributions in scientific-scholarly journals (2016) 0.01
    0.011416006 = product of:
      0.034248017 = sum of:
        0.034248017 = product of:
          0.05137202 = sum of:
            0.027482506 = weight(_text_:g in 2646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027482506 = score(doc=2646,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.132453 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03526487 = queryNorm
                0.20748875 = fieldWeight in 2646, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2646)
            0.023889516 = weight(_text_:22 in 2646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023889516 = score(doc=2646,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12349156 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03526487 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2646, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2646)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2016 14:11:17
  18. Wang, S.; Ma, Y.; Mao, J.; Bai, Y.; Liang, Z.; Li, G.: Quantifying scientific breakthroughs by a novel disruption indicator based on knowledge entities : On the rise of scrape-and-report scholarship in online reviews research (2023) 0.01
    0.011416006 = product of:
      0.034248017 = sum of:
        0.034248017 = product of:
          0.05137202 = sum of:
            0.027482506 = weight(_text_:g in 882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027482506 = score(doc=882,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.132453 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03526487 = queryNorm
                0.20748875 = fieldWeight in 882, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=882)
            0.023889516 = weight(_text_:22 in 882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023889516 = score(doc=882,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12349156 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03526487 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 882, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=882)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2023 18:37:33
  19. Cerda-Cosme, R.; Méndez, E.: Analysis of shared research data in Spanish scientific papers about COVID-19 : a first approach (2023) 0.01
    0.011416006 = product of:
      0.034248017 = sum of:
        0.034248017 = product of:
          0.05137202 = sum of:
            0.027482506 = weight(_text_:g in 916) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027482506 = score(doc=916,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.132453 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03526487 = queryNorm
                0.20748875 = fieldWeight in 916, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=916)
            0.023889516 = weight(_text_:22 in 916) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023889516 = score(doc=916,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12349156 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03526487 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 916, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=916)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    During the coronavirus pandemic, changes in the way science is done and shared occurred, which motivates meta-research to help understand science communication in crises and improve its effectiveness. The objective is to study how many Spanish scientific papers on COVID-19 published during 2020 share their research data. Qualitative and descriptive study applying nine attributes: (a) availability, (b) accessibility, (c) format, (d) licensing, (e) linkage, (f) funding, (g) editorial policy, (h) content, and (i) statistics. We analyzed 1,340 papers, 1,173 (87.5%) did not have research data. A total of 12.5% share their research data of which 2.1% share their data in repositories, 5% share their data through a simple request, 0.2% do not have permission to share their data, and 5.2% share their data as supplementary material. There is a small percentage that shares their research data; however, it demonstrates the researchers' poor knowledge on how to properly share their research data and their lack of knowledge on what is research data.
    Date
    21. 3.2023 19:22:02
  20. Neth, M.: Citation analysis and the Web (1998) 0.01
    0.0111853955 = product of:
      0.033556186 = sum of:
        0.033556186 = product of:
          0.050334275 = sum of:
            0.016888952 = weight(_text_:m in 108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.016888952 = score(doc=108,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.087754816 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03526487 = queryNorm
                0.19245613 = fieldWeight in 108, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=108)
            0.03344532 = weight(_text_:22 in 108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03344532 = score(doc=108,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12349156 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03526487 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 108, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=108)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    10. 1.1999 16:22:37

Languages

  • e 374
  • d 39
  • ? 1
  • chi 1
  • m 1
  • ro 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 388
  • m 25
  • s 5
  • el 4
  • b 1
  • r 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…