Search (28 results, page 1 of 2)

0.102050826 = product of:
  0.15307623 = sum of:
    0.08929396 = weight(_text_:p in 1841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08929396 = score(doc=1841,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16055661 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044654723 = queryNorm
        0.55615246 = fieldWeight in 1841, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1841)
    0.06378228 = product of:
      0.12756456 = sum of:
        0.12756456 = weight(_text_:de in 1841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12756456 = score(doc=1841,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19190319 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044654723 = queryNorm
            0.66473395 = fieldWeight in 1841, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1841)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

0.034016747 = product of:
  0.10205024 = sum of:
    0.10205024 = weight(_text_:p in 218) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10205024 = score(doc=218,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16055661 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044654723 = queryNorm
        0.63560283 = fieldWeight in 218, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=218)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

0.030372515 = product of:
  0.091117546 = sum of:
    0.091117546 = product of:
      0.18223509 = sum of:
        0.18223509 = weight(_text_:de in 6320) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18223509 = score(doc=6320,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.19190319 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044654723 = queryNorm
            0.94961995 = fieldWeight in 6320, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6320)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Imprint

Lille : Université Charles-de-Gaulle

Source

Organisation des connaissances en vue de leur intégration dans les systèmes de représentation et de recherche d'information. Ed.: J. Maniez, et al

0.026303371 = product of:
  0.07891011 = sum of:
    0.07891011 = product of:
      0.15782022 = sum of:
        0.15782022 = weight(_text_:de in 607) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15782022 = score(doc=607,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.19190319 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044654723 = queryNorm
            0.822395 = fieldWeight in 607, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=607)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Source

Revista de Biblioteconomia de Brasilia. 20(1996) no.2, S.215-226

0.02304934 = product of:
  0.03457401 = sum of:
    0.028523909 = weight(_text_:p in 1858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028523909 = score(doc=1858,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.16055661 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044654723 = queryNorm
        0.1776564 = fieldWeight in 1858, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1858)
    0.0060500987 = product of:
      0.012100197 = sum of:
        0.012100197 = weight(_text_:22 in 1858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012100197 = score(doc=1858,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15637323 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044654723 = queryNorm
            0.07738023 = fieldWeight in 1858, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1858)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Date

22. 9.1997 19:16:05

Footnote

Rez. in JASIST 54(2003) no.4, S.356-357 (S.J. Lincicum): "Reliance upon shared cataloging in academic libraries in the United States has been driven largely by the need to reduce the expense of cataloging operations without muck regard for the Impact that this approach might have an the quality of the records included in local catalogs. In recent years, ever increasing pressures have prompted libraries to adopt practices such as "rapid" copy cataloging that purposely reduce the scrutiny applied to bibliographic records downloaded from shared databases, possibly increasing the number of errors that slip through unnoticed. Errors in bibliographic records can lead to serious problems for library catalog users. If the data contained in bibliographic records is inaccurate, users will have difficulty discovering and recognizing resources in a library's collection that are relevant to their needs. Thus, it has become increasingly important to understand the extent and nature of errors that occur in the records found in large shared bibliographic databases, such as OCLC WorldCat, to develop cataloging practices optimized for the shared cataloging environment. Although this monograph raises a few legitimate concerns about recent trends in cataloging practice, it fails to provide the "detailed look" at misinformation in library catalogs arising from linguistic errors and mistakes in subject analysis promised by the publisher. A basic premise advanced throughout the text is that a certain amount of linguistic and subject knowledge is required to catalog library materials effectively. The author emphasizes repeatedly that most catalogers today are asked to catalog an increasingly diverse array of materials, and that they are often required to work in languages or subject areas of which they have little or no knowledge. He argues that the records contributed to shared databases are increasingly being created by catalogers with inadequate linguistic or subject expertise. This adversely affects the quality of individual library catalogs because errors often go uncorrected as records are downloaded from shared databases to local catalogs by copy catalogers who possess even less knowledge. Calling misinformation an "evil phenomenon," Bade states that his main goal is to discuss, "two fundamental types of misinformation found in bibliographic and authority records in library catalogs: that arising from linguistic errors, and that caused by errors in subject analysis, including missing or wrong subject headings" (p. 2). After a superficial discussion of "other" types of errors that can occur in bibliographic records, such as typographical errors and errors in the application of descriptive cataloging rules, Bade begins his discussion of linguistic errors. He asserts that sharing bibliographic records created by catalogers with inadequate linguistic or subject knowledge has, "disastrous effects an the library community" (p. 6). To support this bold assertion, Bade provides as evidence little more than a laundry list of errors that he has personally observed in bibliographic records over the years. When he eventually cites several studies that have addressed the availability and quality of records available for materials in languages other than English, he fails to describe the findings of these studies in any detail, let alone relate the findings to his own observations in a meaningful way. Bade claims that a lack of linguistic expertise among catalogers is the "primary source for linguistic misinformation in our databases" (p. 10), but he neither cites substantive data from existing studies nor provides any new data regarding the overall level of linguistic knowledge among catalogers to support this claim. The section concludes with a brief list of eight sensible, if unoriginal, suggestions for coping with the challenge of cataloging materials in unfamiliar languages.
Bade begins his discussion of errors in subject analysis by summarizing the contents of seven records containing what he considers to be egregious errors. The examples were drawn only from items that he has encountered in the course of his work. Five of the seven records were full-level ("I" level) records for Eastern European materials created between 1996 and 2000 in the OCLC WorldCat database. The final two examples were taken from records created by Bade himself over an unspecified period of time. Although he is to be commended for examining the actual items cataloged and for examining mostly items that he claims to have adequate linguistic and subject expertise to evaluate reliably, Bade's methodology has major flaws. First and foremost, the number of examples provided is completely inadequate to draw any conclusions about the extent of the problem. Although an in-depth qualitative analysis of a small number of records might have yielded some valuable insight into factors that contribute to errors in subject analysis, Bade provides no Information about the circumstances under which the live OCLC records he critiques were created. Instead, he offers simplistic explanations for the errors based solely an his own assumptions. He supplements his analysis of examples with an extremely brief survey of other studies regarding errors in subject analysis, which consists primarily of criticism of work done by Sheila Intner. In the end, it is impossible to draw any reliable conclusions about the nature or extent of errors in subject analysis found in records in shared bibliographic databases based an Bade's analysis. In the final third of the essay, Bade finally reveals his true concern: the deintellectualization of cataloging. It would strengthen the essay tremendously to present this as the primary premise from the very beginning, as this section offers glimpses of a compelling argument. Bade laments, "Many librarians simply do not sec cataloging as an intellectual activity requiring an educated mind" (p. 20). Commenting an recent trends in copy cataloging practice, he declares, "The disaster of our time is that this work is being done more and more by people who can neither evaluate nor correct imported errors and offen are forbidden from even thinking about it" (p. 26). Bade argues that the most valuable content found in catalog records is the intellectual content contributed by knowledgeable catalogers, and he asserts that to perform intellectually demanding tasks such as subject analysis reliably and effectively, catalogers must have the linguistic and subject knowledge required to gain at least a rudimentary understanding of the materials that they describe. He contends that requiring catalogers to quickly dispense with materials in unfamiliar languages and subjects clearly undermines their ability to perform the intellectual work of cataloging and leads to an increasing number of errors in the bibliographic records contributed to shared databases.

0.021260468 = product of:
  0.0637814 = sum of:
    0.0637814 = weight(_text_:p in 34) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0637814 = score(doc=34,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16055661 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044654723 = queryNorm
        0.39725178 = fieldWeight in 34, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=34)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

0.01822351 = product of:
  0.054670528 = sum of:
    0.054670528 = product of:
      0.109341055 = sum of:
        0.109341055 = weight(_text_:de in 7292) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.109341055 = score(doc=7292,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19190319 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044654723 = queryNorm
            0.56977195 = fieldWeight in 7292, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7292)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Imprint

Berlin : Mouton de Gruyter

0.018040106 = product of:
  0.054120313 = sum of:
    0.054120313 = weight(_text_:p in 3651) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.054120313 = score(doc=3651,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.16055661 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044654723 = queryNorm
        0.33707932 = fieldWeight in 3651, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3651)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

This paper, presented at the Ottawa Conference an the Conceptual Basis of the Classification of Knowledge, in 1971, is one of Fairthorne's more perceptive works and deserves a wide audience, especially as it breaks new ground in classification theory. In discussing the notion of discourse, he makes a "distinction between what discourse mentions and what discourse is about" [emphasis added], considered as a "fundamental factor to the relativistic nature of bibliographic classification" (p. 360). A table of mathematical functions, for example, describes exactly something represented by a collection of digits, but, without a preface, this table does not fit into a broader context. Some indication of the author's intent ls needed to fit the table into a broader context. This intent may appear in a title, chapter heading, class number or some other aid. Discourse an and discourse about something "cannot be determined solely from what it mentions" (p. 361). Some kind of background is needed. Fairthorne further develops the theme that knowledge about a subject comes from previous knowledge, thus adding a temporal factor to classification. "Some extra textual criteria are needed" in order to classify (p. 362). For example, "documents that mention the same things, but are an different topics, will have different ancestors, in the sense of preceding documents to which they are linked by various bibliographic characteristics ... [and] ... they will have different descendants" (p. 363). The classifier has to distinguish between documents that "mention exactly the same thing" but are not about the same thing. The classifier does this by classifying "sets of documents that form their histories, their bibliographic world lines" (p. 363). The practice of citation is one method of performing the linking and presents a "fan" of documents connected by a chain of citations to past work. The fan is seen as the effect of generations of documents - each generation connected to the previous one, and all ancestral to the present document. Thus, there are levels in temporal structure-that is, antecedent and successor documents-and these require that documents be identified in relation to other documents. This gives a set of documents an "irrevocable order," a loose order which Fairthorne calls "bibliographic time," and which is "generated by the fact of continual growth" (p. 364). He does not consider "bibliographic time" to be an equivalent to physical time because bibliographic events, as part of communication, require delay. Sets of documents, as indicated above, rather than single works, are used in classification. While an event, a person, a unique feature of the environment, may create a class of one-such as the French Revolution, Napoleon, Niagara Falls-revolutions, emperors, and waterfalls are sets which, as sets, will subsume individuals and make normal classes.
The fan of past documents may be seen across time as a philosophical "wake," translated documents as a sideways relationship and future documents as another fan spreading forward from a given document (p. 365). The "overlap of reading histories can be used to detect common interests among readers," (p. 365) and readers may be classified accordingly. Finally, Fairthorne rejects the notion of a "general" classification, which he regards as a mirage, to be replaced by a citation-type network to identify classes. An interesting feature of his work lies in his linkage between old and new documents via a bibliographic method-citations, authors' names, imprints, style, and vocabulary - rather than topical (subject) terms. This is an indirect method of creating classes. The subject (aboutness) is conceived as a finite, common sharing of knowledge over time (past, present, and future) as opposed to the more common hierarchy of topics in an infinite schema assumed to be universally useful. Fairthorne, a mathematician by training, is a prolific writer an the foundations of classification and information. His professional career includes work with the Royal Engineers Chemical Warfare Section and the Royal Aircraft Establishment (RAE). He was the founder of the Computing Unit which became the RAE Mathematics Department.

0.017008374 = product of:
  0.05102512 = sum of:
    0.05102512 = weight(_text_:p in 2489) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05102512 = score(doc=2489,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16055661 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044654723 = queryNorm
        0.31780142 = fieldWeight in 2489, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2489)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

0.017008374 = product of:
  0.05102512 = sum of:
    0.05102512 = weight(_text_:p in 1353) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05102512 = score(doc=1353,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16055661 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044654723 = queryNorm
        0.31780142 = fieldWeight in 1353, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1353)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

0.014882326 = product of:
  0.04464698 = sum of:
    0.04464698 = weight(_text_:p in 1783) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04464698 = score(doc=1783,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16055661 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044654723 = queryNorm
        0.27807623 = fieldWeight in 1783, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1783)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

0.014882326 = product of:
  0.04464698 = sum of:
    0.04464698 = weight(_text_:p in 1961) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04464698 = score(doc=1961,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16055661 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044654723 = queryNorm
        0.27807623 = fieldWeight in 1961, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1961)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Footnote

Wiederabgedruckt in: Readings in information retrieval. Ed.: K. Sparck Jones u. P. Willett. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann 1997. S.93-97.

0.014882326 = product of:
  0.04464698 = sum of:
    0.04464698 = weight(_text_:p in 5845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04464698 = score(doc=5845,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16055661 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044654723 = queryNorm
        0.27807623 = fieldWeight in 5845, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5845)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

0.012149006 = product of:
  0.03644702 = sum of:
    0.03644702 = product of:
      0.07289404 = sum of:
        0.07289404 = weight(_text_:de in 856) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07289404 = score(doc=856,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19190319 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044654723 = queryNorm
            0.37984797 = fieldWeight in 856, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=856)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

0.012149006 = product of:
  0.03644702 = sum of:
    0.03644702 = product of:
      0.07289404 = sum of:
        0.07289404 = weight(_text_:de in 4707) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07289404 = score(doc=4707,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19190319 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044654723 = queryNorm
            0.37984797 = fieldWeight in 4707, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4707)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

0.01063038 = product of:
  0.03189114 = sum of:
    0.03189114 = product of:
      0.06378228 = sum of:
        0.06378228 = weight(_text_:de in 1018) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06378228 = score(doc=1018,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19190319 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044654723 = queryNorm
            0.33236697 = fieldWeight in 1018, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1018)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Imprint

Berlin : De Gruyter Saur

0.010630234 = product of:
  0.0318907 = sum of:
    0.0318907 = weight(_text_:p in 2347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0318907 = score(doc=2347,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16055661 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044654723 = queryNorm
        0.19862589 = fieldWeight in 2347, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2347)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

0.010523394 = product of:
  0.03157018 = sum of:
    0.03157018 = weight(_text_:p in 3648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03157018 = score(doc=3648,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.16055661 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044654723 = queryNorm
        0.1966296 = fieldWeight in 3648, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3648)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Footnote

Original in: Wilson, P.: Two kinds of power: an essay on bibliograpical control. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press 1968. S.69-92.

0.010083498 = product of:
  0.030250493 = sum of:
    0.030250493 = product of:
      0.060500987 = sum of:
        0.060500987 = weight(_text_:22 in 5835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.060500987 = score(doc=5835,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15637323 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044654723 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5835, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5835)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date

5. 8.2006 13:22:44

0.009111755 = product of:
  0.027335264 = sum of:
    0.027335264 = product of:
      0.054670528 = sum of:
        0.054670528 = weight(_text_:de in 320) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.054670528 = score(doc=320,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19190319 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044654723 = queryNorm
            0.28488597 = fieldWeight in 320, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=320)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Content

Beitrag aus: Selected Papers from the 8th ISKO-France Conference, 27-28 June 2011, Lille, Université Charles-De-Gaulle Lille 3. Vgl.: http://www.ergon-verlag.de/isko_ko/downloads/ko_39_2012_4_g.pdf.