Search (7 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"O'Neill, E.T."
  1. O'Neill, E.T.; Chan, L.M.; Childress, E.; Dean, R.; El-Hoshy, L.M.; Vizine-Goetz, D.: Form subdivisions : their identification and use in LCSH (2001) 0.06
    0.058307745 = product of:
      0.08746161 = sum of:
        0.06950371 = weight(_text_:v in 2205) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06950371 = score(doc=2205,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2152264 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044181384 = queryNorm
            0.32293302 = fieldWeight in 2205, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2205)
        0.017957903 = product of:
          0.035915807 = sum of:
            0.035915807 = weight(_text_:22 in 2205) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035915807 = score(doc=2205,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15471569 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044181384 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2205, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2205)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Form subdivisions have always been an important part of the Library of Congress Subject Headings. However, when the MARC format was developed, no separate subfield code to identify form subdivisions was defined. Form and topical subdivisions were both included within a general subdivision category. In 1995, the USMARC Advisory Group approved a proposal defining subfield v for form subdivisions, and in 1999 the Library of Congress (LC) began identifying form subdivisions with the new code. However, there are millions of older bibliographic records lacking the explicit form subdivision coding. Identifying form subdivisions retrospectively is not a simple task. An algorithmic method was developed to identify form subdivisions coded as general subdivisions. The algorithm was used to identify 2,563 unique form subdivisions or combinations of form subdivisions in OCLC's WorldCat. The algorithm proved to be highly accurate with an error rate estimated to be less than 0.1%. The observed usage of the form subdivisions was highly skewed with the 100 most used form subdivisions or combinations of subdivisions accounting for 90% of the assignments.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  2. Lavoie, B.F.; O'Neill, E.T.: How "World Wide" Is the Web? : Trends in the Internationalization of Web Sites (2001) 0.01
    0.009976614 = product of:
      0.029929841 = sum of:
        0.029929841 = product of:
          0.059859682 = sum of:
            0.059859682 = weight(_text_:22 in 1066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.059859682 = score(doc=1066,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15471569 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044181384 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1066, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1066)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    7.10.2002 9:22:14
  3. O'Neill, E.T.; Connaway, L.S.; Dickey, T.J.: Estimating the audience level for library resources (2008) 0.01
    0.007981291 = product of:
      0.023943871 = sum of:
        0.023943871 = product of:
          0.047887743 = sum of:
            0.047887743 = weight(_text_:22 in 6654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047887743 = score(doc=6654,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15471569 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044181384 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6654, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6654)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    8.11.2008 19:22:53
  4. O'Neill, E.T.; Childress, E.; Dean, R.; Kammerer, K.; Vizine-Goetz, D.; Chan, L.M.; El-Hoshy, L.: FAST: faceted application of subject terminology (2003) 0.01
    0.007512642 = product of:
      0.022537926 = sum of:
        0.022537926 = product of:
          0.045075852 = sum of:
            0.045075852 = weight(_text_:de in 3816) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.045075852 = score(doc=3816,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18986902 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044181384 = queryNorm
                0.23740499 = fieldWeight in 3816, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3816)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The Library of Congress Subject Headings schema (LCSH) is by far the most commonly used and widely accepted subject vocabulary for general application. It is the de facto universal controlled vocabulary and has been a model for developing subject heading systems by many countries. However, LCSH's complex syntax and rules for constructing headings restrict its application by requiring highly skilled personnel and limit the effectiveness of automated authority control. Recent trends, driven to a large extent by the rapid growth of the Web, are forcing changes in bibliographic control systems to make them easier to use, understand, and apply, and subject headings are no exception. The purpose of adapting the LCSH with a simplified syntax to create FAST is to retain the very rich vocabulary of LCSH while making the schema easier to understand, control, apply, and use. The schema maintains upward compatibility with LCSH, and any valid set of LC subject headings can be converted to FAST headings.
  5. Hickey, T.B.; Toves, J.; O'Neill, E.T.: NACO normalization : a detailed examination of the authority file comparison rules (2006) 0.01
    0.0069836294 = product of:
      0.020950887 = sum of:
        0.020950887 = product of:
          0.041901775 = sum of:
            0.041901775 = weight(_text_:22 in 5760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041901775 = score(doc=5760,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15471569 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044181384 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5760, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5760)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  6. Lavoie, B.F.; Connaway, L.S.; O'Neill, E.T.: Mapping WorldCat's digital landscape (2007) 0.01
    0.005985968 = product of:
      0.017957903 = sum of:
        0.017957903 = product of:
          0.035915807 = sum of:
            0.035915807 = weight(_text_:22 in 2292) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035915807 = score(doc=2292,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15471569 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044181384 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2292, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2292)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  7. O'Neill, E.T.: FRBR: Functional requirements for bibliographic records application of the entity-relationship model to Humphry Clinker (2002) 0.00
    0.004988307 = product of:
      0.0149649205 = sum of:
        0.0149649205 = product of:
          0.029929841 = sum of:
            0.029929841 = weight(_text_:22 in 2434) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029929841 = score(doc=2434,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15471569 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044181384 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2434, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2434)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22