Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

Lozano, G.A.; Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.: ¬The weakening relationship between the impact factor and papers' citations in the digital age (2012) 0.02

0.019306587 = product of:
  0.05791976 = sum of:
    0.05791976 = weight(_text_:v in 486) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05791976 = score(doc=486,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2152264 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044181384 = queryNorm
        0.26911086 = fieldWeight in 486, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=486)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abad-García, M.-F.; González-Teruel, A.; González-Llinares, J.: Effectiveness of OpenAIRE, BASE, Recolecta, and Google Scholar at finding spanish articles in repositories (2018) 0.01
```
0.007512642 = product of:
  0.022537926 = sum of:
    0.022537926 = product of:
      0.045075852 = sum of:
        0.045075852 = weight(_text_:de in 4185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045075852 = score(doc=4185,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18986902 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044181384 = queryNorm
            0.23740499 = fieldWeight in 4185, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4185)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
```
Abstract

This paper explores the usefulness of OpenAIRE, BASE, Recolecta, and Google Scholar (GS) for evaluating open access (OA) policies that demand a deposit in a repository. A case study was designed focusing on 762 financed articles with a project of FIS-2012 of the Instituto de Salud Carlos III, the Spanish national health service's main management body for health research. Its finance is therefore subject to the Spanish Government OA mandate. A search was carried out for full-text OA copies of the 762 articles using the four tools being evaluated and with identification of the repository housing these items. Of the 762 articles concerned, 510 OA copies were found of 353 unique articles (46.3%) in 68 repositories. OA copies were found of 81.9% of the articles in PubMed Central and copies of 49.5% of the articles in an institutional repository (IR). BASE and GS identified 93.5% of the articles and OpenAIRE 86.7%. Recolecta identified just 62.2% of the articles deposited in a Spanish IR. BASE achieved the greatest success, by locating copies deposited in IR, while GS found those deposited in disciplinary repositories. None of the tools identified copies of all the articles, so they need to be used in a complementary way when evaluating OA policies.
Walters, W.H.; Linvill, A.C.: Bibliographic index coverage of open-access journals in six subject areas (2011) 0.00
```
0.004988307 = product of:
  0.0149649205 = sum of:
    0.0149649205 = product of:
      0.029929841 = sum of:
        0.029929841 = weight(_text_:22 in 4635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029929841 = score(doc=4635,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15471569 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044181384 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4635, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4635)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
```
Abstract

We investigate the extent to which open-access (OA) journals and articles in biology, computer science, economics, history, medicine, and psychology are indexed in each of 11 bibliographic databases. We also look for variations in index coverage by journal subject, journal size, publisher type, publisher size, date of first OA issue, region of publication, language of publication, publication fee, and citation impact factor. Two databases, Biological Abstracts and PubMed, provide very good coverage of the OA journal literature, indexing 60 to 63% of all OA articles in their disciplines. Five databases provide moderately good coverage (22-41%), and four provide relatively poor coverage (0-12%). OA articles in biology journals, English-only journals, high-impact journals, and journals that charge publication fees of $1,000 or more are especially likely to be indexed. Conversely, articles from OA publishers in Africa, Asia, or Central/South America are especially unlikely to be indexed. Four of the 11 databases index commercially published articles at a substantially higher rate than articles published by universities, scholarly societies, nonprofit publishers, or governments. Finally, three databases-EBSCO Academic Search Complete, ProQuest Research Library, and Wilson OmniFile-provide less comprehensive coverage of OA articles than of articles in comparable subscription journals.

Moed, H.F.; Halevi, G.: On full text download and citation distributions in scientific-scholarly journals (2016) 0.00

0.004988307 = product of:
  0.0149649205 = sum of:
    0.0149649205 = product of:
      0.029929841 = sum of:
        0.029929841 = weight(_text_:22 in 2646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029929841 = score(doc=2646,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15471569 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044181384 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2646, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2646)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date: 22. 1.2016 14:11:17

Ortega, J.L.: ¬The presence of academic journals on Twitter and its relationship with dissemination (tweets) and research impact (citations) (2017) 0.00

0.004988307 = product of:
  0.0149649205 = sum of:
    0.0149649205 = product of:
      0.029929841 = sum of:
        0.029929841 = weight(_text_:22 in 4410) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029929841 = score(doc=4410,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15471569 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044181384 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4410, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4410)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date: 20. 1.2015 18:30:22

Costas, R.; Perianes-Rodríguez, A.; Ruiz-Castillo, J.: On the quest for currencies of science : field "exchange rates" for citations and Mendeley readership (2017) 0.00

0.0039906455 = product of:
  0.011971936 = sum of:
    0.011971936 = product of:
      0.023943871 = sum of:
        0.023943871 = weight(_text_:22 in 4051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023943871 = score(doc=4051,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15471569 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044181384 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 4051, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4051)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date: 20. 1.2015 18:30:22

Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

Authors