Search (22 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Begriffstheorie"
  1. Treude, L.: ¬Das Problem der Konzeptdefinition in der Wissensorganisation : über einen missglückten Versuch der Klärung (2013) 0.05 
    0.047041383 = product of:
  0.07056207 = sum of:
    0.052840866 = weight(_text_:p in 3060) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.052840866 = score(doc=3060,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.15676093 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04359905 = queryNorm
        0.33707932 = fieldWeight in 3060, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3060)
    0.017721208 = product of:
      0.035442416 = sum of:
        0.035442416 = weight(_text_:22 in 3060) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035442416 = score(doc=3060,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15267645 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04359905 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3060, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3060)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Alon Friedman und Richard P. Smiraglia kündigen in ihrem aktuellen Artikel "Nodes and arcs: concept map, semiotics, and knowledge organization" an, eine "empirical demonstration of how the domain [of knowledge organisation] itself understands the meaning of a concept" durchzuführen. Die Klärung des Konzeptbegriffs ist ein begrüßenswertes Vorhaben, das die Autoren in einer empirischen Untersuchung von concept maps (also Konzeptdiagrammen) aus dem Bereich der Wissensorganisation nachvollziehen wollen. Beschränkte sich Friedman 2011 in seinem Artikel "Concept theory and semiotics in knowledge organization" [Fn 01] noch ausschließlich auf Sprache als Medium im Zeichenprozess, bezieht er sich nun auf Visualisierungen als Repräsentationsform und scheint somit seinen Ansatz um den Aspekt der Bildlichkeit zu erweitern. Zumindest erwartet man dies nach der Lektüre der Beschreibung des aktuellen Vorhabens von Friedman und Smiraglia, das - wie die Autoren verkünden - auf einer semiotischen Grundlage durchgeführt worden sei.
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.libreas.eu/09treude.htm. Bezug zu: Alon Friedman, Richard P. Smiraglia, (2013): Nodes and arcs: concept map, semiotics, and knowledge organization. In: Journal of Documentation, Vol. 69/1, S.27-48.
    Source
    LIBREAS: Library ideas. no.22, 2013, S.xx-xx
  2. Storms, G.; VanMechelen, I.; DeBoeck, P.: Structural-analysis of the intension and extension of semantic concepts (1994) 0.04 
    0.042844158 = product of:
  0.064266235 = sum of:
    0.04359149 = weight(_text_:p in 2574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04359149 = score(doc=2574,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15676093 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04359905 = queryNorm
        0.27807623 = fieldWeight in 2574, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2574)
    0.020674743 = product of:
      0.041349486 = sum of:
        0.041349486 = weight(_text_:22 in 2574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041349486 = score(doc=2574,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15267645 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04359905 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2574, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2574)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Date
    22. 7.2000 19:17:40
  3. Zawada, B.; Swanepoel, P.: On the empirical adequacy of terminological concept theories : the case for prototype theory (1994) 0.03 
    0.033212565 = product of:
  0.099637695 = sum of:
    0.099637695 = weight(_text_:p in 2004) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.099637695 = score(doc=2004,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15676093 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04359905 = queryNorm
        0.63560283 = fieldWeight in 2004, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2004)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  4. Rahmstorf, G.: ¬An integrated conceptual representation for words and phrases (1992) 0.03 
    0.029356038 = product of:
  0.08806811 = sum of:
    0.08806811 = weight(_text_:p in 2415) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08806811 = score(doc=2415,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.15676093 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04359905 = queryNorm
        0.5617989 = fieldWeight in 2415, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2415)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    Discourse and lexical meaning. Proceedings of a Workshop of the DFG Sonderforschungsbereich 340, Stuttgart, 30.11.-1.12.1992. Ed.: P. Bosch u. P. Gerstl
  5. Winograd, T.: ¬Ein prozedurales Modell des Sprachverstehens (1977) 0.03 
    0.029060993 = product of:
  0.08718298 = sum of:
    0.08718298 = weight(_text_:p in 4707) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08718298 = score(doc=4707,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15676093 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04359905 = queryNorm
        0.55615246 = fieldWeight in 4707, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4707)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    Semantik und künstliche Intelligenz: Beiträge zur automatischen Sprachbearbeitung II. Hrsg. u. eingeleitet von P. Eisenberg
  6. Rahmstorf, G.: Methoden und Formate für mehrsprachige Begriffssysteme (1996) 0.02 
    0.024909422 = product of:
  0.074728265 = sum of:
    0.074728265 = weight(_text_:p in 7110) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.074728265 = score(doc=7110,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15676093 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04359905 = queryNorm
        0.47670212 = fieldWeight in 7110, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7110)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Type
    p
  7. Schimany, P.: Vom 'Chaos der denkender Ordnung' zu einer 'Ethik statischer Begriffssysteme' (1996) 0.02 
    0.024909422 = product of:
  0.074728265 = sum of:
    0.074728265 = weight(_text_:p in 3936) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.074728265 = score(doc=3936,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15676093 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04359905 = queryNorm
        0.47670212 = fieldWeight in 3936, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3936)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  8. Weissenhofer, P.: Conceptology in terminology : theory, semantics, and word-formation. A morpho-conceptually based approach to classification as exemplified by the English baseball terminology (1995) 0.02 
    0.016606282 = product of:
  0.049818847 = sum of:
    0.049818847 = weight(_text_:p in 4632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.049818847 = score(doc=4632,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15676093 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04359905 = queryNorm
        0.31780142 = fieldWeight in 4632, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4632)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  9. Wille, R.: Denken in Begriffen : von der griechischen Philosophie bis zur Künstlichen Intelligenz heute (1993) 0.01 
    0.014530497 = product of:
  0.04359149 = sum of:
    0.04359149 = weight(_text_:p in 3145) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04359149 = score(doc=3145,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15676093 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04359905 = queryNorm
        0.27807623 = fieldWeight in 3145, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3145)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Type
    p
  10. Dahlberg, I.: ¬Die gegenstandsbezogene, analytische Begriffstheorie und ihre Definitionsarten (1987) 0.01 
    0.013783162 = product of:
  0.041349486 = sum of:
    0.041349486 = product of:
      0.08269897 = sum of:
        0.08269897 = weight(_text_:22 in 880) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08269897 = score(doc=880,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15267645 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04359905 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 880, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=880)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Pages
    S.9-22
  11. Working with conceptual structures : contributions to ICCS 2000. 8th International Conference on Conceptual Structures: Logical, Linguistic, and Computational Issues. Darmstadt, August 14-18, 2000 (2000) 0.01 
    0.01258378 = product of:
  0.03775134 = sum of:
    0.03775134 = weight(_text_:p in 5089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03775134 = score(doc=5089,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.15676093 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04359905 = queryNorm
        0.24082111 = fieldWeight in 5089, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=5089)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Content
    Concepts & Language: Knowledge organization by procedures of natural language processing. A case study using the method GABEK (J. Zelger, J. Gadner) - Computer aided narrative analysis using conceptual graphs (H. Schärfe, P. 0hrstrom) - Pragmatic representation of argumentative text: a challenge for the conceptual graph approach (H. Irandoust, B. Moulin) - Conceptual graphs as a knowledge representation core in a complex language learning environment (G. Angelova, A. Nenkova, S. Boycheva, T. Nikolov) - Conceptual Modeling and Ontologies: Relationships and actions in conceptual categories (Ch. Landauer, K.L. Bellman) - Concept approximations for formal concept analysis (J. Saquer, J.S. Deogun) - Faceted information representation (U. Priß) - Simple concept graphs with universal quantifiers (J. Tappe) - A framework for comparing methods for using or reusing multiple ontologies in an application (J. van ZyI, D. Corbett) - Designing task/method knowledge-based systems with conceptual graphs (M. Leclère, F.Trichet, Ch. Choquet) - A logical ontology (J. Farkas, J. Sarbo) - Algorithms and Tools: Fast concept analysis (Ch. Lindig) - A framework for conceptual graph unification (D. Corbett) - Visual CP representation of knowledge (H.D. Pfeiffer, R.T. Hartley) - Maximal isojoin for representing software textual specifications and detecting semantic anomalies (Th. Charnois) - Troika: using grids, lattices and graphs in knowledge acquisition (H.S. Delugach, B.E. Lampkin) - Open world theorem prover for conceptual graphs (J.E. Heaton, P. Kocura) - NetCare: a practical conceptual graphs software tool (S. Polovina, D. Strang) - CGWorld - a web based workbench for conceptual graphs management and applications (P. Dobrev, K. Toutanova) - Position papers: The edition project: Peirce's existential graphs (R. Mülller) - Mining association rules using formal concept analysis (N. Pasquier) - Contextual logic summary (R Wille) - Information channels and conceptual scaling (K.E. Wolff) - Spatial concepts - a rule exploration (S. Rudolph) - The TEXT-TO-ONTO learning environment (A. Mädche, St. Staab) - Controlling the semantics of metadata on audio-visual documents using ontologies (Th. Dechilly, B. Bachimont) - Building the ontological foundations of a terminology from natural language to conceptual graphs with Ribosome, a knowledge extraction system (Ch. Jacquelinet, A. Burgun) - CharGer: some lessons learned and new directions (H.S. Delugach) - Knowledge management using conceptual graphs (W.K. Pun)
  12. Dahlberg, I.: Zur 'Begriffskultur' in den Sozialwissenschaften : lassen sich ihre Probleme lösen? (1996) 0.01 
    0.012454711 = product of:
  0.037364133 = sum of:
    0.037364133 = weight(_text_:p in 3941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.037364133 = score(doc=3941,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15676093 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04359905 = queryNorm
        0.23835106 = fieldWeight in 3941, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3941)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Footnote
    Dazu im selben Heft Erwiderungen von: J. Becker u. A. Reiss, W.L. Bühl, V. Dreier, R. Dürr, T. Eckes, W. Friedlmeier, W. Gödert, A. Hahn, H. Kerber, R. Kleinknecht, J. Klüver, J. Krause, S. Lamnek, M.-T. Liske, C. Lütge, R. Meyers, K. Manhart, H.P. Ohly, M. Patzak, R. Popp, F.J. Radermacher, A. Ros, P. Schimany, T.B. Seiler, A. Suchanek, E. Walther-Klaus, H. Weiss; eine Erwiderung von I. Dahlberg u. eine Metakritik von G. Endruweit. - Replik der Verfasserin auf die Erwiderungen: S.67-85
  13. Felgner, U.: ¬Die Begriffe der Äquivalenz, der Gleichheit und der Identität (2020) 0.01 
    0.012454711 = product of:
  0.037364133 = sum of:
    0.037364133 = weight(_text_:p in 348) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.037364133 = score(doc=348,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15676093 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04359905 = queryNorm
        0.23835106 = fieldWeight in 348, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=348)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    "Der Begriff der Gleichheit ist uns Mathematikern vielleicht der geläufigste; dennoch läßt sich schwer sagen, was wir unter ihm verstehen." - Mit diesem Satz beginnt GERHARD HESSENBERG sein Buch über die .Grundlagen der Geometrie' ([24], Berlin, 1930, §1). Er kommt nach einer ausführlichen Diskussion zum Schluß, daß die Relation der Gleichheit nichts anderes als eine Äquivalenzrelation sei, also eine symmetrische, transitive und reflexive Relation, und daß auch umgekehrt jede symmetrische, transitive und reflexive Relation eine Gleichheitsbeziehung sei. Die Begriffe Gleichheit und Äquivalenz wären demnach synonym. Schaut man im .Mathematischen Wörterbuch' von J. NAAS & H.L. SCHMID (Berlin, 1967) nach, so findet man unter dem Stichwort Gleichheit (p. 639) genau dieselbe Definition: "Die Gleichheit ist eine Äquivalenzrelation und umgekehrt kann jede Äquivalenzrelation als eine besondere Art von Gleichheit aufgefaßt werden."
  14. Wüster, E.: Begriffs- und Themaklassifikation : Unterschiede in ihrem Wesen und in ihrer Anwendung (1971) 0.01 
    0.011814139 = product of:
  0.035442416 = sum of:
    0.035442416 = product of:
      0.07088483 = sum of:
        0.07088483 = weight(_text_:22 in 3904) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07088483 = score(doc=3904,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15267645 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04359905 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3904, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3904)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    Nachrichten für Dokumentation. 22(1971) H.3, S.98-104 (T.1); H.4, S.143-150 (T.2)
  15. Hjoerland, B.: Are relations in thesauri "context-free, definitional, and true in all possible worlds"? (2015) 0.01 
    0.010378927 = product of:
  0.03113678 = sum of:
    0.03113678 = weight(_text_:p in 2033) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03113678 = score(doc=2033,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15676093 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04359905 = queryNorm
        0.19862589 = fieldWeight in 2033, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2033)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Much of the literature of information science and knowledge organization has accepted and built upon Elaine Svenonius's (2004) claim that "paradigmatic relationships are those that are context-free, definitional, and true in all possible worlds" (p. 583). At the same time, the literature demonstrates a common understanding that paradigmatic relations are the kinds of semantic relations used in thesauri and other knowledge organization systems (including equivalence relations, hierarchical relations, and associative relations). This understanding is problematic and harmful because it directs attention away from the empirical and contextual basis for knowledge-organizing systems. Whether A is a kind of X is certainly not context-free and definitional in empirical sciences or in much everyday information. Semantic relations are theory-dependent and, in biology, for example, a scientific revolution has taken place in which many relations have changed following the new taxonomic paradigm named "cladism." This biological example is not an exception, but the norm. Semantic relations including paradigmatic relations are not a priori but are dependent on subject knowledge, scientific findings, and paradigms. As long as information scientists and knowledge organizers isolate themselves from subject knowledge, knowledge organization cannot possibly progress.
  16. Dahlberg, I.: Begriffsarbeit in der Wissensorganisation (2010) 0.01 
    0.007876093 = product of:
  0.023628278 = sum of:
    0.023628278 = product of:
      0.047256555 = sum of:
        0.047256555 = weight(_text_:22 in 3726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047256555 = score(doc=3726,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15267645 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04359905 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3726, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3726)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
  17. Bauer, G.: ¬Die vielseitigen Anwendungsmöglichkeiten des Kategorienprinzips bei der Wissensorganisation (2006) 0.01 
    0.006891581 = product of:
  0.020674743 = sum of:
    0.020674743 = product of:
      0.041349486 = sum of:
        0.041349486 = weight(_text_:22 in 5710) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041349486 = score(doc=5710,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15267645 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04359905 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5710, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5710)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Pages
    S.22-33
  18. Conceptual structures : logical, linguistic, and computational issues. 8th International Conference on Conceptual Structures, ICCS 2000, Darmstadt, Germany, August 14-18, 2000 (2000) 0.01 
    0.0062273555 = product of:
  0.018682066 = sum of:
    0.018682066 = weight(_text_:p in 691) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018682066 = score(doc=691,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15676093 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04359905 = queryNorm
        0.11917553 = fieldWeight in 691, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=691)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Content
    Concepts and Language: The Role of Conceptual Structure in Human Evolution (Keith Devlin) - Concepts in Linguistics - Concepts in Natural Language (Gisela Harras) - Patterns, Schemata, and Types: Author Support through Formalized Experience (Felix H. Gatzemeier) - Conventions and Notations for Knowledge Representation and Retrieval (Philippe Martin) - Conceptual Ontology: Ontology, Metadata, and Semiotics (John F. Sowa) - Pragmatically Yours (Mary Keeler) - Conceptual Modeling for Distributed Ontology Environments (Deborah L. McGuinness) - Discovery of Class Relations in Exception Structured Knowledge Bases (Hendra Suryanto, Paul Compton) - Conceptual Graphs: Perspectives: CGs Applications: Where Are We 7 Years after the First ICCS ? (Michel Chein, David Genest) - The Engineering of a CC-Based System: Fundamental Issues (Guy W. Mineau) - Conceptual Graphs, Metamodeling, and Notation of Concepts (Olivier Gerbé, Guy W. Mineau, Rudolf K. Keller) - Knowledge Representation and Reasonings: Based on Graph Homomorphism (Marie-Laure Mugnier) - User Modeling Using Conceptual Graphs for Intelligent Agents (James F. Baldwin, Trevor P. Martin, Aimilia Tzanavari) - Towards a Unified Querying System of Both Structured and Semi-structured Imprecise Data Using Fuzzy View (Patrice Buche, Ollivier Haemmerlé) - Formal Semantics of Conceptual Structures: The Extensional Semantics of the Conceptual Graph Formalism (Guy W. Mineau) - Semantics of Attribute Relations in Conceptual Graphs (Pavel Kocura) - Nested Concept Graphs and Triadic Power Context Families (Susanne Prediger) - Negations in Simple Concept Graphs (Frithjof Dau) - Extending the CG Model by Simulations (Jean-François Baget) - Contextual Logic and Formal Concept Analysis: Building and Structuring Description Logic Knowledge Bases: Using Least Common Subsumers and Concept Analysis (Franz Baader, Ralf Molitor) - On the Contextual Logic of Ordinal Data (Silke Pollandt, Rudolf Wille) - Boolean Concept Logic (Rudolf Wille) - Lattices of Triadic Concept Graphs (Bernd Groh, Rudolf Wille) - Formalizing Hypotheses with Concepts (Bernhard Ganter, Sergei 0. Kuznetsov) - Generalized Formal Concept Analysis (Laurent Chaudron, Nicolas Maille) - A Logical Generalization of Formal Concept Analysis (Sébastien Ferré, Olivier Ridoux) - On the Treatment of Incomplete Knowledge in Formal Concept Analysis (Peter Burmeister, Richard Holzer) - Conceptual Structures in Practice: Logic-Based Networks: Concept Graphs and Conceptual Structures (Peter W. Eklund) - Conceptual Knowledge Discovery and Data Analysis (Joachim Hereth, Gerd Stumme, Rudolf Wille, Uta Wille) - CEM - A Conceptual Email Manager (Richard Cole, Gerd Stumme) - A Contextual-Logic Extension of TOSCANA (Peter Eklund, Bernd Groh, Gerd Stumme, Rudolf Wille) - A Conceptual Graph Model for W3C Resource Description Framework (Olivier Corby, Rose Dieng, Cédric Hébert) - Computational Aspects of Conceptual Structures: Computing with Conceptual Structures (Bernhard Ganter) - Symmetry and the Computation of Conceptual Structures (Robert Levinson) An Introduction to SNePS 3 (Stuart C. Shapiro) - Composition Norm Dynamics Calculation with Conceptual Graphs (Aldo de Moor) - From PROLOG++ to PROLOG+CG: A CG Object-Oriented Logic Programming Language (Adil Kabbaj, Martin Janta-Polczynski) - A Cost-Bounded Algorithm to Control Events Generalization (Gaël de Chalendar, Brigitte Grau, Olivier Ferret)
  19. Jouis, C.: Logic of relationships (2002) 0.00 
    0.004922558 = product of:
  0.014767674 = sum of:
    0.014767674 = product of:
      0.029535348 = sum of:
        0.029535348 = weight(_text_:22 in 1204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029535348 = score(doc=1204,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15267645 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04359905 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1204, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1204)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    1.12.2002 11:12:22
  20. Marradi, A.: ¬The concept of concept : concepts and terms (2012) 0.00 
    0.004922558 = product of:
  0.014767674 = sum of:
    0.014767674 = product of:
      0.029535348 = sum of:
        0.029535348 = weight(_text_:22 in 33) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029535348 = score(doc=33,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15267645 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04359905 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 33, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=33)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    22. 1.2012 13:11:25

Authors

Years

Languages

  • d 11
  • e 11

Types

Themes