Search (12 results, page 1 of 1)

0.0352697 = product of:
  0.0705394 = sum of:
    0.0705394 = sum of:
      0.039809994 = weight(_text_:f in 1417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.039809994 = score(doc=1417,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18080194 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04536168 = queryNorm
          0.22018565 = fieldWeight in 1417, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1417)
      0.030729406 = weight(_text_:22 in 1417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.030729406 = score(doc=1417,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15884887 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04536168 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1417, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1417)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik

0.022519933 = product of:
  0.045039866 = sum of:
    0.045039866 = product of:
      0.09007973 = sum of:
        0.09007973 = weight(_text_:f in 4834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09007973 = score(doc=4834,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18080194 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04536168 = queryNorm
            0.49822325 = fieldWeight in 4834, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4834)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Challenges and opportunities for knowledge organization in the digital age: proceedings of the Fifteenth International ISKO Conference, 9-11 July 2018, Porto, Portugal / organized by: International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO Spain and Portugal Chapter, University of Porto - Faculty of Arts and Humanities, Research Centre in Communication, Information and Digital Culture (CIC.digital) - Porto. Eds.: F. Ribeiro u. M.E. Cerveira

0.015923997 = product of:
  0.031847995 = sum of:
    0.031847995 = product of:
      0.06369599 = sum of:
        0.06369599 = weight(_text_:f in 2623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06369599 = score(doc=2623,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18080194 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04536168 = queryNorm
            0.35229704 = fieldWeight in 2623, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2623)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.014074958 = product of:
  0.028149916 = sum of:
    0.028149916 = product of:
      0.05629983 = sum of:
        0.05629983 = weight(_text_:f in 380) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05629983 = score(doc=380,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18080194 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04536168 = queryNorm
            0.31138954 = fieldWeight in 380, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=380)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Location

F

0.0139334975 = product of:
  0.027866995 = sum of:
    0.027866995 = product of:
      0.05573399 = sum of:
        0.05573399 = weight(_text_:f in 3522) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05573399 = score(doc=3522,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18080194 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04536168 = queryNorm
            0.3082599 = fieldWeight in 3522, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3522)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.013790587 = product of:
  0.027581174 = sum of:
    0.027581174 = product of:
      0.055162348 = sum of:
        0.055162348 = weight(_text_:f in 3949) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055162348 = score(doc=3949,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.18080194 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04536168 = queryNorm
            0.3050982 = fieldWeight in 3949, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3949)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Purpose - The object of this study is to develop methods for automatically annotating the argumentative role of sentences in scientific abstracts. Working from Medline abstracts, sentences were classified into four major argumentative roles: objective, method, result, and conclusion. The idea is that, if the role of each sentence can be marked up, then these metadata can be used during information retrieval to seek particular types of information such as novelty, conclusions, methodologies, aims/goals of a scientific piece of work. Design/methodology/approach - Two approaches were tested: linguistic cues and positional heuristics. Linguistic cues are lexico-syntactic patterns modelled as regular expressions implemented in a linguistic parser. Positional heuristics make use of the relative position of a sentence in the abstract to deduce its argumentative class. Findings - The experiments showed that positional heuristics attained a much higher degree of accuracy on Medline abstracts with an F-score of 64 per cent, whereas the linguistic cues only attained an F-score of 12 per cent. This is mostly because sentences from different argumentative roles are not always announced by surface linguistic cues. Research limitations/implications - A limitation to the study was the inability to test other methods to perform this task such as machine learning techniques which have been reported to perform better on Medline abstracts. Also, to compare the results of the study with earlier studies using Medline abstracts, the different argumentative roles present in Medline had to be mapped on to four major argumentative roles. This may have favourably biased the performance of the sentence classification by positional heuristics. Originality/value - To the best of one's knowledge, this study presents the first instance of evaluating linguistic cues and positional heuristics on the same corpus.

0.011942998 = product of:
  0.023885995 = sum of:
    0.023885995 = product of:
      0.04777199 = sum of:
        0.04777199 = weight(_text_:f in 2275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04777199 = score(doc=2275,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18080194 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04536168 = queryNorm
            0.26422277 = fieldWeight in 2275, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2275)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.011942998 = product of:
  0.023885995 = sum of:
    0.023885995 = product of:
      0.04777199 = sum of:
        0.04777199 = weight(_text_:f in 3241) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04777199 = score(doc=3241,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18080194 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04536168 = queryNorm
            0.26422277 = fieldWeight in 3241, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3241)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.011942998 = product of:
  0.023885995 = sum of:
    0.023885995 = product of:
      0.04777199 = sum of:
        0.04777199 = weight(_text_:f in 3591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04777199 = score(doc=3591,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18080194 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04536168 = queryNorm
            0.26422277 = fieldWeight in 3591, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3591)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.009952499 = product of:
  0.019904997 = sum of:
    0.019904997 = product of:
      0.039809994 = sum of:
        0.039809994 = weight(_text_:f in 1853) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.039809994 = score(doc=1853,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18080194 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04536168 = queryNorm
            0.22018565 = fieldWeight in 1853, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1853)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.009952499 = product of:
  0.019904997 = sum of:
    0.019904997 = product of:
      0.039809994 = sum of:
        0.039809994 = weight(_text_:f in 3624) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.039809994 = score(doc=3624,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18080194 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04536168 = queryNorm
            0.22018565 = fieldWeight in 3624, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3624)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.007961999 = product of:
  0.015923997 = sum of:
    0.015923997 = product of:
      0.031847995 = sum of:
        0.031847995 = weight(_text_:f in 5595) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031847995 = score(doc=5595,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18080194 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04536168 = queryNorm
            0.17614852 = fieldWeight in 5595, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5595)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)