Search (30 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Theorie verbaler Dokumentationssprachen"
  1. Ruge, G.: ¬A spreading activation network for automatic generation of thesaurus relationships (1991) 0.09
    0.09415379 = product of:
      0.14123069 = sum of:
        0.09844389 = weight(_text_:g in 4506) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09844389 = score(doc=4506,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1694479 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04511456 = queryNorm
            0.5809685 = fieldWeight in 4506, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4506)
        0.0427868 = product of:
          0.0855736 = sum of:
            0.0855736 = weight(_text_:22 in 4506) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0855736 = score(doc=4506,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1579835 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04511456 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4506, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4506)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    8.10.2000 11:52:22
  2. Bhattacharyya, G.: ¬A general theory of subject headings (1974) 0.04
    0.037502434 = product of:
      0.1125073 = sum of:
        0.1125073 = weight(_text_:g in 1592) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1125073 = score(doc=1592,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1694479 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04511456 = queryNorm
            0.663964 = fieldWeight in 1592, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1592)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  3. Salton, G.: Experiments in automatic thesaurus construction for information retrieval (1972) 0.03
    0.03281463 = product of:
      0.09844389 = sum of:
        0.09844389 = weight(_text_:g in 5314) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09844389 = score(doc=5314,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1694479 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04511456 = queryNorm
            0.5809685 = fieldWeight in 5314, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5314)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  4. Boteram, F.: Semantische Relationen in Dokumentationssprachen : vom Thesaurus zum semantischen Netz (2010) 0.02
    0.0225408 = product of:
      0.0676224 = sum of:
        0.0676224 = sum of:
          0.024835603 = weight(_text_:von in 4792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.024835603 = score(doc=4792,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.120363325 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04511456 = queryNorm
              0.20633863 = fieldWeight in 4792, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4792)
          0.0427868 = weight(_text_:22 in 4792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0427868 = score(doc=4792,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1579835 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04511456 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4792, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4792)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Moderne Verfahren des Information Retrieval verlangen nach aussagekräftigen und detailliert relationierten Dokumentationssprachen. Der selektive Transfer einzelner Modellierungsstrategien aus dem Bereich semantischer Technologien für die Gestaltung und Relationierung bestehender Dokumentationssprachen wird diskutiert. In Form einer Taxonomie wird ein hierarchisch strukturiertes Relationeninventar definiert, welches sowohl hinreichend allgemeine als auch zahlreiche spezifische Relationstypen enthält, die eine detaillierte und damit aussagekräftige Relationierung des Vokabulars ermöglichen. Das bringt einen Zugewinn an Übersichtlichkeit und Funktionalität. Im Gegensatz zu anderen Ansätzen und Überlegungen zur Schaffung von Relationeninventaren entwickelt der vorgestellte Vorschlag das Relationeninventar aus der Begriffsmenge eines bestehenden Gegenstandsbereichs heraus.
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
  5. Compatibility and integration of order systems : Research Seminar Proceedings of the TIP/ISKO Meeting, Warsaw, 13-15 September 1995 (1996) 0.02
    0.016573891 = product of:
      0.049721673 = sum of:
        0.049721673 = weight(_text_:g in 6050) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049721673 = score(doc=6050,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1694479 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04511456 = queryNorm
            0.2934334 = fieldWeight in 6050, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6050)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: SCHMITZ-ESSER, W.: Language of general communication and concept compatibility; RIESTHUIS, G.: Theory of compatibility of information languages; DAHLBERG, I.: The compatibility guidelines - a re-evaluation; SOERGEL, D.: Data structure and software support for integrated thesauri; MURASZKIEWICZ, M., H. RYBINSKI u. W. STRUK: Software problems of merging multilingual thesauri; CHMIELEWSKA-GORCZYCA, E.: Compatibility of indexing tools in multidatabase environment; NEGRINI, G.: Towards structural compatibility between concept systems; SCIBOR, E.: Some remarks on the establishment of concordances between a universal classification system and an interdisciplinary thesaurus; HOPPE, S.: The UMLS - a model for knowledge integration in a subject field; DEXTRE-CLARKE, S.: Integrating thesauri in the agricultural sciences; ROULIN, C.: Bringing multilingual thesauri together: a feasibility study; ZIMMERMANN, H.: Conception and application possibilities of classification concordances in an OPAC environment; SOSINSKA-KALATA, B.: The Universal Decimal Classification as an international standard for knowledge organization in bibliographic databases and library catalogues; WOZNIAK, J. u. T. GLOWACKA: KABA Subject Authority File - an example of an integrated Polish-French-English subject headings system; BABIK, W.: Terminology as a level for the compatibility of indexing languages - some remarks; STANCIKOVA, P.: International integrated database systems linked to multilingual thesauri covering the field of environment and agriculture; SAMEK, T.: Indexing languages integration and the EUROVOC Thesaurus in the Czech Republic; SIWEK, K.: Compatibility discrepancies between Polish and foreign databases; GLINSKI, W. u. M. MURASZKIEWICZ: An intelligent front-end processor for accessing information systems
  6. Mikacic, M.: Statistical system for subject designation (SSSD) for libraries in Croatia (1996) 0.01
    0.011525652 = product of:
      0.034576956 = sum of:
        0.034576956 = product of:
          0.06915391 = sum of:
            0.06915391 = weight(_text_:22 in 2943) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06915391 = score(doc=2943,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1579835 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04511456 = queryNorm
                0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2943, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2943)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    31. 7.2006 14:22:21
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) no.1, S.77-93
  7. Neet, H.: Assoziationsrelationen in Dokumentationslexika für die verbale Sacherschließung (1984) 0.01
    0.010577924 = product of:
      0.03173377 = sum of:
        0.03173377 = product of:
          0.06346754 = sum of:
            0.06346754 = weight(_text_:von in 1254) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06346754 = score(doc=1254,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.120363325 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04511456 = queryNorm
                0.52729964 = fieldWeight in 1254, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1254)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Thesauri und Dokumentationslexika können als Varianten von onomasiologischen Wörterbüchern aufgefaßt werden, deren besonderes Interesse für die Linguistik darin besteht, daß Äquivalenz-, Hierarchie- und Assoziationsrelationen angegegeben werden. Regelwerke und Beiträge werden besprochen, die sich mit der Ausweisung von "verwandten" Begriffen in der bibliothekarischen und dokumentarischen Praxis befassen. Belege zu Musterbeispielen von "siehe auch"- und "related term"-Verweisungen werden anhand von drei deutschsprachigen Schlagwortregistern aufgelistet. Die Assoziationsrelationen werden in paradigmatische und syntagmatische Beziehungen eingeteilt. Auch Gruppierungen nach Begriffsfeldern und Assoziationsfeldern sind möglich. Untersuchungen von Assoziationsrelationen im Sachbereich "Buchwesen" bestätigen die Vermutung, daß die Mehrzahl der Verweisungen das gemeinsame Vorkommen bestimmter Begriffe in typischen Kontexten der außersprachlichen Wirklichkeit betrifft.
  8. Schmitz-Esser, W.: Language of general communication and concept compatibility (1996) 0.01
    0.010187333 = product of:
      0.030562 = sum of:
        0.030562 = product of:
          0.061124 = sum of:
            0.061124 = weight(_text_:22 in 6089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.061124 = score(doc=6089,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1579835 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04511456 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 6089, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6089)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Pages
    S.11-22
  9. Krömmelbein, U.: Natürliche Sprache und Strukturprinzipien von Dokumentationssprachen : eine vergleichende Analyse (1981) 0.01
    0.009461182 = product of:
      0.028383546 = sum of:
        0.028383546 = product of:
          0.05676709 = sum of:
            0.05676709 = weight(_text_:von in 1372) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05676709 = score(doc=1372,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.120363325 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04511456 = queryNorm
                0.47163114 = fieldWeight in 1372, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1372)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  10. Fugmann, R.: ¬Die Grenzen des Thesaurus-Verfahrens bei der Wiedergabe von Begriffsrelationen (1975) 0.01
    0.009461182 = product of:
      0.028383546 = sum of:
        0.028383546 = product of:
          0.05676709 = sum of:
            0.05676709 = weight(_text_:von in 4765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05676709 = score(doc=4765,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.120363325 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04511456 = queryNorm
                0.47163114 = fieldWeight in 4765, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4765)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  11. Dahlberg, I.: Über Gegenstände, Begriffe, Definitionen und Benennungen: zur möglichen Neufassung von DIN 2330 (1976) 0.01
    0.009461182 = product of:
      0.028383546 = sum of:
        0.028383546 = product of:
          0.05676709 = sum of:
            0.05676709 = weight(_text_:von in 1390) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05676709 = score(doc=1390,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.120363325 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04511456 = queryNorm
                0.47163114 = fieldWeight in 1390, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1390)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  12. ALA / Subcommittee on Subject Relationships/Reference Structures: Final Report to the ALCTS/CCS Subject Analysis Committee (1997) 0.01
    0.008203657 = product of:
      0.024610972 = sum of:
        0.024610972 = weight(_text_:g in 1800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024610972 = score(doc=1800,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1694479 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04511456 = queryNorm
            0.14524212 = fieldWeight in 1800, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1800)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Content
    Enthält: Appendix A: Subcommittee on Subject Relationships/Reference Structures - REPORT TO THE ALCTS/CCS SUBJECT ANALYSIS COMMITTEE - July 1996 Appendix B (part 1): Taxonomy of Subject Relationships. Compiled by Dee Michel with the assistance of Pat Kuhr - June 1996 draft (alphabetical display) (Separat in: http://web2.ala.org/ala/alctscontent/CCS/committees/subjectanalysis/subjectrelations/msrscu2.pdf) Appendix B (part 2): Taxonomy of Subject Relationships. Compiled by Dee Michel with the assistance of Pat Kuhr - June 1996 draft (hierarchical display) Appendix C: Checklist of Candidate Subject Relationships for Information Retrieval. Compiled by Dee Michel, Pat Kuhr, and Jane Greenberg; edited by Greg Wool - June 1997 Appendix D: Review of Reference Displays in Selected CD-ROM Abstracts and Indexes by Harriette Hemmasi and Steven Riel Appendix E: Analysis of Relationships in Six LC Subject Authority Records by Harriette Hemmasi and Gary Strawn Appendix F: Report of a Preliminary Survey of Subject Referencing in OPACs by Gregory Wool Appendix G: LC Subject Referencing in OPACs--Why Bother? by Gregory Wool Appendix H: Research Needs on Subject Relationships and Reference Structures in Information Access compiled by Jane Greenberg and Steven Riel with contributions from Dee Michel and others edited by Gregory Wool Appendix I: Bibliography on Subject Relationships compiled mostly by Dee Michel with additional contributions from Jane Greenberg, Steven Riel, and Gregory Wool
  13. Degez, D.: Compatibilité des langages d'indexation mariage, cohabitation ou fusion? : Quelques examples concrèts (1998) 0.01
    0.007131133 = product of:
      0.0213934 = sum of:
        0.0213934 = product of:
          0.0427868 = sum of:
            0.0427868 = weight(_text_:22 in 2245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0427868 = score(doc=2245,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1579835 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04511456 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2245, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2245)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
  14. Dextre Clarke, S.G.: Thesaural relationships (2001) 0.01
    0.007131133 = product of:
      0.0213934 = sum of:
        0.0213934 = product of:
          0.0427868 = sum of:
            0.0427868 = weight(_text_:22 in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0427868 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1579835 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04511456 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 9.2007 15:45:57
  15. DIN 31623: Indexierung zur inhaltlichen Erschließung von Dokumenten : T.1: Begriffe, Grundlagen; T.2: Gleichordnende Indexierung mit Deskriptoren; T.3: Syntaktische Indexierung mit Deskriptoren (1988) 0.01
    0.0070958864 = product of:
      0.02128766 = sum of:
        0.02128766 = product of:
          0.04257532 = sum of:
            0.04257532 = weight(_text_:von in 832) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04257532 = score(doc=832,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.120363325 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04511456 = queryNorm
                0.35372335 = fieldWeight in 832, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=832)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  16. Sechser, O.: Beziehungen im Sprachsystem und in Texten (1992) 0.01
    0.0070958864 = product of:
      0.02128766 = sum of:
        0.02128766 = product of:
          0.04257532 = sum of:
            0.04257532 = weight(_text_:von in 1369) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04257532 = score(doc=1369,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.120363325 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04511456 = queryNorm
                0.35372335 = fieldWeight in 1369, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1369)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Kognitive Ansätze zum Ordnen und Darstellen von Wissen. 2. Tagung der Deutschen ISKO Sektion einschl. der Vorträge des Workshops "Thesauri als Werkzeuge der Sprachtechnologie", Weilburg, 15.-18.10.1991
  17. Fugmann, R.: ¬Die Funktion von semantischen Kategorien in Indexierungssprachen und bei der Indexierung (1986) 0.01
    0.0061452184 = product of:
      0.018435655 = sum of:
        0.018435655 = product of:
          0.03687131 = sum of:
            0.03687131 = weight(_text_:von in 1554) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03687131 = score(doc=1554,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.120363325 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04511456 = queryNorm
                0.30633342 = fieldWeight in 1554, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1554)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Wenn man unter "Indexierung" den zweistufigen Prozeß (a) des Erkennens der Essenz eines wiederauffindbar zu machenden Textes und (b) des Wiedergebens dieser Essenz in einer ausreichend wiedergabetreuen und genügend gut voraussagbaren Form versteht, dann kann die Qualität der Indexierung gesteigert werden, wenn sie unter besonderer Beachtung der Begriffe aus einer kleinen Zahl von besonders wichtigen semantischen Kategorien erfolgt. Bei der Gestaltung der Indexierungssprache müssen die Begriffe aus diesen Kategorien in der erforderlichen Detailliertheit in den Wortschatz aufgenommen werden, und Präkombinationen, die zu "multikategorialen" Begroffen führen, sind möglichst weitgehend zu vermeiden. Präkombinationen, die ausschließlich durch Einbeziehung von häufig vorkommenden ("ubiquitätren") monokategorialen Begriffen gebildet werden, können und sollen aus pragmatischen Gründen für den Wortschatz zugelassen werden. Das Konzept des "Relationenweges" erklärt, inwiefern solche Präkombinationen für den Wortschatz nicht schädlich sind
  18. Maniez, J.: Fusion de banques de donnees documentaires at compatibilite des languages d'indexation (1997) 0.01
    0.0061124 = product of:
      0.0183372 = sum of:
        0.0183372 = product of:
          0.0366744 = sum of:
            0.0366744 = weight(_text_:22 in 2246) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0366744 = score(doc=2246,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1579835 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04511456 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2246, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2246)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
  19. Fugmann, R.: Theoretische Grundlagen der Indexierungspraxis (1985) 0.01
    0.005913239 = product of:
      0.017739717 = sum of:
        0.017739717 = product of:
          0.035479434 = sum of:
            0.035479434 = weight(_text_:von in 280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035479434 = score(doc=280,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.120363325 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04511456 = queryNorm
                0.29476947 = fieldWeight in 280, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=280)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Content
    Enthält in gut verständlicher Form u.a. eine Darstellung der Konzepte 'Vorhersagbarkeit' und 'Wiedergabetreue' von Elementen einer Indexierungssprache
  20. Casagrande, J.B.; Hale, K.L.: Semantic relations in Papago folk definitions (1967) 0.01
    0.005913239 = product of:
      0.017739717 = sum of:
        0.017739717 = product of:
          0.035479434 = sum of:
            0.035479434 = weight(_text_:von in 1194) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035479434 = score(doc=1194,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.120363325 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04511456 = queryNorm
                0.29476947 = fieldWeight in 1194, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1194)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Studie zu Typen von Begriffsrelationen