-
¬Die deutsche Zeitschrift für Dokumentation, Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis von 1950 bis 2011 : eine vorläufige Bilanz in vier Abschnitten (2012)
0.06
0.06041386 = product of:
0.12082772 = sum of:
0.12082772 = sum of:
0.038015775 = weight(_text_:k in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038015775 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16064468 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.04500131 = queryNorm
0.23664509 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
0.046229605 = weight(_text_:r in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046229605 = score(doc=402,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14896595 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.04500131 = queryNorm
0.3103367 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
0.036582336 = weight(_text_:22 in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036582336 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15758692 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04500131 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2012 19:35:26
- Footnote
- Besteht aus 4 Teilen: Teil 1: Eden, D., A. Arndt, A. Hoffer, T. Raschke u. P. Schön: Die Nachrichten für Dokumentation in den Jahren 1950 bis 1962 (S.159-163). Teil 2: Brose, M., E. durst, D. Nitzsche, D. Veckenstedt u. R. Wein: Statistische Untersuchung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) 1963-1975 (S.164-170). Teil 3: Bösel, J., G. Ebert, P. Garz,, M. Iwanow u. B. Russ: Methoden und Ergebnisse einer statistischen Auswertung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) 1976 bis 1988 (S.171-174). Teil 4: Engelage, H., S. Jansen, R. Mertins, K. Redel u. S. Ring: Statistische Untersuchung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) / "Information. Wissenschaft & Praxis" (IWP) 1989-2011 (S.164-170).
-
Liu, D.-R.; Shih, M.-J.: Hybrid-patent classification based on patent-network analysis (2011)
0.04
0.044703074 = product of:
0.08940615 = sum of:
0.08940615 = sum of:
0.03167981 = weight(_text_:k in 4189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03167981 = score(doc=4189,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16064468 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.04500131 = queryNorm
0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 4189, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4189)
0.027241055 = weight(_text_:r in 4189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027241055 = score(doc=4189,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14896595 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.04500131 = queryNorm
0.18286766 = fieldWeight in 4189, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4189)
0.030485282 = weight(_text_:22 in 4189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030485282 = score(doc=4189,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15758692 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04500131 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4189, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4189)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Effective patent management is essential for organizations to maintain their competitive advantage. The classification of patents is a critical part of patent management and industrial analysis. This study proposes a hybrid-patent-classification approach that combines a novel patent-network-based classification method with three conventional classification methods to analyze query patents and predict their classes. The novel patent network contains various types of nodes that represent different features extracted from patent documents. The nodes are connected based on the relationship metrics derived from the patent metadata. The proposed classification method predicts a query patent's class by analyzing all reachable nodes in the patent network and calculating their relevance to the query patent. It then classifies the query patent with a modified k-nearest neighbor classifier. To further improve the approach, we combine it with content-based, citation-based, and metadata-based classification methods to develop a hybrid-classification approach. We evaluate the performance of the hybrid approach on a test dataset of patent documents obtained from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, and compare its performance with that of the three conventional methods. The results demonstrate that the proposed patent-network-based approach yields more accurate class predictions than the patent network-based approach.
- Date
- 22. 1.2011 13:04:21
-
Falkingham, L.T.; Reeves, R.: Context analysis : a technique for analysing research in a field, applied to literature on the management of R&D at the section level (1998)
0.04
0.039651453 = product of:
0.07930291 = sum of:
0.07930291 = product of:
0.11895435 = sum of:
0.07627496 = weight(_text_:r in 3689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07627496 = score(doc=3689,freq=8.0), product of:
0.14896595 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.04500131 = queryNorm
0.51202947 = fieldWeight in 3689, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3689)
0.04267939 = weight(_text_:22 in 3689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04267939 = score(doc=3689,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15758692 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04500131 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3689, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3689)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Context analysis is a new method for appraising a body of publications. the process consists of creating a database of attributes assigned to each paper by the reviewer and then looking for interesting relationships in the data. Assigning the attributes requires an understanding of the subject matter of the papers. Presents findings about one particular research field, Management of R&D at the Section Level. The findings support the view that this body of academic publications does not meet the needs of practitioner R&D managers. Discusses practical aspects of how to apply the method in other fields
- Date
- 22. 5.1999 19:18:46
-
Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: Introduction to informetrics : quantitative methods in library, documentation and information science (1990)
0.03
0.033620104 = product of:
0.06724021 = sum of:
0.06724021 = product of:
0.100860305 = sum of:
0.062722825 = weight(_text_:k in 1515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.062722825 = score(doc=1515,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16064468 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.04500131 = queryNorm
0.39044446 = fieldWeight in 1515, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1515)
0.03813748 = weight(_text_:r in 1515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03813748 = score(doc=1515,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14896595 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.04500131 = queryNorm
0.25601473 = fieldWeight in 1515, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1515)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Classification
- BCGS (FH K)
- GHBS
- BCGS (FH K)
-
Grazia Colonia; Dimmler, E.; Dresel, R.; Messner, C.; Krobath, A.; Petz, S.; Sypien, M.; Boxen, P. van; Harders, M.; Heuer, D.; Jordans, I.; Juchem, K.; Linnertz, M.; Mittelhuber, I.; Schwammel, S.; Schlögl, C.; Stock, W.G.: Informationswissenschaftliche Zeitschriften in szientometrischer Analyse (2002)
0.03
0.032762095 = product of:
0.06552419 = sum of:
0.06552419 = product of:
0.09828628 = sum of:
0.044351738 = weight(_text_:k in 1075) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044351738 = score(doc=1075,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16064468 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.04500131 = queryNorm
0.27608594 = fieldWeight in 1075, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1075)
0.05393454 = weight(_text_:r in 1075) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05393454 = score(doc=1075,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14896595 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.04500131 = queryNorm
0.3620595 = fieldWeight in 1075, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1075)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Type
- r
-
Bornmann, L.; Mutz, R.: From P100 to P100' : a new citation-rank approach (2014)
0.03
0.030787379 = product of:
0.061574757 = sum of:
0.061574757 = product of:
0.092362136 = sum of:
0.04358569 = weight(_text_:r in 1431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04358569 = score(doc=1431,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14896595 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.04500131 = queryNorm
0.29258826 = fieldWeight in 1431, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1431)
0.048776448 = weight(_text_:22 in 1431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048776448 = score(doc=1431,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15758692 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04500131 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1431, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1431)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 8.2014 17:05:18
-
Schreiber, M.: Inconsistencies of recently proposed citation impact indicators and how to avoid them (2012)
0.03
0.027775567 = product of:
0.055551134 = sum of:
0.055551134 = product of:
0.0833267 = sum of:
0.04480202 = weight(_text_:k in 459) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04480202 = score(doc=459,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16064468 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.04500131 = queryNorm
0.2788889 = fieldWeight in 459, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=459)
0.038524672 = weight(_text_:r in 459) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038524672 = score(doc=459,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14896595 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.04500131 = queryNorm
0.25861394 = fieldWeight in 459, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=459)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- It is shown that under certain circumstances in particular for small data sets, the recently proposed citation impact indicators I3(6PR) and R(6,k) behave inconsistently when additional papers or citations are taken into consideration. Three simple examples are presented, in which the indicators fluctuate strongly and the ranking of scientists in the evaluated group is sometimes completely mixed up by minor changes in the database. The erratic behavior is traced to the specific way in which weights are attributed to the six percentile rank classes, specifically for the tied papers. For 100 percentile rank classes, the effects will be less serious. For the six classes, it is demonstrated that a different way of assigning weights avoids these problems, although the nonlinearity of the weights for the different percentile rank classes can still lead to (much less frequent) changes in the ranking. This behavior is not undesired because it can be used to correct for differences in citation behavior in different fields. Remaining deviations from the theoretical value R(6,k) = 1.91 can be avoided by a new scoring rule: the fractional scoring. Previously proposed consistency criteria are amended by another property of strict independence at which a performance indicator should aim.
-
Debackere, K.; Clarysse, B.: Advanced bibliometric methods to model the relationship between entry behavior and networking in emerging technological communities (1998)
0.03
0.027496409 = product of:
0.054992817 = sum of:
0.054992817 = product of:
0.08248922 = sum of:
0.044351738 = weight(_text_:k in 330) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044351738 = score(doc=330,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16064468 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.04500131 = queryNorm
0.27608594 = fieldWeight in 330, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=330)
0.03813748 = weight(_text_:r in 330) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03813748 = score(doc=330,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14896595 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.04500131 = queryNorm
0.25601473 = fieldWeight in 330, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=330)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Organizational ecology and social network theory are used to explain entries in technological communities. Using bibliometric data on 411 organizations in the field of plant biotechnology, we test several hypotheses that entry is not only influenced by the density of the field, but also by the structure of the R&D network within the community. The empirical findings point to the usefulness of bibliometric data in mapping change and evolution in technological communities, as well as to the effects of networking on entry behavior
-
McKeown, K.; Daume III, H.; Chaturvedi, S.; Paparrizos, J.; Thadani, K.; Barrio, P.; Biran, O.; Bothe, S.; Collins, M.; Fleischmann, K.R.; Gravano, L.; Jha, R.; King, B.; McInerney, K.; Moon, T.; Neelakantan, A.; O'Seaghdha, D.; Radev, D.; Templeton, C.; Teufel, S.: Predicting the impact of scientific concepts using full-text features (2016)
0.03
0.027370699 = product of:
0.054741398 = sum of:
0.054741398 = product of:
0.082112096 = sum of:
0.05487104 = weight(_text_:k in 3153) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05487104 = score(doc=3153,freq=6.0), product of:
0.16064468 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.04500131 = queryNorm
0.34156775 = fieldWeight in 3153, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3153)
0.027241055 = weight(_text_:r in 3153) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027241055 = score(doc=3153,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14896595 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.04500131 = queryNorm
0.18286766 = fieldWeight in 3153, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3153)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Ahlgren, P.; Jarneving, B.; Rousseau, R.: Requirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson's correlation coefficient (2003)
0.03
0.025923193 = product of:
0.051846385 = sum of:
0.051846385 = product of:
0.07776958 = sum of:
0.053381354 = weight(_text_:r in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053381354 = score(doc=5171,freq=12.0), product of:
0.14896595 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.04500131 = queryNorm
0.358346 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5171)
0.024388224 = weight(_text_:22 in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024388224 = score(doc=5171,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15758692 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04500131 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5171)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Ahlgren, Jarneving, and. Rousseau review accepted procedures for author co-citation analysis first pointing out that since in the raw data matrix the row and column values are identical i,e, the co-citation count of two authors, there is no clear choice for diagonal values. They suggest the number of times an author has been co-cited with himself excluding self citation rather than the common treatment as zeros or as missing values. When the matrix is converted to a similarity matrix the normal procedure is to create a matrix of Pearson's r coefficients between data vectors. Ranking by r and by co-citation frequency and by intuition can easily yield three different orders. It would seem necessary that the adding of zeros to the matrix will not affect the value or the relative order of similarity measures but it is shown that this is not the case with Pearson's r. Using 913 bibliographic descriptions form the Web of Science of articles form JASIS and Scientometrics, authors names were extracted, edited and 12 information retrieval authors and 12 bibliometric authors each from the top 100 most cited were selected. Co-citation and r value (diagonal elements treated as missing) matrices were constructed, and then reconstructed in expanded form. Adding zeros can both change the r value and the ordering of the authors based upon that value. A chi-squared distance measure would not violate these requirements, nor would the cosine coefficient. It is also argued that co-citation data is ordinal data since there is no assurance of an absolute zero number of co-citations, and thus Pearson is not appropriate. The number of ties in co-citation data make the use of the Spearman rank order coefficient problematic.
- Date
- 9. 7.2006 10:22:35
-
Stvilia, B.; Hinnant, C.C.; Schindler, K.; Worrall, A.; Burnett, G.; Burnett, K.; Kazmer, M.M.; Marty, P.F.: Composition of scientific teams and publication productivity at a national science lab (2011)
0.03
0.025095768 = product of:
0.050191537 = sum of:
0.050191537 = product of:
0.075287305 = sum of:
0.04480202 = weight(_text_:k in 4191) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04480202 = score(doc=4191,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16064468 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.04500131 = queryNorm
0.2788889 = fieldWeight in 4191, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4191)
0.030485282 = weight(_text_:22 in 4191) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030485282 = score(doc=4191,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15758692 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04500131 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4191, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4191)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2011 13:19:42
-
Ajiferuke, I.; Lu, K.; Wolfram, D.: ¬A comparison of citer and citation-based measure outcomes for multiple disciplines (2010)
0.02
0.024866037 = product of:
0.049732074 = sum of:
0.049732074 = product of:
0.07459811 = sum of:
0.038015775 = weight(_text_:k in 4000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038015775 = score(doc=4000,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16064468 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.04500131 = queryNorm
0.23664509 = fieldWeight in 4000, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4000)
0.036582336 = weight(_text_:22 in 4000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036582336 = score(doc=4000,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15758692 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04500131 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4000, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4000)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 28. 9.2010 12:54:22
-
Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: Averaging and globalising quotients of informetric and scientometric data (1996)
0.02
0.023090538 = product of:
0.046181075 = sum of:
0.046181075 = product of:
0.06927161 = sum of:
0.03268927 = weight(_text_:r in 7659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03268927 = score(doc=7659,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14896595 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.04500131 = queryNorm
0.2194412 = fieldWeight in 7659, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7659)
0.036582336 = weight(_text_:22 in 7659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036582336 = score(doc=7659,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15758692 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04500131 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 7659, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7659)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.3, S.165-170
-
Asonuma, A.; Fang, Y.; Rousseau, R.: Reflections on the age distribution of Japanese scientists (2006)
0.02
0.023090538 = product of:
0.046181075 = sum of:
0.046181075 = product of:
0.06927161 = sum of:
0.03268927 = weight(_text_:r in 5270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03268927 = score(doc=5270,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14896595 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.04500131 = queryNorm
0.2194412 = fieldWeight in 5270, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5270)
0.036582336 = weight(_text_:22 in 5270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036582336 = score(doc=5270,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15758692 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04500131 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5270, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5270)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:26:24
-
Raan, A.F.J. van: Scaling rules in the science system : influence of field-specific citation characteristics on the impact of research groups (2008)
0.02
0.023090538 = product of:
0.046181075 = sum of:
0.046181075 = product of:
0.06927161 = sum of:
0.03268927 = weight(_text_:r in 2758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03268927 = score(doc=2758,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14896595 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.04500131 = queryNorm
0.2194412 = fieldWeight in 2758, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2758)
0.036582336 = weight(_text_:22 in 2758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036582336 = score(doc=2758,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15758692 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04500131 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2758, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2758)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 19:03:12
- Footnote
- Vgl. auch: Costas, R., M. Bordons u. T.N. van Leeuwen u.a.: Scaling rules in the science system: Influence of field-specific citation characteristics on the impact of individual researchers. In: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.4, S.740-753.
-
Huang, M.-H.; Huang, W.-T.; Chang, C.-C.; Chen, D. Z.; Lin, C.-P.: The greater scattering phenomenon beyond Bradford's law in patent citation (2014)
0.02
0.023090538 = product of:
0.046181075 = sum of:
0.046181075 = product of:
0.06927161 = sum of:
0.03268927 = weight(_text_:r in 1352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03268927 = score(doc=1352,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14896595 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.04500131 = queryNorm
0.2194412 = fieldWeight in 1352, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1352)
0.036582336 = weight(_text_:22 in 1352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036582336 = score(doc=1352,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15758692 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04500131 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1352, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1352)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Patent analysis has become important for management as it offers timely and valuable information to evaluate R&D performance and identify the prospects of patents. This study explores the scattering patterns of patent impact based on citations in 3 distinct technological areas, the liquid crystal, semiconductor, and drug technological areas, to identify the core patents in each area. The research follows the approach from Bradford's law, which equally divides total citations into 3 zones. While the result suggests that the scattering of patent citations corresponded with features of Bradford's law, the proportion of patents in the 3 zones did not match the proportion as proposed by the law. As a result, the study shows that the distributions of citations in all 3 areas were more concentrated than what Bradford's law proposed. The Groos (1967) droop was also presented by the scattering of patent citations, and the growth rate of cumulative citation decreased in the third zone.
- Date
- 22. 8.2014 17:11:29
-
Ntuli, H.; Inglesi-Lotz, R.; Chang, T.; Pouris, A.: Does research output cause economic growth or vice versa? : evidence from 34 OECD countries (2015)
0.02
0.023090538 = product of:
0.046181075 = sum of:
0.046181075 = product of:
0.06927161 = sum of:
0.03268927 = weight(_text_:r in 2132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03268927 = score(doc=2132,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14896595 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.04500131 = queryNorm
0.2194412 = fieldWeight in 2132, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2132)
0.036582336 = weight(_text_:22 in 2132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036582336 = score(doc=2132,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15758692 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04500131 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2132, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2132)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 8. 7.2015 22:00:42
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Bornmann, L.; Wagner, C.S.: ¬The relative influences of government funding and international collaboration on citation impact (2019)
0.02
0.023090538 = product of:
0.046181075 = sum of:
0.046181075 = product of:
0.06927161 = sum of:
0.03268927 = weight(_text_:r in 4681) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03268927 = score(doc=4681,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14896595 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.04500131 = queryNorm
0.2194412 = fieldWeight in 4681, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4681)
0.036582336 = weight(_text_:22 in 4681) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036582336 = score(doc=4681,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15758692 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04500131 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4681, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4681)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- A recent publication in Nature reports that public R&D funding is only weakly correlated with the citation impact of a nation's articles as measured by the field-weighted citation index (FWCI; defined by Scopus). On the basis of the supplementary data, we up-scaled the design using Web of Science data for the decade 2003-2013 and OECD funding data for the corresponding decade assuming a 2-year delay (2001-2011). Using negative binomial regression analysis, we found very small coefficients, but the effects of international collaboration are positive and statistically significant, whereas the effects of government funding are negative, an order of magnitude smaller, and statistically nonsignificant (in two of three analyses). In other words, international collaboration improves the impact of research articles, whereas more government funding tends to have a small adverse effect when comparing OECD countries.
- Date
- 8. 1.2019 18:22:45
-
Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M.: How is science cited on the Web? : a classification of google unique Web citations (2007)
0.02
0.020721696 = product of:
0.041443393 = sum of:
0.041443393 = product of:
0.06216509 = sum of:
0.03167981 = weight(_text_:k in 586) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03167981 = score(doc=586,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16064468 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.04500131 = queryNorm
0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 586, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=586)
0.030485282 = weight(_text_:22 in 586) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030485282 = score(doc=586,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15758692 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04500131 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 586, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=586)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Although the analysis of citations in the scholarly literature is now an established and relatively well understood part of information science, not enough is known about citations that can be found on the Web. In particular, are there new Web types, and if so, are these trivial or potentially useful for studying or evaluating research communication? We sought evidence based upon a sample of 1,577 Web citations of the URLs or titles of research articles in 64 open-access journals from biology, physics, chemistry, and computing. Only 25% represented intellectual impact, from references of Web documents (23%) and other informal scholarly sources (2%). Many of the Web/URL citations were created for general or subject-specific navigation (45%) or for self-publicity (22%). Additional analyses revealed significant disciplinary differences in the types of Google unique Web/URL citations as well as some characteristics of scientific open-access publishing on the Web. We conclude that the Web provides access to a new and different type of citation information, one that may therefore enable us to measure different aspects of research, and the research process in particular; but to obtain good information, the different types should be separated.
-
Shibata, N.; Kajikawa, Y.; Takeda, Y.; Matsushima, K.: Comparative study on methods of detecting research fronts using different types of citation (2009)
0.02
0.020721696 = product of:
0.041443393 = sum of:
0.041443393 = product of:
0.06216509 = sum of:
0.03167981 = weight(_text_:k in 2743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03167981 = score(doc=2743,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16064468 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.04500131 = queryNorm
0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 2743, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2743)
0.030485282 = weight(_text_:22 in 2743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030485282 = score(doc=2743,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15758692 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04500131 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2743, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2743)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 17:52:50
