Search (262 results, page 1 of 14)

  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  1. Rostaing, H.; Barts, N.; Léveillé, V.: Bibliometrics: representation instrument of the multidisciplinary positioning of a scientific area : Implementation for an Advisory Scientific Committee (2007) 0.11
    0.11257879 = sum of:
      0.09108254 = product of:
        0.3187889 = sum of:
          0.1294977 = weight(_text_:de in 1144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.1294977 = score(doc=1144,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.17045991 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                0.039665002 = queryNorm
              0.75969595 = fieldWeight in 1144, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1144)
          0.18929116 = weight(_text_:la in 1144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.18929116 = score(doc=1144,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.22145785 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.583205 = idf(docFreq=451, maxDocs=44218)
                0.039665002 = queryNorm
              0.8547503 = fieldWeight in 1144, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                5.583205 = idf(docFreq=451, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1144)
        0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
      0.021496242 = product of:
        0.042992484 = sum of:
          0.042992484 = weight(_text_:22 in 1144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042992484 = score(doc=1144,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13890009 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.039665002 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1144, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1144)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    30.12.2007 11:22:39
    Imprint
    León : Universidad de León, Secretariado de Publicaciones
    Source
    ¬La interdisciplinariedad y la transdisciplinariedad en la organización del conocimiento científico : actas del VIII Congreso ISKO-España, León, 18, 19 y 20 de Abril de 2007 : Interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in the organization of scientific knowledge. Ed.: B. Rodriguez Bravo u. M.L Alvite Diez
  2. Lewison, G.: ¬The work of the Bibliometrics Research Group (City University) and associates (2005) 0.07
    0.069338284 = product of:
      0.13867657 = sum of:
        0.13867657 = sum of:
          0.074187845 = weight(_text_:g in 4890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.074187845 = score(doc=4890,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14897966 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                0.039665002 = queryNorm
              0.49797297 = fieldWeight in 4890, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4890)
          0.064488724 = weight(_text_:22 in 4890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.064488724 = score(doc=4890,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13890009 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.039665002 = queryNorm
              0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4890, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4890)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2007 17:02:22
  3. Boutin, E.: ¬La recherche d'information sur Internet au prisme de la théorie des facettes (2008) 0.06
    0.060830235 = product of:
      0.12166047 = sum of:
        0.12166047 = product of:
          0.42581162 = sum of:
            0.21198452 = weight(_text_:de in 2800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.21198452 = score(doc=2800,freq=28.0), product of:
                0.17045991 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.039665002 = queryNorm
                1.2436033 = fieldWeight in 2800, product of:
                  5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
                    28.0 = termFreq=28.0
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2800)
            0.2138271 = weight(_text_:la in 2800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.2138271 = score(doc=2800,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.22145785 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.583205 = idf(docFreq=451, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.039665002 = queryNorm
                0.9655431 = fieldWeight in 2800, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  5.583205 = idf(docFreq=451, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2800)
          0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Les occasions sont rares pour un chercheur de porter un regard réflexif sur sa production scientifique. L'objet de ce préambule est précisément de poser les valises et de regarder le chemin parcouru. Nous proposons d'analyser ce chemin à travers trois prismes : - Positionnement et évolution de la recherche en Sciences de l'Information et de la Communication (SIC) - Cohérence du parcours et dynamique de recherche - Collaborations scientifiques suscitées par cette recherche Chacun de ces prismes offre une grille de lecture possible et permet d'éclairer le présent document.
    Content
    Habilitation à Diriger des Recherches, Discipline : Sciences de l'Information et de la Communication, Laboratoire I3M. - Présentée et soutenue publiquement le 9 Octobre 2008.
    Imprint
    Toulon-Var : École doctorale de l'Université du Sud
  4. Visscher, A. De: Response to "remarks on the paper by a. De Visscher, 'what does the g-index really measure?' " (2013) 0.06
    0.058853563 = sum of:
      0.016021188 = product of:
        0.11214831 = sum of:
          0.11214831 = weight(_text_:de in 1052) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.11214831 = score(doc=1052,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.17045991 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                0.039665002 = queryNorm
              0.657916 = fieldWeight in 1052, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1052)
        0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
      0.042832375 = product of:
        0.08566475 = sum of:
          0.08566475 = weight(_text_:g in 1052) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08566475 = score(doc=1052,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.14897966 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                0.039665002 = queryNorm
              0.5750097 = fieldWeight in 1052, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1052)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl.: Visscher, A. De: What does the g-index really measure?. In: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.11, S.2290-2293.
    Object
    g-index
  5. Schreiber, M.: Do we need the g-index? (2013) 0.06
    0.0587084 = sum of:
      0.009249836 = product of:
        0.06474885 = sum of:
          0.06474885 = weight(_text_:de in 1113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06474885 = score(doc=1113,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17045991 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                0.039665002 = queryNorm
              0.37984797 = fieldWeight in 1113, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1113)
        0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
      0.049458563 = product of:
        0.09891713 = sum of:
          0.09891713 = weight(_text_:g in 1113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09891713 = score(doc=1113,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.14897966 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                0.039665002 = queryNorm
              0.663964 = fieldWeight in 1113, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1113)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Using a very small sample of 8 data sets it was recently shown by De Visscher (2011) that the g-index is very close to the square root of the total number of citations. It was argued that there is no bibliometrically meaningful difference. Using another somewhat larger empirical sample of 26 data sets I show that the difference may be larger and I argue in favor of the g-index.
    Object
    g-index
  6. Egghe, L.: Remarks on the paper by A. De Visscher, "what does the g-index really measure?" (2012) 0.05
    0.051496867 = sum of:
      0.014018538 = product of:
        0.098129764 = sum of:
          0.098129764 = weight(_text_:de in 463) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.098129764 = score(doc=463,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.17045991 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                0.039665002 = queryNorm
              0.5756765 = fieldWeight in 463, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=463)
        0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
      0.037478328 = product of:
        0.074956656 = sum of:
          0.074956656 = weight(_text_:g in 463) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.074956656 = score(doc=463,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.14897966 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                0.039665002 = queryNorm
              0.5031335 = fieldWeight in 463, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=463)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The author presents a different view on properties of impact measures than given in the paper of De Visscher (2011). He argues that a good impact measure works better when citations are concentrated rather than spread out over articles. The author also presents theoretical evidence that the g-index and the R-index can be close to the square root of the total number of citations, whereas this is not the case for the A-index. Here the author confirms an assertion of De Visscher.
    Object
    g-index
  7. Visscher, A. De: What does the g-index really measure? (2011) 0.05
    0.050905447 = sum of:
      0.010013242 = product of:
        0.07009269 = sum of:
          0.07009269 = weight(_text_:de in 1053) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07009269 = score(doc=1053,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.17045991 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                0.039665002 = queryNorm
              0.4111975 = fieldWeight in 1053, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1053)
        0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
      0.040892206 = product of:
        0.08178441 = sum of:
          0.08178441 = weight(_text_:g in 1053) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08178441 = score(doc=1053,freq=14.0), product of:
              0.14897966 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                0.039665002 = queryNorm
              0.5489636 = fieldWeight in 1053, product of:
                3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                  14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1053)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    It was argued recently that the g-index is a measure of a researcher's specific impact (i.e., impact per paper) as much as it is a measure of overall impact. While this is true for the productive "core" of publications, it can be argued that the g-index does not differ from the square root of the total number of citations in a bibliometrically meaningful way when the entire publication list is considered. The R-index also has a tendency to follow total impact, leaving only the A-index as a true measure of specific impact. The main difference between the g-index and the h-index is that the former penalizes consistency of impact whereas the latter rewards such consistency. It is concluded that the h-index is a better bibliometric tool than is the g-index, and that the square root of the total number of citations is a convenient measure of a researcher's overall impact.
    Footnote
    Vgl.: Visscher, A. De: Response to "remarks on the paper by a. De Visscher, 'what does the g-index really measure?' ". In: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2013) no.9, S.1960-1962.
    Object
    g-index
  8. Colina, J.: ¬Un algoritmo informetrico para la evaluacion de un vocabulario de busqueda (1995) 0.04
    0.035867143 = product of:
      0.07173429 = sum of:
        0.07173429 = product of:
          0.25107 = sum of:
            0.11446088 = weight(_text_:de in 6755) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11446088 = score(doc=6755,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17045991 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.039665002 = queryNorm
                0.6714827 = fieldWeight in 6755, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6755)
            0.13660912 = weight(_text_:la in 6755) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13660912 = score(doc=6755,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.22145785 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.583205 = idf(docFreq=451, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.039665002 = queryNorm
                0.61686283 = fieldWeight in 6755, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.583205 = idf(docFreq=451, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6755)
          0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  9. D'Angelo, C.A.; Giuffrida, C.; Abramo, G.: ¬A heuristic approach to author name disambiguation in bibliometrics databases for large-scale research assessments (2011) 0.03
    0.034669142 = product of:
      0.069338284 = sum of:
        0.069338284 = sum of:
          0.037093922 = weight(_text_:g in 4190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.037093922 = score(doc=4190,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14897966 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                0.039665002 = queryNorm
              0.24898648 = fieldWeight in 4190, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4190)
          0.032244362 = weight(_text_:22 in 4190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.032244362 = score(doc=4190,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13890009 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.039665002 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4190, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4190)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2011 13:06:52
  10. ¬Die deutsche Zeitschrift für Dokumentation, Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis von 1950 bis 2011 : eine vorläufige Bilanz in vier Abschnitten (2012) 0.03
    0.034669142 = product of:
      0.069338284 = sum of:
        0.069338284 = sum of:
          0.037093922 = weight(_text_:g in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.037093922 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14897966 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                0.039665002 = queryNorm
              0.24898648 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
          0.032244362 = weight(_text_:22 in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.032244362 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13890009 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.039665002 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2012 19:35:26
    Footnote
    Besteht aus 4 Teilen: Teil 1: Eden, D., A. Arndt, A. Hoffer, T. Raschke u. P. Schön: Die Nachrichten für Dokumentation in den Jahren 1950 bis 1962 (S.159-163). Teil 2: Brose, M., E. durst, D. Nitzsche, D. Veckenstedt u. R. Wein: Statistische Untersuchung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) 1963-1975 (S.164-170). Teil 3: Bösel, J., G. Ebert, P. Garz,, M. Iwanow u. B. Russ: Methoden und Ergebnisse einer statistischen Auswertung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) 1976 bis 1988 (S.171-174). Teil 4: Engelage, H., S. Jansen, R. Mertins, K. Redel u. S. Ring: Statistische Untersuchung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) / "Information. Wissenschaft & Praxis" (IWP) 1989-2011 (S.164-170).
  11. Diaz, I.G.; Aguilar, G.S.: Bibliometria comparada sobre tecnologia de informacion : diez anos en la base de datos ERIC (1995) 0.03
    0.033337988 = product of:
      0.066675976 = sum of:
        0.066675976 = product of:
          0.2333659 = sum of:
            0.098129764 = weight(_text_:de in 6388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.098129764 = score(doc=6388,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.17045991 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.039665002 = queryNorm
                0.5756765 = fieldWeight in 6388, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6388)
            0.13523613 = weight(_text_:la in 6388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13523613 = score(doc=6388,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.22145785 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.583205 = idf(docFreq=451, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.039665002 = queryNorm
                0.61066306 = fieldWeight in 6388, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.583205 = idf(docFreq=451, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6388)
          0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Ciencias de la informacion. 26(1995) no.4, S.162-173
  12. Ruiz-Baños, R.; Bailón-Moreno, R.: Metodos para medir experimentalmente el envejecimiento de la literatura cientific (1997) 0.03
    0.033337988 = product of:
      0.066675976 = sum of:
        0.066675976 = product of:
          0.2333659 = sum of:
            0.098129764 = weight(_text_:de in 836) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.098129764 = score(doc=836,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.17045991 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.039665002 = queryNorm
                0.5756765 = fieldWeight in 836, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=836)
            0.13523613 = weight(_text_:la in 836) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13523613 = score(doc=836,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.22145785 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.583205 = idf(docFreq=451, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.039665002 = queryNorm
                0.61066306 = fieldWeight in 836, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.583205 = idf(docFreq=451, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=836)
          0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Boletin de la Asociacion Andaluza de Bibliotecarios. 13(1997) no.46, S.57-75
  13. Avramescu, A.: Teoria difuziei informatiei stiintifice (1997) 0.03
    0.03282775 = sum of:
      0.014018538 = product of:
        0.098129764 = sum of:
          0.098129764 = weight(_text_:de in 3030) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.098129764 = score(doc=3030,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.17045991 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                0.039665002 = queryNorm
              0.5756765 = fieldWeight in 3030, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3030)
        0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
      0.018809212 = product of:
        0.037618425 = sum of:
          0.037618425 = weight(_text_:22 in 3030) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.037618425 = score(doc=3030,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13890009 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.039665002 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3030, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3030)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Contribution to the 30th anniversary issue of 'Probleme de Informare si Documentare' - Reprint of an article which originally appeared in 'Probleme de Informare si Documentare 13(1978) no.2, S.43-64'
    Date
    22. 2.1999 16:16:11
    Source
    Probleme de Informare si Documentare. 31(1997) nos.3/4, S.207-220
  14. Ohly, P.: Dimensions of globality : a bibliometric analysis (2016) 0.03
    0.030746078 = sum of:
      0.009249836 = product of:
        0.06474885 = sum of:
          0.06474885 = weight(_text_:de in 4942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06474885 = score(doc=4942,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17045991 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                0.039665002 = queryNorm
              0.37984797 = fieldWeight in 4942, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4942)
        0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
      0.021496242 = product of:
        0.042992484 = sum of:
          0.042992484 = weight(_text_:22 in 4942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042992484 = score(doc=4942,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13890009 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.039665002 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4942, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4942)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2019 11:22:31
    Source
    Knowledge organization for a sustainable world: challenges and perspectives for cultural, scientific, and technological sharing in a connected society : proceedings of the Fourteenth International ISKO Conference 27-29 September 2016, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil / organized by International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO-Brazil, São Paulo State University ; edited by José Augusto Chaves Guimarães, Suellen Oliveira Milani, Vera Dodebei
  15. Schreiber, M.: Revisiting the g-index : the average number of citations in the g-core (2009) 0.03
    0.03028706 = product of:
      0.06057412 = sum of:
        0.06057412 = product of:
          0.12114824 = sum of:
            0.12114824 = weight(_text_:g in 3313) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12114824 = score(doc=3313,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.14897966 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.039665002 = queryNorm
                0.81318647 = fieldWeight in 3313, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3313)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The g-index is discussed in terms of the average number of citations of the publications in the g-core, showing that it combines features of the h-index and the A-index in one number. For a visualization, data of 8 famous physicists are presented and analyzed. In comparison with the h-index, the g-index increases between 67% and 144%, on average by a factor of 2.
    Object
    g-index
  16. Stvilia, B.; Hinnant, C.C.; Schindler, K.; Worrall, A.; Burnett, G.; Burnett, K.; Kazmer, M.M.; Marty, P.F.: Composition of scientific teams and publication productivity at a national science lab (2011) 0.03
    0.028890952 = product of:
      0.057781905 = sum of:
        0.057781905 = sum of:
          0.030911604 = weight(_text_:g in 4191) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030911604 = score(doc=4191,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14897966 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                0.039665002 = queryNorm
              0.20748875 = fieldWeight in 4191, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4191)
          0.026870303 = weight(_text_:22 in 4191) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.026870303 = score(doc=4191,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13890009 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.039665002 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4191, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4191)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2011 13:19:42
  17. Moed, H.F.; Halevi, G.: On full text download and citation distributions in scientific-scholarly journals (2016) 0.03
    0.028890952 = product of:
      0.057781905 = sum of:
        0.057781905 = sum of:
          0.030911604 = weight(_text_:g in 2646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030911604 = score(doc=2646,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14897966 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                0.039665002 = queryNorm
              0.20748875 = fieldWeight in 2646, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2646)
          0.026870303 = weight(_text_:22 in 2646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.026870303 = score(doc=2646,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13890009 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.039665002 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2646, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2646)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2016 14:11:17
  18. Wang, S.; Ma, Y.; Mao, J.; Bai, Y.; Liang, Z.; Li, G.: Quantifying scientific breakthroughs by a novel disruption indicator based on knowledge entities : On the rise of scrape-and-report scholarship in online reviews research (2023) 0.03
    0.028890952 = product of:
      0.057781905 = sum of:
        0.057781905 = sum of:
          0.030911604 = weight(_text_:g in 882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030911604 = score(doc=882,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14897966 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                0.039665002 = queryNorm
              0.20748875 = fieldWeight in 882, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=882)
          0.026870303 = weight(_text_:22 in 882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.026870303 = score(doc=882,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13890009 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.039665002 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 882, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=882)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2023 18:37:33
  19. Cerda-Cosme, R.; Méndez, E.: Analysis of shared research data in Spanish scientific papers about COVID-19 : a first approach (2023) 0.03
    0.028890952 = product of:
      0.057781905 = sum of:
        0.057781905 = sum of:
          0.030911604 = weight(_text_:g in 916) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030911604 = score(doc=916,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14897966 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                0.039665002 = queryNorm
              0.20748875 = fieldWeight in 916, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=916)
          0.026870303 = weight(_text_:22 in 916) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.026870303 = score(doc=916,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13890009 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.039665002 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 916, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=916)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    During the coronavirus pandemic, changes in the way science is done and shared occurred, which motivates meta-research to help understand science communication in crises and improve its effectiveness. The objective is to study how many Spanish scientific papers on COVID-19 published during 2020 share their research data. Qualitative and descriptive study applying nine attributes: (a) availability, (b) accessibility, (c) format, (d) licensing, (e) linkage, (f) funding, (g) editorial policy, (h) content, and (i) statistics. We analyzed 1,340 papers, 1,173 (87.5%) did not have research data. A total of 12.5% share their research data of which 2.1% share their data in repositories, 5% share their data through a simple request, 0.2% do not have permission to share their data, and 5.2% share their data as supplementary material. There is a small percentage that shares their research data; however, it demonstrates the researchers' poor knowledge on how to properly share their research data and their lack of knowledge on what is research data.
    Date
    21. 3.2023 19:22:02
  20. Zhang, Y.; Wu, M.; Zhang, G.; Lu, J.: Stepping beyond your comfort zone : diffusion-based network analytics for knowledge trajectory recommendation (2023) 0.03
    0.028890952 = product of:
      0.057781905 = sum of:
        0.057781905 = sum of:
          0.030911604 = weight(_text_:g in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030911604 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14897966 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                0.039665002 = queryNorm
              0.20748875 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
          0.026870303 = weight(_text_:22 in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.026870303 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13890009 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.039665002 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2023 18:07:12

Authors

Languages

  • e 235
  • d 20
  • sp 4
  • f 1
  • m 1
  • ro 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 251
  • m 7
  • el 4
  • s 4
  • x 2
  • More… Less…