Search (24 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Citation indexing"
  1. Garfield, E.: Essays of an information scientist (1977-) 0.02
    0.01633175 = product of:
      0.04899525 = sum of:
        0.04899525 = product of:
          0.0979905 = sum of:
            0.0979905 = weight(_text_:u.a in 2015) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0979905 = score(doc=2015,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19672036 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.5084743 = idf(docFreq=1323, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043633465 = queryNorm
                0.49812075 = fieldWeight in 2015, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.5084743 = idf(docFreq=1323, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2015)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Footnote
    U.a. Wiedergabe der Beiträge von E. Garfield in der Rubrik 'Current comments' in den 'Current contents'
  2. Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007) 0.02
    0.01576462 = product of:
      0.047293857 = sum of:
        0.047293857 = product of:
          0.09458771 = sum of:
            0.09458771 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09458771 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15279695 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043633465 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    13. 7.2008 19:53:22
  3. Døsen, K.: One more reference on self-reference (1992) 0.02
    0.01576462 = product of:
      0.047293857 = sum of:
        0.047293857 = product of:
          0.09458771 = sum of:
            0.09458771 = weight(_text_:22 in 4604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09458771 = score(doc=4604,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15279695 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043633465 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4604, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4604)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    7. 2.2005 14:10:22
  4. Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001) 0.01
    0.013934086 = product of:
      0.041802257 = sum of:
        0.041802257 = product of:
          0.083604515 = sum of:
            0.083604515 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.083604515 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15279695 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043633465 = queryNorm
                0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:22:28
  5. Gering, E.: ¬Die Analyse von Online-Datenbanken : ein Instrument für das Beobachten von Forschungsaktivitäten; dargestellt an einem Forschungsfeld der Festkörperphysik (1995) 0.01
    0.0130654 = product of:
      0.039196197 = sum of:
        0.039196197 = product of:
          0.078392394 = sum of:
            0.078392394 = weight(_text_:u.a in 2660) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.078392394 = score(doc=2660,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19672036 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.5084743 = idf(docFreq=1323, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043633465 = queryNorm
                0.3984966 = fieldWeight in 2660, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.5084743 = idf(docFreq=1323, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2660)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Sinnvolle forschungspolitische bzw. forschungsstrategische Entscheidungsprozesse bedürfen beim Wissenschafts- und Forschungsmanagement ausreichender Informationen hinsichtlich der Forschungsaktivitäten bestimmter Wissenschaftlergruppen, Institutionen bzw. Länder. Durch entsprechende Vergleichsuntersuchungen lassen sich u.a. auch thematische, länderweite bzw. zeitkritische Forschungsschwerpunkte herausarbeiten. Die folgende Arbeit skizziert die Möglichkeiten von Forschungsanalysen mittels Online-Datenbanken und verdeutlicht die spezifischen Möglichekeiten und Probleme am Beispiel von Arbeiten aus der Festkörperphysik
  6. Glänzel, W.: Visual bibliometrics : eine visuelle Oberfläche zur Erweiterung der Nutzungsmöglichkeiten bibliographischer Datenbanken (1996) 0.01
    0.011432225 = product of:
      0.034296673 = sum of:
        0.034296673 = product of:
          0.068593346 = sum of:
            0.068593346 = weight(_text_:u.a in 6110) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.068593346 = score(doc=6110,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19672036 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.5084743 = idf(docFreq=1323, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043633465 = queryNorm
                0.34868452 = fieldWeight in 6110, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.5084743 = idf(docFreq=1323, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6110)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Herausforderungen an die Informationswirtschaft: Informationsverdichtung, Informationsbewertung und Datenvisualisierung. Proceedings des 5. Internationalen Symposiums für Informationswissenschaft (ISI'96), Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 17.-19. Oktober 1996. Hrsg.: J. Krause u.a
  7. Garfield, E.; Stock, W.G.: Citation Consciousness : Interview with Eugene Garfiels, chairman emeritus of ISI; Philadelphia (2002) 0.01
    0.009852887 = product of:
      0.02955866 = sum of:
        0.02955866 = product of:
          0.05911732 = sum of:
            0.05911732 = weight(_text_:22 in 613) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05911732 = score(doc=613,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15279695 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043633465 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 613, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=613)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Password. 2002, H.6, S.22-25
  8. Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.; Archambault, E.: ¬The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007 (2009) 0.01
    0.008360452 = product of:
      0.025081355 = sum of:
        0.025081355 = product of:
          0.05016271 = sum of:
            0.05016271 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05016271 = score(doc=2763,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15279695 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043633465 = queryNorm
                0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:22:35
  9. Stock, W.G.: Publikation und Zitat : Die problematische Basis empirischer Wissenschaftsforschung (2001) 0.01
    0.008165875 = product of:
      0.024497624 = sum of:
        0.024497624 = product of:
          0.04899525 = sum of:
            0.04899525 = weight(_text_:u.a in 5787) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04899525 = score(doc=5787,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19672036 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.5084743 = idf(docFreq=1323, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043633465 = queryNorm
                0.24906038 = fieldWeight in 5787, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.5084743 = idf(docFreq=1323, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5787)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Die empirische Wissenschaftsforschung arbeitet bei den Indikatoren wissenschaftlicher Leistung und wissenschaftlicher Wirkung mit Publikations- und Zitationsraten. Die vorliegende Arbeit befaßt sich mit dabei auftretenden methodischen Problemen. Was ist überhaupt eine Publikation? Was heißt Zitation? Zentral ist auch die Zählbasis, d.h. die Einheitenbildung: Was ist 1 Publikation? und: Was ist 1 Zitation? Bei Printpublikationen gibt es eine Reihe von beachtenswerten Faktoren (u.a. Mehrautorenwerke, Gewichtungsfaktoren wie den Impact Factor, Dokumenttypen). Bei elektronischen Publikationen im Internet mit ihrem dynamischen Charakter ist die Einheitenbildung noch weitaus problematischer. Zitationen, verstanden als zitierte Publikationen, werfen alle methodischen Probleme der Publikationseinheiten auf, hinzu kommen weitere, spezifische Probleme. Lösungsmöglichkeiten im syntaktischen Bereich (Relativierung auf Textseiten oder Zeichen) ändern am grundlegenden Problem nur wenig, Lösungsversuche im semantischen Bereich (etwa im Rahmen der semantischen Informationstheorie) sind im Rahmen der Publikations- und Zitationsanalysen nicht durchführbar und verweisen sowohl auf themenanalytische Methoden als auch auf die Wissenschaftstheorie. Mit diesem Working Paper wollen wir vor allem auf offene Probleme hinweisen; "endgültige" Lösungen wird der Leser nicht finden, wohl aber Lösungsvorschläge, die meist durchaus noch diskussionswürdig sind. In der Informationswissenschaft wie in der Wissenschaftsforschung sind wir bisher viel zu sicher davon ausgegangen, daß wir wissen, was Publikationen und Zitationen sind
  10. Bensman, S.J.: Eugene Garfield, Francis Narin, and PageRank : the theoretical bases of the Google search engine (2013) 0.01
    0.00788231 = product of:
      0.023646928 = sum of:
        0.023646928 = product of:
          0.047293857 = sum of:
            0.047293857 = weight(_text_:22 in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047293857 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15279695 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043633465 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    17.12.2013 11:02:22
  11. Garfield, E.: Recollections of Irving H. Sher 1924-1996 : Polymath/information scientist extraordinaire (2001) 0.01
    0.0068970206 = product of:
      0.020691061 = sum of:
        0.020691061 = product of:
          0.041382123 = sum of:
            0.041382123 = weight(_text_:22 in 6920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041382123 = score(doc=6920,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15279695 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043633465 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6920, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6920)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    16.12.2001 14:01:22
  12. Van der Veer Martens, B.; Goodrum, G.: ¬The diffusion of theories : a functional approach (2006) 0.01
    0.0068970206 = product of:
      0.020691061 = sum of:
        0.020691061 = product of:
          0.041382123 = sum of:
            0.041382123 = weight(_text_:22 in 5269) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041382123 = score(doc=5269,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15279695 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043633465 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5269, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5269)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:20:01
  13. Tay, A.: ¬The next generation discovery citation indexes : a review of the landscape in 2020 (2020) 0.01
    0.0068970206 = product of:
      0.020691061 = sum of:
        0.020691061 = product of:
          0.041382123 = sum of:
            0.041382123 = weight(_text_:22 in 40) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041382123 = score(doc=40,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15279695 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043633465 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 40, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=40)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    17.11.2020 12:22:59
  14. Campanario, J.M.: Have referees rejected some of the most-cited articles of all times? (1996) 0.01
    0.0059117316 = product of:
      0.017735194 = sum of:
        0.017735194 = product of:
          0.03547039 = sum of:
            0.03547039 = weight(_text_:22 in 4215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03547039 = score(doc=4215,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15279695 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043633465 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4215, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4215)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    In this article a quantitative study is reported on the resistance that scientists may encounter when they do innovative work or when they attempt to publish articles that later become highly cited. A set of 205 commentaries by authors of some of the most-cited papers of all times have been examined in order to identify those articles whose authors encountered difficulty in getting his or her work published. There are 22 commentaries (10,7%) in which authors mention some difficulty or resistance in doing or publishing the research reported in the article. Three of the articles which had problems in being published are the most cited from their respective journals. According the authors' commentaries, although sometimes referees' negative evaluations can help improve the articles, in other instances referees and editors wrongly rejected the highly cited articles
  15. Snyder, H.; Bonzi, S.: Patterns of self-citation across disciplines : 1980-1989 (1998) 0.01
    0.0059117316 = product of:
      0.017735194 = sum of:
        0.017735194 = product of:
          0.03547039 = sum of:
            0.03547039 = weight(_text_:22 in 3692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03547039 = score(doc=3692,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15279695 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043633465 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3692, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3692)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:33:24
  16. wst: Cut-and-paste-Wissenschaft (2003) 0.01
    0.0059117316 = product of:
      0.017735194 = sum of:
        0.017735194 = product of:
          0.03547039 = sum of:
            0.03547039 = weight(_text_:22 in 1270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03547039 = score(doc=1270,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15279695 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043633465 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1270, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1270)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Content
    "Mikhail Simkin und Vwani Roychowdhury von der University of Califomia, Los Angeles, haben eine in der wissenschaftlichen Gemeinschaft verbreitete Unsitte erstmals quantitativ erfasst. Die Wissenschaftler analysierten die Verbreitung von Druckfehlern in den Literaturlisten wissenschaftlicher Arbeiten (www.arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0212043). 78 Prozent aller zitierten Aufsätze - so schätzen die Forscher - haben die zitierenden Wissenschaftler demnach nicht gelesen, sondern nur per 'cut and paste' von einer Vorlage in ihre eigene Literaturliste übernommen. Das könne man beispielsweise abschätzen aus der Analyse fehlerhafter Seitenangaben in der Literaturliste eines 1973 veröffentlichten Aufsatzes über die Struktur zweidimensionaler Kristalle: Dieser Aufsatz ist rund 4300 mal zitiert worden. In 196 Fällen enthalten die Zitate jedoch Fehler in der Jahreszahl, dem Band der Zeitschrift oder der Seitenzahl, die als Indikatoren für cut and paste genommen werden können, denn man kann, obwohl es Milliarden Möglichkeiten gibt, nur 45 verschiedene Arten von Druckfehlern unterscheiden. In erster Näherung ergibt sich eine Obergrenze für die Zahl der `echten Leser' daher aus der Zahl der unterscheidbaren Druckfehler (45) geteilt durch die Gesamtzahl der Publikationen mit Druckfehler (196), das macht etwa 22 Prozent."
  17. Chan, H.C.; Kim, H.-W.; Tan, W.C.: Information systems citation patterns from International Conference on Information Systems articles (2006) 0.01
    0.0059117316 = product of:
      0.017735194 = sum of:
        0.017735194 = product of:
          0.03547039 = sum of:
            0.03547039 = weight(_text_:22 in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03547039 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15279695 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043633465 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    3. 1.2007 17:22:03
  18. H-Index auch im Web of Science (2008) 0.01
    0.0059117316 = product of:
      0.017735194 = sum of:
        0.017735194 = product of:
          0.03547039 = sum of:
            0.03547039 = weight(_text_:22 in 590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03547039 = score(doc=590,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15279695 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043633465 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 590, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=590)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    6. 4.2008 19:04:22
  19. Mingers, J.; Burrell, Q.L.: Modeling citation behavior in Management Science journals (2006) 0.01
    0.0059117316 = product of:
      0.017735194 = sum of:
        0.017735194 = product of:
          0.03547039 = sum of:
            0.03547039 = weight(_text_:22 in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03547039 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15279695 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043633465 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    26.12.2007 19:22:05
  20. Ma, N.; Guan, J.; Zhao, Y.: Bringing PageRank to the citation analysis (2008) 0.01
    0.0059117316 = product of:
      0.017735194 = sum of:
        0.017735194 = product of:
          0.03547039 = sum of:
            0.03547039 = weight(_text_:22 in 2064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03547039 = score(doc=2064,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15279695 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043633465 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2064, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2064)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    31. 7.2008 14:22:05