Search (1542 results, page 2 of 78)

  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. O'Neill, E.T.; Chan, L.M.; Childress, E.; Dean, R.; El-Hoshy, L.M.; Vizine-Goetz, D.: Form subdivisions : their identification and use in LCSH (2001) 0.05 
    0.053686336 = product of:
  0.10737267 = sum of:
    0.10737267 = sum of:
      0.07079144 = weight(_text_:v in 2205) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07079144 = score(doc=2205,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.219214 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
            0.044999957 = queryNorm
          0.32293302 = fieldWeight in 2205, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2205)
      0.036581237 = weight(_text_:22 in 2205) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.036581237 = score(doc=2205,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15758218 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.044999957 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2205, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2205)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Form subdivisions have always been an important part of the Library of Congress Subject Headings. However, when the MARC format was developed, no separate subfield code to identify form subdivisions was defined. Form and topical subdivisions were both included within a general subdivision category. In 1995, the USMARC Advisory Group approved a proposal defining subfield v for form subdivisions, and in 1999 the Library of Congress (LC) began identifying form subdivisions with the new code. However, there are millions of older bibliographic records lacking the explicit form subdivision coding. Identifying form subdivisions retrospectively is not a simple task. An algorithmic method was developed to identify form subdivisions coded as general subdivisions. The algorithm was used to identify 2,563 unique form subdivisions or combinations of form subdivisions in OCLC's WorldCat. The algorithm proved to be highly accurate with an error rate estimated to be less than 0.1%. The observed usage of the form subdivisions was highly skewed with the 100 most used form subdivisions or combinations of subdivisions accounting for 90% of the assignments.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  2. Katzmayr, M.; Putz, M.; Fessler, G.: Evaluationsmethoden zur Bewertung von Aggregatordatenbanken am Beispiel von ProQuest ABI/Inform und EBSCO Business Source Premier (2005) 0.05 
    0.053686336 = product of:
  0.10737267 = sum of:
    0.10737267 = sum of:
      0.07079144 = weight(_text_:v in 3420) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07079144 = score(doc=3420,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.219214 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
            0.044999957 = queryNorm
          0.32293302 = fieldWeight in 3420, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3420)
      0.036581237 = weight(_text_:22 in 3420) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.036581237 = score(doc=3420,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15758218 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.044999957 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3420, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3420)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    An der Universitätsbibliothek der Wirtschaftsuniversität Wien wurden im Rahmen einer Lizenzierungsentscheidung die Datenbanken ABI/Inform Proquest und EBSCO Business Source Premier verglichen. Neben den Ergebnissen wird ein Konzept vorgestellt, wie in der Praxis ein Vergleich zwischen Aggregatordatenbanken bezogen auf den eigenen Bibliotheksbestand durchgeführt werden kann. Ausgehend von einer Beschreibung der Besonderheiten von Aggregatordatenbanken (z.B. Embargos) werden sowohl quantitative (Vergleich der Titellisten, Volltextverfügbarkeit) als auch qualitative (peer-reviewed, Rankings, Indexierung und Abstracting) inhaltliche Kriterien für die Evaluation angeführt. Neben der inhaltlichen Bewertung wurden die Usability der Datenbankoberfläche (v a. Suchmöglichkeiten), das Nutzungsverhalten sowie die Bedürfnisse der Benutzer untersucht. Vor allem bei quantitativen Kriterien schneidet EBSCO Business Source Premier besser ab als ABI/Inform Pro0uest jedoch kann - die budgetären Möglichkeiten vorausgesetzt - aufgrund der mitunter geringen inhaltlichen Überschneidung für eine Lizenzierung beider Datenbanken argumentiert werden.
    Date
    22. 5.2005 12:27:18
  3. Slavic, A.: On the nature and typology of documentary classifications and their use in a networked environment (2007) 0.05 
    0.053686336 = product of:
  0.10737267 = sum of:
    0.10737267 = sum of:
      0.07079144 = weight(_text_:v in 780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07079144 = score(doc=780,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.219214 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
            0.044999957 = queryNorm
          0.32293302 = fieldWeight in 780, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=780)
      0.036581237 = weight(_text_:22 in 780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.036581237 = score(doc=780,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15758218 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.044999957 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 780, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=780)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22.12.2007 17:22:31
    Source
    El profesional de la información, 2007, noviembre-diciembre, v.16, no.6, S.580-589
  4. Haarmann, H.: Geschichte der Schrift (2002) 0.05 
    0.05306521 = product of:
  0.10613042 = sum of:
    0.10613042 = sum of:
      0.08174293 = weight(_text_:v in 6084) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08174293 = score(doc=6084,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.219214 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
            0.044999957 = queryNorm
          0.37289098 = fieldWeight in 6084, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=6084)
      0.024387492 = weight(_text_:22 in 6084) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.024387492 = score(doc=6084,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15758218 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.044999957 = queryNorm
          0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 6084, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=6084)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    12. 2.1996 22:34:46
    Footnote
    Rez. in FR Nr.150 vom 2.7.2003, S.WB3 (F. Ufen): "Langsam spricht es sich herum. Die Schrift ist nicht, wie man lange geglaubt hat, gegen Ende des 4. Jahrtausends v Chr. in Mesopotamien erfunden worden. Es scheint auch nicht zu stimmen, dass nur Gesellschaften, die schon staatlich organisiert und in Klassen gespalten sind, sich Schriftsysteme austüfteln, um sie als Herrschaftsinstrumente einzusetzen. Nach dem heutigen Erkenntnisstand ist die Schrift um 5500 v Chr. in Europa erfunden worden - womit sie mehr als 2000 Jahre älter ist als die Hieroglyphen des prädynastischen Ägyptens und die archaischen piktographischen Zeichen der sumerischen Stadtstaaten. Die älteste Schrift war die Errungenschaft einer Zivilisation, die so egalitär organisiert war, dass sie ohne einen Staatsapparat auskam. Und offensichtlich haben nicht ökonomische, militärische oder politisch-administrative Erfordernisse zur Entwicklung des ersten Schriftsystems geführt, sondern die Notwendigkeit, mit den gesellschaftlichen Folgen einer verheerenden Naturkatastrophe fertig zu werden. Noch lange nach dem Ende der letzten Eiszeit war das Schwarze Meer ein Süßwassersee, der erheblich niedriger als das Mittelmeer lag und mit ihm nur durch eine Landbrücke verbunden war. Doch dann stieg der Wasserspiegel im Gebiet der Dardanellen dramatisch an, bis um 6800 v Chr. schließlich der Riegel gesprengt wurde. Das Mittelmeer brach durch, riesige Wassermassen ergossen sich ins Schwarze Meer und überschwemmten die neolithischen Siedlungen an seinen Küstengebieten. Die Küstenbewohner flohen und ließen sich später am Unterlauf der Donau - im heutigen Bulgarien und Rumänien - nieder, um dort die erste Hochkultur der Weltgeschichte zu begründen. Aus der Schrift, die sie nebenbei erfanden, sollte später die kretische Linear A hervorgehen. Mittlerweile wird vermutet, dass auch die Sumerer bei der Donauzivilisation Anleihen gemacht haben könnten. Die Schrift ist mindestens sechsmal erfunden worden - in Südosteuropa, Mesopotamien, Ägypten, Indien, China und Mesoamerika. Überall beginnt sie als Pikto- und Logographie, während der Übergang zur Phonographie erst spät erfolgt. Auf die Idee, mit dem alphabetischen Schreibprinzip zu experimentieren, ist man allerdings nur im Nahen Osten gekommen. Der Linguist Harald Haarmann hat mit seiner "Universalgeschichte der Schrift" einen Klassiker geschrieben. Wer nicht die Zeit hat zu lesen, was dort auf über 800 Seiten abgehandelt wird, kann aus diesem Abriss das Wesentliche über die Ursprünge, Entwicklungsstadien, Formen, Funktionen und Auswirkungen des Schriftgebrauchs erfahren. Ein hervorragendes Kompendium."
  5. Malaise, V.; Zweigenbaum, P.; Bachimont, B.: Mining defining contexts to help structuring differential ontologies (2005) 0.05 
    0.047194295 = product of:
  0.09438859 = sum of:
    0.09438859 = product of:
      0.18877718 = sum of:
        0.18877718 = weight(_text_:v in 6598) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18877718 = score(doc=6598,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.219214 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044999957 = queryNorm
            0.86115474 = fieldWeight in 6598, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6598)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  6. Windfeld Lund, N.; Smalheiser, N.; Torvik, V.: Author name disambiguation (2009) 0.05 
    0.047194295 = product of:
  0.09438859 = sum of:
    0.09438859 = product of:
      0.18877718 = sum of:
        0.18877718 = weight(_text_:v in 675) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18877718 = score(doc=675,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.219214 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044999957 = queryNorm
            0.86115474 = fieldWeight in 675, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=675)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  7. Brack, V.: ¬The eLib collection description scheme (2000) 0.05 
    0.047194295 = product of:
  0.09438859 = sum of:
    0.09438859 = product of:
      0.18877718 = sum of:
        0.18877718 = weight(_text_:v in 4905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18877718 = score(doc=4905,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.219214 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044999957 = queryNorm
            0.86115474 = fieldWeight in 4905, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4905)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  8. Fugmann, R.: Obstacles to progress in mechanized subject access and the necessity of a paradigm change (2000) 0.04 
    0.044738617 = product of:
  0.08947723 = sum of:
    0.08947723 = sum of:
      0.05899287 = weight(_text_:v in 1182) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05899287 = score(doc=1182,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.219214 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
            0.044999957 = queryNorm
          0.26911086 = fieldWeight in 1182, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1182)
      0.030484365 = weight(_text_:22 in 1182) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.030484365 = score(doc=1182,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15758218 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.044999957 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1182, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1182)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Contemporary information systems, both the private and the commercially available ones, have often been blamed for their low effectiveness in terms of precision and recall, especially when they have reached considerable size with respect to file volume and use frequency (see, for example, Belkin, 1980; Blair, 1996, p.19; Desai, 1997; Drabenstott, 1996; Knorz, 1998). Saracevic (1989), after having reviewed the contemporary design of online subject access, calls "for radically different design principles and implementation" (p. 107). Van Rijsbergen (1990) writes: "The keywords approach with statistical techniques has reached its theoretical limit and further attempts for improvement are considered a waste of time" (p. 111). Lancaster (1992) deplores that very little really significant literature an subject indexing has been published in the last thirty or so years. In her preface to the Proceedings of the Sixth International Study Conference an Classification Research in 1997, Mcllwaine (1997) writes, "many were surprised to find that the problems with which they wrestle today are not greatly different from those that have been occupying the minds of specialists in the field for over a generation, and probably a great deal longer" (p. v).
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
  9. Loia, V.; Pedrycz, W.; Senatore, S.; Sessa, M.I.: Web navigation support by means of proximity-driven assistant agents (2006) 0.04 
    0.044738617 = product of:
  0.08947723 = sum of:
    0.08947723 = sum of:
      0.05899287 = weight(_text_:v in 5283) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05899287 = score(doc=5283,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.219214 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
            0.044999957 = queryNorm
          0.26911086 = fieldWeight in 5283, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5283)
      0.030484365 = weight(_text_:22 in 5283) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.030484365 = score(doc=5283,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15758218 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.044999957 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5283, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5283)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 7.2006 16:59:13
  10. Broughton, V.: Classification and subject organization and retrieval (2007) 0.04 
    0.04129501 = product of:
  0.08259002 = sum of:
    0.08259002 = product of:
      0.16518004 = sum of:
        0.16518004 = weight(_text_:v in 6145) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16518004 = score(doc=6145,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.219214 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044999957 = queryNorm
            0.7535104 = fieldWeight in 6145, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6145)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  11. Norton, M.J.: Introductory concepts in information science (2001) 0.04 
    0.04129501 = product of:
  0.08259002 = sum of:
    0.08259002 = product of:
      0.16518004 = sum of:
        0.16518004 = weight(_text_:v in 8315) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16518004 = score(doc=8315,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.219214 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044999957 = queryNorm
            0.7535104 = fieldWeight in 8315, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8315)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Pages
    V,127 S
  12. Belogonov, G.G.: Metod analogii v komputernoi (2000) 0.04 
    0.04129501 = product of:
  0.08259002 = sum of:
    0.08259002 = product of:
      0.16518004 = sum of:
        0.16518004 = weight(_text_:v in 979) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16518004 = score(doc=979,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.219214 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044999957 = queryNorm
            0.7535104 = fieldWeight in 979, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=979)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  13. Brochard, C.; Ruck, V.: Internet : das sechste Medium? (2000) 0.04 
    0.04129501 = product of:
  0.08259002 = sum of:
    0.08259002 = product of:
      0.16518004 = sum of:
        0.16518004 = weight(_text_:v in 4414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16518004 = score(doc=4414,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.219214 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044999957 = queryNorm
            0.7535104 = fieldWeight in 4414, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4414)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  14. Decker, B.: Data Mining in Öffentlichen Bibliotheken (2000) 0.04 
    0.04129501 = product of:
  0.08259002 = sum of:
    0.08259002 = product of:
      0.16518004 = sum of:
        0.16518004 = weight(_text_:v in 4782) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16518004 = score(doc=4782,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.219214 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044999957 = queryNorm
            0.7535104 = fieldWeight in 4782, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4782)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Pages
    III,45,V S
  15. Fischer, V.: Emotionen in der Digitale : Eine Phänomonologie elektronischer 'devices' (2001) 0.04 
    0.04129501 = product of:
  0.08259002 = sum of:
    0.08259002 = product of:
      0.16518004 = sum of:
        0.16518004 = weight(_text_:v in 6350) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16518004 = score(doc=6350,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.219214 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044999957 = queryNorm
            0.7535104 = fieldWeight in 6350, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6350)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  16. Albus, V.: Suppen ohne Teller : Über Konventionen im Umgang mit Produkten (2001) 0.04 
    0.04129501 = product of:
  0.08259002 = sum of:
    0.08259002 = product of:
      0.16518004 = sum of:
        0.16518004 = weight(_text_:v in 6353) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16518004 = score(doc=6353,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.219214 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044999957 = queryNorm
            0.7535104 = fieldWeight in 6353, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6353)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  17. Broughton, V.: ¬A new classification for the literature of religion (2000) 0.04 
    0.04129501 = product of:
  0.08259002 = sum of:
    0.08259002 = product of:
      0.16518004 = sum of:
        0.16518004 = weight(_text_:v in 353) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16518004 = score(doc=353,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.219214 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044999957 = queryNorm
            0.7535104 = fieldWeight in 353, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=353)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  18. Francu, V.: UDC-based thesauri and multilingual access to information (2004) 0.04 
    0.04129501 = product of:
  0.08259002 = sum of:
    0.08259002 = product of:
      0.16518004 = sum of:
        0.16518004 = weight(_text_:v in 3767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16518004 = score(doc=3767,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.219214 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044999957 = queryNorm
            0.7535104 = fieldWeight in 3767, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3767)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  19. Broughton, V.: ¬A new common auxiliary table for relations, processes and operations (2002) 0.04 
    0.04129501 = product of:
  0.08259002 = sum of:
    0.08259002 = product of:
      0.16518004 = sum of:
        0.16518004 = weight(_text_:v in 3784) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16518004 = score(doc=3784,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.219214 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044999957 = queryNorm
            0.7535104 = fieldWeight in 3784, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3784)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  20. Hollink, V.; Kamps, J.; Monz, C.; Rijke, M. de: Monolingual document retrieval for European languages (2004) 0.04 
    0.04129501 = product of:
  0.08259002 = sum of:
    0.08259002 = product of:
      0.16518004 = sum of:
        0.16518004 = weight(_text_:v in 3828) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16518004 = score(doc=3828,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.219214 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044999957 = queryNorm
            0.7535104 = fieldWeight in 3828, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3828)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Authors

Languages

Types

  • a 1253
  • m 195
  • el 84
  • s 67
  • b 26
  • x 24
  • i 10
  • n 2
  • p 1
  • r 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications