Search (46 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Retrievalalgorithmen"
  • × language_ss:"e"
  1. Bornmann, L.; Mutz, R.: From P100 to P100' : a new citation-rank approach (2014) 0.06
    0.056258976 = product of:
      0.11251795 = sum of:
        0.11251795 = sum of:
          0.063346416 = weight(_text_:l in 1431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.063346416 = score(doc=1431,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18031335 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045365814 = queryNorm
              0.35131297 = fieldWeight in 1431, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1431)
          0.049171533 = weight(_text_:22 in 1431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049171533 = score(doc=1431,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15886335 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045365814 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1431, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1431)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 8.2014 17:05:18
  2. Soulier, L.; Jabeur, L.B.; Tamine, L.; Bahsoun, W.: On ranking relevant entities in heterogeneous networks using a language-based model (2013) 0.04
    0.04336153 = product of:
      0.08672306 = sum of:
        0.08672306 = sum of:
          0.055990852 = weight(_text_:l in 664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.055990852 = score(doc=664,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.18031335 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045365814 = queryNorm
              0.31051973 = fieldWeight in 664, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=664)
          0.030732209 = weight(_text_:22 in 664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030732209 = score(doc=664,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15886335 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045365814 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 664, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=664)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2013 19:34:49
  3. Voorhees, E.M.: Implementing agglomerative hierarchic clustering algorithms for use in document retrieval (1986) 0.02
    0.024585767 = product of:
      0.049171533 = sum of:
        0.049171533 = product of:
          0.09834307 = sum of:
            0.09834307 = weight(_text_:22 in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09834307 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15886335 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045365814 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 22(1986) no.6, S.465-476
  4. Smeaton, A.F.; Rijsbergen, C.J. van: ¬The retrieval effects of query expansion on a feedback document retrieval system (1983) 0.02
    0.021512546 = product of:
      0.04302509 = sum of:
        0.04302509 = product of:
          0.08605018 = sum of:
            0.08605018 = weight(_text_:22 in 2134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08605018 = score(doc=2134,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15886335 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045365814 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2134, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2134)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    30. 3.2001 13:32:22
  5. Back, J.: ¬An evaluation of relevancy ranking techniques used by Internet search engines (2000) 0.02
    0.021512546 = product of:
      0.04302509 = sum of:
        0.04302509 = product of:
          0.08605018 = sum of:
            0.08605018 = weight(_text_:22 in 3445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08605018 = score(doc=3445,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15886335 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045365814 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3445, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3445)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    25. 8.2005 17:42:22
  6. Schamber, L.; Bateman, J.: Relevance criteria uses and importance : progress in development of a measurement scale (1999) 0.02
    0.016797256 = product of:
      0.03359451 = sum of:
        0.03359451 = product of:
          0.06718902 = sum of:
            0.06718902 = weight(_text_:l in 6691) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06718902 = score(doc=6691,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18031335 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045365814 = queryNorm
                0.37262368 = fieldWeight in 6691, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6691)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Knowledge: creation, organization and use. Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, 31.10.-4.11.1999. Ed.: L. Woods
  7. Sakai, T.: On the reliability of information retrieval metrics based on graded relevance (2007) 0.02
    0.016797256 = product of:
      0.03359451 = sum of:
        0.03359451 = product of:
          0.06718902 = sum of:
            0.06718902 = weight(_text_:l in 910) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06718902 = score(doc=910,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18031335 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045365814 = queryNorm
                0.37262368 = fieldWeight in 910, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=910)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper compares 14 information retrieval metrics based on graded relevance, together with 10 traditional metrics based on binary relevance, in terms of stability, sensitivity and resemblance of system rankings. More specifically, we compare these metrics using the Buckley/Voorhees stability method, the Voorhees/Buckley swap method and Kendall's rank correlation, with three data sets comprising test collections and submitted runs from NTCIR. Our experiments show that (Average) Normalised Discounted Cumulative Gain at document cut-off l are the best among the rank-based graded-relevance metrics, provided that l is large. On the other hand, if one requires a recall-based graded-relevance metric that is highly correlated with Average Precision, then Q-measure is the best choice. Moreover, these best graded-relevance metrics are at least as stable and sensitive as Average Precision, and are fairly robust to the choice of gain values.
  8. Zhao, L.; Wu, L.; Huang, X.: Using query expansion in graph-based approach for query-focused multi-document summarization (2009) 0.02
    0.016797256 = product of:
      0.03359451 = sum of:
        0.03359451 = product of:
          0.06718902 = sum of:
            0.06718902 = weight(_text_:l in 2449) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06718902 = score(doc=2449,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18031335 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045365814 = queryNorm
                0.37262368 = fieldWeight in 2449, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2449)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  9. Wartik, S.; Fox, E.; Heath, L.; Chen, Q.-F.: Hashing algorithms (1992) 0.02
    0.015836604 = product of:
      0.031673208 = sum of:
        0.031673208 = product of:
          0.063346416 = sum of:
            0.063346416 = weight(_text_:l in 3510) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.063346416 = score(doc=3510,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18031335 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045365814 = queryNorm
                0.35131297 = fieldWeight in 3510, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3510)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  10. Lee, D.L.; Ren, L.: Document ranking on weight-partitioned signature files (1996) 0.01
    0.013857029 = product of:
      0.027714059 = sum of:
        0.027714059 = product of:
          0.055428118 = sum of:
            0.055428118 = weight(_text_:l in 2417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055428118 = score(doc=2417,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18031335 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045365814 = queryNorm
                0.30739886 = fieldWeight in 2417, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2417)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  11. Boughanem, M.; Chrisment, C.; Tamine, L.: On using genetic algorithms for multimodal relevance optimization in information retrieval (2002) 0.01
    0.013857029 = product of:
      0.027714059 = sum of:
        0.027714059 = product of:
          0.055428118 = sum of:
            0.055428118 = weight(_text_:l in 1011) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055428118 = score(doc=1011,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18031335 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045365814 = queryNorm
                0.30739886 = fieldWeight in 1011, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1011)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  12. Losee, R.M.; Church Jr., L.: Are two document clusters better than one? : the cluster performance question for information retrieval (2005) 0.01
    0.013857029 = product of:
      0.027714059 = sum of:
        0.027714059 = product of:
          0.055428118 = sum of:
            0.055428118 = weight(_text_:l in 3270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055428118 = score(doc=3270,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18031335 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045365814 = queryNorm
                0.30739886 = fieldWeight in 3270, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3270)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  13. MacFarlane, A.; Robertson, S.E.; McCann, J.A.: Parallel computing for passage retrieval (2004) 0.01
    0.012292883 = product of:
      0.024585767 = sum of:
        0.024585767 = product of:
          0.049171533 = sum of:
            0.049171533 = weight(_text_:22 in 5108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049171533 = score(doc=5108,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15886335 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045365814 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5108, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5108)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2007 18:30:22
  14. Faloutsos, C.: Signature files (1992) 0.01
    0.012292883 = product of:
      0.024585767 = sum of:
        0.024585767 = product of:
          0.049171533 = sum of:
            0.049171533 = weight(_text_:22 in 3499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049171533 = score(doc=3499,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15886335 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045365814 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3499, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3499)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    7. 5.1999 15:22:48
  15. Losada, D.E.; Barreiro, A.: Emebedding term similarity and inverse document frequency into a logical model of information retrieval (2003) 0.01
    0.012292883 = product of:
      0.024585767 = sum of:
        0.024585767 = product of:
          0.049171533 = sum of:
            0.049171533 = weight(_text_:22 in 1422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049171533 = score(doc=1422,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15886335 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045365814 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1422, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1422)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2003 19:27:23
  16. Thelwall, M.; Vaughan, L.: New versions of PageRank employing alternative Web document models (2004) 0.01
    0.011877453 = product of:
      0.023754906 = sum of:
        0.023754906 = product of:
          0.04750981 = sum of:
            0.04750981 = weight(_text_:l in 674) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04750981 = score(doc=674,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18031335 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045365814 = queryNorm
                0.26348472 = fieldWeight in 674, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=674)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  17. Yang, L.; Ji, D.; Leong, M.: Document reranking by term distribution and maximal marginal relevance for chinese information retrieval (2007) 0.01
    0.011877453 = product of:
      0.023754906 = sum of:
        0.023754906 = product of:
          0.04750981 = sum of:
            0.04750981 = weight(_text_:l in 907) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04750981 = score(doc=907,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18031335 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045365814 = queryNorm
                0.26348472 = fieldWeight in 907, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=907)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  18. Singh, S.; Dey, L.: ¬A rough-fuzzy document grading system for customized text information retrieval (2005) 0.01
    0.011877453 = product of:
      0.023754906 = sum of:
        0.023754906 = product of:
          0.04750981 = sum of:
            0.04750981 = weight(_text_:l in 1007) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04750981 = score(doc=1007,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18031335 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045365814 = queryNorm
                0.26348472 = fieldWeight in 1007, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1007)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  19. Deerwester, S.; Dumais, S.; Landauer, T.; Furnass, G.; Beck, L.: Improving information retrieval with latent semantic indexing (1988) 0.01
    0.011877453 = product of:
      0.023754906 = sum of:
        0.023754906 = product of:
          0.04750981 = sum of:
            0.04750981 = weight(_text_:l in 2396) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04750981 = score(doc=2396,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18031335 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045365814 = queryNorm
                0.26348472 = fieldWeight in 2396, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2396)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  20. Biskri, I.; Rompré, L.: Using association rules for query reformulation (2012) 0.01
    0.011877453 = product of:
      0.023754906 = sum of:
        0.023754906 = product of:
          0.04750981 = sum of:
            0.04750981 = weight(_text_:l in 92) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04750981 = score(doc=92,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18031335 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045365814 = queryNorm
                0.26348472 = fieldWeight in 92, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=92)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    

Years

Types

  • a 43
  • m 2
  • s 2
  • More… Less…