-
Scholarly metrics under the microscope : from citation analysis to academic auditing (2015)
0.01
0.007984796 = product of:
0.015969591 = sum of:
0.015969591 = product of:
0.04790877 = sum of:
0.04790877 = weight(_text_:22 in 4654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04790877 = score(doc=4654,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15478362 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044200785 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4654, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4654)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2017 17:12:50
-
Gingras, Y.: Bibliometrics and research evaluation : uses and abuses (2016)
0.01
0.007539929 = product of:
0.015079858 = sum of:
0.015079858 = product of:
0.04523957 = sum of:
0.04523957 = weight(_text_:y in 3805) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04523957 = score(doc=3805,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21271187 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.044200785 = queryNorm
0.21268006 = fieldWeight in 3805, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3805)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
De Bellis, N.: Bibliometrics and citation analysis : from the Science citation index to cybermetrics (2008)
0.01
0.006052462 = product of:
0.012104924 = sum of:
0.012104924 = product of:
0.03631477 = sum of:
0.03631477 = weight(_text_:n in 3585) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03631477 = score(doc=3585,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19057861 = queryWeight, product of:
4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
0.044200785 = queryNorm
0.19055009 = fieldWeight in 3585, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3585)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
