Search (79 results, page 1 of 4)

  • × theme_ss:"Benutzerstudien"
  1. Yoo, E.-Y.; Robbins, L.S.: Understanding middle-aged women's health information seeking on the web : a theoretical approach (2008) 0.07
    0.06919396 = product of:
      0.13838792 = sum of:
        0.13838792 = product of:
          0.20758188 = sum of:
            0.13571872 = weight(_text_:y in 2973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13571872 = score(doc=2973,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21271187 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044200785 = queryNorm
                0.6380402 = fieldWeight in 2973, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2973)
            0.07186315 = weight(_text_:22 in 2973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07186315 = score(doc=2973,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15478362 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044200785 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2973, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2973)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    9. 2.2008 17:52:22
  2. Westman, S.; Laine-Hernandez, M.; Oittinen, P.: Development and evaluation of a multifaceted magazine image categorization model (2011) 0.03
    0.03137968 = product of:
      0.06275936 = sum of:
        0.06275936 = product of:
          0.09413904 = sum of:
            0.06419606 = weight(_text_:n in 4193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06419606 = score(doc=4193,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.19057861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044200785 = queryNorm
                0.33684817 = fieldWeight in 4193, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4193)
            0.029942982 = weight(_text_:22 in 4193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029942982 = score(doc=4193,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15478362 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044200785 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4193, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4193)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The development of visual retrieval methods requires information about user interaction with images, including their description and categorization. This article presents the development of a categorization model for magazine images based on two user studies. In Study 1, we elicited 10 main classes of magazine image categorization criteria through sorting tasks with nonexpert and expert users (N=30). Multivariate methods, namely, multidimensional scaling and hierarchical clustering, were used to analyze similarity data. Content analysis of category names gave rise to classes that were synthesized into a categorization framework. The framework was evaluated in Study 2 by experts (N=24) who categorized another set of images consistent with the framework and found it to be useful in the task. Based on the evaluation study the framework was solidified into a model for categorizing magazine imagery. Connections between classes were analyzed both from the original sorting data and from the evaluation study and included into the final model. The model is a practical categorization tool that may be used in workplaces, such as magazine editorial offices. It may also serve to guide the development of computational methods for image understanding, selection of concepts for automatic detection, and approaches to support browsing and exploratory image search.
    Date
    22. 1.2011 14:09:26
  3. Karbach, N.: Suchverhalten von Benutzern an Online-Publikumskatalogen (1991) 0.03
    0.03026231 = product of:
      0.06052462 = sum of:
        0.06052462 = product of:
          0.18157385 = sum of:
            0.18157385 = weight(_text_:n in 2282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.18157385 = score(doc=2282,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19057861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044200785 = queryNorm
                0.95275044 = fieldWeight in 2282, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=2282)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  4. Drabenstott, K.M.; Simcox, S.; Fenton, E.G.: End-user understanding of subject headings in library catalogs (1999) 0.03
    0.03013458 = product of:
      0.06026916 = sum of:
        0.06026916 = product of:
          0.090403736 = sum of:
            0.054472156 = weight(_text_:n in 1333) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054472156 = score(doc=1333,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19057861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044200785 = queryNorm
                0.28582513 = fieldWeight in 1333, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1333)
            0.035931576 = weight(_text_:22 in 1333) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035931576 = score(doc=1333,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15478362 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044200785 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1333, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1333)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    n this article, we report on the first large-scale study of end-user understanding of subject headings. Our objectives were to determine the extent to which children and adults understood subdivided subject headings and to suggest improvements for improving understanding of subject headings. The 1991 Library of Congress Subject Subdivisions Conference suggested standardizing the order of subject subdivisions for the purpose of simplifying subject cataloging, which served as the impetus for the study. We demonstrated that adults understood subject headings better than children; however, both adults and children assigned correct meanings to less than half of the subject headings they examined. Neither subject heading context nor subdivision order had an effect on understanding. Based on our findings, we challenge the library community to make major changes to the Library of Congress Subject Headings system that have the potential to increase end-user understanding of subject headings.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  5. Griesbaum, J.; Mahrholz, N.; Kiedrowski, K. von Löwe; Rittberger, M.: Knowledge generation in online forums : a case study in the German educational domain (2015) 0.02
    0.02008972 = product of:
      0.04017944 = sum of:
        0.04017944 = product of:
          0.060269155 = sum of:
            0.03631477 = weight(_text_:n in 4440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03631477 = score(doc=4440,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19057861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044200785 = queryNorm
                0.19055009 = fieldWeight in 4440, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4440)
            0.023954386 = weight(_text_:22 in 4440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023954386 = score(doc=4440,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15478362 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044200785 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 4440, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4440)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  6. Hsieh, Y.-s.: ¬A study on the users' perception to the body language of reference librarians (1997) 0.02
    0.018849822 = product of:
      0.037699644 = sum of:
        0.037699644 = product of:
          0.11309893 = sum of:
            0.11309893 = weight(_text_:y in 2819) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11309893 = score(doc=2819,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21271187 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044200785 = queryNorm
                0.53170013 = fieldWeight in 2819, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2819)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  7. Wu, Y.; Liu, Y.; Tsai, Y.-H.R.; Yau, S.-T.: Investigating the role of eye movements and physiological signals in search satisfaction prediction using geometric analysis (2019) 0.02
    0.016324427 = product of:
      0.032648854 = sum of:
        0.032648854 = product of:
          0.097946554 = sum of:
            0.097946554 = weight(_text_:y in 5382) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.097946554 = score(doc=5382,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.21271187 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044200785 = queryNorm
                0.46046585 = fieldWeight in 5382, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5382)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  8. Matus, G.S.; Mendoza, E.S.; Duran, C.V.C.: Estudio comparativo de los usuarios reales y potenciales de bases de datos cientificas : una experiencia y una reflexion en la Universidad de Concepcion (1994) 0.02
    0.015994605 = product of:
      0.03198921 = sum of:
        0.03198921 = product of:
          0.09596762 = sum of:
            0.09596762 = weight(_text_:y in 1519) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09596762 = score(doc=1519,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.21271187 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044200785 = queryNorm
                0.45116252 = fieldWeight in 1519, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1519)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  9. Scholle, U.: Kann ich Ihnen behilflich sein? : Erhebung am zentralen Auskunftsplatz der ULB Münster (2000) 0.01
    0.013973392 = product of:
      0.027946783 = sum of:
        0.027946783 = product of:
          0.08384035 = sum of:
            0.08384035 = weight(_text_:22 in 7585) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08384035 = score(doc=7585,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15478362 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044200785 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7585, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7585)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2000 17:52:11
  10. Branch, J.L.: Investigating the information-seeking process of adolescents : the value of using think alouds and think afters (2000) 0.01
    0.013973392 = product of:
      0.027946783 = sum of:
        0.027946783 = product of:
          0.08384035 = sum of:
            0.08384035 = weight(_text_:22 in 3924) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08384035 = score(doc=3924,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15478362 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044200785 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3924, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3924)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library and information science research. 22(2000) no.4, S.371-382
  11. Huang, C.-Y.; Shen, Y.-C.; Chiang, I.-P.; Lin, C.-S.: Characterizing Web users' online information behavior (2007) 0.01
    0.013328837 = product of:
      0.026657674 = sum of:
        0.026657674 = product of:
          0.07997302 = sum of:
            0.07997302 = weight(_text_:y in 616) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07997302 = score(doc=616,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.21271187 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044200785 = queryNorm
                0.37596878 = fieldWeight in 616, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=616)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  12. Zhang, X.; Li, Y.; Liu, J.; Zhang, Y.: Effects of interaction design in digital libraries on user interactions (2008) 0.01
    0.013328837 = product of:
      0.026657674 = sum of:
        0.026657674 = product of:
          0.07997302 = sum of:
            0.07997302 = weight(_text_:y in 1898) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07997302 = score(doc=1898,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.21271187 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044200785 = queryNorm
                0.37596878 = fieldWeight in 1898, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1898)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  13. Wang, P.; Berry, M.W.; Yang, Y.: Mining longitudinal Web queries : trends and patterns (2003) 0.01
    0.013194876 = product of:
      0.026389752 = sum of:
        0.026389752 = product of:
          0.07916925 = sum of:
            0.07916925 = weight(_text_:y in 6561) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07916925 = score(doc=6561,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21271187 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044200785 = queryNorm
                0.3721901 = fieldWeight in 6561, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6561)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  14. Huang, M.-h.; Wang, H.-y.: ¬The influence of document presentation order and number of documents judged an users' judgments of relevance (2004) 0.01
    0.013194876 = product of:
      0.026389752 = sum of:
        0.026389752 = product of:
          0.07916925 = sum of:
            0.07916925 = weight(_text_:y in 2885) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07916925 = score(doc=2885,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21271187 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044200785 = queryNorm
                0.3721901 = fieldWeight in 2885, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2885)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  15. Ford, N.; Miller, D.; Moss, N.: ¬The role of individual differences in Internet searching : an empirical study (2001) 0.01
    0.012839211 = product of:
      0.025678422 = sum of:
        0.025678422 = product of:
          0.07703526 = sum of:
            0.07703526 = weight(_text_:n in 6978) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07703526 = score(doc=6978,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.19057861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044200785 = queryNorm
                0.40421778 = fieldWeight in 6978, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6978)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  16. Ford, N.; Miller, D.; Moss, N.: Web search strategies and human individual differences : cognitive and demographic factors, Internet attitudes, and approaches (2005) 0.01
    0.012839211 = product of:
      0.025678422 = sum of:
        0.025678422 = product of:
          0.07703526 = sum of:
            0.07703526 = weight(_text_:n in 3475) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07703526 = score(doc=3475,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.19057861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044200785 = queryNorm
                0.40421778 = fieldWeight in 3475, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3475)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  17. Ford, N.; Miller, D.; Moss, N.: Web search strategies and human individual differences : a combined analysis (2005) 0.01
    0.012839211 = product of:
      0.025678422 = sum of:
        0.025678422 = product of:
          0.07703526 = sum of:
            0.07703526 = weight(_text_:n in 3476) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07703526 = score(doc=3476,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.19057861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044200785 = queryNorm
                0.40421778 = fieldWeight in 3476, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3476)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  18. Ford, N.; Miller, D.; Moss, N.: Web search strategies and retrieval effectiveness : an empirical study (2002) 0.01
    0.012839211 = product of:
      0.025678422 = sum of:
        0.025678422 = product of:
          0.07703526 = sum of:
            0.07703526 = weight(_text_:n in 4472) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07703526 = score(doc=4472,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.19057861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044200785 = queryNorm
                0.40421778 = fieldWeight in 4472, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4472)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  19. Jansen, B.J.; Booth, D.L.; Spink, A.: Patterns of query reformulation during Web searching (2009) 0.01
    0.012839211 = product of:
      0.025678422 = sum of:
        0.025678422 = product of:
          0.07703526 = sum of:
            0.07703526 = weight(_text_:n in 2936) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07703526 = score(doc=2936,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.19057861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044200785 = queryNorm
                0.40421778 = fieldWeight in 2936, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2936)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Query reformulation is a key user behavior during Web search. Our research goal is to develop predictive models of query reformulation during Web searching. This article reports results from a study in which we automatically classified the query-reformulation patterns for 964,780 Web searching sessions, composed of 1,523,072 queries, to predict the next query reformulation. We employed an n-gram modeling approach to describe the probability of users transitioning from one query-reformulation state to another to predict their next state. We developed first-, second-, third-, and fourth-order models and evaluated each model for accuracy of prediction, coverage of the dataset, and complexity of the possible pattern set. The results show that Reformulation and Assistance account for approximately 45% of all query reformulations; furthermore, the results demonstrate that the first- and second-order models provide the best predictability, between 28 and 40% overall and higher than 70% for some patterns. Implications are that the n-gram approach can be used for improving searching systems and searching assistance.
  20. Mandl, T.; Schulz, J.M.; Marholz, N.; Werner, K.: Benutzerforschung anhand von Log-Dateien : Chancen Grenzen und aktuelle Trends (2011) 0.01
    0.012104924 = product of:
      0.024209848 = sum of:
        0.024209848 = product of:
          0.07262954 = sum of:
            0.07262954 = weight(_text_:n in 4304) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07262954 = score(doc=4304,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19057861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044200785 = queryNorm
                0.38110018 = fieldWeight in 4304, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4304)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 77
  • b 1
  • el 1
  • r 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…