Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Sieber, W."
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Dresel, R.; Hörnig, D.; Kaluza, H.; Peter, A.; Roßmann, A.; Sieber, W.: Evaluation deutscher Web-Suchwerkzeuge : Ein vergleichender Retrievaltest (2001) 0.05
    0.053772107 = product of:
      0.10754421 = sum of:
        0.10754421 = sum of:
          0.058308005 = weight(_text_:w in 261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.058308005 = score(doc=261,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17310768 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045425482 = queryNorm
              0.33683082 = fieldWeight in 261, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=261)
          0.049236204 = weight(_text_:22 in 261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049236204 = score(doc=261,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1590723 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045425482 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 261, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=261)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Die deutschen Suchmaschinen, Abacho, Acoon, Fireball und Lycos sowie die Web-Kataloge Web.de und Yahoo! werden einem Qualitätstest nach relativem Recall, Precision und Availability unterzogen. Die Methoden der Retrievaltests werden vorgestellt. Im Durchschnitt werden bei einem Cut-Off-Wert von 25 ein Recall von rund 22%, eine Precision von knapp 19% und eine Verfügbarkeit von 24% erreicht
  2. Sieber, W.: Visualisierung von Thesaurus-Strukturen unter besonderer Berücksichtigung eines Hyperbolic Tree Views (2004) 0.01
    0.012754875 = product of:
      0.02550975 = sum of:
        0.02550975 = product of:
          0.0510195 = sum of:
            0.0510195 = weight(_text_:w in 1456) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0510195 = score(doc=1456,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17310768 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045425482 = queryNorm
                0.29472697 = fieldWeight in 1456, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1456)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  3. Sieber, W.: Thesaurus-Arbeit versus Informationsvisualisierung : Analyse und Evaluation am Maßstab der Usability (2007) 0.01
    0.01093275 = product of:
      0.0218655 = sum of:
        0.0218655 = product of:
          0.043731 = sum of:
            0.043731 = weight(_text_:w in 1457) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043731 = score(doc=1457,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17310768 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045425482 = queryNorm
                0.2526231 = fieldWeight in 1457, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1457)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)