Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Suchmaschinen"
  • × theme_ss:"Retrievalstudien"
  1. Clarke, S.J.; Willett, P.: Estimating the recall performance of Web search engines (1997) 0.01
    0.01299786 = product of:
      0.02599572 = sum of:
        0.02599572 = product of:
          0.05199144 = sum of:
            0.05199144 = weight(_text_:p in 760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05199144 = score(doc=760,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16359726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045500398 = queryNorm
                0.31780142 = fieldWeight in 760, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=760)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  2. Dresel, R.; Hörnig, D.; Kaluza, H.; Peter, A.; Roßmann, A.; Sieber, W.: Evaluation deutscher Web-Suchwerkzeuge : Ein vergleichender Retrievaltest (2001) 0.01
    0.012329352 = product of:
      0.024658704 = sum of:
        0.024658704 = product of:
          0.04931741 = sum of:
            0.04931741 = weight(_text_:22 in 261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04931741 = score(doc=261,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15933464 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045500398 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 261, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=261)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Die deutschen Suchmaschinen, Abacho, Acoon, Fireball und Lycos sowie die Web-Kataloge Web.de und Yahoo! werden einem Qualitätstest nach relativem Recall, Precision und Availability unterzogen. Die Methoden der Retrievaltests werden vorgestellt. Im Durchschnitt werden bei einem Cut-Off-Wert von 25 ein Recall von rund 22%, eine Precision von knapp 19% und eine Verfügbarkeit von 24% erreicht
  3. Schaer, P.; Mayr, P.; Sünkler, S.; Lewandowski, D.: How relevant is the long tail? : a relevance assessment study on million short (2016) 0.01
    0.011488594 = product of:
      0.022977188 = sum of:
        0.022977188 = product of:
          0.045954376 = sum of:
            0.045954376 = weight(_text_:p in 3144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.045954376 = score(doc=3144,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16359726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045500398 = queryNorm
                0.28089944 = fieldWeight in 3144, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3144)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  4. Mettrop, W.; Nieuwenhuysen, P.: Internet search engines : fluctuations in document accessibility (2001) 0.01
    0.008123662 = product of:
      0.016247325 = sum of:
        0.016247325 = product of:
          0.03249465 = sum of:
            0.03249465 = weight(_text_:p in 4481) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03249465 = score(doc=4481,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16359726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045500398 = queryNorm
                0.19862589 = fieldWeight in 4481, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4481)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)