Search (3723 results, page 1 of 187)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  1. Ackermann, E.: Piaget's constructivism, Papert's constructionism : what's the difference? (2001) 0.25
    0.24904399 = sum of:
      0.23118904 = product of:
        0.46237808 = sum of:
          0.18042444 = weight(_text_:3a in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.18042444 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.38523552 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
          0.28195363 = weight(_text_:2c in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.28195363 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.48157898 = queryWeight, product of:
                10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.5854775 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
        0.5 = coord(2/4)
      0.017854942 = product of:
        0.035709884 = sum of:
          0.035709884 = weight(_text_:i in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.035709884 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.20836058 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    What is the difference between Piaget's constructivism and Papert's "constructionism"? Beyond the mere play on the words, I think the distinction holds, and that integrating both views can enrich our understanding of how people learn and grow. Piaget's constructivism offers a window into what children are interested in, and able to achieve, at different stages of their development. The theory describes how children's ways of doing and thinking evolve over time, and under which circumstance children are more likely to let go of-or hold onto- their currently held views. Piaget suggests that children have very good reasons not to abandon their worldviews just because someone else, be it an expert, tells them they're wrong. Papert's constructionism, in contrast, focuses more on the art of learning, or 'learning to learn', and on the significance of making things in learning. Papert is interested in how learners engage in a conversation with [their own or other people's] artifacts, and how these conversations boost self-directed learning, and ultimately facilitate the construction of new knowledge. He stresses the importance of tools, media, and context in human development. Integrating both perspectives illuminates the processes by which individuals come to make sense of their experience, gradually optimizing their interactions with the world.
    Content
    Vgl.: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Piaget-%E2%80%99-s-Constructivism-%2C-Papert-%E2%80%99-s-%3A-What-%E2%80%99-s-Ackermann/89cbcc1e740a4591443ff4765a6ae8df0fdf5554. Darunter weitere Hinweise auf verwandte Beiträge. Auch unter: Learning Group Publication 5(2001) no.3, S.438.
  2. Dahlberg, I.: Conceptual definitions for INTERCONCEPT (1981) 0.13
    0.13298385 = product of:
      0.2659677 = sum of:
        0.2659677 = sum of:
          0.14283954 = weight(_text_:i in 1630) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.14283954 = score(doc=1630,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.83344233 = fieldWeight in 1630, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1630)
          0.12312816 = weight(_text_:22 in 1630) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.12312816 = score(doc=1630,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 1630, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1630)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    International classification. 8(1981), S.16-22
  3. Popper, K.R.: Three worlds : the Tanner lecture on human values. Deliverd at the University of Michigan, April 7, 1978 (1978) 0.12
    0.121650845 = sum of:
      0.07216977 = product of:
        0.2886791 = sum of:
          0.2886791 = weight(_text_:3a in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.2886791 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.38523552 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.049481075 = product of:
        0.09896215 = sum of:
          0.09896215 = weight(_text_:i in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09896215 = score(doc=230,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.57742584 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In this lecture I intend to challenge those who uphold a monist or even a dualist view of the universe; and I will propose, instead, a pluralist view. I will propose a view of the universe that recognizes at least three different but interacting sub-universes.
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Ftannerlectures.utah.edu%2F_documents%2Fa-to-z%2Fp%2Fpopper80.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3f4QRTEH-OEBmoYr2J_c7H
  4. Bookstein, A.: Informetric distributions : I. Unified overview (1990) 0.09
    0.0930887 = product of:
      0.1861774 = sum of:
        0.1861774 = sum of:
          0.099987686 = weight(_text_:i in 6902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.099987686 = score(doc=6902,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.58340967 = fieldWeight in 6902, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6902)
          0.08618971 = weight(_text_:22 in 6902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08618971 = score(doc=6902,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6902, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6902)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:55:29
  5. Ingwersen, P.; Wormell, I.: Modern indexing and retrieval techniques matching different types of information needs (1989) 0.09
    0.0930887 = product of:
      0.1861774 = sum of:
        0.1861774 = sum of:
          0.099987686 = weight(_text_:i in 7322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.099987686 = score(doc=7322,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.58340967 = fieldWeight in 7322, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7322)
          0.08618971 = weight(_text_:22 in 7322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08618971 = score(doc=7322,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7322, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7322)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    International forum on information and documentation. 14(1989), S.17-22
  6. CD-ROMs in print (1995) 0.08
    0.07979031 = product of:
      0.15958062 = sum of:
        0.15958062 = sum of:
          0.08570373 = weight(_text_:i in 7589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08570373 = score(doc=7589,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.50006545 = fieldWeight in 7589, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7589)
          0.073876895 = weight(_text_:22 in 7589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.073876895 = score(doc=7589,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 7589, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7589)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Audiovisual librarian 22(1996) no.2, S.130-131 ( R. Williams)
    Type
    i
  7. Encyclopedia of world problems and human potential : Vol.1: World problems (1994) 0.08
    0.07979031 = product of:
      0.15958062 = sum of:
        0.15958062 = sum of:
          0.08570373 = weight(_text_:i in 2022) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08570373 = score(doc=2022,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.50006545 = fieldWeight in 2022, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2022)
          0.073876895 = weight(_text_:22 in 2022) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.073876895 = score(doc=2022,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2022, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2022)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Knowledge organization 22(1995) no.1, S.50-51 (I. Dahlberg)
  8. Encyclopedia of world problems and human potential : Vol.2: Human potential-transformation and values (1994) 0.08
    0.07979031 = product of:
      0.15958062 = sum of:
        0.15958062 = sum of:
          0.08570373 = weight(_text_:i in 2891) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08570373 = score(doc=2891,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.50006545 = fieldWeight in 2891, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2891)
          0.073876895 = weight(_text_:22 in 2891) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.073876895 = score(doc=2891,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2891, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2891)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Knowledge organization 22(1995) no.1, S.50-51 (I. Dahlberg)
  9. Encyclopedia of world problems and human potential : Vol.3: Actions - strategies - solutions (1994) 0.08
    0.07979031 = product of:
      0.15958062 = sum of:
        0.15958062 = sum of:
          0.08570373 = weight(_text_:i in 2892) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08570373 = score(doc=2892,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.50006545 = fieldWeight in 2892, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2892)
          0.073876895 = weight(_text_:22 in 2892) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.073876895 = score(doc=2892,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2892, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2892)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Knowledge organization 22(1995) no.3/4, S.184-185 (I. Dahlberg)
  10. Cronin, J.: Social influences on quantum mechanics? : I (2001) 0.08
    0.07979031 = product of:
      0.15958062 = sum of:
        0.15958062 = sum of:
          0.08570373 = weight(_text_:i in 1994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08570373 = score(doc=1994,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.50006545 = fieldWeight in 1994, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1994)
          0.073876895 = weight(_text_:22 in 1994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.073876895 = score(doc=1994,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1994, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1994)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Erwiderung auf: Graham, L.R.: Do mathematical equations display social attributes? in: Mathematical intelligencer 22(2000) no.3, S.31-36
  11. Parent, I.: International and national cataloguing rules : current situation and future trends, Moscow, 20-24 April 1999 (2000) 0.08
    0.07979031 = product of:
      0.15958062 = sum of:
        0.15958062 = sum of:
          0.08570373 = weight(_text_:i in 6465) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08570373 = score(doc=6465,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.50006545 = fieldWeight in 6465, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6465)
          0.073876895 = weight(_text_:22 in 6465) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.073876895 = score(doc=6465,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6465, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6465)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    11. 8.2001 17:22:42
  12. Badia, A.: Data, information, knowledge : an information science analysis (2014) 0.08
    0.07744224 = product of:
      0.15488449 = sum of:
        0.15488449 = sum of:
          0.11178964 = weight(_text_:i in 1296) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.11178964 = score(doc=1296,freq=10.0), product of:
              0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.65227187 = fieldWeight in 1296, product of:
                3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                  10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1296)
          0.043094855 = weight(_text_:22 in 1296) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.043094855 = score(doc=1296,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1296, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1296)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    I analyze the text of an article that appeared in this journal in 2007 that published the results of a questionnaire in which a number of experts were asked to define the concepts of data, information, and knowledge. I apply standard information retrieval techniques to build a list of the most frequent terms in each set of definitions. I then apply information extraction techniques to analyze how the top terms are used in the definitions. As a result, I draw data-driven conclusions about the aggregate opinion of the experts. I contrast this with the original analysis of the data to provide readers with an alternative viewpoint on what the data tell us.
    Date
    16. 6.2014 19:22:57
  13. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.07
    0.07259655 = sum of:
      0.054127328 = product of:
        0.21650931 = sum of:
          0.21650931 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.21650931 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.38523552 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.018469224 = product of:
        0.036938448 = sum of:
          0.036938448 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.036938448 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  14. Taylor, A.G.: Implementing AACR and AACR2 : a personal perspective and lessons learned (2012) 0.07
    0.07154127 = product of:
      0.14308254 = sum of:
        0.14308254 = sum of:
          0.099987686 = weight(_text_:i in 2546) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.099987686 = score(doc=2546,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.58340967 = fieldWeight in 2546, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2546)
          0.043094855 = weight(_text_:22 in 2546) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.043094855 = score(doc=2546,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2546, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2546)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    As we move toward implementing RDA: Resource Description and Access, I have been pondering how we might manage the transition to new cataloging rules effectively. I was a practicing cataloger when Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules, 2nd ed., was implemented and remember it as a traumatic process. The published literature that I found focused on the impact of the then-new rules on specific formats and genres, but no one seems to have addressed the process of implementation and what type of training worked well (or did not). After a bit of sleuthing, I found a pertinent presentation by Arlene G. Taylor, which she graciously agreed to repurpose as this guest editorial.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  15. Schmitz-Esser, W.: Language of general communication and concept compatibility (1996) 0.07
    0.066491924 = product of:
      0.13298385 = sum of:
        0.13298385 = sum of:
          0.07141977 = weight(_text_:i in 6089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07141977 = score(doc=6089,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.41672117 = fieldWeight in 6089, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6089)
          0.06156408 = weight(_text_:22 in 6089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06156408 = score(doc=6089,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 6089, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6089)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.11-22
    Series
    Propozycje i Materialy; 6
  16. Tilsed, I.: UK library and information science resources on the Internet (1997) 0.07
    0.066491924 = product of:
      0.13298385 = sum of:
        0.13298385 = sum of:
          0.07141977 = weight(_text_:i in 2928) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07141977 = score(doc=2928,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.41672117 = fieldWeight in 2928, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2928)
          0.06156408 = weight(_text_:22 in 2928) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06156408 = score(doc=2928,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2928, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2928)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    11. 2.1999 22:09:53
  17. Papadakis, I. et al.: Highlighting timely information in libraries through social and semantic Web technologies (2016) 0.07
    0.066491924 = product of:
      0.13298385 = sum of:
        0.13298385 = sum of:
          0.07141977 = weight(_text_:i in 2090) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07141977 = score(doc=2090,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.41672117 = fieldWeight in 2090, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2090)
          0.06156408 = weight(_text_:22 in 2090) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06156408 = score(doc=2090,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2090, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2090)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
  18. Fidel, R.: ¬The user-centered approach (2000) 0.07
    0.06637906 = product of:
      0.13275813 = sum of:
        0.13275813 = sum of:
          0.09581968 = weight(_text_:i in 917) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09581968 = score(doc=917,freq=10.0), product of:
              0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.55909014 = fieldWeight in 917, product of:
                3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                  10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=917)
          0.036938448 = weight(_text_:22 in 917) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.036938448 = score(doc=917,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 917, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=917)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    I started my professional career in library and information science because of my great interest in knowledge organization. The more experience I gained in the profession, the more I realized how crucial it is to understand which organization would be best for each group of users. This in turn requires an understanding of how users seek information. And so now my focus is an studying information seeking and searching behavior. Throughout the relatively long course of changing my focus, I followed Pauline Cochrane's writings. Now I can say that she has been among the first to have a "user-centered approach" to knowledge organization, and she has used the term three years before it became a mainstream phrase. The following is a short discussion about the usercentered approach which was presented in a workshop in 1997.
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
  19. Molholt, P.: Qualities of classification schemes for the Information Superhighway (1995) 0.06
    0.059126526 = product of:
      0.11825305 = sum of:
        0.11825305 = sum of:
          0.08747101 = weight(_text_:i in 5562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08747101 = score(doc=5562,freq=12.0), product of:
              0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.51037717 = fieldWeight in 5562, product of:
                3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                  12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5562)
          0.03078204 = weight(_text_:22 in 5562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03078204 = score(doc=5562,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5562, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5562)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    For my segment of this program I'd like to focus on some basic qualities of classification schemes. These qualities are critical to our ability to truly organize knowledge for access. As I see it, there are at least five qualities of note. The first one of these properties that I want to talk about is "authoritative." By this I mean standardized, but I mean more than standardized with a built in consensus-building process. A classification scheme constructed by a collaborative, consensus-building process carries the approval, and the authority, of the discipline groups that contribute to it and that it affects... The next property of classification systems is "expandable," living, responsive, with a clear locus of responsibility for its continuous upkeep. The worst thing you can do with a thesaurus, or a classification scheme, is to finish it. You can't ever finish it because it reflects ongoing intellectual activity... The third property is "intuitive." That is, the system has to be approachable, it has to be transparent, or at least capable of being transparent. It has to have an underlying logic that supports the classification scheme but doesn't dominate it... The fourth property is "organized and logical." I advocate very strongly, and agree with Lois Chan, that classification must be based on a rule-based structure, on somebody's world-view of the syndetic structure... The fifth property is "universal" by which I mean the classification scheme needs be useable by any specific system or application, and be available as a language for multiple purposes.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 21(1995) no.2, S.19-22
  20. Tell, B.: On MARC and natural text searching : a review of Pauline Cochrane's inspirational thinking grafted onto a Swedish spy on library matters (2000) 0.06
    0.055580027 = product of:
      0.111160055 = sum of:
        0.111160055 = sum of:
          0.07422161 = weight(_text_:i in 1183) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07422161 = score(doc=1183,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.43306938 = fieldWeight in 1183, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1183)
          0.036938448 = weight(_text_:22 in 1183) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.036938448 = score(doc=1183,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1183, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1183)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The following discussion is in appreciation of the invaluable inspirations Pauline Cochrane, by her acumen and perspicacity, has implanted into my thinking regarding various applications of library and information science, especially those involving machine-readable records and subject categorization. It is indeed an honor for me at my age to be offered to contribute to Pauline's Festschrift when instead I should be concerned about my forthcoming obituary. In the following, I must give some Background to what formed my thinking before my involvement in the field and thus before I encountered Pauline.
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05

Authors

Languages

Types

  • a 3069
  • m 385
  • el 222
  • s 176
  • i 159
  • b 45
  • r 15
  • x 11
  • p 6
  • n 5
  • d 1
  • h 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications