-
Leydesdorff, L.: ¬The construction and globalization of the knowledge base in inter-human communication systems (2003)
0.02
0.018595984 = product of:
0.03719197 = sum of:
0.03719197 = product of:
0.05578795 = sum of:
0.018678864 = weight(_text_:h in 1621) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018678864 = score(doc=1621,freq=2.0), product of:
0.113413334 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045649286 = queryNorm
0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 1621, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1621)
0.03710909 = weight(_text_:22 in 1621) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03710909 = score(doc=1621,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15985602 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045649286 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1621, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1621)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 5.2003 19:48:04
- Source
- Canadian Journal of Communication 28(2003), H.3, S. -
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Bornmann, L.; Wagner, C.S.: ¬The relative influences of government funding and international collaboration on citation impact (2019)
0.02
0.016010672 = product of:
0.032021344 = sum of:
0.032021344 = product of:
0.04803201 = sum of:
0.010922924 = weight(_text_:d in 4681) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010922924 = score(doc=4681,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0867278 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.045649286 = queryNorm
0.1259449 = fieldWeight in 4681, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4681)
0.03710909 = weight(_text_:22 in 4681) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03710909 = score(doc=4681,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15985602 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045649286 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4681, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4681)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- A recent publication in Nature reports that public R&D funding is only weakly correlated with the citation impact of a nation's articles as measured by the field-weighted citation index (FWCI; defined by Scopus). On the basis of the supplementary data, we up-scaled the design using Web of Science data for the decade 2003-2013 and OECD funding data for the corresponding decade assuming a 2-year delay (2001-2011). Using negative binomial regression analysis, we found very small coefficients, but the effects of international collaboration are positive and statistically significant, whereas the effects of government funding are negative, an order of magnitude smaller, and statistically nonsignificant (in two of three analyses). In other words, international collaboration improves the impact of research articles, whereas more government funding tends to have a small adverse effect when comparing OECD countries.
- Date
- 8. 1.2019 18:22:45
-
Ye, F.Y.; Leydesdorff, L.: ¬The "academic trace" of the performance matrix : a mathematical synthesis of the h-index and the integrated impact indicator (I3) (2014)
0.01
0.007782861 = product of:
0.015565722 = sum of:
0.015565722 = product of:
0.046697166 = sum of:
0.046697166 = weight(_text_:h in 1237) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046697166 = score(doc=1237,freq=18.0), product of:
0.113413334 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045649286 = queryNorm
0.41174316 = fieldWeight in 1237, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1237)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The h-index provides us with 9 natural classes which can be written as a matrix of 3 vectors. The 3 vectors are: X = (X1, X2, X3) and indicates publication distribution in the h-core, the h-tail, and the uncited ones, respectively; Y = (Y1, Y2, Y3) denotes the citation distribution of the h-core, the h-tail and the so-called "excess" citations (above the h-threshold), respectively; and Z = (Z1, Z2, Z3) = (Y1-X1, Y2-X2, Y3-X3). The matrix V = (X,Y,Z)T constructs a measure of academic performance, in which the 9 numbers can all be provided with meanings in different dimensions. The "academic trace" tr(V) of this matrix follows naturally, and contributes a unique indicator for total academic achievements by summarizing and weighting the accumulation of publications and citations. This measure can also be used to combine the advantages of the h-index and the integrated impact indicator (I3) into a single number with a meaningful interpretation of the values. We illustrate the use of tr(V) for the cases of 2 journal sets, 2 universities, and ourselves as 2 individual authors.
- Object
- h-index
-
Leydesdorff, L.: Can networks of journal-journal citations be used as indicators of change in the social sciences? (2003)
0.01
0.006184848 = product of:
0.012369696 = sum of:
0.012369696 = product of:
0.03710909 = sum of:
0.03710909 = weight(_text_:22 in 4460) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03710909 = score(doc=4460,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15985602 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045649286 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4460, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4460)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 6.11.2005 19:02:22
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Sun, Y.: National and international dimensions of the Triple Helix in Japan : university-industry-government versus international coauthorship relations (2009)
0.01
0.006184848 = product of:
0.012369696 = sum of:
0.012369696 = product of:
0.03710909 = sum of:
0.03710909 = weight(_text_:22 in 2761) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03710909 = score(doc=2761,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15985602 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045649286 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2761, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2761)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 19:07:20
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Bornmann, L.: How fractional counting of citations affects the impact factor : normalization in terms of differences in citation potentials among fields of science (2011)
0.01
0.00515404 = product of:
0.01030808 = sum of:
0.01030808 = product of:
0.03092424 = sum of:
0.03092424 = weight(_text_:22 in 4186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03092424 = score(doc=4186,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15985602 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045649286 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4186, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4186)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2011 12:51:07
-
Hellsten, I.; Leydesdorff, L.: ¬The construction of interdisciplinarity : the development of the knowledge base and programmatic focus of the journal Climatic Change, 1977-2013 (2016)
0.01
0.00515404 = product of:
0.01030808 = sum of:
0.01030808 = product of:
0.03092424 = sum of:
0.03092424 = weight(_text_:22 in 3089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03092424 = score(doc=3089,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15985602 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045649286 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3089, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3089)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 24. 8.2016 17:53:22
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Johnson, M.W.; Ivanova, I.: Toward a calculus of redundancy : signification, codification, and anticipation in cultural evolution (2018)
0.01
0.00515404 = product of:
0.01030808 = sum of:
0.01030808 = product of:
0.03092424 = sum of:
0.03092424 = weight(_text_:22 in 4463) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03092424 = score(doc=4463,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15985602 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045649286 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4463, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4463)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 29. 9.2018 11:22:09
-
Leydesdorff, L.: How are new citation-based journal indicators adding to the bibliometric toolbox? (2009)
0.00
0.003113144 = product of:
0.006226288 = sum of:
0.006226288 = product of:
0.018678864 = sum of:
0.018678864 = weight(_text_:h in 2929) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018678864 = score(doc=2929,freq=2.0), product of:
0.113413334 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045649286 = queryNorm
0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 2929, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2929)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The launching of Scopus and Google Scholar, and methodological developments in social-network analysis have made many more indicators for evaluating journals available than the traditional impact factor, cited half-life, and immediacy index of the ISI. In this study, these new indicators are compared with one another and with the older ones. Do the various indicators measure new dimensions of the citation networks, or are they highly correlated among themselves? Are they robust and relatively stable over time? Two main dimensions are distinguished - size and impact - which together shape influence. The h-index combines the two dimensions and can also be considered as an indicator of reach (like Indegree). PageRank is mainly an indicator of size, but has important interactions with centrality measures. The Scimago Journal Ranking (SJR) indicator provides an alternative to the journal impact factor, but the computation is less easy.
-
Shelton, R.D.; Leydesdorff, L.: Publish or patent : bibliometric evidence for empirical trade-offs in national funding strategies (2012)
0.00
0.002145465 = product of:
0.00429093 = sum of:
0.00429093 = product of:
0.01287279 = sum of:
0.01287279 = weight(_text_:d in 70) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01287279 = score(doc=70,freq=4.0), product of:
0.0867278 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.045649286 = queryNorm
0.1484275 = fieldWeight in 70, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=70)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Multivariate linear regression models suggest a trade-off in allocations of national research and development (R&D). Government funding and spending in the higher education sector encourage publications as a long-term research benefit. Conversely, other components such as industrial funding and spending in the business sector encourage patenting. Our results help explain why the United States trails the European Union in publications: The focus in the United States is on industrial funding-some 70% of its total R&D investment. Likewise, our results also help explain why the European Union trails the United States in patenting, since its focus on government funding is less effective than industrial funding in predicting triadic patenting. Government funding contributes negatively to patenting in a multiple regression, and this relationship is significant in the case of triadic patenting. We provide new forecasts about the relationships of the United States, the European Union, and China for publishing; these results suggest much later dates for changes than previous forecasts because Chinese growth has been slowing down since 2003. Models for individual countries might be more successful than regression models whose parameters are averaged over a set of countries because nations can be expected to differ historically in terms of the institutional arrangements and funding schemes.
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Rotolo, D.; Rafols, I.: Bibliometric perspectives on medical innovation using the medical subject headings of PubMed (2012)
0.00
0.0018204873 = product of:
0.0036409746 = sum of:
0.0036409746 = product of:
0.010922924 = sum of:
0.010922924 = weight(_text_:d in 494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010922924 = score(doc=494,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0867278 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.045649286 = queryNorm
0.1259449 = fieldWeight in 494, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=494)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Rotolo, D.; Leydesdorff, L.: Matching Medline/PubMed data with Web of Science: A routine in R language (2015)
0.00
0.0018204873 = product of:
0.0036409746 = sum of:
0.0036409746 = product of:
0.010922924 = sum of:
0.010922924 = weight(_text_:d in 2224) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010922924 = score(doc=2224,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0867278 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.045649286 = queryNorm
0.1259449 = fieldWeight in 2224, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2224)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Heimeriks, G.; Rotolo, D.: Journal portfolio analysis for countries, cities, and organizations : maps and comparisons (2016)
0.00
0.0018204873 = product of:
0.0036409746 = sum of:
0.0036409746 = product of:
0.010922924 = sum of:
0.010922924 = weight(_text_:d in 2781) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010922924 = score(doc=2781,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0867278 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.045649286 = queryNorm
0.1259449 = fieldWeight in 2781, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2781)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Rotolo, D.; Rafols, I.; Hopkins, M.M.; Leydesdorff, L.: Strategic intelligence on emerging technologies : scientometric overlay mapping (2017)
0.00
0.0018204873 = product of:
0.0036409746 = sum of:
0.0036409746 = product of:
0.010922924 = sum of:
0.010922924 = weight(_text_:d in 3322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010922924 = score(doc=3322,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0867278 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.045649286 = queryNorm
0.1259449 = fieldWeight in 3322, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3322)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Lucio-Arias, D.; Leydesdorff, L.: Main-path analysis and path-dependent transitions in HistCite(TM)-based historiograms (2008)
0.00
0.0015170728 = product of:
0.0030341456 = sum of:
0.0030341456 = product of:
0.009102437 = sum of:
0.009102437 = weight(_text_:d in 2373) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009102437 = score(doc=2373,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0867278 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.045649286 = queryNorm
0.104954086 = fieldWeight in 2373, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2373)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Lucio-Arias, D.; Leydesdorff, L.: ¬An indicator of research front activity : measuring intellectual organization as uncertainty reduction in document sets (2009)
0.00
0.0015170728 = product of:
0.0030341456 = sum of:
0.0030341456 = product of:
0.009102437 = sum of:
0.009102437 = weight(_text_:d in 3297) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009102437 = score(doc=3297,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0867278 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.045649286 = queryNorm
0.104954086 = fieldWeight in 3297, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3297)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Park, H.W.; Wagner, C.: International coauthorship relations in the Social Sciences Citation Index : is internationalization leading the Network? (2014)
0.00
0.0015170728 = product of:
0.0030341456 = sum of:
0.0030341456 = product of:
0.009102437 = sum of:
0.009102437 = weight(_text_:d in 1505) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009102437 = score(doc=1505,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0867278 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.045649286 = queryNorm
0.104954086 = fieldWeight in 1505, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1505)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- International coauthorship relations have increasingly shaped another dynamic in the natural and life sciences during recent decades. However, much less is known about such internationalization in the social sciences. In this study, we analyze international and domestic coauthorship relations of all citable items in the DVD version of the Social Sciences Citation Index 2011 (SSCI). Network statistics indicate 4 groups of nations: (a) an Asian-Pacific one to which all Anglo-Saxon nations (including the United Kingdom and Ireland) are attributed, (b) a continental European one including also the Latin-American countries, (c) the Scandinavian nations, and (d) a community of African nations. Within the EU-28, 11 of the EU-15 states have dominant positions. In many respects, the network parameters are not so different from the Science Citation Index. In addition to these descriptive statistics, we address the question of the relative weights of the international versus domestic networks. An information-theoretical test is proposed at the level of organizational addresses within each nation; the results are mixed, but the international dimension is more important than the national one in the aggregated sets (as in the Science Citation Index). In some countries (e.g., France), however, the national distribution is leading more than the international one. Decomposition of the United States in terms of states shows a similarly mixed result; more U.S. states are domestically oriented in the SSCI and more internationally in the SCI. The international networks have grown during the last decades in addition to the national ones but not by replacing them.
