-
H-Index auch im Web of Science (2008)
0.05
0.04872582 = product of:
0.09745164 = sum of:
0.09745164 = sum of:
0.049419634 = weight(_text_:h in 590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049419634 = score(doc=590,freq=14.0), product of:
0.113413334 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045649286 = queryNorm
0.435748 = fieldWeight in 590, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=590)
0.010922924 = weight(_text_:d in 590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010922924 = score(doc=590,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0867278 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.045649286 = queryNorm
0.1259449 = fieldWeight in 590, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=590)
0.03710909 = weight(_text_:22 in 590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03710909 = score(doc=590,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15985602 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045649286 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 590, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=590)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- "Zur Kurzmitteilung "Latest enhancements in Scopus: ... h-Index incorporated in Scopus" in den letzten Online-Mitteilungen (Online-Mitteilungen 92, S.31) ist zu korrigieren, dass der h-Index sehr wohl bereits im Web of Science enthalten ist. Allerdings findet man/frau diese Information nicht in der "cited ref search", sondern neben der Trefferliste einer Quick Search, General Search oder einer Suche über den Author Finder in der rechten Navigationsleiste unter dem Titel "Citation Report". Der "Citation Report" bietet für die in der jeweiligen Trefferliste angezeigten Arbeiten: - Die Gesamtzahl der Zitierungen aller Arbeiten in der Trefferliste - Die mittlere Zitationshäufigkeit dieser Arbeiten - Die Anzahl der Zitierungen der einzelnen Arbeiten, aufgeschlüsselt nach Publikationsjahr der zitierenden Arbeiten - Die mittlere Zitationshäufigkeit dieser Arbeiten pro Jahr - Den h-Index (ein h-Index von x sagt aus, dass x Arbeiten der Trefferliste mehr als x-mal zitiert wurden; er ist gegenüber sehr hohen Zitierungen einzelner Arbeiten unempfindlicher als die mittlere Zitationshäufigkeit)."
- Date
- 6. 4.2008 19:04:22
- Language
- d
- Object
- H-Index
- Source
- Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare. 61(2008) H.1, S.124-125
-
Thelwall, M.; Ruschenburg, T.: Grundlagen und Forschungsfelder der Webometrie (2006)
0.04
0.044473916 = product of:
0.08894783 = sum of:
0.08894783 = sum of:
0.024905154 = weight(_text_:h in 77) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024905154 = score(doc=77,freq=2.0), product of:
0.113413334 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045649286 = queryNorm
0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 77, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=77)
0.014563899 = weight(_text_:d in 77) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014563899 = score(doc=77,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0867278 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.045649286 = queryNorm
0.16792654 = fieldWeight in 77, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=77)
0.049478784 = weight(_text_:22 in 77) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049478784 = score(doc=77,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15985602 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045649286 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 77, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=77)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 4.12.2006 12:12:22
- Language
- d
- Source
- Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 57(2006) H.8, S.401-406
-
¬Die deutsche Zeitschrift für Dokumentation, Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis von 1950 bis 2011 : eine vorläufige Bilanz in vier Abschnitten (2012)
0.04
0.043974698 = product of:
0.087949395 = sum of:
0.087949395 = sum of:
0.026415905 = weight(_text_:h in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026415905 = score(doc=402,freq=4.0), product of:
0.113413334 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045649286 = queryNorm
0.2329171 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
0.0244244 = weight(_text_:d in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0244244 = score(doc=402,freq=10.0), product of:
0.0867278 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.045649286 = queryNorm
0.28162137 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
0.03710909 = weight(_text_:22 in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03710909 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15985602 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045649286 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2012 19:35:26
- Footnote
- Besteht aus 4 Teilen: Teil 1: Eden, D., A. Arndt, A. Hoffer, T. Raschke u. P. Schön: Die Nachrichten für Dokumentation in den Jahren 1950 bis 1962 (S.159-163). Teil 2: Brose, M., E. durst, D. Nitzsche, D. Veckenstedt u. R. Wein: Statistische Untersuchung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) 1963-1975 (S.164-170). Teil 3: Bösel, J., G. Ebert, P. Garz,, M. Iwanow u. B. Russ: Methoden und Ergebnisse einer statistischen Auswertung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) 1976 bis 1988 (S.171-174). Teil 4: Engelage, H., S. Jansen, R. Mertins, K. Redel u. S. Ring: Statistische Untersuchung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) / "Information. Wissenschaft & Praxis" (IWP) 1989-2011 (S.164-170).
- Language
- d
- Location
- D
- Source
- Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 63(2012) H.3, S.157-182
-
Schlögl, C.: Internationale Sichtbarkeit der europäischen und insbesondere der deutschsprachigen Informationswissenschaft (2013)
0.04
0.041553922 = product of:
0.083107844 = sum of:
0.083107844 = sum of:
0.02179201 = weight(_text_:h in 900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02179201 = score(doc=900,freq=2.0), product of:
0.113413334 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045649286 = queryNorm
0.19214681 = fieldWeight in 900, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=900)
0.018021906 = weight(_text_:d in 900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018021906 = score(doc=900,freq=4.0), product of:
0.0867278 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.045649286 = queryNorm
0.2077985 = fieldWeight in 900, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=900)
0.043293934 = weight(_text_:22 in 900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043293934 = score(doc=900,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15985602 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045649286 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 900, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=900)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 3.2013 14:04:09
- Language
- d
- Location
- D
- Source
- Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 64(2013) H.1, S.1-8
-
Huang, M.-H.; Huang, W.-T.; Chang, C.-C.; Chen, D. Z.; Lin, C.-P.: The greater scattering phenomenon beyond Bradford's law in patent citation (2014)
0.04
0.03561765 = product of:
0.0712353 = sum of:
0.0712353 = sum of:
0.018678864 = weight(_text_:h in 1352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018678864 = score(doc=1352,freq=2.0), product of:
0.113413334 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045649286 = queryNorm
0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 1352, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1352)
0.015447348 = weight(_text_:d in 1352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015447348 = score(doc=1352,freq=4.0), product of:
0.0867278 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.045649286 = queryNorm
0.178113 = fieldWeight in 1352, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1352)
0.03710909 = weight(_text_:22 in 1352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03710909 = score(doc=1352,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15985602 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045649286 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1352, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1352)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Patent analysis has become important for management as it offers timely and valuable information to evaluate R&D performance and identify the prospects of patents. This study explores the scattering patterns of patent impact based on citations in 3 distinct technological areas, the liquid crystal, semiconductor, and drug technological areas, to identify the core patents in each area. The research follows the approach from Bradford's law, which equally divides total citations into 3 zones. While the result suggests that the scattering of patent citations corresponded with features of Bradford's law, the proportion of patents in the 3 zones did not match the proportion as proposed by the law. As a result, the study shows that the distributions of citations in all 3 areas were more concentrated than what Bradford's law proposed. The Groos (1967) droop was also presented by the scattering of patent citations, and the growth rate of cumulative citation decreased in the third zone.
- Date
- 22. 8.2014 17:11:29
-
Jovanovic, M.: ¬Eine kleine Frühgeschichte der Bibliometrie (2012)
0.03
0.033355437 = product of:
0.066710874 = sum of:
0.066710874 = sum of:
0.018678864 = weight(_text_:h in 326) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018678864 = score(doc=326,freq=2.0), product of:
0.113413334 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045649286 = queryNorm
0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 326, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=326)
0.010922924 = weight(_text_:d in 326) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010922924 = score(doc=326,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0867278 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.045649286 = queryNorm
0.1259449 = fieldWeight in 326, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=326)
0.03710909 = weight(_text_:22 in 326) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03710909 = score(doc=326,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15985602 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045649286 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 326, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=326)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2012 19:23:32
- Language
- d
- Source
- Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 63(2012) H.2, S.71-80
-
Ball, R.: Wissenschaftsindikatoren im Zeitalter digitaler Wissenschaft (2007)
0.03
0.0277962 = product of:
0.0555924 = sum of:
0.0555924 = sum of:
0.015565722 = weight(_text_:h in 875) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015565722 = score(doc=875,freq=2.0), product of:
0.113413334 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045649286 = queryNorm
0.13724773 = fieldWeight in 875, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=875)
0.009102437 = weight(_text_:d in 875) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009102437 = score(doc=875,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0867278 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.045649286 = queryNorm
0.104954086 = fieldWeight in 875, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=875)
0.03092424 = weight(_text_:22 in 875) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03092424 = score(doc=875,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15985602 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045649286 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 875, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=875)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 23.12.2007 19:22:21
- Language
- d
- Source
- B.I.T.online. 10(2007) H.2, S.xxx-xxx
-
Hayer, L.: Lazarsfeld zitiert : eine bibliometrische Analyse (2008)
0.03
0.0277962 = product of:
0.0555924 = sum of:
0.0555924 = sum of:
0.015565722 = weight(_text_:h in 1934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015565722 = score(doc=1934,freq=2.0), product of:
0.113413334 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045649286 = queryNorm
0.13724773 = fieldWeight in 1934, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1934)
0.009102437 = weight(_text_:d in 1934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009102437 = score(doc=1934,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0867278 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.045649286 = queryNorm
0.104954086 = fieldWeight in 1934, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1934)
0.03092424 = weight(_text_:22 in 1934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03092424 = score(doc=1934,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15985602 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045649286 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1934, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1934)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 6.2008 12:54:12
- Language
- d
- Source
- Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare. 61(2008) H.2, S.14-20
-
Cerda-Cosme, R.; Méndez, E.: Analysis of shared research data in Spanish scientific papers about COVID-19 : a first approach (2023)
0.03
0.0277962 = product of:
0.0555924 = sum of:
0.0555924 = sum of:
0.015565722 = weight(_text_:h in 916) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015565722 = score(doc=916,freq=2.0), product of:
0.113413334 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045649286 = queryNorm
0.13724773 = fieldWeight in 916, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=916)
0.009102437 = weight(_text_:d in 916) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009102437 = score(doc=916,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0867278 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.045649286 = queryNorm
0.104954086 = fieldWeight in 916, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=916)
0.03092424 = weight(_text_:22 in 916) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03092424 = score(doc=916,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15985602 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045649286 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 916, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=916)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- During the coronavirus pandemic, changes in the way science is done and shared occurred, which motivates meta-research to help understand science communication in crises and improve its effectiveness. The objective is to study how many Spanish scientific papers on COVID-19 published during 2020 share their research data. Qualitative and descriptive study applying nine attributes: (a) availability, (b) accessibility, (c) format, (d) licensing, (e) linkage, (f) funding, (g) editorial policy, (h) content, and (i) statistics. We analyzed 1,340 papers, 1,173 (87.5%) did not have research data. A total of 12.5% share their research data of which 2.1% share their data in repositories, 5% share their data through a simple request, 0.2% do not have permission to share their data, and 5.2% share their data as supplementary material. There is a small percentage that shares their research data; however, it demonstrates the researchers' poor knowledge on how to properly share their research data and their lack of knowledge on what is research data.
- Date
- 21. 3.2023 19:22:02
-
Norris, M.; Oppenheim, C.: ¬The h-index : a broad review of a new bibliometric indicator (2010)
0.02
0.024983583 = product of:
0.049967166 = sum of:
0.049967166 = product of:
0.07495075 = sum of:
0.04402651 = weight(_text_:h in 4147) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04402651 = score(doc=4147,freq=16.0), product of:
0.113413334 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045649286 = queryNorm
0.3881952 = fieldWeight in 4147, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4147)
0.03092424 = weight(_text_:22 in 4147) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03092424 = score(doc=4147,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15985602 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045649286 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4147, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4147)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Purpose - This review aims to show, broadly, how the h-index has become a subject of widespread debate, how it has spawned many variants and diverse applications since first introduced in 2005 and some of the issues in its use. Design/methodology/approach - The review drew on a range of material published in 1990 or so sources published since 2005. From these sources, a number of themes were identified and discussed ranging from the h-index's advantages to which citation database might be selected for its calculation. Findings - The analysis shows how the h-index has quickly established itself as a major subject of interest in the field of bibliometrics. Study of the index ranges from its mathematical underpinning to a range of variants perceived to address the indexes' shortcomings. The review illustrates how widely the index has been applied but also how care must be taken in its application. Originality/value - The use of bibliometric indicators to measure research performance continues, with the h-index as its latest addition. The use of the h-index, its variants and many applications to which it has been put are still at the exploratory stage. The review shows the breadth and diversity of this research and the need to verify the veracity of the h-index by more studies.
- Date
- 8. 1.2011 19:22:13
- Object
- h-index
-
Rostaing, H.; Barts, N.; Léveillé, V.: Bibliometrics: representation instrument of the multidisciplinary positioning of a scientific area : Implementation for an Advisory Scientific Committee (2007)
0.02
0.024794646 = product of:
0.04958929 = sum of:
0.04958929 = product of:
0.07438394 = sum of:
0.024905154 = weight(_text_:h in 1144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024905154 = score(doc=1144,freq=2.0), product of:
0.113413334 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045649286 = queryNorm
0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 1144, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1144)
0.049478784 = weight(_text_:22 in 1144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049478784 = score(doc=1144,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15985602 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045649286 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1144, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1144)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 30.12.2007 11:22:39
-
Bornmann, L.; Daniel, H.-D.: What do we know about the h index? (2007)
0.02
0.02479351 = product of:
0.04958702 = sum of:
0.04958702 = product of:
0.074380524 = sum of:
0.06163711 = weight(_text_:h in 477) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06163711 = score(doc=477,freq=16.0), product of:
0.113413334 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045649286 = queryNorm
0.54347324 = fieldWeight in 477, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=477)
0.012743411 = weight(_text_:d in 477) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012743411 = score(doc=477,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0867278 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.045649286 = queryNorm
0.14693572 = fieldWeight in 477, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=477)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Jorge Hirsch recently proposed the h index to quantify the research output of individual scientists. The new index has attracted a lot of attention in the scientific community. The claim that the h index in a single number provides a good representation of the scientific lifetime achievement of a scientist as well as the (supposed) simple calculation of the h index using common literature databases lead to the danger of improper use of the index. We describe the advantages and disadvantages of the h index and summarize the studies on the convergent validity of this index. We also introduce corrections and complements as well as single-number alternatives to the h index.
- Object
- H-Index
-
Krattenthaler, C.: Was der h-Index wirklich aussagt (2021)
0.02
0.023417842 = product of:
0.046835683 = sum of:
0.046835683 = product of:
0.07025352 = sum of:
0.05568962 = weight(_text_:h in 407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05568962 = score(doc=407,freq=10.0), product of:
0.113413334 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045649286 = queryNorm
0.4910324 = fieldWeight in 407, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=407)
0.014563899 = weight(_text_:d in 407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014563899 = score(doc=407,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0867278 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.045649286 = queryNorm
0.16792654 = fieldWeight in 407, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=407)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Diese Note legt dar, dass der sogenannte h-Index (Hirschs bibliometrischer Index) im Wesentlichen dieselbe Information wiedergibt wie die Gesamtanzahl von Zitationen von Publikationen einer Autorin oder eines Autors, also ein nutzloser bibliometrischer Index ist. Dies basiert auf einem faszinierenden Satz der Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie, der hier ebenfalls erläutert wird.
- Content
- Vgl.: DOI: 10.1515/dmvm-2021-0050. Auch abgedruckt u.d.T.: 'Der h-Index - "ein nutzloser bibliometrischer Index"' in Open Password Nr. 1007 vom 06.12.2021 unter: https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzM3NCwiZDI3MzMzOTEwMzUzIiwwLDAsMzQ4LDFd.
- Language
- d
- Object
- h-index
- Source
- Mitteilungen der Deutschen Mathematiker-Vereinigung. 2021, H.3, S.124-128
-
Umstätter, W.: Informetrische Hilfe durch das 'intelligente Terminal' (1986)
0.02
0.023023613 = product of:
0.046047226 = sum of:
0.046047226 = product of:
0.06907084 = sum of:
0.04358402 = weight(_text_:h in 501) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04358402 = score(doc=501,freq=2.0), product of:
0.113413334 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045649286 = queryNorm
0.38429362 = fieldWeight in 501, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=501)
0.025486821 = weight(_text_:d in 501) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025486821 = score(doc=501,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0867278 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.045649286 = queryNorm
0.29387143 = fieldWeight in 501, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=501)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Language
- d
- Source
- Deutscher Dokumentartag 1986, Freiburg, 8.-10.10.1986: Bedarfsorientierte Fachinformation: Methoden und Techniken am Arbeitsplatz. Bearb.: H. Strohl-Goebel
-
Henzler, R.G.: Informetrische Auswertungen bei der Online-Retrieval-Praxis (1982)
0.02
0.023023613 = product of:
0.046047226 = sum of:
0.046047226 = product of:
0.06907084 = sum of:
0.04358402 = weight(_text_:h in 3054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04358402 = score(doc=3054,freq=2.0), product of:
0.113413334 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045649286 = queryNorm
0.38429362 = fieldWeight in 3054, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3054)
0.025486821 = weight(_text_:d in 3054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025486821 = score(doc=3054,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0867278 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.045649286 = queryNorm
0.29387143 = fieldWeight in 3054, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3054)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Language
- d
- Source
- Deutscher Dokumentartag 1981, Mainz, 5.-8.10.1981: Kleincomputer in Information und Dokumentation. Bearb.: H. Strohl-Goebel
-
Meho, L.I.; Rogers, Y.: Citation counting, citation ranking, and h-index of human-computer interaction researchers : a comparison of Scopus and Web of Science (2008)
0.02
0.02301744 = product of:
0.04603488 = sum of:
0.04603488 = product of:
0.069052316 = sum of:
0.038128074 = weight(_text_:h in 2352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038128074 = score(doc=2352,freq=12.0), product of:
0.113413334 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045649286 = queryNorm
0.3361869 = fieldWeight in 2352, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2352)
0.03092424 = weight(_text_:22 in 2352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03092424 = score(doc=2352,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15985602 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045649286 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2352, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2352)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This study examines the differences between Scopus and Web of Science in the citation counting, citation ranking, and h-index of 22 top human-computer interaction (HCI) researchers from EQUATOR - a large British Interdisciplinary Research Collaboration project. Results indicate that Scopus provides significantly more coverage of HCI literature than Web of Science, primarily due to coverage of relevant ACM and IEEE peer-reviewed conference proceedings. No significant differences exist between the two databases if citations in journals only are compared. Although broader coverage of the literature does not significantly alter the relative citation ranking of individual researchers, Scopus helps distinguish between the researchers in a more nuanced fashion than Web of Science in both citation counting and h-index. Scopus also generates significantly different maps of citation networks of individual scholars than those generated by Web of Science. The study also presents a comparison of h-index scores based on Google Scholar with those based on the union of Scopus and Web of Science. The study concludes that Scopus can be used as a sole data source for citation-based research and evaluation in HCI, especially when citations in conference proceedings are sought, and that researchers should manually calculate h scores instead of relying on system calculations.
- Object
- h-index
-
Wettlauf der Wissenschaft (2004)
0.02
0.022236958 = product of:
0.044473916 = sum of:
0.044473916 = sum of:
0.012452577 = weight(_text_:h in 2495) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012452577 = score(doc=2495,freq=2.0), product of:
0.113413334 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045649286 = queryNorm
0.10979818 = fieldWeight in 2495, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2495)
0.0072819493 = weight(_text_:d in 2495) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0072819493 = score(doc=2495,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0867278 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.045649286 = queryNorm
0.08396327 = fieldWeight in 2495, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2495)
0.024739392 = weight(_text_:22 in 2495) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024739392 = score(doc=2495,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15985602 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045649286 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2495, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2495)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Language
- d
- Source
- Online Mitteilungen. 2004, Nr.79, S.22-23 [=Mitteilungen VÖB 57(2004) H.2]
-
Falkingham, L.T.; Reeves, R.: Context analysis : a technique for analysing research in a field, applied to literature on the management of R&D at the section level (1998)
0.02
0.021788724 = product of:
0.043577448 = sum of:
0.043577448 = product of:
0.06536617 = sum of:
0.022072237 = weight(_text_:d in 3689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022072237 = score(doc=3689,freq=6.0), product of:
0.0867278 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.045649286 = queryNorm
0.25450015 = fieldWeight in 3689, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3689)
0.043293934 = weight(_text_:22 in 3689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043293934 = score(doc=3689,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15985602 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045649286 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3689, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3689)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Context analysis is a new method for appraising a body of publications. the process consists of creating a database of attributes assigned to each paper by the reviewer and then looking for interesting relationships in the data. Assigning the attributes requires an understanding of the subject matter of the papers. Presents findings about one particular research field, Management of R&D at the Section Level. The findings support the view that this body of academic publications does not meet the needs of practitioner R&D managers. Discusses practical aspects of how to apply the method in other fields
- Date
- 22. 5.1999 19:18:46
-
Zitatenanalyse und verwandte Verfahren : Vorträge einer öffentlichen Sitzung während der 32. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Dokumentation, Oktober 1979 (1980)
0.02
0.020743795 = product of:
0.04148759 = sum of:
0.04148759 = product of:
0.062231384 = sum of:
0.04402651 = weight(_text_:h in 417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04402651 = score(doc=417,freq=4.0), product of:
0.113413334 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045649286 = queryNorm
0.3881952 = fieldWeight in 417, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=417)
0.018204873 = weight(_text_:d in 417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018204873 = score(doc=417,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0867278 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.045649286 = queryNorm
0.20990817 = fieldWeight in 417, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=417)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Enthält die Beiträge: NACKE, O.: Zitatenanalyse im engeren Sinne; GERDEL, W.: Datentechnische Methoden in der Referenzanalyse; EISENHARDT, O.-H.: Ergebnisse der Referenzanalyse; KRUG, G.: List-Analyse; LANGE, H.: Requestanalyse; HENZLER, R.G.: Bibliometrische Methoden der Termanalyse; NACKE, O.: Fehlerquellen bei der Zitatenanalyse
- Language
- d
-
Hauffe, H.: ¬The role of citation analysis in the history and evaluation of science : Bericht über einen Vortrag von Eugene Garfield (Wien, 26. Mai 2004) (2004)
0.02
0.020743795 = product of:
0.04148759 = sum of:
0.04148759 = product of:
0.062231384 = sum of:
0.04402651 = weight(_text_:h in 2492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04402651 = score(doc=2492,freq=4.0), product of:
0.113413334 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045649286 = queryNorm
0.3881952 = fieldWeight in 2492, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2492)
0.018204873 = weight(_text_:d in 2492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018204873 = score(doc=2492,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0867278 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.045649286 = queryNorm
0.20990817 = fieldWeight in 2492, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2492)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Language
- d
- Source
- Online Mitteilungen. 2004, Nr.79, S.7-9 [=Mitteilungen VÖB 57(2004) H.2]
