Search (45 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  • × theme_ss:"Retrievalalgorithmen"
  1. Kanaeva, Z.: Ranking: Google und CiteSeer (2005) 0.03
    0.028200626 = product of:
      0.056401253 = sum of:
        0.056401253 = sum of:
          0.012826167 = weight(_text_:d in 3276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.012826167 = score(doc=3276,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045945734 = queryNorm
              0.14693572 = fieldWeight in 3276, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3276)
          0.043575086 = weight(_text_:22 in 3276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.043575086 = score(doc=3276,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16089413 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045945734 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3276, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3276)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 3.2005 16:23:22
    Language
    d
  2. Back, J.: ¬An evaluation of relevancy ranking techniques used by Internet search engines (2000) 0.02
    0.021787543 = product of:
      0.043575086 = sum of:
        0.043575086 = product of:
          0.08715017 = sum of:
            0.08715017 = weight(_text_:22 in 3445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08715017 = score(doc=3445,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16089413 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045945734 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3445, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3445)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    25. 8.2005 17:42:22
  3. Song, D.; Bruza, P.D.: Towards context sensitive information inference (2003) 0.02
    0.020143306 = product of:
      0.04028661 = sum of:
        0.04028661 = sum of:
          0.009161548 = weight(_text_:d in 1428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.009161548 = score(doc=1428,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045945734 = queryNorm
              0.104954086 = fieldWeight in 1428, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1428)
          0.031125063 = weight(_text_:22 in 1428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.031125063 = score(doc=1428,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16089413 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045945734 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1428, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1428)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2003 19:35:46
  4. Shiri, A.A.; Revie, C.: Query expansion behavior within a thesaurus-enhanced search environment : a user-centered evaluation (2006) 0.02
    0.020143306 = product of:
      0.04028661 = sum of:
        0.04028661 = sum of:
          0.009161548 = weight(_text_:d in 56) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.009161548 = score(doc=56,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045945734 = queryNorm
              0.104954086 = fieldWeight in 56, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=56)
          0.031125063 = weight(_text_:22 in 56) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.031125063 = score(doc=56,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16089413 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045945734 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 56, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=56)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The study reported here investigated the query expansion behavior of end-users interacting with a thesaurus-enhanced search system on the Web. Two groups, namely academic staff and postgraduate students, were recruited into this study. Data were collected from 90 searches performed by 30 users using the OVID interface to the CAB abstracts database. Data-gathering techniques included questionnaires, screen capturing software, and interviews. The results presented here relate to issues of search-topic and search-term characteristics, number and types of expanded queries, usefulness of thesaurus terms, and behavioral differences between academic staff and postgraduate students in their interaction. The key conclusions drawn were that (a) academic staff chose more narrow and synonymous terms than did postgraduate students, who generally selected broader and related terms; (b) topic complexity affected users' interaction with the thesaurus in that complex topics required more query expansion and search term selection; (c) users' prior topic-search experience appeared to have a significant effect on their selection and evaluation of thesaurus terms; (d) in 50% of the searches where additional terms were suggested from the thesaurus, users stated that they had not been aware of the terms at the beginning of the search; this observation was particularly noticeable in the case of postgraduate students.
    Date
    22. 7.2006 16:32:43
  5. MacFarlane, A.; Robertson, S.E.; McCann, J.A.: Parallel computing for passage retrieval (2004) 0.01
    0.0124500245 = product of:
      0.024900049 = sum of:
        0.024900049 = product of:
          0.049800098 = sum of:
            0.049800098 = weight(_text_:22 in 5108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049800098 = score(doc=5108,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16089413 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045945734 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5108, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5108)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2007 18:30:22
  6. Losada, D.E.; Barreiro, A.: Emebedding term similarity and inverse document frequency into a logical model of information retrieval (2003) 0.01
    0.0124500245 = product of:
      0.024900049 = sum of:
        0.024900049 = product of:
          0.049800098 = sum of:
            0.049800098 = weight(_text_:22 in 1422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049800098 = score(doc=1422,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16089413 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045945734 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1422, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1422)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2003 19:27:23
  7. Crestani, F.; Dominich, S.; Lalmas, M.; Rijsbergen, C.J.K. van: Mathematical, logical, and formal methods in information retrieval : an introduction to the special issue (2003) 0.01
    0.009337518 = product of:
      0.018675037 = sum of:
        0.018675037 = product of:
          0.037350073 = sum of:
            0.037350073 = weight(_text_:22 in 1451) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037350073 = score(doc=1451,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16089413 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045945734 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1451, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1451)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2003 19:27:36
  8. Fan, W.; Fox, E.A.; Pathak, P.; Wu, H.: ¬The effects of fitness functions an genetic programming-based ranking discovery for Web search (2004) 0.01
    0.009337518 = product of:
      0.018675037 = sum of:
        0.018675037 = product of:
          0.037350073 = sum of:
            0.037350073 = weight(_text_:22 in 2239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037350073 = score(doc=2239,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16089413 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045945734 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2239, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2239)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    31. 5.2004 19:22:06
  9. Furner, J.: ¬A unifying model of document relatedness for hybrid search engines (2003) 0.01
    0.009337518 = product of:
      0.018675037 = sum of:
        0.018675037 = product of:
          0.037350073 = sum of:
            0.037350073 = weight(_text_:22 in 2717) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037350073 = score(doc=2717,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16089413 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045945734 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2717, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2717)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    11. 9.2004 17:32:22
  10. Witschel, H.F.: Global term weights in distributed environments (2008) 0.01
    0.009337518 = product of:
      0.018675037 = sum of:
        0.018675037 = product of:
          0.037350073 = sum of:
            0.037350073 = weight(_text_:22 in 2096) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037350073 = score(doc=2096,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16089413 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045945734 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2096, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2096)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    1. 8.2008 9:44:22
  11. Klas, C.-P.; Fuhr, N.; Schaefer, A.: Evaluating strategic support for information access in the DAFFODIL system (2004) 0.01
    0.009337518 = product of:
      0.018675037 = sum of:
        0.018675037 = product of:
          0.037350073 = sum of:
            0.037350073 = weight(_text_:22 in 2419) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037350073 = score(doc=2419,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16089413 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045945734 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2419, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2419)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    16.11.2008 16:22:48
  12. Campos, L.M. de; Fernández-Luna, J.M.; Huete, J.F.: Implementing relevance feedback in the Bayesian network retrieval model (2003) 0.01
    0.009337518 = product of:
      0.018675037 = sum of:
        0.018675037 = product of:
          0.037350073 = sum of:
            0.037350073 = weight(_text_:22 in 825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037350073 = score(doc=825,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16089413 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045945734 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 825, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=825)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2003 19:30:19
  13. Dominich, S.: Mathematical foundations of information retrieval (2001) 0.01
    0.007781266 = product of:
      0.015562532 = sum of:
        0.015562532 = product of:
          0.031125063 = sum of:
            0.031125063 = weight(_text_:22 in 1753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031125063 = score(doc=1753,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16089413 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045945734 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1753, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1753)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2008 12:26:32
  14. Chen, Z.; Fu, B.: On the complexity of Rocchio's similarity-based relevance feedback algorithm (2007) 0.01
    0.006478193 = product of:
      0.012956386 = sum of:
        0.012956386 = product of:
          0.025912773 = sum of:
            0.025912773 = weight(_text_:d in 578) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025912773 = score(doc=578,freq=16.0), product of:
                0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045945734 = queryNorm
                0.296855 = fieldWeight in 578, product of:
                  4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                    16.0 = termFreq=16.0
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=578)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Rocchio's similarity-based relevance feedback algorithm, one of the most important query reformation methods in information retrieval, is essentially an adaptive learning algorithm from examples in searching for documents represented by a linear classifier. Despite its popularity in various applications, there is little rigorous analysis of its learning complexity in literature. In this article, the authors prove for the first time that the learning complexity of Rocchio's algorithm is O(d + d**2(log d + log n)) over the discretized vector space {0, ... , n - 1 }**d when the inner product similarity measure is used. The upper bound on the learning complexity for searching for documents represented by a monotone linear classifier (q, 0) over {0, ... , n - 1 }d can be improved to, at most, 1 + 2k (n - 1) (log d + log(n - 1)), where k is the number of nonzero components in q. Several lower bounds on the learning complexity are also obtained for Rocchio's algorithm. For example, the authors prove that Rocchio's algorithm has a lower bound Omega((d über 2)log n) on its learning complexity over the Boolean vector space {0,1}**d.
  15. Dreßler, H.: Fuzzy Information Retrieval (2008) 0.01
    0.006478193 = product of:
      0.012956386 = sum of:
        0.012956386 = product of:
          0.025912773 = sum of:
            0.025912773 = weight(_text_:d in 2300) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025912773 = score(doc=2300,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045945734 = queryNorm
                0.296855 = fieldWeight in 2300, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2300)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Nach einer Erläuterung der Grundlagen der Fuzzylogik wird das Prinzip der unscharfen Suche dargestellt und die Unterschiede zum herkömmlichen Information Retrieval beschrieben. Am Beispiel der Suche nach Steinen für ein Mauerwerk wird gezeigt, wie eine unscharfe Suche in der D&WFuzzydatenbank erfolgreich durchgeführt werden kann und zu eindeutigen Ergebnissen führt.
    Language
    d
  16. Zhang, D.; Dong, Y.: ¬An effective algorithm to rank Web resources (2000) 0.01
    0.0064130835 = product of:
      0.012826167 = sum of:
        0.012826167 = product of:
          0.025652334 = sum of:
            0.025652334 = weight(_text_:d in 3662) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025652334 = score(doc=3662,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045945734 = queryNorm
                0.29387143 = fieldWeight in 3662, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3662)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  17. Khoo, C.S.G.; Wan, K.-W.: ¬A simple relevancy-ranking strategy for an interface to Boolean OPACs (2004) 0.01
    0.0054468857 = product of:
      0.010893771 = sum of:
        0.010893771 = product of:
          0.021787543 = sum of:
            0.021787543 = weight(_text_:22 in 2509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021787543 = score(doc=2509,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16089413 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045945734 = queryNorm
                0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 2509, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2509)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Electronic library. 22(2004) no.2, S.112-120
  18. Archuby, C.G.: Interfaces se recuperacion para catalogos en linea con salidas ordenadas por probable relevancia (2000) 0.00
    0.004580774 = product of:
      0.009161548 = sum of:
        0.009161548 = product of:
          0.018323096 = sum of:
            0.018323096 = weight(_text_:d in 5727) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018323096 = score(doc=5727,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045945734 = queryNorm
                0.20990817 = fieldWeight in 5727, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5727)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Übers. d. Titels: Interface for retrieval from online access catalogues with ranked results according to their relevance
  19. Weinstein, A.: Hochprozentig : Tipps and tricks für ein Top-Ranking (2002) 0.00
    0.004580774 = product of:
      0.009161548 = sum of:
        0.009161548 = product of:
          0.018323096 = sum of:
            0.018323096 = weight(_text_:d in 1083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018323096 = score(doc=1083,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045945734 = queryNorm
                0.20990817 = fieldWeight in 1083, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1083)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    d
  20. Bodoff, D.; Enache, D.; Kambil, A.; Simon, G.; Yukhimets, A.: ¬A unified maximum likelihood approach to document retrieval (2001) 0.00
    0.003886916 = product of:
      0.007773832 = sum of:
        0.007773832 = product of:
          0.015547664 = sum of:
            0.015547664 = weight(_text_:d in 174) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015547664 = score(doc=174,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045945734 = queryNorm
                0.178113 = fieldWeight in 174, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=174)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    

Languages

  • e 25
  • d 19
  • pt 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 34
  • x 6
  • el 2
  • m 2
  • r 1
  • More… Less…